Recent Comments

  • Robert Paul Leitao on Premarket: Apple is green - 'Apple ended Monday trading off $5.49 at $303.42. This is a big drop from the newly minted all-time high of $344.57 reached last Wednesday. Adding insult to injury Morningstar has dropped Apple to a 2-star sell rating and a Fair Value Estimate of $285 per share. In contrast to Apple’s performance, Amazon set a new all-time high of $287.16 today and a new all-time closing high of $284.02 while rising $12.44 today and ending the day with a market cap above $3 trillion for the first time. The shares are up 22.75% over the past five trading days. Microsoft is up 25.33% over the past five days, gained $22.93 today or 4.93% to close at $487.65. The shares remain below the all-time high of $553.72 set back in October. Microsoft’s market cap now stands at $3.62 trillion versus $4.43 trillion for Apple and $4.57 trillion for Alphabet. The search giant is up just over 14% over the past five days. What a difference a few days can make when investors relax their concerns (at least for now) about the economics of AI and the capex deployments of the hyperscalers.'
  • Robert Paul Leitao on Premarket: Apple is green - 'Vertiv Holdings, a big supplier of components for data centers, reached an all-time high of $379.93 on May 14th and fell to a multi-month low of $220.92 last Wednesday on July 29th, and closed up $21.64 today or 8.96% at $263.05 today. The company also reported strong quarterly results on the 29th and the share price has responded positively over the most recent trading days. One firm just raised the company to a strong buy and a $375 price target. The reason I bring up Vertiv is because at this time I consider it primarily a data center play and the recovery in the share price is due not only to the company’s recent earnings report but also the earnings of hyperscalers Microsoft and Amazon. Perhaps investors are viewing at least three of the hyperscalers – Alphabet, Amazon and Microsoft as sound investments and some of the recent concerns about select data center product and services providers are now fading away. This relates to the pullback in Apple over the past few days. Apple was considered a safe haven of sorts for investors wary of the hyperscalers and data center-related enterprises.'
  • Robert Paul Leitao on Apple-AI enthusiast Errol Brandt looks forward to Oracle's comeuppance - 'Mark: I’ve noticed over the past several days you’ve made a number of posts on Apple 3.0 in response to blog posts or comments by members about data center economics. What is your view on today’s data center economics? Do you see significant financial risks for investors in today’s data center demand and construction activity? What do you see in terms of the pace of data center construction relative to demand? I’ve valued your views on various issues over the years and I’d like to get a clear “picture” of your informed view on this particular issue.'
  • Ben Gepp on Apple-AI enthusiast Errol Brandt looks forward to Oracle's comeuppance - 'https://bushfire.io has excellent fire mapping and detailed information. The extent and number of fires across North America at the moment is staggering. I’d be off line if I were Gregg.'
  • Daniel Epstein on Premarket: Apple is green - 'David, Jim Cramer has been very emotional about stocks including Apple but his projections in terms of Apple stock in times were Apple stock was low or being dragged down often have had random accuracy. Despite his “hold Apple don’t trade it “ advice he is influenced by the sentiment on the street that surrounds him. When the news about Apple is negative he often thinks the stock price will drop farther than it does. Of course the drop this time after earnings is strong enough to test anyone’s patience so it could take a while for the stock to stabilize. And somehow I think the fall product line should sell well which won’t show up in this quarter as much as the next.'
  • Steven Philips on Apple-AI enthusiast Errol Brandt looks forward to Oracle's comeuppance - 'Don’t know if this is correct. Somehow in the past I’d gotten the impression that Gregg lived a bit NW of Spokane proper. And North and NW are where the fires are. So concerns may be warranted.'
  • Joseph Bland on Premarket: Apple is green - '…er, intentions…'
  • Mark Visnic on Apple-AI enthusiast Errol Brandt looks forward to Oracle's comeuppance - '@Fred The thesis of the Warren’s seaside metaphor is ineluctable. The hypothesis underlying its application to datacenter economics is less solid.'
  • Mark Visnic on Apple-AI enthusiast Errol Brandt looks forward to Oracle's comeuppance - 'Here is some data that tends to pierce Brandt’s thesis on datacenter economics: https://x.com/micyoung75/status/2084036771252240410?s=20 Oracle and Larry Ellison are not representative. Singling out Oracle is easy.'
  • Lou Falek on Apple-AI enthusiast Errol Brandt looks forward to Oracle's comeuppance - 'Re: Ellison A few years ago we visited a friend in Woodside, Calif. and afterwards were driving when suddenly there was a stretch alongside the road where every leaf and loose branch had been meticulously picked up. Also, fancy guard shacks placed every few hundred feet. It was Ellison’s property. I think I told the following story previously, but it is a good one so I’ll repeat it. Steve Jobs and Larry Ellison were talking and Larry said “I own this big boat, a whole Hawaiian island, etc. etc…” And Steve said “Yeah Larry that’s nice, but I have something that you’ll never have”. Larry: “What’s that?” Steve: “I have Enough”.'
  • Lou Falek on Apple-AI enthusiast Errol Brandt looks forward to Oracle's comeuppance - 'I’ve heard the Warren quote said as “Only when the tide goes out do we see who has been swimming naked.”'
  • Joseph Bland on Tim Cook stuck to his knitting - 'So what the heck is my stepson saying here? He’s saying Apple is the one who should be creating those “peer-to-peer LLM networks” (call them ptp LLM nets for short). Because, simply put, individual folks (as opposed to legal firms, R&D labs, etc) will trust Apple more than they will individual ptp LLM nets. Heck, I know I would! Pretty simple idea, really. Apple, are you listening?'
  • Joseph Bland on Premarket: Apple is green - 'Yes, the volume is heavy, but I see the resistance to dropping much further as a sign of significant interest in taking advantage of the “windfall” from the Thursday post-premarket dump. Which was WAY overdone and WAY too obviously an attempt to create a panicky environment by a tiny AAPL “tail “of short term investors just like used to wag the AAPL “dog” back in the bad old days following the Great Recession. But thanks, guys, for giving Apple the chance to buy back even more undervalued AAPL! Long term Apple investors are truly grateful to you for your greedy intensions!'
  • Joseph Bland on Premarket: Apple is green - 'IMO, this “downturn” is based almost entirely on short term investors deciding that the AI “profit” shown by off-the-books debt being hidden is going to make more book than Apple’s so-called ho-hum guidance of a “lousy 10% increase” in next quarter’s EPS. Nevertheless, the mess in the Middle East isn’t even close to resolved which is still driving inflation up, debt is still debt, and Apple is still rock solid. I don’t see Apple falling much farther, if not quickly reversing, especially as Apple is back in the open market and once again buying big handfuls of its own stock.'
  • Steven Philips on Tim Cook stuck to his knitting - 'Obviously a parody! On Pluto it has to be a dog! 🙂'
  • Joseph Bland on Tim Cook stuck to his knitting - 'Back to the subject: Apple’s “knitting” is serving its clients, which, for Apple, is it’s users. Thus, they literally started over with Smart Siri, putting their client’s privacy first, then figuring a way to create a truly Secure Enclave that still allowed access to AI. By all accounts,, although it clearly wasn’t easy they have succeeded. Oh, and the nonsensical drop in Apple valuation that appears to be continuing? It’s just noise and options shenanigans. Pay it no mind. That said, there’s no time for Apple to rest on its laurels; so the furious knitting needs to continue. The Singularity is approaching, whether we want it to or not, and there’s also a golden opportunity for Apple to do great things for its users by completing the job of what my steps calls a “trustless peer to peer LLM/AI compute network”. But it turns out there’s a hangup: It may all turn on a thing called “open weight”, which basically amounts to free access to “open source AI models”. For example, my stepson informs me that GLM (a Chinese open source model) has beaten Anthropic’s top of the line Opus model. Per my stepson: “What you can do is fine-tune the model to your specific use cases. Then convert the neural net to MLX so inference, or the actual use of an LLM, maximizes the hardware power.” However, as he also says: “I was researching the plausibility for Apple to be at the forefront of this “trustless peer to peer LLM/AI compute network” (which clearly would be revenue generating). There is actually a constraint and I haven’t yet figured out an effective way around it. NVIDIA, AMD and Intel hardware has something called a “Trusted Execution Environment” (TEE, for short), which is cryptographically verifiable execution of AI compute in a fully confidential/private way (i.e., RAM and bus are all encrypted and the hardware owner can’t even see what is being run or computed). Apple hardware has something called a “Secure Enclave” which I thought could handle that, but it turns out it can’t be extended to LLM inference. It only can be used for secure key exchange. Apple needs to extend its Secure Enclave hardware capabilities so it works with MLX and the unified memory systems. At that point, you can have fully private local inference where the hardware owner won’t know what is being computed or what messages are being passed back and forth. Then, the install base of all compatible Macintosh machines could be leveraged in a peer to peer fashion for a “world computer” AI — trustless, secure, private, permissionless AI. (We even could add further capabilities like individual fine-tuning, etc., but that’s later.) “ The promise: Earlier, he dropped a link (which I’m not including for security reasons), that prompted him to say: “It’s starting. There is now a peer-to-peer LLM network. (link) Soon there will be “zero trust” mechanisms and cryptocurrency integration to a platform similar to (but not the same) PeerLLM’s network. That that means is people will be running LLMs locally. The LLM requests will first run inference locally but then — if there are too many requests and you have set to hybrid mode — will farm out the LLM queries *in a completely encrypted and trustless way* (i.e., you don’t have to trust that no one is sniffing the queries — the encryption mechanisms are provable such that you *know* that there has been no interference or interception). When you aren’t using your local LLM, you make it available to others on the network and earn revenue. Distributed. Trustless. Private. Permissionless. Like I said: it’s already starting. (If APPLE built that platform, it would go WAY beyond the App Store and iTunes in terms of revenue. Direct residuals on artificial intelligence with customers themselves serving the main compute.)” And like I said, Apple still has some furious knitting that it needs to attend to….'
  • John Konopka on Tim Cook stuck to his knitting - 'I feel we were incredibly lucky to have Tim Cook as CEO all these years. He’s always deceptively calm and reserved in public appearances. I think of all the crazy CEOs we’ve seen in the last few decades. Tim has done a masterful job of navigation. My favorite line from him is how he often tells us how he “couldn’t be more excited” while speaking in a slow, calm voice. I’ll miss that. Think of how it could have been. Recall there was talk of making Elon Musk CEO of Apple. (Shiver) I saw a headline today that Musk wants to put a giraffe on Pluto in five years. It was a parody but when I related that to someone today they had to ask “Did he really say that?”. Sounds plausible that Elon might have said that.'
  • Fred Stein on Apple-AI enthusiast Errol Brandt looks forward to Oracle's comeuppance - 'Remember WeWork? Long term real estate leases, rent out short term. Silicon Valley Bank – borrow long to lend short. Or Warren Buffet; “When the tide goes out, we see who’s wearing a bathing suit.”'
  • Jonny T on Apple-AI enthusiast Errol Brandt looks forward to Oracle's comeuppance - 'I am quite looking forward to the second AI domino after Oracle. Sam Altman falling to the ground will be entertaining. No-one will have sympathy for Ellison nor Altman I suspect.'
  • Jonny T on Tim Cook stuck to his knitting - 'As a Brit, I too am astounded at how blinkered people choose to be on Trump (in the UK too). For better or worse it is what you’ve got and some nuance is more helpful than a binary yes/no, even when you may loathe them. Tim Cook has played Apple’s hand very well indeed in my opinion.'
  • David Thall on Premarket: Apple is green - 'Regardless of how you may feel about Jim Cramer, I find that he’s useful as a pretty good gauge of the market’s temperament, especially during sell-offs and rallies. Last Friday, Cramer said that Apple will very likely go down further than where it already had. MY TAKE My sense is, based on years of observing this kind of “sell on the news“ behavior, that Apple’s going to continue to get pounded down as much as the algorithms and HFT’s can possibly make it go down. And then go sideways… at least until after the dividend is paid. I don’t wish to be pessimistic, but based on the cold, calculating playbook that algorithms and HFT‘s use, it would not surprise me if Apple doesn’t go back down into the 290s before settling. Everything else being equal, like war and inflation – Apple’s stock price will probably not settle and start going back up until there is some good Apple centric news. In this case, as we wait to get past this latest news cycle, I think the stock will recover when new iPhones launch in September and there are good preliminary sales numbers reported. And it also wouldn’t surprise me if Apple’s stock price isn’t back where it was before the sell-off by then. Of course, like over half the analysts out there, I could be wrong. In which case, I might have better luck flipping a coin. The awful truth is, AI is not our friend. At least in terms of investing in Apple. Because AI has done nothing but upset Apple‘s phenomenal performance. From a seesaw of changing opinions. Fortunately, Apple has a resilient business model with many levers to pull, and long-term the stock will do just fine.'
  • Jonny T on Mark Gurman: Apple is now a subscription - 'And as Gumdrop said, it’ll help create the next trillion.'
  • Robert Paul Leitao on Premarket: Apple is green - 'Good morning and welcome to Monday! All four major indexes are deep in the green in early trading. Apple is off $4.71 or 1.53% at $304.20 as the post-earnings sell-off continues into the new week. In Monday trading Microsoft is up $20.06 or 4.32% at $484.78. Amazon, which, like Microsoft, delivered strong earnings and guidance last week, is up $14.21 or 5.23% at $285.79. Amazon, Alphabet and Microsoft are together moving the DJIA 30 index higher this morning. Blue Owl Capital, an alternative asset manager, is up $0.55 or 5.29% at $10.85. BMO Capital raised its price target on the shares to $12 and CFRA has reiterated its buy rating on the shares with a $15 price target.'
  • Robert Stack on Apple-AI enthusiast Errol Brandt looks forward to Oracle's comeuppance - 'I was thinking the same thing. That he’s gone silent is unusual – and concerning.'
  • David Emery on Apple-AI enthusiast Errol Brandt looks forward to Oracle's comeuppance - 'If/When Oracle goes bust, what -should happen- is the reorganization splits it into two companies. One for the DBMS and related software products, and the other for cloud & AI infrastructure.'
  • Rodney Avilla on Tim Cook stuck to his knitting - '“ but did he have to spend so much time at the White House?” I believe some people’s hate for Trump will make it hard for them to reasonably think thru that question. Personally I believe any negative effects from those visits will be short lived and history will be on TC’s side.'
  • David Drinkwater on Tim Cook stuck to his knitting - 'That’s the answer to the $25 million question that I posed on Saturday. (Hence upvoted.)'
  • Ron Fredrick on Premarket: Apple is green - 'At market close last Friday, 07/31/26, AAPL was down about -7.4% from the previous day and about -9.2% from its ATH close on 07/28/26. Since my wife and I have been 100% invested in AAPL for the past 26 years we watched our entire portfolio drop that same percentage over those two days. I’ve often compared our current AAPL portfolio worth to our AAPL portfolio worth when I retired in 2008. At AAPL’s recent ATH close, our portfolio was about 55.8 times the 2008 size…now it’s about 50.7. Is there a problem with long-term investing in AAPL? I don’t think so. And, since we held AAPL when it dropped -35% in 2002, -57% in 2008 and through 3 other years when AAPL was negative for the year, I’m not worried. After all, AAPL is still up 13.6% for 2026…and if we look at the entire “Magnificent Seven” stocks, AAPL is still doing very well in comparison. YTD Percentages (as of 0/31/26) 1. AMZN: +17.7% YTD 2. GOOG: +13.7% YTD 3. AAPL: +13.6% YTD 4. NVDA: +7.6% YTD 5. MSFT: +3.9% YTD 6. META: -15.7% YTD 7. TSLA: -30.8% YTD Cheers to the very patient AAPL Longs!'
  • Steven Philips on Premarket: Apple is green - 'For some reason AAPL dropped on opening. Now around 305. 🙁'
  • Steven Philips on Apple-AI enthusiast Errol Brandt looks forward to Oracle's comeuppance - 'Well that “sums up” ( 🙂 ! ) things rather nicely! 🙂'