Recent Comments

  • Stephen Gordon on Mark Gurman and pals break down Apple's HomeView event (video) - 'Gurman mentioned the next event happening 10/23, and pointed out that Apple will be covering hotel fare and business class travel for influencers on the invite list. Standard practice these days for the creator economy, he noted, especially since they no longer host live keynotes for fanboys and journalists who attend on their own dime. How times have changed.'
  • Bart Yee on Apple investors: Set your calendars - 'https://youtu.be/DZkRGgQn6CA?is=QXFPSv6Pbk9Uf5X2 Gurman and friends take on the HomeView, 4th gen Apple TV 4K, Home Pod Mini plus additional MacBook event at end of October.'
  • Bart Yee on Apple investors: Set your calendars - 'There will always be profit taking when Apple/AAPL reaches a new high, because there are those who feel that new high is pretty much as high as you’ll get for some time. (AAPL is over its ski’s, the stock and some investors have gotten ahead of themselves, there is nothing in the hardware, products and revenue growth that can support a PE this high, especially compared to the 5, 10, and 20 year retrospective PE averages, Apple will always be a hardware company so should always be valued as such, like a steel mill going out of business, etc. etc.) This was shown on July 28 when Apple hit $5T and a new ATCH only to encounter a tepid response to guidance, or the guidance wasn’t nearly good enough, or Apple was falling back with the rest of AI/Tech stocks even though fundamentally Apple is moving revenue and AI in a completely different way than AI companies are, save another hardware company, NVidia. So there will be a few selling to lock in profits, some taking RMD’s and DAF contributions for end of year financial and tax planning, and of course hedge funds and institutions that feel there will be another tech company or sector rotation where the escalator is going up faster. It’s always been that way with fund manager humans thinking they will outsmart and out move the market or Apple short term and long term. Maybe yes, maybe no. But the reality is, Apple just keeps chugging along, working diligently to serve their users, stick to their knitting, and manage and control what they can, and not get caught up with what other are doing. What was that that Steve said? “Your time is limited, so don’t waste it living someone else’s life.” Apple lives its own life, its own way, guided by principles and ethics that Jobs, Cook, and now Ternus espoused, live, and put into action for the benefit of users, the company and its investors, and broadly, humankind. Apple never has been interested in living/building out someone else’s AI fueled machinations, life and dreams, especially the way the rest of the MANGOTS (MSFT, AMZN, NVDA, GOOGL, ORCL or OpenAI, TSLA, SPCX) are heading. (Could have been MAG-SNOT too). In that sense, AAPL is the market’s ATM, a place to withdraw money to use elsewhere, then rush back to when elsewhere pans out. Meanwhile, Apple will keep innovating, grow its portfolio of products and services, and just keep growing, perhaps not nearly fast enough for some market movers, but grow nonetheless, and keep making money the old fashioned way, they earn it. Can the AI companies say the same if the true spend and expenditures are correctly assessed against return on investments?'
  • David Emery on OpenAI promises not to use Apple trade secrets — for now - 'Detecting and proving either company is using knowledge from the other strikes me as difficult. It would need A LOT of discovery.'
  • Roger Schutte on Premarket: Apple is green - 'Already seeing extended delivery dates. I just ordered a starlight colored HomeView and the delivery date is 11/20 (7 days after the 11/13 available date). Also ordered an AppleTV and its delivery date is 11/23 – 11/27 (10 to 14 days after 11/13). Silver and gray HomeViews were available for delivery on 11/13 but I wanted a little color on this guy.'
  • Greg Lippert on OpenAI promises not to use Apple trade secrets — for now - 'Speaking of Meta, I saw Apple is working to allow Muse to run locally on Macs, for better or worse.'
  • Greg Lippert on OpenAI promises not to use Apple trade secrets — for now - 'They stuck (and still stand with) the pedo-in-charge. Corruption junction…'
  • Gregg Thurman on OpenAI promises not to use Apple trade secrets — for now - 'In the last 6 – 15 months we’ve heard several advisals that the demand for AI, while very large, isn’t to be big enough to pay for the Data Center build out it requires, that the cash demands of AI buildout will, at some point, hit a cash availability ceiling. And that will occur before the builders of these money pits attain positive cash flow. Now throw in Apple’s on device Apple Intelligence, and Mac Mini and Mac Studio, and a major amount of that AI demand will never see the inside of a Data Center. The TAM for Data Centers not only has hit a growth ceiling, but that ceiling has become lower. I don’t see investors in Data Centers, or the firms building them, getting their money back. Meanwhile, Apple will make hay (profits) on the fact that its products (revenue/profit generators, not expense centers) can support on device AI, while protecting user data and privacy. As I’ve stated before, I think by 2030 we will see the hype over Data Center AI implode, leaving an incredible amount of financial wreckage in its rubble. The first to collapse will be those requiring venture capitalist financing and debt. Off Balance Sheet accounting sleight of hand isn’t going to save them. Long AAPL.'
  • David Emery on OpenAI promises not to use Apple trade secrets — for now - 'Altman just lies. Zuckerberg is a sociopath.'
  • Bart Yee on OpenAI promises not to use Apple trade secrets — for now - 'Regarding any OpenAI, Anthropic or other AI company IPO (so that the founders can cash in / out and slide debt onto investors), this recent video by Dr. Earl Brandt from Kiraa AI about whether IPO investors and finance are soon to be drying up, and does that portend the inevitable AI bubble slowdown, deflation, or bubble pop? The canary in the coal mine, indeed. Heed the warnings. https://youtu.be/0V7KONODqIY?is=OYgBj6Skuah5hefG'
  • Robert Paul Leitao on Premarket: Apple is green - 'It was a good day for the market with over 75% of S&P 500 components rising on the day and the DJIA gained 556.21 points or 1.08%. As Bart points out above, Apple gradually moved south in afternoon trading to close off $0.96 or 0.28% at $342 even. In other news CFRA has announced a rise in its Apple price target to $380 per share from $350 while maintaining a 4-star Buy recommendation. This follows the “Welcome Home” event on Tuesday morning.'
  • Bart Yee on Premarket: Apple is green - 'AAPL closed down $0.96 to exactly $342.00 on very mediocre volume of 35M shares, just a quiet sideways move. Last 5 sessions have shown spiky openings up $4-6 and then slow rest of session declines on subdued volume except for Wednesday. I expect a little positivity tomorrow as Duo preorders open and optimism that Preoprders will point to better than expected demand, say over 5-6M for 2026, and delivery times extending well into December and January.'
  • John Konopka on OpenAI promises not to use Apple trade secrets — for now - '@Richard The big problem they have for the IPO is showing that they have any useful revenue. This is the big mystery about AI: enormous expenses, little to no revenue.'
  • Steven Philips on OpenAI promises not to use Apple trade secrets — for now - 'It was panned – until they actually drove one.'
  • John Konopka on Apple investors: Set your calendars - 'Curiously, one day before the elections. Could be spun different ways. Whatever Apple announces on Monday will be swamped by the news on Tuesday. Apple’s P/E is just under 40. It has been a bit higher in the past. On the other hand, Tesla’s P/E is 342 and AMD’s is 152 so P/E is not the sole indicator of value. In Apple’s case, I’d say it is an indicator of future revenue.'
  • Gregg Thurman on OpenAI promises not to use Apple trade secrets — for now - 'In any settlement Apple force Open AI to bond its word for at least $10 Billion. Then if found guilty of breaking a non-use agreement Apple get paid by the bond holder.'
  • Steven Philips on Under Ternus, Apple closes above $5T for first time - 'Yeah, but you’re “smarter than the average bear!” 🙂'
  • Joseph Bland on OpenAI promises not to use Apple trade secrets — for now - 'Please permit me to clarify; There is the physical threat ((WWIII, biological agents, nano-machines creating Grey Goo, etcetera) to humanity (and even biological life itself), but there’s is also a oligarchic threat from too much power in the hands of too few.'
  • Joseph Bland on OpenAI promises not to use Apple trade secrets — for now - 'Hi, Richard. I agree, if by “this” you mean trying to wriggle off the hook, which I think it does, and consequently upvoted. That said, there’s a much more insidious push behind AI more generally than meets the eye, and “this” reveals it. And why Apple almost alone is working to counter it. IMO..'
  • Joseph Bland on OpenAI promises not to use Apple trade secrets — for now - '(timed out) …co-opting the acronym ASI not only doesn’t work, it reveals to anyone with half a brain what you dirtbags are up to. This naked power grab is the real threat that ASI represents, not just to humanity, but to freedom, justice, and the American way of life.'
  • Joseph Bland on OpenAI promises not to use Apple trade secrets — for now - 'This. Thanks, Daniel, for pointing out the intellectual property damage that results from theft of proprietary information. Knowing where Apple is going instructs how to get to the same place slightly differently and first – and throw up barriers. Dirtbags. No wonder they’re at this President’s beck and call: Like him, they have zero morals when it comes to the almighty buck! And then there’s the power that AI, let alone true ASI, gives them to “invent the future”. And no, President Trump/Republican toadies; there is a huge difference between AI and ASI, so co-opting the Acronym'
  • Bill Donahue on OpenAI vs. Apple: The plot thickens - 'Not to slice things too thinly, but unless OpenAI has evidence that the person emailed those files under inducement by Apple, their legal beef is solely limited to the ex-employee. Especially if all they’ve got is evidence that he emailed them to himself.'
  • Bill Donahue on OpenAI promises not to use Apple trade secrets — for now - 'Apple should seek the injunction anyways. Because a promise not to do something that is broken doesn’t have the same legal consequences as an injunction that is not followed. Especially when that promise comes from a company that is i) run by a pathological liar, and ii) based on technology entirely trained using stolen IP. At best, even if it’s in the form of a contract with Apple, the broken promise allows Apple to seek civil remedies, which would simply put them back in the exact position they are in today. Whereas a broken injunction lands them in trouble for contempt.'
  • Daniel Epstein on Apple investors: Set your calendars - 'Kind of like this year’s fall IPhone release schedule. Staggered and some models delayed. Also a lot of new product releases and a new CEO to organize. They aren’t rushing to get out the results but haven’t warned either. Not the most important quarter but the guide will be important to the street reaction. An extra week could be useful.'
  • Rodney Avilla on Apple investors: Set your calendars - 'Why the extra week? It will give them more data on new products for their forward guidance.'
  • Gregg Thurman on OpenAI promises not to use Apple trade secrets — for now - 'I’ve always felt that Zuckerberg was the lowest of the low. It appears that Altman may be lower. If I was an investor I would be super concerned how this proposed settlement (an indirect admission of guilt) would impact sales. As a potential IPO buyer I would be more than concerned. I would not trust my money to the likes of Altman. I think Altman’s career at ChatAI may be over. How many Board members, senior executives, senior employees, potential customers are going to distance themselves from this stain?'
  • Gregg Thurman on Apple investors: Set your calendars - 'With this upcoming Earnings Report Apple has extended the period between end of quarter to day of report by a full week. Historically, Earnings Reports occurred four weeks and 2 or 3 business days after the reporting period The next Earnings Report will occur five weeks and 1 business day after the reporting period. Why the extra week?'
  • Richard Gayle on OpenAI promises not to use Apple trade secrets — for now - 'I think this is all about OpenAI getting to its IPO. There was no way that was going to happen any time soon with this mega-case hanging over it. Altman already delayed it to next year (He said for security and safety reasons. As a known liar, I suspect it was this case that was scaring off the investors.) So it has come to an agreement that may make this go away long enough for OpenAI to cash in. Any court case will then happen after the IPO when they can then drag it out forever.'
  • William Baggs on OpenAI promises not to use Apple trade secrets — for now - 'Ive’s move looks like betrayal. What a nice pile of a AI billion or two will do. I do like the new electric car however. I have seen it in flesh both inside and out at the factory in Maranello, moving through the hight tech production line. It has a very carefully thought out design and blistering performance. Talking of IP theft, the movable monitor in the car is very much like the swivel neck iMac. It has no heads up display however and the range needs improvement.'