Bart Yee on Chateâu de la Treyne - 'Pretty amazing that Porsche is back-filling Apple Play functionality to older Porsche models, what other manufacturers would do that? From Road & Track via Apple News: https://apple.news/ArxKweCNCQuKfXpczO7bk0Q Porsche Just Gave 300,000 of Its Best Older Sports Cars Modern Infotainment With Apple CarPlay Porsche Classic Communication Management Plus brings CarPlay, Android Auto and more modern functions to many 2009-2016 cars. “Many Porsche enthusiasts prefer old-school technology. Manual transmissions, naturally aspirated engines, and analog gauges often provide a more tactile, more engaging driving experience than their alternatives. But when it comes to infotainment, newer is generally better. Porsche began bringing those two worlds together in 2020 with Porsche Classic Communication Management Plus (PCCM Plus), giving owners of classic models access to modern infotainment without sacrificing the factory look. And as of Tuesday, Porsche is expanding the technology to a newer generation of future classics.” “The latest version of PCCM Plus is now available for the 997.2-generation 911, 987.2-gen Boxster and Cayman, 991.1-generation 911, and 981-gen Boxster and Cayman. Porsche says that opens the factory infotainment upgrade to more than 300,000 cars from model years 2009 through 2016. These generations represent something of a dividing line in Porsche history, arriving before turbocharged Carreras and four-cylinder Boxsters and Caymans became the norm. At the center of PCCM Plus is a seven-inch high-resolution touchscreen, but the biggest upgrade is the addition of wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. Bluetooth and Wi-Fi connectivity are included, along with Bluetooth audio streaming, 4G support through a nano SIM card, and over-the-air map updates.” “PCCM Plus was designed to integrate with the car’s existing electronics. Cars originally equipped with a multifunction steering wheel can use it to control the new system, while navigation instructions and music information can appear in the instrument cluster. Existing vehicle settings remain supported as well; for example, Boxster and Cayman models equipped with parking sensors gain a visual distance display to supplement the original audible warning. Plus, the look is seamless and can easily be mistaken for original equipment, unlike most aftermarket systems. But Porsche drivers love to drive above all else, so PCCM Plus adds a few features that seem tailor-made for drivers. Oil temperature and oil pressure can be displayed on the trip screen; even more exciting is the satellite-image navigation and a Scenic Roads function that can deliberately select winding, panoramic routes rather than simply finding the fastest way to your destination. Porsche offers two versions of the system: One covering the 997.2 and 987.2, and another for the 991.1 and 981. Individual functions vary depending on the model and original equipment, and Porsche recommends having PCCM Plus installed at a Porsche dealer.” Excerpt From “Porsche Just Gave 300,000 of Its Best Older Sports Cars Modern Infotainment With Apple CarPlay” Joe Kucinski Road & Track This material may be protected by copyright.'
on Chateâu de la Treyne - 'Its is highly speculative. In today’s Fast Money podcast Gene Munster mentions Apple’s AI efforts and Siri at about the 15 minute mark and at about the 25 minute mark the panel debunks the risk to Apple from Meta’s Muse. https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/cnbcs-fast-money/id215529509?i=1000792271402'
on Chateâu de la Treyne - 'Wow! That is scary. I don’t need to be advised to continue to avoid anything Meta. So maybe after this new report gets out, the market will be less intimidated by the incomplete news from Benzinga that caused the selloff today. That could bode well for an AAPL rebound'
on Chateâu de la Treyne - 'Here is a non-paywall account of the article: Unsurprisingly, Meta’s new Muse AI agent blatantly ignores users permissions'
on Chateâu de la Treyne - '“What Apple could truly change is this cycle. If the iPhone Duo brings in millions of new users, the commercial returns for developers adapting their interfaces to larger screens will increase accordingly. At that point, foldable screens could potentially transform from “foldable smartphones” into new products with their own independent software ecosystem and interaction logic. Therefore, the first year after Apple’s foldable screen is launched will be a crucial window to verify this judgment. In the early stages of a new product launch, there may be supply shortages due to limited production capacity and demand from early adopters, but what truly determines whether the product can achieve sustained growth is whether there will be significant changes in the software ecosystem thereafter. The iPhone Duo is just the first generation of Apple’s foldable screen product line. The aforementioned analyst told reporters that as production capacity ramps up and the software ecosystem matures, its sales volume could increase to 20 to 30 million units in the next two to three years. Only then can it transition from a high-priced, small-scale, early adopter to a mainstream Apple product.” And that’s the whole article. Here’s the AppleInsider Summary: https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/09/29/making-millions-of-iphone-duos-is-proving-harder-than-apple-hoped'
on Chateâu de la Treyne - 'Apple may be able to further expand the foldable screen market. Apple wasn’t the first company to launch a foldable phone. Samsung released a similar product as early as 2019, and many domestic Chinese phone manufacturers followed suit. However, even after seven years of development, foldable screens have yet to become a mainstream product. According to Omdia data, global shipments of foldable smartphones are projected to reach 18.2 million units in 2025, representing a 6% year-on-year increase, the lowest growth rate in recent years. During the same period, global smartphone shipments are estimated at approximately 1.26 billion units. Based on this, the penetration rate of foldable screens is approximately 1.4%, still considered a niche product. In the first half of this year, global shipments of foldable smartphones reached 5.1 million units, a year-on-year decrease of 21.6%. Among them, shipments of vertically foldable models decreased by 47% compared to the first half of 2025, while shipments of horizontally foldable models remained basically flat. However, after speaking with several industry insiders, reporters found that many still have high hopes for Apple’s entry into this market. They believe that Apple’s significance goes beyond simply adding another foldable screen brand; rather, it could leverage its global sales, developer ecosystem, and supply chain influence to further expand the foldable screen market. An individual who has long been engaged in mobile phone retail and has come into contact with many foldable screen products also told reporters that he is relatively optimistic about the growth of this market. In his view, the demand for larger display areas has been a long-standing issue. While mobile phone screens have grown from one or two inches to nearly seven inches, the size of traditional smartphones is nearing its limit due to limitations in grip and portability. Holographic displays and rollable screens are unlikely to mature in the short term, making foldable screens one of the few viable solutions that balance large screens and portability for the next three to five years. “If Apple can expand its user base and encourage Samsung and domestic mobile phone manufacturers to continue investing, the foldable screen market may enter a new round of growth,” the person also mentioned. According to industry sources, Apple’s sales guidance for its first product in 2026 has exceeded 5 million units, which is about a quarter of the total global foldable screen market in 2025. In addition, Apple can also promote the further development of the foldable screen software ecosystem. In the early days of foldable screens, many apps simply stretched the existing phone interface horizontally after unfolding. For apps like short videos, social media, and e-commerce, the larger screen did not necessarily result in a significantly better user experience. A retail industry insider who uses domestically produced foldable screen phones told reporters that even if store managers need to use the large screen to view business reports, they usually only unfold the foldable screen for less than 10 minutes a day. Many apps haven’t redesigned their information layout, split-screen collaboration, and interaction methods for foldable screens. Even though users buy a foldable phone, they’re essentially still using the same logic as a traditional smartphone. Foldable screens have thus fallen into a cycle: insufficient user base, software vendors lack the motivation to specifically adapt their software; no significant improvement in software experience, and users can’t find a reason to frequently unfold the screen.'
on Chateâu de la Treyne - 'The screen support plate is located below the flexible inner screen. It needs to provide support for the screen when unfolded to prevent the middle area from sagging; and when folded, it should not prevent the screen from bending according to a set radius. Beneath the support plate lies a hinge composed of over 100 parts. The hinge needs to control the opening and closing resistance, determine the screen’s bending radius, and flatten the center of the screen when the phone is fully unfolded. It also needs to be lightweight, durable, and dust and water resistant within a very small space. “Hinges contain many components, each manufactured using different processes, such as stamping, CNC machining, and MIM,” the analyst said. Different manufacturers produce the bearing caps, transmission components, support components, and other precision parts, which are then assembled into complete hinges by assembly companies. Of course, the challenges posed by hinges extend beyond their own manufacturing and assembly. They occupy space in the center of the fuselage, further limiting the layout options for other components. When unfolded, the iPhone Duo is only about 5.2 millimeters thick, about 0.4 millimeters thinner than the iPhone Air. The hinge occupies the central space of the device, leaving the battery, motherboard, and cooling system to be placed on the sides. To allow more space for the battery cells, the battery casing needs to be as thin as possible. Lingyi Intelligent Manufacturing uses ultra-thin stainless steel sheets, which are precision stamped or deep drawn to form a flat casing, and a flange is formed around the edge for subsequent welding, sealing and assembly. If the casing is too thin, it is prone to wrinkling, cracking, or springback deformation during stamping; if it is too thick, it will take up the limited battery space. The two batteries are distributed on both sides of the body, and the shapes and space conditions of the two battery casings are not exactly the same, which puts forward higher requirements for dimensional accuracy and flatness. The vapor chamber also needs to be thinner. It needs to dissipate the heat generated by the A20 Pro chip quickly without taking up too much of the already limited internal space. Chinese supply chain companies are involved in more than just glass and structural components. According to public responses from listed companies, Zhuhai Guanyu supplies battery cells for Apple’s foldable phones; Qiangrui Technology participates in the R&D, prototyping, and trial production of related testing equipment and precision fixtures; and Rongqi Technology participates in the VC heat dissipation testing for the iPhone Duo. Pressure, temperature, bonding position, hinge assembly precision, and even minute differences between different batches of materials can all affect the final result. While the production line and process parameters for a regular iPhone have matured over many years of iteration, the iPhone Duo essentially requires establishing a completely new manufacturing system. “Without the Chinese supply chain, it’s not that it’s impossible to produce, but it would be very difficult to turn it into a consumer product at the current cost and scale,” the analyst said. China’s supply chain has moved from low-cost assembly to precision manufacturing. However, the ability to extend further upstream to materials, module assemblies, and joint design will determine these companies’ profit margins and bargaining power.'
on Chateâu de la Treyne - 'Based on Apple’s disclosed technical solutions and information gathered by reporters from the supply chain, Apple addresses the crease issue by breaking it down into three problems: how the screen material changes, how light is reflected, and how the screen should actually be folded. The special adhesive layer is responsible for releasing bending pressure; the nano-texture on the surface reduces the visual presence of creases by dispersing reflected light; and the hinge and support structure below the screen are responsible for controlling the bending trajectory and flattening the center of the screen after unfolding. These solutions are designed by Apple as a whole, but turning them into products that can be delivered in large quantities still relies on the long-term accumulation of suppliers in materials, processing and mass production processes. Several key manufacturing processes are undertaken by Chinese supply chain companies. Apple Reorganizes its China Supply Chain According to sources in the supply chain, the inner screen of Apple’s first foldable phone, the iPhone DUO, uses custom nano-textured UTG glass, which can reduce creases. The nano-textured glass was exclusively developed by Lens Technology. Lens Technology recently mentioned in an institutional survey that it supplies core components such as UTG glass, CPI film, UTG glass support plate and 3D glass cover plate to its major customers’ folding machine projects. “Previously, high-end Android foldable screens were already using UTG glass.” An analyst who has long followed Apple’s supply chain told Jiemian News that UTG is more advanced than PI film and can also reduce creases. “Apple has also designed UTG glass with uneven thickness, with the middle folded part being thinner, while the sides need to maintain strength. The technical requirements are indeed higher than before.” Lens Technology previously primarily supplied front and rear cover glass, camera covers, and metal frames for some models of the standard iPhone. With the advent of foldable screens, the added internal screen and technical requirements have further increased its supply scope and the value per unit. Below the UTG is a complete foldable OLED and support structure. The flexible screen’s ability to bend also means it cannot remain flat like a single piece of rigid glass. When the phone is unfolded, the center of the screen must be supported by both the hinge and the support plate. According to sources within the industry chain, Lingyi Intelligent Manufacturing supplies iPhone Duo with precision hinge components, screen support plates, ultra-thin VC heat sinks, and ultra-thin stainless steel battery casing modules with flanges. Continued'
on Chateâu de la Treyne - 'Hinges and creases are major obstacles to mass production. Apple has allocated more time than in previous years for the iPhone Duo’s production ramp-up. On the morning of September 10th, newly appointed Apple CEO John Tenus unveiled the iPhone Duo at a product launch event. However, unlike previous new iPhones, the phone did not launch immediately. Apple announced that the iPhone Duo would be available for pre-order on October 16th and officially released on October 23rd. According to statistics compiled by Jiemian News reporters, in the past five years, Apple’s fall flagship iPhones have taken an average of only about 3 days from release to pre-orders and about 10 days from release to market launch. The two time intervals for the iPhone Duo have been extended to 36 days and 43 days respectively, about a month longer than before. According to Jiemian News, the delayed launch of the iPhone Duo is primarily affected by the delivery schedule of core components such as the foldable OLED panel and hinge. The foldable OLED panels used in the iPhone Duo are supplied by Samsung Display. An analyst who closely follows Apple’s supply chain stated that the delivery time of these panels may be later than previously expected, and subsequent assembly and production line ramp-up will also be delayed. The hinge design also underwent adjustments. According to sources within the supply chain, Apple once tested the use of liquid metal in some hinge components, but the proposed solution was re-evaluated before mass production. “If the materials or production process of the components are changed midway, other suppliers will need to re-sample, verify and produce, and the new supplier cannot immediately increase the output,” the analyst said. Even without adjusting the design, foldable screens and hinges are not standard components that are easy to manufacture. Compared to regular candybar phones, they introduce new material, structural, and assembly requirements, making error control in the overall manufacturing process more difficult. Judging from the prototype shown at the launch event, the crease on the iPhone Duo is less noticeable than most foldable phones on the market. However, this still doesn’t meet Apple’s initial vision of a “perfect” foldable phone. A crease is not simply a groove on the screen surface, but the result of the combined effects of screen materials, hinge structure, and overall assembly. Compared to regular candybar phones, foldable phones not only have an additional internal screen but also a hinge composed of over 100 parts. The errors between the screen, hinge, and body must be controlled within a very small range; otherwise, it may result in deeper creases, inconsistent opening and closing resistance, localized screen sagging, and even affect the phone’s lifespan. Continued'
on Chateâu de la Treyne - '[Hard Tech Headlines] iPhone Duo assembly yield is only slightly over 60%, Apple’s foldable screen is still ramping up mass production. Based on Apple’s current quality standards, it may take another six months or even a year for the overall yield rate of the device to reach a mature level. Jiemian News reporters | Liang Baoxin and Li Jiaqi Jiemian News Editors | Lin Teng, Liu Fangyuan With just over a month left before its official release, Apple’s first foldable phone, the iPhone Duo, has not yet completed its mass production ramp-up. On September 17, a reporter from Jiemian News exclusively learned from sources close to Foxconn’s supply chain that the current yield rate of Foxconn’s assembled iPhone Duo is only slightly over 60%, with a small initial production run. Based on Apple’s current quality standards, it may take another six months to a year for the overall yield rate to reach a mature level. “The supply chain is now waiting for Apple to make a decision on whether to relax the quality requirements. If the quality requirements are relaxed, it will be possible to move towards mass production more quickly.” The aforementioned person said that the low yield rate is not entirely due to a problem with a certain technology, but rather because Apple is mass-producing foldable screen phones for the first time, and the production line still needs to be repeatedly adjusted in actual operation to optimize equipment, processes, and parameters. “A production line cannot be made good simply by having the technology and equipment; it needs to be debugged while producing.” Jiemian News reporters also learned from industry sources that, in addition to Foxconn’s assembly yield still being ramped up, Samsung Display’s OLED panels and hinge-related components have also previously experienced insufficient yield, delivery delays, and adjustments to plans. Any delay in any upstream link reduces the time available for subsequent assembly plants to debug their production lines. In a research report released on September 3, Mizuho Securities also mentioned that hinge specifications and screen crease issues have hampered the mass production progress of Apple’s foldable screen devices. Apple needs to weigh quality standards in order to promote full-scale mass production. An industry insider told Jiemian News that the global inventory target for the iPhone Duo this year is approximately 6 to 8 million units. In comparison, a mainstream Pro or Pro Max model typically ships 20 to 30 million units per product cycle. “The folding phone is a separate model, and it won’t start shipping until October this year, so sales won’t be particularly high,” he said. A source from the retail channel told reporters that Apple’s sales guidance exceeds 5 million units. Continued'
on Chateâu de la Treyne - 'Love the details about the locations you’re staying at, PED. Makes me want to go back and explore the country some more, though by car. There used to be a version of me that was more journalistic after finishing college, but my career path got the better of me and eventually led to Apple stock ownership, 3.0, etc. In other words, my passion for research and curation is not what it used to be, not to mention the lack of bandwidth. Much respect to whomever can fill in when needed. Regarding Muse, I downloaded the app and set up my avatar, then deleted the app after hearing how it accessed information that was supposed to be walled off. Never used it in between, I might add. Meta might squeeze out a few extra bucks by leveraging the agent against their vast advertising network, but competition is on the horizon, and the new Siri is already much improved and will only get better. Speaking of leverage, does it matter that Meta had to resort to financial engineering to keep data center expenses off the balance sheet?'
on Chateâu de la Treyne - 'Ok, here is the translated Chinese to English text of the Jiemian article TR refers to: https://m.jiemian.com/article/15109695.html Its long but very detailed on the Duo design, design choices, implementation and production challenges, and the choices Apple & Foxconn have to make between Apple Quality standards, so far lower production yields due to hinge and display bottlenecks and assembly yields, production line complexity, learning and tuning, or choosing to relax some quality standards and get yields up. Interesting is the comments that Samsung Foldable display yields are also a bottleneck. You know my choice – stay at Apple’s highest standards, produce what you can of highest quality level products you can make, resist the desire to cut quality for quantity – because ANY quality faults found, especially in such an expensive device, will be long remembered and mocked over any sales crowns. Apple’s quality reputation is built on products such as the Duo, so it can ill afford putting out less than perfect/best they can do products. Certainly Apple and Foxconn will learn from Manufacturing issues and version 2 may address that in the refined or redesigned hinges, and execution phase for next few years. At this point, what it results in is delayed deliveries, IMO, not lost sales. Consider that Samsung only produced and sold about 5M Duo in 2026, and up to 8-10M production capacity for all of 2027. Next post: the article text'
on Chateâu de la Treyne - 'BofA maintained its buy rating on Apple and its $370 Price Objective. The team looked at the potential risks to Apple and the intent of Meta. Apple will always face some level of new and prospective competition. I’m in Apple’s camp on this and see no reason to be overly concerned. Markets will react in the moment and sort it all out later. Will you trust your purchases, transaction security and privacy on your payment means to Meta? Not me.'
on Chateâu de la Treyne - 'The idea that Meta’s software replaces Apple’s hardware is highly “speculative”. The little bit I read on Mohan’s comments were not particularly persuasive.'
on Chateâu de la Treyne - 'I saw a Benzinga report today that seems to be what T R refers to. There’s just a slight problem, though, with that report. It’s somewhat incomplete. I happened to find a more complete explanation of BOA’s comments at StockTwits (love that name, eh). Basically, StokTiwts stated: “ Bank of America reiterated its ‘Buy’ rating on Apple Inc. (AAPL), saying concerns around Meta Platforms Inc.’s Muse AI agent are overdone even as it acknowledged a new risk to Apple’s role in how consumers discover products and start transactions. And “ Whoever owns the agent collects the routing economics that previously accrued to operating systems, search, and app stores, it said, adding, “The risk for Apple is that it can keep every handset sale and still lose discovery, referral, and transaction initiation”. And, “Despite those emerging risks, the firm said it views Apple as an “eventual winner of AI at the edge.” So, including those two additional quotes could certainly have tempered the big sell-off today but Benzinga is Benzinga. Not particularly good, apparently, at including relevant quotes. In kind of a Jim Cramer kinda way'
on Château de Mercuès - 'Some interesting revelations in the filings for Anthropic’s IPO: Revenue in 2025 was nearly $4.6 billion. Operating losses more than doubled in 2025 to more than $8 billion. About $3.8 billion of the 2025 revenue was from customers paying based on how much they use Claude , while subscription revenue was $789 million. Anthropic said it expects the former to comprise “the substantial majority” of its revenue for the foreseeable future. Anthropic paid roughly $351 million back to the platforms in distribution fees, or about 16% of sales. By early 2026, Anthropic’s total long-term commitments exceeded $417 billion. So, in summary: their IPO goal is a $2 trillion valuation… with last year’s revenue of $4.6 billion, an operating loss of $8 billion (more than double the year before), and outstanding long-term commitments of $417 billion. Now that IPO “plan” truly is some financial alchemy!'
on Chateâu de la Treyne - '– Bank of America’s Wamsi Mohan warned Meta’s Muse agent could siphon Apple’s product discovery and transaction revenue, yet kept a Buy rating on AAPL. – A person said to be close to Foxconn’s supply chain told China’s Jiemian News that final assembly yields for Apple’s first foldable iPhone were only slightly above 60% as of September 17. – Apple’s haptic feedback $5.7B trial loss likely to get pared way back. I dont want to make a thing, but if someone feels they could assist, great. It’s always been a great place to catch the headlines, consolidated, and enjoy members quick rebuttals and sanity checks.'
on Chateâu de la Treyne - 'In other news, the tiny post-premarket tail wagged the massive open-market AAPL dog, taking advantage of its minimum volume to influence said open market, which itself barely managed a lackluster 38 M trading volume, closing down 3.25% for the day, And as Apple is still buying in the open market (it still being September), yet more undervalued stock just got removed from Apple’s float, which makes me a very happy camper.'
on Chateâu de la Treyne - 'Like most of us, you are advanced in years. I hope you are grooming someone to take over when you decide you don’t want to do it anymore. PS, I imagine that would be a rare person, much like yourself.'
on Château de Mercuès - 'Totally agree, Gregg. Thanks, Bart! And thanks, Mr. Federighi! Apple and its users are indeed fortunate to have such a great communicator in their stable!'
on Chateâu de la Treyne - 'What he said! As long as you keep the travel photos coming, I’m OK with the current level of contribution. But more photos, particularly of castle interiors, would also be appreciated.'
on Chateâu de la Treyne - 'We’re managing, PED, as I hope you can see. Keep having a blast, and no worries! Signed, Friends of Philip Elmer DeWitt30.com!'
on This week's Apple trading strategies (9/28-10/2/26) - 'One more: ROI/share from buybacks alone on AAPL bought pre-buyback as of 9:40 AM PDT: (331/72.30=) about 458%. And those metrics continue to compound since Apple’s net cash flow continues to be under-appreciated, giving Apple the chance to buy back even more undervalued stock – even as I type…. Congrats to the Apple longs!'
on This week's Apple trading strategies (9/28-10/2/26) - 'I agree, Robert. As of June 6th, since 2013, Apple has spent about $853 billion buying back its own stock Other comparative metrics to be watched include: Total number of split-adjusted shares bought back: (26.5-14.7=) 11.8 B Percentage of shares bought back: (11.8/26.5=) 44.53% Apple’s average cost per split-adjusted share: (853/11.8=) $72.30/share.'
on Château de Mercuès - '” https://youtu.be/y227RF0smAg?is=f1Yk_LzvuZY5iua6%27” Wow. Just WoW. Thank you Bart. There are foldables, then there is Duo.'


