Recent Comments

  • John Lizza on This week's Apple trading strategies (8/3-8/7/26) - 'Thanks Robert. Good insight and context.'
  • Joseph Bland on This week's Apple trading strategies (8/3-8/7/26) - 'Apple has been underestimated multiple times a year for as long as I’ve followed their stock. As I said earlier: “These are not the droids we’re looking for: Move along…”'
  • Joseph Bland on This week's Apple trading strategies (8/3-8/7/26) - 'Morning, Gregg. My stepson gives them 10 years until those buildings will be, like abandoned mansions, malls, etc, the subject of “doom porn” videos….'
  • Joseph Bland on This week's Apple trading strategies (8/3-8/7/26) - 'Hi, Greg. There already are “shenanigans”, and when the Dems get in power, the facts will come out – and they won’t be pretty. Why else do you think this President, Administration, Congress and rigged Supreme Court are in a panic, to the point of attempting to destroy our democratic republic? As a very famous individual once said: “I has seen the enemy, and he is us.”'
  • Robert Paul Leitao on This week's Apple trading strategies (8/3-8/7/26) - 'D.A. Davidson’s Gil Luria is a smart and informed analyst. Despite Apple’s headline grabbing, rubberneck-inducing pullback on Friday, the shares have performed comparatively very well over the past 12 months: 1-Year Share Price Performance Alphabet – up 84.93% Apple – up 48.82% NASDAQ Composite – up 20.13% DJIA — up 18.93% S&P 500 – up 18.15% Amazon – up 16.01% Microsoft – down (12.89%) Meta – down (28.02%) Oracle – down (48.82% Apple has outperformed almost all of the big hyperscalers and all of the major indexes over the past year. This is not to take away from the impressive results delivered this week by Amazon and Microsoft. As Mr. Luria suggests, Apple was likely a refuge or haven for those wary of the hyperscalers and their pending results. With Microsoft and Amazon reporting, it’s safe for investors to get off the beach so-to-speak and get back in the water. I’m bullish on Apple, a few other select names in tech and, in general, on the AI trade. There will, however, likely both winners and losers in the trade.'
  • Steven Philips on Mark Gurman: Apple is now a subscription - 'Not an area of knowledge for me, but your comment about business and leasing felt important to me. Especially considering it applies to ALL Apple’s products.'
  • Gregg Thurman on This week's Apple trading strategies (8/3-8/7/26) - 'Data Center supporters better hurry, Apple’s on device tune is picking up listensers. By the time you are ready for prime time it may be too late. Being generous I give them until 2031, then too much of the market they are counting on will have taken a different path.'
  • Greg Lippert on This week's Apple trading strategies (8/3-8/7/26) - 'As long as the data centers sell all their capacity its a win for them, but if demand falters the hours of cards come tumbling down.'
  • Greg Lippert on This week's Apple trading strategies (8/3-8/7/26) - 'Let’s hope they leave when voted out and not play shenanigans.'
  • Gregg Thurman on Mark Gurman: Apple is now a subscription - '” my initial impression is that Apple Upgrade could help power the company’s next trillion…” A happy thought to be sure, but leasing can’t increase sales if the product behind the lease isn’t there. iMac, Mac Mini, Mac Studio, Mac “Baltra”, MacBooks, (“AI” feature/content creation) to iPhones, iPads, Apple Watches, Apple Video, (“AI” feature/content consumption) are going to drive revenue. Leasing will just make the acquisition easier. Is Gurman turning the page on his reporting style? Of late, in interviews, he is coming off as a more knowledgeable ‘statesman’ vs a rumor monger, and making good points. There remain many better than he, but the improvements are refreshing.'
  • Joseph Bland on Mark Gurman: Apple is now a subscription - 'Check out my comment lower down, Fred. I suppose that Apple refurbishing assembly line I worked on (at better than average temp wages, btw) could be replaced by a robotic system, but we were pretty good, and the job at each workstation shifted week to week, which helped stave off boredom. My only kick with it was (1) being at the mercy of Apple-direct bosses who could be tyrannical (not mine, thankfully!) and (2) being generally treated like 2nd class Apple employees.'
  • Joseph Bland on Mark Gurman: Apple is now a subscription - 'Morning, Steven. Been on the 1 year program since it started, partly because I got an early invite to buy a new one – sort of like saving a place in line… And I’d have bought a new one every year anyway, and it saved me the hassle of selling it on. Also, I knew some lucky person would get my basically pristine used iPhone (I always bought a cover and a screen shield), so I figured it would go to a good home…'
  • Joseph Bland on This week's Apple trading strategies (8/3-8/7/26) - 'My strategy: Hold Apple. My strategy if I weren’t 80 years old and permanently out of the job market: Buy more Apple. I could do that now, but this President and this sycophant Congress are still in power, and I need the insurance. Always take out insurance….'
  • Joseph Bland on Mark Gurman: Apple is now a subscription - 'I should probably add that I actually know how the sausage is made, having worked as a temp for Apple at the Apple Elk Grove facility when I was in my early 70’s and concerned about having enough AAPL left for my wife after I kicked the bucket (no longer a concern, since the Great Apple Revaluation of 2020). I “refurbished” iPads on the assembly line there, which is actually a misnomer; what we really did is test, examine, and sort. We did have a minor operation replacing cracked screens or replacing batteries, but that was mainly for inscribed iPads with broken screens or faulty batteries – a small subset of the actual business. (BTW, there was sometimes buyers regret for an inscribed iPad. Sadly, those could not be passed on, and even though they were pristine, they went to the recycling pile. Heartbreaking!) So even then, Apple was making book off of traded in or retired products. And of course, they made sure that non-pristine products were completely recycled, which was a service to the planet, and that those that passed our tests or could be given a new screen or battery and were deemed useful (including products that looked like their previous owner had taken sandpaper to them but were undented, had no cracks to the screen, and passed all the use and battery tests! – these went to places where they could still be sold on and used by less affluent folks). Quite an operation, and if Apple had taken my advice (offered at a subsequent Apple Investors Meeting on the new Spaceship campus, btw), they would have moved more temps like me over to being direct employees, or at least treated the contract employees more like direct employees. It was the only lack of real sensitivity I’ve ever seen by Apple, and still rankles me. Bottom line: This move is classic Apple; well thought out, and an obvious move to both increase profitability while passing on a way to ease the pain/increase the attractiveness for its buying customers.'
  • Kemble Widmer on Mark Gurman: Apple is now a subscription - 'Had another wildly speculative thought on this. Perhaps Apple will use this to vastly increase its direct control and quantity of high quality used iPhones for sale in developing countries, selling direct within Apple Stores there. This would bring more traffic into the stores at lower price points, bringing more developing country aspirational users within the Apple moat. Similar long term strategy to Mac Neo.'
  • Joseph Bland on Mark Gurman: Apple is now a subscription - 'AppleCar, like any insurance, only “pays off” if something goes wrong. For me, insurance has more than paid for itself, and so I consider it a necessary expense, period. That Apple has provided it and now wants to break it out is perfectly fine by me. If someone else wants to sell me insurance at a lower price and can guarantee al the benefits Apple does, and if the “bargain” is good enough, I’ll consider it, but if I can easily afford AppleCare, I won’t even bother.'
  • Ron Fredrick on Mark Gurman: Apple is now a subscription - 'PED’s take: “I dunno. For my work, I buy a new iPhone every year. On the other hand, AppleCare has been very good to me.” **Unlike PED, neither my wife nor I use an iPhone for any work. 🙂 However, since AAPL has been such a great investment over the years, my wife and I both get a new iPhone every year since we figure it’s the least we can do to help increase iPhone sales. Plus, our family appreciates getting the older iPhones.'
  • Fred Stein on Mark Gurman: Apple is now a subscription - 'Might Apple start selling used iPhones after they take in gear at lease expiration? Robitics could cost-effectively refurb and test to ensure a quality level that would allow Apple sell used iPhones with 1 yr warranties. Professionals and enterprises like leasing for tax or accounting reasons. For consumers, the ‘stairway to heaven’ becomes wheelchair accessible as $100 price bump is just $4 / month.'
  • Robert Stack on WSJ: Apple gave $25 million for Trump's ballroom - 'Re: “The award “recognizes leaders who demonstrate a dedication to improving the world, reflecting Robert Kennedy’s values.” Unfortunately, these values were not imparted to his son…'
  • Greg Bates on Mark Gurman: Apple is now a subscription - 'I want to hear more about PED’s “Apple care has been very good to me.” I always thought it was over priced insurance and never purchased it (except once when an employee tacked it on when I wasn’t looking). I calculate that without it, I’ll have to pay full whack every few years for a dropped phone or something that Apple care would have covered (or at least defrayed the costs of), but that that big expense would be less than the total monthly premiums over several years. Am I counting it wrong?'
  • Steven Philips on Mark Gurman: Apple is now a subscription - 'For me the question is the process. I tried the old yearly upgrade and the process was awful. Almost worse than buying a new phone. What I want is to sign a lease with no hassle. Come back at the end. Sign another contract and walk out with the new phone. Still connected to my ISP and no additional paperwork. IF that’s how this new process works, then I think I’m all in.'
  • Dan Scropos on Mark Gurman: Apple is now a subscription - 'Solid comments from Gurman, albeit nothing groundbreaking. Be it Netflix, Claude or Apple, subscriptions are now very mainstream, and roughly a dollar a day for a new iPhone every year is absolutely the right psychological approach to iPhones. I’m sure cross-hardware bundles are coming down the pike, and that, too, should aid sales, revenue, and second hand hardware, while growing the Installed Base.'
  • Jonathan Rotenberg on NYT: The day Trump put Larry Ellison in charge of AI - 'Exactly! Which why I believe they became friends. From a user-centered design perspective, Larry Ellison would make Bill Gates look like a deeply caring saint. If Steve only knew he had befriended the Anti-Christ… What seemed to drive the friendship, though, was that they were loners who both felt they had no friends. (I learned a lot I never knew about Steve’s NeXT years from the new ‘Steve Jobs in Exile’ book by Geoffrey Cain. It’s very interesting.)'
  • Romeo Esparrago on This week's Apple trading strategies (8/3-8/7/26) - '“ Don’t blame me if you drain your IRA doing something you read about here. “ My first year retirement travel costs burn rate feels high but that’s okay. My decades of being an AAPL long is paying for it. And we’re not even touching my wife’s shares. In my life, I’ve seen  lead or pivot successfully at OR after the major computing technological milestones of history it chose to act on. Stay long, don’t stay hungry LOL.'
  • Romeo Esparrago on The AI burn rate is making Washington nervous - '’s Image Playground’s output wasn’t any fun and probably required more reference images (more effort). My paid subscription to Perplexity’s Comet.Ai resulted in something humorous to what you asked for using your one single, simple sentence.'
  • David Emery on NYT: The day Trump put Larry Ellison in charge of AI - 'Somehow, I have a hard time imagining Steve Jobs doing an expense report on anything…'
  • Darren DMW on This week's Apple trading strategies (8/3-8/7/26) - 'Some observations from earnings call last week … – after 40 years the Mac is now pretty much indispensable at the low end and the top end of the PC market. PED – I think the Mac has become more relevant than wearables for the time being – maybe update 5 easy charts with Mac included and Wearables benched for a while? – I think I heard that the F1 movie created a hard compare for services this quarter. If the movie was indeed that successful that it contributes so much to quarterly results then you can see why a sequel is being talked about.'
  • Jonathan Rotenberg on NYT: The day Trump put Larry Ellison in charge of AI - 'I’ve always wondered if Steve Jobs was ever forced to use Oracle software to submit an expense report. If he had, I can’t imagine he would have had anything to do with Larry Ellison!'
  • Bart Yee on Apple's mixed Q3 2026: What the analysts are saying - 'Joseph Bland said: “Apple bought back $62 B in stock last quarter and still has a cash surplus of $39 B (up by $3 B from last year).“ That’s incorrect, Apple has repurchased $62B worth of stock over the first 3 quarters or nine months of FY2026. Apple repurchased aprox $25.95B worth of shares in Q3 FY2026.'
  • Greg Lippert on NYT: The day Trump put Larry Ellison in charge of AI - 'Aww father & son. Couldn’t happen to nicer shitbirds. If everyone is starting to wet themselves over hyperscaling costs, why is Apple being punished? They are the anti-hyperscaler. Oh yeah, they are being punished because the hyperscalers have destroyed reasonable memory prices.'