Recent Comments

  • Neal Guttenberg on Ming-Chi Kuo: OpenAI's Apple killer is an AI Phone - 'Bill, Upvoted your post as well as a bunch of others here. I will first say I didn’t read the article itself to see if some of what I am going to mention is talked about there. As Bill mentioned, they were first going to come up with a different device. Presumably, it didn’t work out, or, they found out there isn’t a market for it. A phone, both the hardware and the software, is a much more complicated device. For them to have suppliers later this year or early next year would mean that they would have to have a working model right now. It doesn’t sound right to me. Also, to be tightly integrated, they would, like Apple, have to come up with their own silicon. Which, from the story, they aren’t. The “tight integration” doesn’t sound like it will be as “tight” as Apple’s. Also, would you trust your personal data to an “Open AI Phone”? I wouldn’t. It is one of the reasons why Apple is doing well in the Smart Phone space because, in most cases, they are respectful of the user’s privacy. By definition, your information if part of Open AI’s product. I know many people handle a lot of stuff on their phones. I still do the most important stuff on my Mac mini(used to be a Mac book pro). A little skepticism from Kuo should be in order on this story. The timeline seems very fast, unless this is what Open AI has been doing for the past several years. But this sounds like a shift in strategy from them so I can’t seem to wrap my mind around their timeline being in any way, shape or form being doable. Just my take.'
  • Bill Donahue on Premarket: Apple is red - 'The legal battle between Elon Musk and Sam Altman over OpenAI starts today. Assuming it proceeds and doesn’t end in a settlement (which I can’t imagine Musk doing), it should be revealing on a bunch of levels, including the contrast between the arguments and evidence presented and the inevitable rhetoric, hyperbole and bluster of the two named parties, who both share a penchant for exaggeration and deflection.'
  • John Konopka on Evercore: iPhone revenues grew 20%-plus in the March quarter - 'Does anyone know about the RAM in the M series chips? Does Apple buy in a chip to integrate into this package or does TSMC make it as part of M series fabrication?'
  • Bill Donahue on Ming-Chi Kuo: OpenAI's Apple killer is an AI Phone - 'This actually made me laugh. And reminds me of when Phil Knight decided to start a shoe company and just went to Japanese shoe makers and told them to give him copies of cheap athletic shoes they were already producing, but with a swooping symbol on the side. The difference being, of course, that the smart phone industry and product line out there aren’t quite as simple to make as 1960s running shoes and prone to disruption by a newcomer.'
  • Steven Philips on Ming-Chi Kuo: OpenAI's Apple killer is an AI Phone - 'Well, you could use one of the British Lords! 🙂'
  • Bill Donahue on To what AI party, exactly, is Apple late? - 'I’m trying to picture what Tommo’s response to this article is. My guess is that it’s not particularly positive! Unless his ChatGPT bot isn’t even acknowledging how creaky a foundation it’s on, or delivers a message that’s the equivalent of Hal’s “I’m sorry, Dave, I’m afraid I can’t do that.” I picture all the LLM frontier models and the financial and functional story surrounding them like an inverted pyramid – the top is the mythical world-solving potential the hyperscalers like Sam Altman push that’s always just around the corner, and the vast resources and money they’re consuming, and the tiny little point on which it balances is the requirement that no other AI technology or computer technology displaces them. I’m betting that it turns out that no, you can’t get an LLM elephant to dance on the head of a pin.'
  • Stephen Gordon on Ming-Chi Kuo: OpenAI's Apple killer is an AI Phone - 'A quick read made me take the lord’s name in vain, and I’m not even religious.'
  • Bill Donahue on Big bet on Apple puts - 'I think the stars are aligned for some great performance from Apple as a company and stock, for the foreseeable future. Starting last August I began unloading most of my holdings in NVDA, MSFT and GOOG and by late October was 50% cash. I came back off the sidelines a couple of weeks ago, upping my Apple holdings by about 50%, bringing it to ~40% of my portfolio and taking me down to ~25% cash. I’d probably do better by working options like Gregg, but I don’t have the feel for them that overcomes my hesitance, so I’m still sticking to the stock.'
  • David Wilson on Ming-Chi Kuo: OpenAI's Apple killer is an AI Phone - 'And I think this is what is depressing Apple’s stock today. There are factual reports that indicate Apple is doing amazingly well, and this vaporware report that indicates there may be some competition in the future. Guess which one moves the stock? Sheesh.'
  • David Wilson on Big bet on Apple puts - 'Wow, as a simple farmer of AAPL, that sounds like some kind of genius-engineered crime. But how much genius does it take to become a criminal?'
  • Bill Donahue on 'Apple is about to burst the AI bubble' (video) - 'Add to this that individual companies or fields develop their own AI for their specific uses and needs, and those tools are not LLMs. If I do research on protein function, structural chemistry, drug development, energy physics, or any other highly technical task, I’m using AI based on machine learning or other approaches that is specifically designed and trained using only information relevant to the field. And if I’m a corporate leader wanting to protect my company’s tech and market, my priority is to own secure computing capacity. Which I can do because I’ve cut out the insane computing power demands of LLMs and only need enough to run the specialized AI the company uses. With its chip technology, hardware based on it, and completely integrated hardware-software systems, Apple’s exceptionally well positioned to tap into that market: one that has critically high demands on AI functionality and error-avoidance, network and output security, and energy and financial efficiency.'
  • Daniel Epstein on Premarket: Apple is red - 'Feels like a typical drop in Apple stock price before earnings is occurring. Also Monday mornings seem like a negative for Apple stock these days. Doesn’t mean the stock will pop much past highs of last week after earnings but often the sellers are in control before they learn how well the company is doing. Not a buy the rumor sell the news pattern. Considering the change of CEO to Ternus and Cook going to be chairman already announced I wonder what the updated Buyout and dividend numbers will be. Guidance should be interesting as well. Hoping for some good news on peace with Iran but not counting on that.'
  • Bill Fouche on Ming-Chi Kuo: OpenAI's Apple killer is an AI Phone - 'Nothing about Ming’s article makes sense to me. If it’s true, Open AI is playing directly into Apple’s strengths — particularly 1) its ecosystem of a family of devices that complement each other and work well together, along with a vast and established data cloud infrastructure, 2) trustworthiness, and 3) firm commitment to privacy. And if Ming is correct, it represents an enormous change in direction for Open AI that calls their timeline into question. They said as recently as Feb. 2026 that the device they are designing will be screenless and voice controlled. Creating an entirely new OS for a phone comparable to Apple’s, plus designing, vetting, and mass producing phone hardware backed up by the necessary data cloud infrastructure seems a daunting task. And given that this is their first effort and they have a lot to prove, they will want it to be “just right.” 2028 seems nearly impossible. Wildly speculating 2030 at the earliest. And this assumes that Ive – a famous perfectionist – can keep that impulse in check.'
  • Bill Donahue on To what AI party, exactly, is Apple late? - 'One important correction: The huge majority of people don’t pay for or use any of the LLMs, and don’t know that they’re using AI that operates in the background and improves the output of a lot of things they do on their smart phones. And a similar majority will continue to choose to approach AI in the same way. And Apple is focused on that market – users of AI-enhanced software and services – which is far, far, far bigger than the people willing to pay $20 to use a frontier LLM. Most people simply aren’t interested in the LLM world – they have no need and no interest, other than maybe playing around with generating amusing pictures or videos. And that completely ignores that LLM outputs are low quality and very unreliable when it comes to technical and specialized topics. That’s why I agree with the author’s opinion that a lot of the LLMs will also be busts. Maybe all of them, from the perspective of the mind-boggling amounts of real money, resources and energy getting consumed while chasing hyperscaling that will never lead to artificial general intelligence.'
  • Fred Stein on To what AI party, exactly, is Apple late? - 'Great reminder. Thanks. Upvoted. A lot of AI infra companies’ income comes from VC funded startups. And a lot of AI build-out is with borrowed money.'
  • Stephen Gordon on Big bet on Apple puts - 'Ran this through Gemini… The Put/Call Ratio for the data provided is **0.66**. ### Calculation To find the Put/Call Ratio, divide the Put Open Interest by the Call Open Interest: ### Contextual Observations * **Sentiment:** A ratio of **0.66** typically suggests bullish sentiment, as there are significantly more open call positions than puts. * **Price Positioning:** The current stock price ($265.92) is trading below **Max Pain** ($270.00), suggesting potential upward pressure toward the $270 strike as expiration approaches. * **Range:** The market is currently anchored between the major support at **$190.00** (Highest Put OI) and resistance at **$275.00** (Highest Call OI).'
  • James Murphy on Big bet on Apple puts - 'That looks like money laundering to me. In order to have open interest you need both a buyer and a seller to hold their positions. It is extraordinarily unlikely for a widely held stock like AAPL to drop 30% in one non-earnings day, particularly when you consider its inclusion in major indices and the crash circuit breakers design to give people time to reconsider what is actually transpiring. So it looks like two parties are purposely doing a transaction to transfer money from one party to the other using the exchange’s variation margin process to bypasses normal bank large transaction reporting requirements.'
  • Robert Paul Leitao on Premarket: Apple is red - 'Happy Monday! Index futures are below the line as we approach the beginning of the week’s trading. Qualcomm is up over $13 pre-market on talk of a new AI smartphone processor to debut in 2028. The shares are at $162.12. The shares rose $14.90 on Friday to $148.85. Apple reports March quarter results on Thursday. The shares are off before the bell $3.24 at $267.82 this morning after falling $2.37 on Friday. Domino’s pizza is off nearly $26 pre-market at $342.25 on disappointing quarterly results. Trading begins in 10 minutes.'
  • Charles A. on Big bet on Apple puts - 'From 4/13: https://www.ped30.com/2026/04/13/apple-bet-puts-2020/'
  • James Murphy on Big bet on Apple puts - '190 puts expiring 04/27/2026 (ie, today)? Either a fat finger mistake or something fishy is going on…'
  • Dave Calderon on Big bet on Apple puts - 'I dont really know what I’m looking at but this coincides with Mings article hitting the wires I guess.'
  • Steven Philips on Ming-Chi Kuo: OpenAI's Apple killer is an AI Phone - 'Apparently they got them! This is another idea that could take a bite out of “the other guys” but it wouldn’t replace Apple’s ecosystem. I’m presuming Apple’s AI implementation will work well.'
  • Greg Lippert on To what AI party, exactly, is Apple late? - 'I’ve had AI make simple math mistakes. Friday I asked it to count a simple column of numbers and it was wrong until I called BS, then it said sorry. My calc wouldn’t do that.'
  • Greg Lippert on Apple leads Daniel Ives' Mag 7 earnings roundup - 'DI is looking more and more like a pimp :)-'
  • Kenny Kruger on Ming-Chi Kuo: OpenAI's Apple killer is an AI Phone - 'This will be great! I’ve missed so many trips to Tokyo , forgotten to reply to so many “Important Emails” and family dinners with my iPhone! My take? Someone wants cheaper shares before Thursday.'
  • Greg Lippert on Evercore: iPhone revenues grew 20%-plus in the March quarter - 'And yet, the beach ball is getting pulled under.'
  • Greg Lippert on Ming-Chi Kuo: OpenAI's Apple killer is an AI Phone - 'Ming using his (outsize) influence to manipulate stock? Hurry! Take me to the fainting couch.'
  • James Murphy on To what AI party, exactly, is Apple late? - 'Great example of survivorship bias. The ones still alive all have .com sites, but when was the last time you did a search on Alta Vista or bought something from Pets.com?'
  • Dave Calderon on Ming-Chi Kuo: OpenAI's Apple killer is an AI Phone - 'This is all in Mings imagination. About a phone that may come in 2028 or 2029. Someone paid him to drop this work of fiction the wk of earnings. BS manipulation at its finest. Im surprised it wasnt Bloomberg.'
  • Les Surdykowski on Ming-Chi Kuo: OpenAI's Apple killer is an AI Phone - 'So an iPhone to compete with the iPhone, which is an asymmetric threat if I’ve ever seen one. Now that’s thinking differently.'