Recent Comments

  • Robert Paul Leitao on Evercore hikes its Apple target $25 to $325 - 'David: I agree a “new and improved” Siri is not only essential for the benefit of Apple’a global bases of product users, it’s also essential to reestablishing Apple’s credibility and confidence in the company’s ability to deliver on AI-bases solutions. I use Siri all day, everyday. It is, in my view and as Gregg suggests, getting marginally better both in speed of responses and in accuracy of responses. My employer provides access to the Microsoft 365 productivity platform and I use Copilot throughout my work day. Although it’s a different style of AI integration than Siri, I find it quite useful for research and fact finding tasks. I’m looking forward to what Apple will eventually deliver to the market and its global user base no later than this spring.'
  • Ted Kluger on Mark Gurman: Apple's AI and robotics teams are draining talent - 'Well Zuckerberg already blew $77 billion on the Metaverse, the last big dream (fantasy?) he chased, even renamed the company after it. Were there any repercussions from that mega-moonshot waste of capital?'
  • Rodney Avilla on Gov. Newsom 'begrudges' Apple's fealty to Trump, but Cook's not so much (video) - 'If Newsom wind the presidency, I bet he won’t begrudge apple’s fealty to himself'
  • Rodney Avilla on Saturday Apple video: 'I'm not remarkable' - 'It is amazing that some who are born with short straws are able to get more out of the cup (of life) than those who are born with long straws.'
  • John Konopka on Mark Gurman: Apple's AI and robotics teams are draining talent - '@Bill The other side of the coin is that Meta is losing talent in spite of the high salaries offered. https://biztechweekly.com/metas-ai-talent-exodus-why-mark-zuckerbergs-1-billion-recruitment-strategy-faces-setbacks-amid-internal-turmoil-and-ethical-concerns/'
  • Stephen Gordon on Mark Gurman: Apple's AI and robotics teams are draining talent - 'Remember when Apple was doomed after Ives’ departure? Me neither.'
  • David Emery on Mark Gurman: Apple's AI and robotics teams are draining talent - 'In particular, would ‘noncompete’ terms apply and be enforceable?'
  • Gregg Thurman on Evercore hikes its Apple target $25 to $325 - 'Mid to upper 300’s a year from now? At the moment I’m modeling $375 by JAN 2027. That’s dependent on the launch of a revised Apple Vision Pro and Vision Store with games, movies and live sports at WWDC.'
  • David Emery on Mark Gurman: Apple's AI and robotics teams are draining talent - 'PED said That said, I’d like to hear more about Ke Yang abandoning his Siri search team after only weeks in the job. Yeah, and I wonder what kind of contractual penalties applied to Yang. My ignorant guess would be “culture mismatch” of some kind.'
  • David Emery on Mark Gurman: Apple's AI and robotics teams are draining talent - 'Bad news on Apple brings clicks.'
  • David Emery on Evercore hikes its Apple target $25 to $325 - 'A ‘new and improved Siri’ is essential for AAPL to move. (And I write that as someone who doesn’t use Siri.) But I sure hope there’s more to Apple’s investment in AI ‘infrastructure for the edge’ showing up in Apple apps and 3rd party apps.'
  • Bill Donahue on Mark Gurman: Apple's AI and robotics teams are draining talent - 'The fact that Gurman only ever talks about one half of the picture – who’s leaving Apple – and never the other half – who’s going to Apple – ensures that I almost never pay any attention to what he says or concludes about the talent flow related to anything Apple is doing. And if Apple is indeed not be prioritizing development of its own LLM, it would be great news to me and an indicator of the high competence and strategic insight of senior Apple management, rather than the panic signal that Gurman wants it to be.'
  • David Thall on Mark Gurman: Apple's AI and robotics teams are draining talent - 'Gurman is becoming a cliché of himself. His penchant for putting a negative spin on everything Apple does undermines any journalistic objectivity he may have once had. To wit: “But there’s been a broader collapse within Apple’s artificial intelligence organization…” And “Roughly a dozen other top AI researchers have left the organization, which is suffering from low morale.” From this horse shit interpretation you’d think Apple was going over a cliff. MY TAKE: What Apple is doing is good news. It is refreshing itself. It is getting rid of old wood and upgrading an important new category with new blood that apparently could use it. THE FUTURE From what’s being churned out by the rumor mill, it appears the entire human race is hell-bent on replacing itself with artificial intelligence. Consequently, the stock market analysts see the rise and fall of every Tech company is now dependent on how quickly they throw money at it. It’s been written that self-generating AI is historic on the level of the industrial revolution, splitting the atom, or inventing the Internet – and some believe is in affect the human race giving birth to a new species. With the logical conclusion that this self-generating superior – inevitably sentient and self-aware intelligence – will grow to be more powerful than anything we could control. Pardon me if I’m getting a bit verbose. But I grew up reading and watching sci-fi based on this fun idea – arguably the most popular movie genre out there today. That said… All significant new technology takes years before it affects the economy, culture, and changes people’s lives. It’s ironical, Apple is doing what genAI is supposed to do. Improve itself and get smarter exponentially at breakneck speed. The difference between Apple and AI, is that Apple is still driven by human values. And unlike tech companies like META – values human privacy and security above profit. There is no finish line. Until we’re completely replaced, of course. It’s only a matter of time before Gurman is replaced by an AI. If he hasn’t been already.'
  • Charles A. on Evercore hikes its Apple target $25 to $325 - 'Mid to upper 300’s a year from now?'
  • Gregg Thurman on Evercore hikes its Apple target $25 to $325 - 'Amit’s forecast aligns with my own, although I lean more towards WWDC as a catalyst going forward. Recently I’ve noticed SIRI functioning better. This is a sample of one so should be taken with a grain of salt, mostly because historically I don’t use it that much.'
  • Robert Paul Leitao on Evercore hikes its Apple target $25 to $325 - '@PED: I agree. Once Apple announces and delivers a conspicuously updated and further AI infused version of Siri the share price will rock. It’s been 18 months since the highly public announcements at WWDC 2024 and the world is still waiting for Apple to deliver on its promises. I believe the company will keep to its word and the share price (as well as the global user base) will definitely benefit as the company finally delivers on its commitment to its customers.'
  • David Drinkwater on Mark Gurman: Johny Srouji is talking about leaving Apple - 'Intel might also be a possibility, if Apple is seriously looking at a return to Intel for chips. I see this as a potentially valuable offer from Apple to Intel to take a whole lot of Apple knowledge to a potential new manufacturer.'
  • Gregg Thurman on Mark Gurman: Apple's AI and robotics teams are draining talent - 'Gurman should take a look at META. Apple’s employee turnover pales in comparison. The media doesn’t report on that, possibly because nobody cares about Zuckerberg and META. Its hires on the other hand are reported because the compensation packages are so extreme.'
  • David Drinkwater on Counterpoint: With Apple's entry, 2026 will be a breakout year for foldables - 'Is it just me, or does it seem more a propos for Apple to delay a foldable iPhone until 2027, the twentieth anniversary of the Original iPhone? Yes, it might look like a year (or two) of lost sales, but given the perceived average turnaround of about three years (not necessarily PED 3.0 readers, but general population), that would really not be a huge fail. I am certainly very interested to see what next September holds for the next iPhone release, but I’m also not gonna make any wagers or predictions.'
  • Robert Paul Leitao on This week's Apple trading strategies (12/8-12/12/25) - 'David: Congratulations on your success with WMT shares! I posted recently WMT begins trading this week on Nasdaq. It’s delisting from the NYSE. The impetus is management considers it a tech company and believes there’s a benefit to being a component of the Nasdaq 100. The company is investing heavily in technology and years ago I believed it was a better investment than Amazon if I wanted exposure in the retail space. That turned out to be correct. Now I’m am looking at Amazon and consider AMZN oversold. I recently entered my first position ever in Amazon and intend to keep my positions in Walmart for the long run.'
  • graham prudhomme on Mark Gurman: Johny Srouji is talking about leaving Apple - 'I think that’s exactly right, Gregg. I think Amazon would be the only destination that could make any sense. Obviously NVDA’s business is aligned with Johny’s skillset, but one doesn’t get the sense that they are in desperate need of a change of direction or strategy at the top. None of the other companies that could afford him (or that operate at a large enough scale) are serious enough about hardware. I don’t see Meta, Google, etc., making a large enough strategic bet to making hiring Srouji make sense. Amazon is the one possible exception; they see strategic value in designing their own hardware to run their own data centers. It isn’t inconceivable that they might make a run at emulating Apple’s M-series program in-house. Maybe Microsoft, if you squint, and imagine them wanting to be more competitive with Windows on ARM? It just doesn’t seem to be in their DNA right now. Massive scale companies aside, what are the other alternatives? A startup? Timing seems very poor for fund raising a new startup at the level of investment that would be required in this space.'
  • David Drinkwater on Mark Gurman: Apple's AI and robotics teams are draining talent - 'It’s a funny thing. I had a conversation about management roles recently. I don’t recall the who it was with, but fundamentally the answer was this: “Being a manager sucks. You have to do a lot of things you don’t want to do.” So maybe the management churn is a function of people waking up and realizing, “I don’t want to do this anymore.” Also, I gotta think, if you’ve spent four or five years close to the sun (i.e. Tim Cook), you’ve been well enough compensated that you can choose to do what you want – even if that simply means chasing more money … or no money at all.'
  • David Drinkwater on Mark Gurman: Johny Srouji is talking about leaving Apple - '“Knowing Eddie gets bonuses based on movement in AAPL, I would think this is the rankest fiction.” What’s your basis for this claim? I know Eddie is a baseless rumor-monger, but this comment also deserves backing.'
  • David Drinkwater on This week's Apple trading strategies (12/8-12/12/25) - 'I’ve used WMT for my gifts of appreciated securities this year. The action over the last week is definitely beneficial to my beneficiaries.'
  • Steven Philips on Mark Gurman: Apple's AI and robotics teams are draining talent - 'I wonder if all the mega bucks Meta is spending to buy all the talent will eventually come back to bite them. Kind of like all the financial commitments to AI. Maybe they’ll be successful. Or not. It might force Apple to start paying mega bucks as well. This is probably at the heart of any dissatisfaction.'
  • Ted Kluger on Mark Gurman: Apple's AI and robotics teams are draining talent - 'As Grrman portrays this, it seems it’s a problem unique to Apple. I’d appreciate a more balanced view of the ebb and flow of job changes across Silicon Valley, some stats on the overall amount of migration typically seen between companies, but then that wouldn’t generate as many clicks as “Apple is doomed,” I suspect.'
  • Robert Paul Leitao on This week's Apple trading strategies (12/8-12/12/25) - 'Entering this week’s trading, below is the market cap scoreboard of the Terrific Ten. These are the 10 largest enterprises ranked by this metric. NVIDIA (NVDA) $4.43 trillion Apple (AAPL) $4.12 trillion Alphabet (GOOG) $3.88 trillion Microsoft (MSFT) $3.59 trillion Amazon (AMZN) $2.45 trillion Broadcom (AVGO) $ 1.84 trillion Meta Platforms (META) $1.70 trillion Tesla (TSLA) $1.51 trillion Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM) $1.21 trillion Berkshire Hathaway (BRK) $1.09 trillion Special mention today of Walmart which is #11 on the market cap list at $0.918 trillion and is up 13.44% over the past month.'
  • Les Surdykowski on Mark Gurman: Apple's AI and robotics teams are draining talent - 'The higher the VIX, the higher the clicks. Or in less financial terms, if it bleeds, it leads.'
  • Gregg Thurman on This week's Apple trading strategies (12/8-12/12/25) - 'If they’re connected to media you know they’re going to exploit a big nothing burger into something it isn’t.'
  • Greg Lippert on Mark Gurman: Johny Srouji is talking about leaving Apple - 'FUD The Eddie trifecta'