Recent Comments

  • Robert Paul Leitao on Premarket: Apple is red - 'Apple ended Thursday trading at $260.49, up $1.59 on the day. This is Apple’s highest closing price since March 11th.'
  • Jonny T on Apple orders fewer foldable iPhones than expected - 'Apple WILL sell every foldable they can make. Move fast if you want one early on I’d say. Myself included, no buyer of the Apple Vision Pro ever thought it was going to be something in use everyday. Still nothing like putting it on and seeing the future every now and again!'
  • Romeo Esparrago on Horace Dediu: At sweet 16, iPad still hits sweet spot - 'I hear you, Daniel. 🙂 Which led to my ↓ post.'
  • Romeo Esparrago on Horace Dediu: At sweet 16, iPad still hits sweet spot - '( I used to work at the  PowerBook Factory in Fountain back in the 1990’s, then later Colorado Springs & Loveland when I worked for HP & Agilent. Visiting old haunts, and former co-team members/now longtime friends )'
  • Romeo Esparrago on Horace Dediu: At sweet 16, iPad still hits sweet spot - 'Still getting used to my iPad/Mac Mini workflow vs my use-anywhere-anyhow-MBP workflow. Will I stick with it? We’ll see. If I had to return to using a MacBook as my travel computer, the Gen1 Neo seems not ready to be able to support my FCP req’ts, so maybe a MBair, as I want to continue having a relatively lightweight travel computer. Again, we’ll see. But so far, I’m forcing my iPad to be my traveling sweet spot (I’m typing this in Sarap Filipino Restaurant, Colorado Springs right now as part of my Retirement Tour/Colorado leg).'
  • Romeo Esparrago on Horace Dediu: At sweet 16, iPad still hits sweet spot - 'When I retired earlier this year, I replaced my workhorse M3 MBP Pro Max with an M5 iPad Pro and an M4 Pro Mac Mini. I got the iPad Pro so I could use it when I did my Retirement Tour traveling, taking advantage of its lighter weight but also the M5 Pro chip so I could create my music videos with both Final Cut Pro and Suno Music Ai. I’m still getting used to the iPad’s UI methodology vs the MacOS way of doing things. FCP works differently so I almost have to rewind my iPad learning curve when I’m not at home. My M5 Pro iPad also is more constrained with how it works with external displays, 3rd party keyboards & mice, and it doesn’t have the wide & ultra-wide options for the Vision Pro like my M4 Pro MacOS offers.'
  • Bart Yee on Apple's Neo opens the door to a $32 billion market - 'Just spitballing here, but what if, as an added incentive, Apple offered, among its subscriptions, free trials, and services options, that with ANY hardware purchase, you could, after a year of ownership, be eligible for a 15-20% discount on a share of APPL stock, at the price it was at on the day you purchased your Apple hardware. Or, you could be eligible for a 15% discount, after 2 years of ownership, on whole shares of AAPL stock equivalent to the total purchase price less taxes of Apple products on the date you purchased them. So for example, you purchased today an iPhone 17 Pro Max, 512GB model, and an Apple Watch Ultra without cellular, an iPad Air, and a pair of Air Pods Pro 3. That would be be $1399 + $799 + $599 + $249 =$3,046.00 bought today April 9, AAPL close of $260.49 Under the first plan you’d be eligible to buy 4 AAPL shares at 15% less or $221 1 year from now. Consider it a one year vesting option. Under the second plan, you could buy $3046/$260.49 =11.693 shares at $221 2 years from now. Consider it a 2 year vesting option. If 15% is too high, then say 10% off. Still a worthwhile effort to put shares into the hands of users while encouraging them to buy discounted shares. Offer is only good to the specified hardware’s Apple owner account, and is not transferable or resell-able. It would be dropped into your Apple Wallet or compatible brokerage. Now that could end up adding as many shares or more than Apple is buying back annually. But it could also turn many more Apple users into Apple investors with a vested (pun intended) interest in AAPl for the long term. Just a thought.'
  • Dan Scropos on Horace Dediu: At sweet 16, iPad still hits sweet spot - 'More hours are spent checking the internet and email on smartphones than on PCs. Mobile devices dominate digital time with roughly 3 hours 50 minutes to 5 hours daily, compared to roughly 2–3 hours on desktops.'
  • Greg Bates on Apple after 50 - 'For a great video on the theory of the firm, Tim Cook lays out some choice elements in his interview with David Pogue. At https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xLqUXIwPGUo Surely this quote (not in the video) is a part of it:“If you want to build a ship, don’t drum up the men to gather wood, divide the work and give orders. Instead, teach them to yearn for the vast and endless sea.” Antoine de Saint-Exupéry'
  • Kemble Widmer on Apple orders fewer foldable iPhones than expected - 'FWIW, I was as likely to pay $$$ for a foldable as paying $$$ for a rock. UNTIL, I held the new Samsung “clam style” foldable while in a Verizon store randomly. Now? I get it, and good chance I and my wife will buy Apple’s when it comes out (which btw likely materially better than Samsung’s).'
  • Daniel Epstein on Horace Dediu: At sweet 16, iPad still hits sweet spot - 'Being a multi Apple device owner user I find the Ipad I use is a great news, email, reading and game consumption device. I travel with the Ipad when I don’t think I need a laptop and don’t only want to use my Iphone. Depending on the trip I sometimes bring all three. I will say the Imac I have at home has been used less and might be replaced by a Laptop in the future. It is nice to have a bigger screen so maybe that will win another round for that system soon. Since I have been buying Apple computers well before the Ipad’s introduction I have shifted some of my screen time from the computers to the Iphone and Ipad. I could create an Ipad situation with a keyboard etc but it actually isn’t much different in price as a computer (sometimes it is more) and I still would likely need to leave a space for it to be used that is not as spontaneous as how I use my Ipad now. There is a place for people to use the Ipad that is different than the computer or Iphone even though there is a lot of crossover. That is actually some of the benefit of the Apple ecosystem. I do think you don’t always need the newest version of any Apple device to take advantage of it so I have been waiting to update my Ipad this year since I expect them to release the regular Ipad that is capable of Apple Intelligence soon. I did have to buy a new cover as I find the Apple Covers wear out while the Ipad is still going strong.'
  • Kemble Widmer on Apple's Mac sales grew 9% in March quarter, in spite of war - 'Yup, and once on Neo, only a matter of time until upgraded Mac’s on the menu for 90%. This will be big and sustain. Classic Apple.'
  • Kemble Widmer on Horace Dediu: At sweet 16, iPad still hits sweet spot - 'For myself, iPhone, Mac, and iPad all indispensable (need Mac heavy lift for photo editing). For my wife, all three indispensable as well. She does NOT need a Mac heavy lift, but appreciates the increased productivity when weight not an issue. Bottom line: all three are differentiated and valuable enough to sustain for the long term.'
  • Mordechai Beizer on Apple orders fewer foldable iPhones than expected - 'I used my Vision Pro this week after a hiatus of many months to see if there was anything new. I was going to try out the court side NBA games but downloading the NBA app took so long that I gave up. Still disappointed that after two years I have very little compelling reason to use the device. The technology still blows me away but there’s too little content. What does this have to do with an Apple foldable? Here’s one Apple enthusiast who won’t be looking to buy the “next great thing” when and if it launches this fall.'
  • John Konopka on Premarket: Apple is red - 'Apple was up today but on just 26M shares. Almost like pre-market volume.'
  • Bill Donahue on Apple's Neo opens the door to a $32 billion market - 'As a shareholder, what I like about Neo is that it’s an exceptionally cheap way to entice people into the ‘walled garden’. With 2.35 billion active devices in the world, and Services FY2025 revenue of ~$109 billion, the per device annual Services revenue is currently ~$46/device. The cheapest Neo is US$600, compared to the cheapest MacBook Air at $1100 the cheapest new iPhone at $700. I don’t know how the profit margins on those three categories of devices compare, but from the perspective of potential new Services earnings – and the major assumption that average annual Services revenue/device means anything at all – the barrier to increased high-margin, continuing Services revenue via the Neo is the lowest of any current Apple device, and far lower than any other Mac product. Which makes the Neo great value for buyers and users of it, compared to other laptops in its price class, and great strategic and financial value for shareholders.'
  • John Konopka on Horace Dediu: At sweet 16, iPad still hits sweet spot - '@Gregg Similar story here. I mostly live on my M4 iPad, next is the iPhone and then a MacStudio. Using an iPad with an external monitor and a keyboard is not bad, the limitations are mostly in software. Apple has made similar software for both the Mac and iPad (Pages, Keynote, Numbers) but with irritating limitations. I can create a document on the Mac and when I switch to the iPad to continue it I find it missing things. A big one is that it is really hard to load fonts onto the iPad. iPads do last a really long time. When I get a new one I hand off the old one to family members. I just saw one around here that is at least 10 years old. Still good enough for simple entertainment, email and messaging.'
  • Bill Donahue on Apple's Neo opens the door to a $32 billion market - 'The simple answer to a question of “Why not nuclear instead of renewables?” is actually as simple as it gets: cost. If one is truly agnostic about energy source, nothing can touch renewables on cost and time to generation (an average of 6 years after construction starts, for nuclear, with often more than 1 year of significant delays) . Not to mention incredible cost over-runs on nuclear. Levelized costs: (meaning the average lifetime cost of generation including construction costs; U.S. Energy Information Administration) – advanced nuclear: $110/MWh in 2023 and forecasted to remain the same up to 2050 – solar PV estimated: $55/MWh in 2023 and expected to decline to $25/MWh in 2050 – onshore wind: $40/MWh in 2023 and expected to decline to $35/MWh in 2050 Similar trends exist for the EU, China and India. Even when you add battery storage to PV, increasing the cost/MW by ~2/3rd, it’s still way cheaper and quicker to build than nuclear. Nuclear is absolutely an option, functionally. But it’s also exceptionally expensive. And typically demands extremely high amounts of fresh water. Which might be a bit of a problem in places like Nevada, that apparently are also allowing water-intensive data center development to proceed unchecked.'
  • Steven Philips on Horace Dediu: At sweet 16, iPad still hits sweet spot - 'Of people in general.'
  • Joseph Bland on Apple's Neo opens the door to a $32 billion market - 'Not my point, Ben, Fred. I was taking exception to this statement: “”Apple’s launch of the MacBook Neo earlier this month marks the company’s first real push to lower-end PC consumers …” — Analyst Wamsi Mohan” That statement only stands if you don’t consider an iPad a PC. Which is balderdash.'
  • Joseph Bland on Apple's Neo opens the door to a $32 billion market - 'IOW, it is an expensive alternative, and, as a breeder reactor, can be used to create uranium-233. Just what the world needs: More atomic bombs. As opposed to renewables, which are already making a difference. Or do you think it’s just a coincidence that the present US leadership is attacking renewables and simultaneous supporting promotion of hydrocarbon combustion? If so, there’s a bridge in Brooklyn that I think you might be interested in buying….'
  • Joseph Bland on Apple's Neo opens the door to a $32 billion market - 'Morning, Gregg “F*ck renewables.” Yours is, to put it much nicer than you did, a somewhat simplistic attitude. But for renewables, we would be far more dependent on burning fossil fuels than we presently are. Nuclear as used in the past wasn’t ready for prime time. Fukushima, Three Mile Island, and Chernobyl proved that. And as regards thorium-burning reactors, your favorite atomic power plant, they are both just barely ready for prime time consideration, and have some serious drawbacks. From Wikipedia; “Disadvantages Significant and expensive testing, analysis and licensing work would be required, requiring business and government support.[34] In a 2012 report on the use of thorium fuel with existing water-cooled reactors, the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists suggested that it would “require too great an investment and provide no clear payoff”, and that “from the utilities’ point of view, the only legitimate driver capable of motivating pursuit of thorium is economics”.[44] The cost of fabrication and reprocessing is higher than using traditional solid fuel rods.[34][45] Thorium, when irradiated for use in reactors, makes uranium-232, which emits gamma rays. This irradiation process may be altered slightly by removing protactinium-233. The decay of the protactinium-233 would then create uranium-233 in lieu of uranium-232 for use in nuclear weapons—making thorium into a dual purpose fuel.[46][47] The melting point of thorium dioxide (3350 °C) is greater than that of uranium dioxide (2800 °C), resulting in a need for increased sintering temperature or addition of non-reactive sintering aids to produce thorium dioxide-based fuel.[48]: 2  Thorium is a fertile material, rather than a fissile one. This means that the fuel must be used in conjunction with a separate fissile material, such as uranium or plutonium, in order to start and maintain the chain reaction required to generate power.[49][50] Thorium has relatively low applicability in non-nuclear power generation settings, resulting in a very small demand for exploring thorium reserves.[48]”'
  • Gregg Thurman on Horace Dediu: At sweet 16, iPad still hits sweet spot - 'My iPad A16 is my primary computer device. Secondary is my iPhone. I haven’t turned on my iMac in a couple of years.'
  • Joseph Bland on Horace Dediu: At sweet 16, iPad still hits sweet spot - 'The point I’ve consistently made and that is consistently given short shrift is that the iPad is a portable PC, and therefore should be included in tallies of PCs. And no, Fred, it’s not a dumb terminal. It can run completely independently of the internet, no differently than any other portable PC. What does fall under your category is the Chrome. It’s why they were so much less expensive and have better battery life. It also unabashedly ripped off children’s personal info, for which it is hoped Alphabet will now pay a huge price. Which is less likely with the present morally bankrupt US leadership. And yet – Alphabet/GOOGL presently has the second highest market cap in the world. Which says a lot about the underlying moral fiber of investors in general….'
  • Greg Lippert on Horace Dediu: At sweet 16, iPad still hits sweet spot - 'Both have key places in my life. For design, video editing, and web dev, I am still wedded to Mac. But for my live performances, iPad runs the show. iPad also better for consumption and casual use. Both equally fine for browsing, email, writing. Long live Mac, long live, iPad'
  • Fred Stein on Horace Dediu: At sweet 16, iPad still hits sweet spot - 'The iPad is a ‘terminal’. The Mac is a ‘client’. Y’all recall the terminal/server, client/server, thin client, fat client chatter back in the day. Disclaimer: Categorizations are fraught. Individual or enterprise use cases break such simplistic models. Eg. Big screen PCs in hospital check-in used for data entry/retrieval.'
  • David Emery on Horace Dediu: At sweet 16, iPad still hits sweet spot - 'Given the ubiquity of iPads in doctor offices and other places where you’re given something to fill out forms, I’d say the iPad has been Apple’s most successful ‘business product’. Not sure if we can see how many iPads are sold for business/corporate/OEM use, versus those sold to consumers (and which category would ‘sales to schools’ go?)'
  • Fred Stein on Apple's Mac sales grew 9% in March quarter, in spite of war - '@ PED, Gregg – What Gemini said about Neo’s segment: “Entry-level models under $600 absorbed nearly half (44.3%) of all PC shipment volume as of 2025.” Neo punches above its weight. It will take share from Mid-level too. Net: Neo doubles Mac’s Addressable Market.'
  • Fred Stein on Apple's Neo opens the door to a $32 billion market - 'Agree Ben. The Neo competes more against the low tier of the PC market than the tablet market. Neo sales will come from younger, poorer, and emerging markets. Very few of us on this forum fit that cohort.'
  • Gregg Thurman on Apple's Mac sales grew 9% in March quarter, in spite of war - '”Wait until the Neo takes off.” I can wait, I just don’t want to.'