Philip Elmer-DeWitt on Apple event: Found in translation - 'Looked to me like a total eclipse of the sun.'
on Premarket: Apple is red - 'Max pain and Call mountain and Put peak are ALL at 310. Quite likely, that’s the anchor then. With Nvidia reporting blowout earnings last evening with a forecast of 70% growth compared to Apple’s 10%, there will be some big money flowing out of AAPL into NVDA. I hope I’m wrong!'
on Apple event: Found in translation - 'Also, apart from the space gray, the other rumored colors of the iPhone 18 Pro are all there in the invite image. The light blue is obvious.'
on Evercore: 'The Little Mac That AI Can' - 'But that’s a classic book. I think AI can, I think AI can…'
on Apple event: Found in translation - 'When I first saw notice of the event, I got it as “rise and shine “ before I realized what it actually said. For the US, the reference to this other phase seems intentional. I saw it as a reference to John Ternus waking up the product line. In other countries, that other phrase wouldn’t work.'
on Apple event: Found in translation - 'I’ll tell you what I think may be up: I think the first product won’t be a foldable iPhone, but a foldable iPad mini. It makes far more sense to me to have an iPad that folds the screen inwards and protects it while simultaneously permitting a larger screen than creating a far more expensive iPhone with three screens. Think about it: If the screen’s on the outside, then the cameras are going to be on the back, so it will require 3 screens; the one on the outside with the cameras on the back, and the ones in the middle. But why not just make a foldable iPad that can also be used as a smartphone – AND keep the price down? In fact, the only reason I can think that you’d want a full screen on the outside is so that, like now, you can see what you’re photographing or videoing. But for that, you don’t really need a full-sized screen, and if you want to take a picture or video, you can just unfold the iPad Fold…. So a camera on both sides of an iPad Fold, and maybe a small viewfinder screen. Makes sense to me….'
on Apple investors: Mark your calendars for 9/9/26 - 'BINGO! Go to the head of the class, Bart! And that, my friends, is pure Bart. No AI on the planet can even come close to that kind of deep and meaningful insight. Sure, he showed us how AI can help build a base of factual information, but it takes that little thing called human ingenuity to even begin to know where to look, let alone synthesize a genius answer. Bravo, Bart!!!'
on Premarket: Apple is red - 'The shenanigans of the after/pre-options market continues. Considering the leverage the tiny amount of shares traded there have (a 10% swing overnight is “normal”? Really?? Don’t make me laugh!), and how much cash some individuals are now worth, it’s absurdly easy for the exceedingly deep-pocketed to make book by playing this “game” over and over ad infinitum. The only saving grace is Apple’s ability to buy back its own stock over and over at the resulting lower prices – which is the only reason I personally tolerate this ridiculous options gambit. Which doesn’t make it right. And the SEC? Especially the SEC with an Administration in power that is being actively aided and abetted by the Party of the Hugely Wealthy? How is it that half the country is blind to what’s going on here? Or are they just that incredibly selfish? Again, don’t make me laugh, because underneath that laughter is my awareness of the deep anguish being caused in the name of making a highly immoral buck.'
on Apple investors: Mark your calendars for 9/9/26 - 'Thinking along similar lines, I’ve speculated that Apple priced an unannounced memory subsidy into iPhone 18 handsets. No matter emerging technologies, the iPhone is Apple’s revenue driver. It would be incumbent on Apple to maintain prior iPhone pricing during the iPhone 18/19 model years. By then the demand surge for memory may have mostly returned to historic levels, as will memory pricing. I like your extrapolation of Apple’s money management, something WS has failed to do. Apple’s Guidance, when it comes, for FQ1/27 is going to be very interesting.'
on Apple investors: Mark your calendars for 9/9/26 - 'Here’s the fun part. Remember in Q2 FY2026, Apple buy back repurchases were curtailed from roughly $25B per quarter over the past 6 quarters to just $11B for Q2, and very little or none at all was purchased in February and March of 2026, “saving” ~$14B in expenses. What are the chances that the $14B saved was then allocated (with $11B more from FCF) to make a preemptive $25B DRAM memory purchases, securing reasonably abundant supply for the entire sales year of new iPhone 18 & Ultra series, and ensuring that most if not all iPhones (save for 17e and 18e) are fully equipped to run Apple Intelligence and local Edge AI? This action would dovetail with the Earnings call statement by Kevan: “Taking a step back, we plan to continue our capital allocation philosophy of first making all the necessary investments needed to support the business, and then returning excess cash to shareholders over time. Net cash neutral has been a valuable framework for our capital structure, and since 2018, we have significantly right-sized our balance sheet and reduced net cash by over $100 billion. As we move ahead, we are no longer providing net cash neutral as a formal target and we will independently evaluate cash and debt.” And in Q&A: “We believe we’re at a stage where evaluating cash and debt independently is really the right approach for us and allows us to make more optimal economic decisions around how we best utilize our debt and cash portfolios to support the business, based on business factors and market conditions. We also believe we can manage this flexibility while also being very efficient and disciplined. So with all that being said, we remain very committed to returning excess cash to shareholders. As we talked about our investment in the business, I think as you know, we invest in the business first and foremost and then look to kind of return excess cash to shareholders. I think we have a very good track record of being disciplined. We’ve returned over a trillion dollars to shareholders from the start of the program, over 850 billion of which has been through share repurchases, and so the other piece as well that’s really important is as part of that, we also have increased our buyback authorization by another $100 billion, and that’s on top of the leftover capacity from the prior authorization. So you can see the capital return piece is something very important to us, and as we talked about in the prepared remarks, important to the overall approach to delivering long-term shareholder value.” Considering Apple is now moving away from the supply constrained 3nm processes that were used for its high demand & volume iPhones 16’s & 17’s, and M4 & M5 Macs, they’ve probably purchased sufficient (for now) supply of DRAM at least for iPhones, iPads, and Macs for one year’s worth of production, assuming no outrageous demand “problems”. By bankrolling and prepaying for over 50% of TSMC’s 2nm wafers and chip production (for A20, A20 Pro, for iPhone 18’s, M5/M6 Macs and iPad chips, and R2’s for Vision Pro, assuming they’ve ordered plenty, they should have few constraints for the 2027 fiscal sales year, again unless unprecedented demand overwhelms even the loftiest of Apple supply projections, a great problem to have.'
on Premarket: Apple was red, turned green - 'Apple ended Wednesday trading up $3.55 on the day at $313.45. The shares reached a high on the day of $315.43 in the last twenty minutes of trading. Overnight the shares have given back much of the day’s gains. At 1:45am on Thursday in New York the shares are off $2.99 at $310.46.'
on Apple investors: Mark your calendars for 9/9/26 - 'Hmm… Probably an opportune time for “One more thing…”, given it’s going to be Ternus’ first outing. Start off with a bang.'
on Premarket: Apple was red, turned green - 'After closing off $3.39 at $209.66 ahead of earnings, overnight NVIDIA’s shares are trading up $11.50 following earnings and the conference call. Year-to-date the shares are up 12.42% at today’s closing price. That compares to a rise in the S&P 500 of 12.13%. We’ll see what tomorrow brings and whether or not the shares can hold the greater than 5% overnight gains in response to earnings results and guidance.'
on Apple investors: Mark your calendars for 9/9/26 - 'I appreciate that Bart is asking very interesting questions. * Thumbs up and hearts* After the initial wow factor of using these systems, I’m no longer impressed by any of them. The way I’ll know when these “AI” systems are truly intelligent is when they write with the brevity and poignancy of someone like Steve Jobs. These all read like an internal Microsoft memo, 5000+ words where 500 or less would do. When something of the quality of “Thoughts on Flash” is produced, then I’ll take notice. Or if they can answer a question about a book that they have clearly ingested, but failed to understand in a way that aids my memory about it.'
on Apple investors: Mark your calendars for 9/9/26 - 'Bart, while I highly respect you, please stop with the AI slop. I care what you think not Gemini or any other AI…'
on Apple's August bombshells (videos) - 'A Studio is overkill, agreed, from a personal purchase budget & use case POV. So far, with my M4 Pro Mac Mini, the cloud AI agents I use (Comet, Runway, Suno) are pretty good. Even better, when I choose the processing to ‘computer’, it processes faster. Both off-cloud & time-to-output speed on my Mini is helping me conserve my monthly Ai credits = $ saved.'
on Apple's August bombshells (videos) - 'Hi, Fred, Another earlier discussion with my stepson may reveal both an issue for Apple and a possible path forward. “I was researching the plausibility for Apple to be at the forefront of this “trustless peer to peer LLM/AI compute network” (which clearly would be revenue generating). There is actually a constraint and I haven’t yet figured out an effective way around it. NVIDIA, AMD and Intel hardware has something called a “Trusted Execution Environment” (TEE, for short), which is cryptographically verifiable execution of AI compute in a fully confidential/private way (i.e., RAM and bus are all encrypted and the hardware owner can’t even see what is being run or computed). Apple hardware has something called a “Secure Enclave” which I thought could handle that, but it turns out it can’t be extended to LLM inference. It only can be used for secure key exchange. Apple needs to extend its Secure Enclave hardware capabilities so it works with MLX and the unified memory systems. At that point, you can have fully private local inference where the hardware owner won’t know what is being computed or what messages are being passed back and forth. Then, the install base of all compatible Macintosh machines could be leveraged in a peer to peer fashion for a “world computer” AI — trustless, secure, private, permissionless AI. (We even could add further capabilities like individual fine-tuning, etc., but that’s later.)” Later, he posted this: “Also, ARM (what M4 and M5s are built around) has a spec called Realms, that allow lower privileged software (e.g., an application or VM) to protect its content and execution from attacks or monitoring by higher-privileged software such as the OS or hypervisor. It’s optional and Apple hasn’t announced support for that functional standard. As soon as Apple supports ARM Realms, distributed, peer-to-peer, trust-less, private/confidential AI is possible with the Mac user base providing the compute fabric.”'
on Apple investors: Mark your calendars for 9/9/26 - 'Now here’s an interesting question I posed to Gemini: “how much would it have cost Apple to buy enough DRAM memory in Q1 2026 to supply 200 million iPhones for fiscal year 2027?” “Purchasing enough mobile DRAM in Q1 2026 to supply 200 million iPhones for 2027 would have cost Apple an estimated $14.4 billion to $18 billion for baseline configurations, climbing up to $24 billion if accounting for Pro model specifications. The calculation depends on the specific baseline component pricing and rumored hardware memory maps from the first quarter of 2026: The Cost Breakdown Framework • The Baseline Q1 2026 Price: Before the massive Q2 2026 price spike hit the industry, conventional mobile LPDDR5/5X DRAM sat at a baseline contract price of roughly $10 per GB. If applying Apple’s historic scale and bulk-purchasing power, an estimated high-volume contract rate would average around $8 to $10 per GB. • The 2027 iPhone Memory Profile (iPhone 18): Supply chain data reveals that Apple’s lower-end 2027 iPhones (such as the base iPhone 18 and 18e) are mapped to feature 9GB of DRAM (utilizing an A20 chip with 1.5GB x 6 dies), while premium Pro models require 12GB of DRAM. Simulated Purchase Scenarios Allocation Strategy RAM per Phone Total Volumetric RAM Needed Total Estimated Q1 Cost All Base-Model Allocation 9 GB 1.8 Billion GB $14.4B – $18.0 Billion All Pro-Model Allocation 12 GB 2.4 Billion GB $19.2B – $24.0 billion ⚠️ The Strategic Impact of the 2026 Memory Crisis Had Apple waited past Q1 2026 to negotiate those allocations, the financial exposure would have doubled. By mid-2026, mobile DRAM pricing surged by nearly 100% quarter-over-quarter, hitting upward of $19.30 to $21.00 per GB. According to analysis from JPMorgan and the Financial Times, this ongoing AI infrastructure supply squeeze means that memory is on track to account for up to 45% of an iPhone’s total component costs by 2027 (up from just 10% historically). This massive cost shift is precisely why Apple has aggressively lobbied to open access to alternative Chinese memory suppliers and why global RAM production capacity is already fully sold out through 2027.” “how about 230M iPhones of all types, and use the Feb-March 2026 months for memory costs?” “Securing enough mobile DRAM during the February–March 2026 window for a full multi-tier production run of 230 million iPhones would have cost Apple an estimated $19.3 billion to $24.8 billion. Locking in orders during these exact months represents a critical “last chance” window right before the absolute worst of the 2026 memory crisis upended the industry. The Volumetric RAM Map Industry analysis indicates Apple is moving away from uniform 8GB capacities across the board. The upcoming generational lineup splits the 230 million hardware allocations into two specific configurations: • The Baseline Allocation (9GB per phone): The standard iPhone models are mapped for 9GB of LPDDR5X DRAM to handle localized iOS 27 Apple Intelligence tasks. • The Premium Allocation (12GB per phone): The high-end Pro, Pro Max, and upcoming Fold models require 12GB of DRAM. Purchase Cost Breakdown (Feb-March 2026) During February and March 2026, TrendForce tracked mobile contract prices rising rapidly, solidifying standard high-tier baseline procurement costs at $10.00 per GB. Even factoring in Apple’s typical high-volume market leverage, the sheer size of the order means the absolute lowest bulk discount tier would likely sit at $8.00 per GB. Depending on how Apple splits its manufacturing volume between entry-level and Pro units, the financial breakdown scales as follows: • Scenario A: Balanced 50/50 Product Mix (115M Base / 115M Pro) -> Total Volumetric RAM: 2.42 Billion GB -> Estimated Total Cost: $19.32 Billion to $24.15 Billion • Scenario B: Premium-Heavy 40/60 Product Mix (92M Base / 138M Pro) -> Total Volumetric RAM: 2.48 Billion GB -> Estimated Total Cost: $19.87 Billion to $24.84 Billion Why the Feb-March Timeline was a High-Stakes Gamble Had Apple delayed this massive capital expenditure by even a few weeks, the price tag would have broken the bank: • The Q2 Explosion: Immediately following March, mobile DRAM contract prices suffered a historic 93% to 98% quarter-over-quarter surge, driving baseline component costs past $19.00 per GB. • The Rejection of Discounts: Suppliers like China’s memory giant CXMT began flatly rejecting Apple’s attempts to negotiate lower bulk prices, as AI data centers simultaneously bought out entire production pipelines at maximum market rates. Because Apple had to absorb these massive baseline procurement increases, it explains why outgoing leadership publicly warned Wall Street that price hikes are coming to consumer hardware to maintain Apple’s near-50% gross margins.'
on Apple's August bombshells (videos) - 'Hi, Fred. A casual search on Apple News gave me this: https://apple.news/AgPo0dTF1QcyY97YOVoVOEA We can’t compare specifications yet because we don’t know them yet. But what we can say is that Apple, with this announcement, is saying it’s not letting any grass grow under its feet.'
on Apple investors: Mark your calendars for 9/9/26 - 'Here’s Gemini’s breakdown of the last 6 September events: Expanding on the flagship fall events from 2020 through 2025, here is the breakdown of when each iPhone officially hit store shelves (retail release date) and the major companion hardware that debuted alongside them. 📱 2025 Event (“Awe Dropping”) Keynote Date: Tuesday, September 9, 2025 In-Store Release Date: Friday, September 19, 2025 iPhone Lineup: iPhone 17, iPhone 17 Pro, iPhone 17 Pro Max, & the ultra-thin iPhone Air Co-Launched Hardware: Apple Watch Series 11, Apple Watch Ultra 3, and AirPods Pro 3. 📱 2024 Event (“It’s Glowtime”) Keynote Date: Monday, September 9, 2024 In-Store Release Date: Friday, September 20, 2024 iPhone Lineup: iPhone 16, 16 Plus, 16 Pro, @ 16 Pro Max Co-Launched Hardware: Apple Watch Series 10, an updated Apple Watch Ultra 2 (Satin Black), and AirPods 4 (both standard and Active Noise Cancellation variants). 📱 2023 Event (“Wonderlust”) Keynote Date: Tuesday, September 12, 2023 In-Store Release Date: Friday, September 22, 2023 iPhone Lineup: iPhone 15, 15 Plus, 15 Pro, & 15 Pro Max (introducing USB-C and Titanium frames) Co-Launched Hardware: Apple Watch Series 9, the original Apple Watch Ultra 2, and a refreshed version of AirPods Pro 2 featuring a USB-C charging case. 📱 2022 Event (“Far Out”) Keynote Date: Wednesday, September 7, 2022 In-Store Release Date: Friday, September 16, 2022 (Note: The iPhone 14 Plus was delayed to October 7). iPhone Lineup: iPhone 14, 14 Plus, 14 Pro, and 14 Pro Max Co-Launched Hardware: Apple Watch Series 8, the first-generation Apple Watch Ultra, Apple Watch SE (2nd Gen), and AirPods Pro 2 (Lightning version). 📱 2021 Event (“California Streaming”) Keynote Date: Tuesday, September 14, 2021 In-Store Release Date: Friday, September 24, 2021 iPhone Lineup: iPhone 13, 13 mini, 13 Pro, and 13 Pro Max Co-Launched Hardware: Apple Watch Series 7, iPad (9th Gen), and the completely redesigned iPad mini (6th Gen). 📱 2020 Event (“Hi, Speed”) Keynote Date: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 (Delayed from September due to global supply chain disruptions) In-Store Release Date: Staggered; iPhone 12 and 12 Pro arrived on October 23, 2020, while the 12 mini and 12 Pro Max arrived on November 13, 2020. iPhone Lineup: iPhone 12, 12 mini, 12 Pro, & 12 Pro Max (introducing 5G & MagSafe) Co-Launched Hardware: HomePod mini. (Note: The Apple Watch Series 6 and SE 1st Gen were actually broken out into a separate, earlier event in September 2020). So the event and availability has moved around a bit but generally second week of September event, third to fourth week availability. There are some big reasons for going a touch earlier this year: 1) Apple must feel pretty darn confident about its supply chain + overcoming advanced node processor supply & yield constraints from prior N3 processes, especially moving to & w/new 2nm (N2) TSMC nodes for M6 Mac and A20/A20 Pro iPhone 18 & presumably Ultra SoC’s, and the slightly older 3nm N3e M5 chips. This bodes very well for the coming year’s chip supplies and I don’t think Apple will underestimate demand and supply needs again. The Mac NEO will likely update to the more available A19 Pro chip of iPhone 17 Pro models. 2) Apple must feel pretty darn confident about its DRAM and SSD chip supplies despite the enormous cost increases that have and will occur for this cycle. Being able to judge demand early and for Q1 into Q2 will make supply chain management easier while maybe creating FOMO if delivery times stretch. Win-win 3) the slightly earlier Ultra Foldable introduction will directly induce comparisons and competition for Samsung’s recent Z Fold8 & Z Fold8 Ultra’s as well as Huawei’s recent Pura & Mate Foldables. IMO, both Samsung’s & Huawei’s sales momentum will slow significantly as Apple’s Ultra hits the market, especially Huawei’s in China. Oppo, Honor, Vivo & Xiaomi Foldables will be similarly affected. IMO, the Ultra will sell >7.5-8.5M (if not more) units in 2H2026, immediately taking almost 50% of the Folding types and >35% of all Foldables 2026 sales.'
on Premarket: Apple was red, turned green - 'The Nvidia earnings results should boost the entire market tomorrow. $64 billion in operating income and they forecast revenue growth of 70%. They will soon be making $100 billion or more per quarter.'
on Apple's August bombshells (videos) - 'Joseph, it’s great to hear the assessment from your stepson. Please ask him to compare with Nvidia’s announced, but not yet shipping, RTX Spark with unified memory. Since it’s not shipping, it’s OK to wait, or to just get good guesses. The developer perspective matters. Nvidia offers CUDA, but saddles it on to a Window system – ugh. Apple offers Metal, MLX and CoreML running on elegant, secure MacOS.'
on Premarket: Apple was red, turned green - 'Re: #4. News seems to indicate that those infilled early orders were upgraded to the new models – for free!'
on Premarket: Apple was red, turned green - 'Yes. What would happen if all the cities and states in the USA that have given major tax breaks to attract businesses were to have the Supreme Court decide that those breaks were – retroactively – illegal and require the companies to refund all the breaks? Plus interest!'
on Premarket: Apple was red, turned green - '@Joseph, Low again at ~29M. Much of that was in the last few minutes. Weird.'
on Apple investors: Mark your calendars for 9/9/26 - '@Joseph The iPhone 17 was also released on 9/9 last year. It is usually around this date depending on the vagaries of the calendar.'
on Premarket: Apple was red, turned green - 'Richard, these new iPhone and Mac lease programs have some interesting potential effects for Apple and its users. 1. Apple can effectively raise prices enough to cover the (continued rising, hopefully short term 1-2 years) memory price increases thrust upon them by Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron (the Big Three). 2. The lease programs allow users and developers to effectively and efficiently manage their AI compute cash flows for the very latest M5 and M6 equipped Macs for defined periods of leased time. 3. Apple gets to sell reasonably highly profitable, high performance, energy efficient Macs at essentially leased terms, while booking direct sales in the quarter they are sold. 4. While not yet clear, users still waiting on previous M4 Mac back orders may decide to cancel and reorder with slightly higher costs but significantly more power (the typical Apple upgrade scenario) or Apple may suggest it to them. 5. Because of these direct lease programs, Apple will have more direct engagement in the online Apple Store and probably more foot traffic in physical Apple Stores. This reduces dependence on carriers and third party resellers like Best Buy and Amazon to a degree. 6. What I really like about the lease programs is that Apple users can then upgrade at lease end or pay the balance and keep, their choice. If they keep, win-win for both users and Apple. If users upgrade to the latest Macs and iPhones, it actually shortens the hardware upgrade cycle for a growing user group, making the lease program an upgrade accelerator. Win-win again. 7. Last but not probably least or finally, with lease end upgrades, Apple gets amortized and probably well kept good condition last gen Macs directly returned for inspection and refurbishment. Products deemed unsellable can have their LPDDR5 and 5X memory harvested for reuse. The rest can now be cleaned, batteries replaced (iPhones), repackaged, and then put up directly in Apple’s online refurbished store at discount to current models. In the case of Macs, it might be at worst, 80-90% of its original sales price, maybe 20% discount to current higher priced Mac’s. Either way, Apple now sees more direct refurbished revenues flowing to itself, rather than seeing traded-in models going to third party refurbishers and resellers where Apple see NONE of that resold revenues. Win-win for Apple. 7a. Depending on the market, this newer refurbished hardware and revenue stream may allow Apple to send more refurbished iPhone and Mac products to price sensitive markets, literally allowing Apple to address lower price tiers (midrange and upper midrange) without the CapEx and expense of designing, building assembly lines, and BOM costs of new, less profitable models. Instead, they can resell already built, used and traded in refurbished models, having the unit generate revenues all over again for the same unit chassis, this time Apple seeing direct revenue generation. And don’t forget the eventual Services growth (App Store, AppleCare, subscriptions) and install base growth in both iPhones and now Macs. Because of the hardware longevity & reliability, and long term iOS and MacOS support, Apple can now capture more of the refurbished market revenues rather than cede them to third parties. I would predict the upper third of interested Apple users would use and trust direct Apple refurbished (with warranties and AppleCare support) more so than others if given a choice. This could mark a gradual but long term shift in Apple user purchasing and leasing behaviors. Even when memory prices drop or recede, the programs will still be advantageous to Apple. Ding-ding-ding!! 💸 💰 💵 Win-win-win!!'
on Premarket: Apple was red, turned green - 'Yesterday was an almost absurdly low 25 M AAPL trades (56 M is “average”). Today is looking to be low as well, although that’s still a few minutes off. The future is looking brighter by the minute for AAPL share price appreciation, so those sitting on the sidelines might end up kicking themselves. Just sayin’….'


