Recent Comments

  • Bart Yee on 'Extraordinary' says Apple of demand for the iPhone Duo - '“what role did Ternus play in development of a folding iPhone and eventually the duo?” John Ternus played a foundational, 15-year role in pioneering Apple’s foldable technology, culminating in the September 2026 launch of the $1,999 iPhone Duo. His involvement spanned from early component concepts to steering the exact standard of quality for the final device: 1. Laying the Patents (2011) • Ternus’ involvement in foldables began long before the category even existed in the consumer market. In 2011, while working on the Product Design team, Ternus and five fellow engineers filed Apple’s first major patent for foldable electronic devices. They explored how circuit boards, internal configurations, and flexible OLED screen technology would interact years before flexible displays were commercially viable. 2. Rejecting Preemptive Launches • During his tenure as VP and SVP of Hardware Engineering, competitors began releasing early foldable devices. Ternus actively resisted rushing a product to market simply to compete. In interviews with TIME Magazine, he admitted he found rival foldables to feel “kind of cheap and crappy,” insisting that Apple hold back until the hardware felt completely premium. 3. Setting the Engineering Standards for the Duo • As the hardware chief, he set a strict standard for the engineering team. According to Richard Dinh, Apple’s VP of Product Design, the team built early prototypes that had similar display flaws to competitors but thought they might be “good enough” to launch. • Ternus pushed back, telling Dinh, “Look, Rich, you’ll know when it’s the right thing.” • This rejection of mediocrity gave the engineering team the mandate to fly globally to sync with suppliers, ultimately developing the iPhone Duo’s custom polymer nanotexture surface and a complex hinge made of over 100 internal precision parts that leaves the unfolded screen practically creaseless. ((Saying No & sticking to a highest Apple quality standard. If ever a Jobs / Apple culture disciple example was needed, this is it)) 4. The Face of the Final Launch (2026) Following his transition to Apple CEO on September 1, 2026, the passport-sized iPhone Duo was his very first major flagship product announcement just nine days later on September 9. The phone serves as the definitive engineering statement for the start of his tenure as CEO. “And what was Ternus’ involvement with Home View” “John Ternus’s involvement with HomeView represents a massive shift in his role at Apple. While his early career focused strictly on mechanical blueprints, HomeView is the second major launch of his CEO tenure and serves as the foundation for his new overarching corporate strategy. His involvement spans a few key areas: 1. The Strategy: Shifting from “Mr. Services” to a Hardware Ecosystem Under Tim Cook, Apple prioritized growing its services division. Ternus is using HomeView to pivot corporate strategy back to aggressive hardware ecosystem expansion. Facing intense pressure from AI rivals like OpenAI, Ternus’s core strategy is to expand physical touchpoints that draw consumers deeper into the Apple ecosystem. HomeView acts as the literal anchor for that ecosystem in the user’s home. 2. The Design Influence: A Nod to Apple’s Heritage As the former Hardware Engineering chief, Ternus oversaw the final development of the device’s physical form factor: a 7-inch square Liquid Retina touchscreen that floats on a stainless steel hinge above a domed speaker base. Tech analysts noted that this design is an unmistakable, nostalgic nod back to the iconic 2002 iMac G4—aligning with Ternus’s reputation for appreciating classic Apple hardware roots. 3. Orchestrating the “Welcome Home” Partnerships To make HomeView a viable household command center, Ternus had to build out a broader hardware network. Alongside the $299 hub, he orchestrated major manufacturing partnerships with LG Electronics and Schneider to simultaneously roll out Apple-vetted smart thermostats, video doorbells, smart locks, and security cameras that integrate seamlessly into the HomeView interface via the Matter and Thread smart home standards. ((LG via LG Innotek and other divisions already has relationships either Apple for OLED IPad displays and display driver chips.)) 4. Spearheading the Siri AI Integration The ultimate success of HomeView rests on its integration with a rebuilt, conversational Siri AI powered by Apple Intelligence. Ternus introduced the device as Apple’s first dedicated piece of home hardware built entirely around this upgraded AI model. By enabling features like localized facial recognition (for up to six family members) and cross-device data pulling from paired iPhones, Ternus is positioning the device as a direct test of his ability to lead Apple into the AI era.”'
  • Bart Yee on 'Extraordinary' says Apple of demand for the iPhone Duo - 'David said: “ Ternus is a hardware guy. Cook is an execution guy. Both are important, but Ternus was surely deeply involved in the development of the Duo, so I think it is totally reasonable that he was the one to introduce it. It may even be why he was named the new CEO.” That is absolutely correct. FYI everyone, John Ternus job titles have been since 2001: • Product Design Team Member / Engineer, Apple (2001–2010s) • Vice President of Hardware Engineering, Apple (2013–2021) • Senior Vice President (SVP) of Hardware Engineering, Apple (2021–2026) • Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Board Member, Apple (September 2026–present) “which products did he work on or was responsible for in each job era“ John Ternus has transitioned from working on single components to managing entire multi-billion dollar ecosystems. His product responsibilities evolved through his main career eras as follows: Apple Product Design Team Era (2001–2013) • Apple Cinema Display: His very first Apple product assignment. • The Original iPad: Worked on the foundational iPad lineup from its inception. • Early Foldable Tech: Co-filed early flexible OLED and foldable device patents for Apple as early as 2011. VP & SVP of Hardware Engineering Era (2013–2026) • Mac Product Lines: Led the massive architecture overhaul transitioning computers from Intel processors to custom Apple silicon (M-series chips). • AirPods: Oversaw the engineering, development, and launch of the entire wireless headphone category. • iPad Ecosystem: Managed the complete maturation of the iPad, iPad Air, and iPad Pro lines. • iPhone 12: iPhone Lineup: Took over direct responsibility for iPhone hardware starting in 2020, spearheading the iPhone 12 and succeeding generations with a heavy focus on durability, repairability, and materials. • Apple Watch: Assumed control of the watch division in late 2022, notably overseeing manufacturing advancements like 3D-printed titanium used in the Apple Watch Ultra. Chief Executive Officer Era (September 2026–Present) • iPhone Duo: His first major flagship reveal as CEO, representing Apple’s first official $2,000 foldable smartphone. • HomeView: Oversees the launch of Apple’s central home ecosystem hub. Continued'
  • John Konopka on Saturday Apple video: Think Different - 'The bit about Apple being 90 days away from bankruptcy was probably not exactly true. It may have been that if all revenue ceased they would fail in 90 days, but they still had revenue coming in so that 90 days was a receding horizon. Scary nevertheless.'
  • David Emery on Ezra Klein on Apple & AI - 'Taken even with a discount to face value, these numbers would require a significant increased value proposition. That could be increased -number- of users, or -increased value- provided to users, to justify that increase. Now I’m no user of AI, so I ask those of you who do have significant experience with current AI: Do you anticipate an order of magnitude better results from future AI (to justify these kinds of increase of scale? All this mumbling I hear about “agents,” does that justify an order of magnitude increase in AI scale? Or is this all about “being the first to reach AGI?”'
  • Bart Yee on Ezra Klein on Apple & AI - 'For compute, here’s the server needs: • 100 Million GPUs: While OpenAI tracks to pass 1 million active graphics processors, Altman aims for a 100x scale-up to 100 million GPUs, which could command a $3 trillion price tag. (How and where is OpenAI going to get $3 Trillion dollars, or about 1/10th the total US GDP to spend on these servers? Is he tapping private equity, asking for the government and taxpayers (you and me) to “help him (without repayment, fat chance of seeing anything back) to foot the bill as a matter of national security and sovereignty, whatever those buzzwords mean, or is he hoping for his long sought IPO to make him rich beyond avarice and fund his company to the tune of $3 Trillion and foist that spending onto “investors”, never mind any return or revenue parity in any near term. “It’s the future we are building, and the future is where returns are, be patient, it will eventually come, but I need your investment dollars NOW, TRUST ME! 🙂 (fingers crossed behind back) ). There’s no place for individuals in this model, only us MAG-AI (sorry, MAG-SI -7) as overseers who know what’s good for enterprise and businesses, and that doesn’t include Apple because they aren’t spending nearly enough. • The “Stargate” Project: In collaboration with Microsoft and Oracle, OpenAI’s primary blueprint relies on a $500 billion multi-facility buildout. The initial phase at Abilene, Texas, targets a massive 10-building complex scaled to 1 gigawatt. (As usual with AI, the fuzzy math just doesn’t work, it’s practically infinite need to feed a voracious vision by carnival barkers and potentially con men, maybe well meaning in a greed sense, but con men nonetheless, IMO). There’s no adults in the room, only CEO’s who see massive Trillion dollar signs blinding them to anything realistic. And of course, there’s no regulation or even overall coordinated planning and reality checking by ANYONE to any of this, it’s just spend, spend, spend.'
  • Bart Yee on Ezra Klein on Apple & AI - 'Kedrosky maybe doesn’t see this or even understand this point: ALL of the AI companies – MSFT, GOOGL, META, ORCL, OpenAI, Anthropic, AMZN, etc. want you (consumers and businesses) to use THEIR AI product, on THEIR SERVERS, in THEIR DATACENTERS by micro-rent or macro-leasing (subscriptions) or pay-as-you-go (tokens and token plans) compute power. Don’t worry about sending your info to us, your behavior and queries, your security and your privacy, we vacuum all that up, take care of all of that ourselves, and like a big AI black box, we’ll spit back your needed response. you can trust us, even if we haven’t been around or at this for very long. Our CEO’s absolutely believe this new technology, implantations, use, and business models are completely different in size and scale from anything seen before. If your output isn’t accurate or good enough, well, that’s what the subscription or token plan is for, we/you can iterate and fine tune as long as you have the tokens to do so, we’re here for you (and us). *(BTW, the fine print says we can learn and train on anything that is on the internet, shared with us, or output by us. After all, we learn by and from all our customer interactions, isn’t that desirable? And technically everything you share with us is on, through or in the internet, so fair game in our minds’ eyes.) The AI Bro’s view access to their Servers & Datacenters through essentially dumb terminals because they are attached to dumb users (did we say that?) in the home or business (PC’s, local regional and national business IT systems, ok, tablets and smartphones) which of course are clearly not and never will be nearly powerful enough to run our ever growing Quadrillion parameter Frontier models that YOU so desperately need (to use, also that WE NEED YOU to use). That’s why we are rushing to build ever more datacenters to supply the compute power you need and want us to have. Since we don’t want to be accused of collusion or fall under antitrust laws, all of us are building out what we think are the needed number of datacenters, power stations, cooling water access, and community takeover, er, engagement. Each of our companies know precisely how many datacenters it will need over the next hundred year, and just to be safe, that’s at least N+X, where X is based on the number of parameters in our AI models. Can’t be left behind like Apple was! To put that in perspective, here’s Gemini quoting Sam Altman, AI visionary: (loosely) ⚡ Sam Altman & OpenAI • 5 to 7 Mega-Data Centers (5 GW Each): OpenAI pitched the White House on building five to seven colossal 5-gigawatt (5GW) facilities. For context, a single gigawatt can power roughly 750,000 homes. (That’s power for 7×5 x 750,000 homes = 26.25M homes, just for OpenAI. For context, there’s about 15M homes in California, and 150M homes in the US) • 250 Gigawatts by 2033: Internally, Altman has floated a target of 250 GW of total compute power—roughly one-third of the entire peak electrical consumption of the United States. (250GW would power 250 x 750,000 homes = 187.5M homes, 25% more power than is needed to power every home in the US, essentially needing to more than double the existing US power grid and then some for safety and reserves.) Continued'
  • Gregg Thurman on Ezra Klein on Apple & AI - 'In 2008 I watched the bank meltdown not understanding what was happening. That cost me big time. Today I think I am ahead of the feast for the latest greatest new thing. I’m watching from the sidelines and invest little of my rebuilt wealth core. I’ve been doing it for so long, it keeps my brain active. In my opinion. The hype for AI is headed for the same kind of meltdown that occurred in 2008. Cash and gold are my prime holdings today.'
  • Steven Philips on Ezra Klein on Apple & AI - 'Please let it infect Meta!'
  • John Konopka on Ezra Klein on Apple & AI - 'I don’t think Apple got “Lucky.” Sure, they maybe had some problems, but it is not as if they were ignoring AI. Look back to the paper from Apple about how poor LLMs are at reasoning. I suspect that Apple had very smart guys looking close at AI. The difference with Apple is that they didn’t drink the Kool-Aid. They were cautious. AI based on LLMs is likely in a bubble. What is fascinating is how it is sitting on a knife edge. The true believers keep shoveling in tons of money while profits have yet to appear and might never appear. CoreWeave is dropping like a rock and might go to zero. Oracle is ratcheting down. One more downgrade and their bonds drop to junk status which triggers all sorts of bad things. Fascinating to watch.'
  • John Konopka on 'Extraordinary' says Apple of demand for the iPhone Duo - 'Apple has been prototyping these for over 10 years, according to rumors.'
  • David Drinkwater on 'Extraordinary' says Apple of demand for the iPhone Duo - 'As an Engineer, I take offense to this. Ternus is a hardware guy. Cook is an execution guy. Both are important, but Ternus was surely deeply involved in the development of the Duo, so I think it is totally reasonable that he was the one to introduce it. It may even be why he was named the new CEO.'
  • Gregg Thurman on Ezra Klein on Apple & AI - 'He’s on 3rd.'
  • David Drinkwater on 'Extraordinary' says Apple of demand for the iPhone Duo - 'That’s what I got when I executed my order on my 10/12 preorder: 1/25. Midnight, 1T.'
  • Gregg Thurman on 'Extraordinary' says Apple of demand for the iPhone Duo - 'I find giving Ternus credit for the Duo silly. After all, Cook was the CEO of Apple for all of its prelaunch development , comprising years. Ternus has been CEO for a couple of weeks.'
  • Richard Gayle on Ezra Klein on Apple & AI - 'I was reminded of SNL’s classic “Point/Counterpoint” with Ackroyd and Curtin: “Jane, you ignorant slut”.'
  • Fred Stein on 'Extraordinary' says Apple of demand for the iPhone Duo - 'Each Duo counts as 2 in terms of revenue. Analysts need to update their revenue estimates for Q1, ’27, likely full FY 27. Pretty obvious, eh? Nice start for Ternus.'
  • Steven Philips on 'Extraordinary' says Apple of demand for the iPhone Duo - 'I get really tired of those “You promised!” Whines. Delivery “by 10/23? Or “starting 10/23”? I could continue this rant for probably dozens of other situations, but I won’t. (You’re welcome! 🙂 )'
  • Gregg Thurman on 'Extraordinary' says Apple of demand for the iPhone Duo - 'I tested delivery dates on a pre-order I did not complete – January 25 (2027)'
  • Les Surdykowski on 'Extraordinary' says Apple of demand for the iPhone Duo - 'Much to my surprise, at 5 past the hour I was staring at 2 phone screens (my wife’s and mine) with a delivery of 10/23 and within a few minutes of completing my orders, I went back to see if delivery dates had changed and started seeing end-of-November dates. I’ve never seen it move that fast before. But that tells me nothing other than the available supply was consumed very quickly. The one thing that was different this year versus prior ones (as far as I can recall) was that all of the provider and credit housekeeping stuff was handled prior to the actual transaction. I remember seeing horror stories of order processes hanging, breaking, etc., in previous years, so my guess is this might have contributed to the amount of time it would take for delivery dates to extend since it was getting bogged down by API calls to Verizon, etc., that would simply shit the bed under that load. Apple got that out of the way this past week with their prepare-for-preorder option. My orders were fast and hassle-free.'
  • Steven Philips on Ezra Klein on Apple & AI - 'Who’s on first. I don’t know. 🙂 (That and ‘Niagara Falls!’)'
  • Gregg Thurman on 'Extraordinary' says Apple of demand for the iPhone Duo - 'OK, from this single report it appears demand was greater than expected. So how does that impact my options re-entry plans? I may end up more, but I’m going to wait for more data points from those I trust, people like those here, on Apple 3.0. What have you heard from people you trust?'
  • Rodney Avilla on 'Extraordinary' says Apple of demand for the iPhone Duo - 'There is one other factor that may be having an effect on delivery times. Last year business accounts could pre-pre-order iPhones, that is place an order before the official pre-order date. However, it turned out that they did not get their iPhones any sooner than anyone else, and may have actually been added onto the end of the pre-orders. This year it was different. We, those with the business accounts, were told otherwise. We were told our pre-pre-orders would go at the beginning of the regular pre-order.. so I placed my pre-pre-order, but I still do not have a date of delivery yet. I was told the delivery would be among those first delivered. We will see.'
  • Rodney Avilla on 'Extraordinary' says Apple of demand for the iPhone Duo - '“Extraordinary compared with what?“ That was exactly my first thought. I was hoping more of a comment that was along the lines of ‘more than what we expected’. I am assuming that is what they meant.'
  • Gregg Thurman on Ezra Klein on Apple & AI - 'This “discussion” made me think of Abbott and Costello’s baseball routine.'
  • Rick Johnson on 'Extraordinary' says Apple of demand for the iPhone Duo - 'Similar experience here – Dec 7-14. Night Sky. '
  • Neil Shapiro on 'Extraordinary' says Apple of demand for the iPhone Duo - 'I had a feeling that the Duo sale was going surprisingly well. I logged onto the sale at exactly 5 PDT (8 ET) and the wait was not bad at about 5:12 it logged me in where I did the pre-order and my accepted order went through no more than five minutes later. I was ecstatic as I figured this time I would have to be amongst the first few to get the fruit of the Apple tree. Imagine my shock that the next page listed my delivery date as December 1 through 8. I had figured the white one might be rare at first but who knew it was going be as hard to catch as maybe Moby Dick! Oh well.'
  • Robert Paul Leitao on Saturday Apple video: Think Different - 'I have several of the posters framed in our home office. They are a daily reminder I still have work to do changing the world in every small way I can.'
  • Steven Philips on Ezra Klein on Apple & AI - 'The thing that Kedrosky – and others – seem to forget is that Apple “fell behind” because of their insistence on maintaining privacy. Gianandrea was hired to try to make that work, but couldn’t. It wasn’t about the AI itself. I think many people tried to get them to just forget about privacy – but they didn’t.'
  • Steven Philips on Saturday Apple video: Think Different - 'I still regret not buying some of the Think Different posters. (Along with the “first” Apple Watch.) It was a great campaign.'
  • David Drinkwater on Saturday Apple video: Think Different - 'For me, the grammar still works. “Think different” means “think about a different way”: “how can I do this in a flashy, splashy, exciting way that others have not?” Or just, yes, “how can I do this differently?” with an emphasis on the fact that this is different. How can I make it different than what others do? What tools do I need to accomplish that goal. That’s the whole thing about the “crazy ones”: they chose something different than what the rest of the world around them was thinking. This also applies to the 1984 commercial. And there is another fine, but important point, hinted at in “think big”, that the style writer (pun intended) overlooks: Syllables and and emphasis: boom! “Think Differently” falls off the tongue and hits the ear differently than “Think Different”. At least to my ear. Here’s to the crazy ones! Cheers!'