Bill Donahue on Needham: Why the AI buildout hasn't paid off yet - 'I think that’s probably what’s actually been going on, David, as opposed to Laura Martin’s explanation. The testing began, and most CEOs are discovering that AI investment is currently not valuable, and future or on-going significant AI investment is on the chopping block, as opposed to employees.'
on Google's breakthrough is Apple's gain - 'Apple’s Mixture of Experts allows one to effectively use models that are 1/10th the size of the entire LLM. If Goggle’s can independently reduce the size of models in memory by 6-fold, then we could enter a period when a working, functional LLM could be resident on a device, just as Apple has been working towards. Of course, the speed of this is dependent on the silicon on device and only Apple has the chips to do this.'
on Google's breakthrough is Apple's gain - 'If I have read things right — Google’s approach deals with compressing memory specifically for AI, to lessen actual physical memory use. Apple’s “Mixture of Experts” changes how the LLM itself is organized to allow much smaller units of the larger system to be used locally. Google changes the overall size of the LLM resident in memory while Apple’s changes the LLM itself to use less memory. Now, can they both be used together?'
on Google's breakthrough is Apple's gain - 'Hmm, Perhaps Apple, working with Google on AI, saw this coming. That may have factored into negotiations with memory suppliers, who don’t want to be caught with massive CAPEX to build manufacturing capacity for demand that may slacken. That may explain Neo’s aggressive pricing.'
on Google's breakthrough is Apple's gain - 'Companion to Jevon’s Paradox is Wright’s Law. Wright (no direct relation to the brothers) coined this phrase from work in aviation manufacturing, noting that costs reduced with increased volume, a precursor to Moore’s Law.'
on Premarket: Apple is red - 'As expected, the price of oil has now soared again. I wonder what trading in oil futures looks like, immediately after the big drop on Monday. If you have insider information about an upcoming announcement of a peace deal and can and do choose to make massive illegal profits off that knowledge, then you probably also understand that that announcement was entirely untrue, and have the ability to use that information to make equally massive illegal profits off the reverse trade.'
on Needham: Why the AI buildout hasn't paid off yet - 'The other side of the coin for a CEO is the risk equation. Employees are a known risk relative to their expense. AI might be cheaper, but what if an AI gets it badly wrong? What’t the likelihood of that? Is there a way to evaluate that risk prior to firing employees and ‘hiring’ AI?'
on Google's breakthrough is Apple's gain - 'It’s early in the game and things are changing fast and furious.'
on How a friend of the bros sees Zuck's judicial comeuppance - '“A politician at the end of the day, doing what politicians do. Scoring points against the current villain in chief, building a reputation on the wreckage of someone else’s failure, and calling it justice.” Kind of an odd take, given how clear the evidence is that Zuckerberg dismissed the warnings and evidence of harm to children, and ordered everyone to ignore it and push full steam ahead on maximizing usage and profits. Party A harms defenceless Party B (and millions of other Party Bs), with full knowledge of the harm prior to doing so, and does it solely to expand market domination, revenues and profits. Holding Party A to account under the law *is* justice, and is exactly what Attorneys-General exist to do. If someone’s looking for an example of a self-serving AG not pursuing justice, a better example is the current federal US AG.'
on Needham: Why the AI buildout hasn't paid off yet - 'Right. It’s the empathy of CEOs and Boards for employees’ well-being that is preventing major companies adopting AI in operations from maximizing profit-potential, and not the fact that the huge majority of corporations have reported that their investments in adopting and implementing AI have had zero ROI, and in many cases have interfered in the efficient completion of work of sufficient quality, and even increased the time and effort to properly complete work. Because if there’s one thing that executive decision-makers of major companies are known for, it’s refusing to fire people if it’s only being done to increase profits, share prices, and executive performance bonus returns. I sense more than a bit of cognitive bias in this interpretation. So much so that it seems more like intentional blindness.'
on Google's breakthrough is Apple's gain - 'It also bears pointing out that the paradox of Jevons Paradox is that new, more efficient technology results in increases in the rate of the use of physical resources. In the case of massive increases in compute efficiency described by Google, I don’t think anyone’s thinking that it will mean the capex for data centers will increase in the race for AGI based on LLMs. If anything, it should result in a big decrease in expenditures and resource consumption in relation to data centers. Big enough that at least some of the majors will put more resources into non-LLM R&D because of the increasing likelihood that LLMs are a dead end in the search for AGI. I’d say this isn’t really an example of Devons Paradox, although Devon’s Paradox does seem to apply to the data center / physical resources story thus far.'
on Needham: Why the AI buildout hasn't paid off yet - 'I believe that part of the friction is indeed a human element, but not necessarily an emotional connection. Some human jobs, or jobs done by humans require some sort of human element, and not just processing data and spitting out an answer or applying requests to algorithms. For example, if you have ever called a medical office with a complicated situation, and went round and round with a bot while thinking if only I could talk to a human, this would be so much easier. I believe the above graph is consistent with my assumption regarding the need, sometimes, for the human element.'
on Google's breakthrough is Apple's gain - 'More importantly, the implications of Google’s announcement is that the hundreds of billions in annual capex that it and the other major AI providers are currently making on building out data centers are either i) sunk capital that will result in massive losses when compared to data centers based on this new technology, or ii) not going to happen to anywhere near the scale announced thus far. My guess is that the smart leaders will choose option ii). Which also has massive financial and economic implications related to not needing to buy as much land, pay for shovels, chips, concrete, steel, power infrastructure, and everything else that goes into building hundreds of billions of dollars worth of data centers all over the world, and all of the jobs that would be required to be filled in relation to all of those. The AI capex spend represents the majority of economic growth in the USA in the last year. Cut that spend amount by a significant amount because of tech development that increases compute efficiency by a large amount, and the economic ripples may become waves.'
on Is this why Apple jumped Thursday morning? - 'Simple answer: no, an announcement of a 0.067% addition to domestic US spending plans in the next 4 years is not the reason that Apple’s stock price went in the opposite direction to the Big AI stocks’ drops. Assuming there’s a rational reason, it’s the growing recognition that Apple’s somehow put itself in the position of having an exceptional hardware lineup now on offer that meets all of Apple’s and Apple users’ expectations for quality and functionality and will dominate all of the relevant markets, while maintaining chip supplies, prices, and profits, and which that will also serve as the foundation for a fundamentally different approach to facilitating consumer access to AI. And all despite the “The end is nigh!” noise from the talking heads over the last two years that’s been hitting the stock every few months, and despite that Apple leadership has somehow navigated to this place without any of the mind-blowing (and financial statement destroying) capex that all of the rest of the “We will win A!” crowd of companies have tied their futures to.'
on Needham: Why the AI buildout hasn't paid off yet - 'Theoretical AI coverage = venture capital ROI enrichment x infinity. No introspection required.'
on How a friend of the bros sees Zuck's judicial comeuppance - 'The entire case was built around the design. Infinite scroll, autoplay, algorithmic feeds, notification systems. Those are not user posts. Those are the company’s own engineering decisions, made in their labs, tested on their servers, optimized by their employees. CBS News put it plainly: this case centered around how the apps are designed, not the content itself. Section 230 does not protect you from your own product choices. I’ve always thought (IANAL) that the “we’re just the delivery channel” argument that allows Facebook, et.al. to disclaim responsibility should NOT APPLY when those platforms algorithmically select content they display. That’s more than just “being the wire the bits move along.”'
on Is this why Apple jumped Thursday morning? - 'A nice “little” bump so far. But similar bumps have been falling back. Still in that under 260 trading range. So I don’t give it much credit until it breaks through.'
on Google's breakthrough is Apple's gain - 'Is this different from what was noted the other day about Apple using LLMs to train smaller models to gain efficiency on small devices? It sounds different. And that sounded like it was attributed to Apple. But I can’t tell.'
on Needham: Why the AI buildout hasn't paid off yet - 'It is, however, a very astute approach to analyzing that specific situation. Whether something is missing in the analysis of large scale LLM buildouts is another question.'
on Needham: Why the AI buildout hasn't paid off yet - 'Asymco on AI and its impact on business writ large: https://asymco.com/2026/03/26/the-biggest-bundle/ History is filled with examples of restructuring of ideas and the re-configuration of businesses due to technological change. AI is an example of both enabling and disabling of existing businesses and occupations. Very much the way the Internet turned out to be. Displacement happens but innovation creates more opportunity and reallocation of effort to better (or at least more) outcomes. The newspaper and internet created markets and jobs. Will AI do the same? Modularity may hold the answer.'
on How a friend of the bros sees Zuck's judicial comeuppance - 'Algorithm! Algorithm! Algorithm! Who could ask for anything more? (With a nod to George Gershwin. 🙂 )'
on How Apple verifies ages on the other side of the pond - 'Exactamundo! (Would you believe that Apple’s auto complete actually offered that as an option?! 🙂 )'
on Premarket: Apple is red - 'Anyone who didn’t think Iran would reject Trump’s “Peace Plan” is a fool!'
on Premarket: Apple is red - 'Apple is off $0.68 or 0.27% at $251.94 pre-market while the major market indexes are also in the red before the bell. I’m expecting the S&P 500 above 7,600 by year-end (it closed yesterday at 6,591.90). I see the current market tumult as a long-term buy opportunity. This buy opportunity includes Apple in its current trading range.'
on How a friend of the bros sees Zuck's judicial comeuppance - 'Om’s insights are always interesting.'
on Why this Apple 'uber-skeptic' doesn't sell his stock - 'Holy shite, what a hot load a of garbage. In his mind phantom products (like Open AI’s) always beat shipping Apple products. Apple, IMHO, is doing quite well. And if they do get SiriAI right, the future looks bright. I wanted to reach through the screen and punch him in the face.'
on Premarket: Apple is red - 'TACO. He’s desperate for an exit strategy. He’s painted himself (and us) into a corner. Looks like the dumbshit we all knew him and his band of fools to be. Yet this will get more American military killed.'
on How Apple verifies ages on the other side of the pond - 'I am constantly astounded how underage controls keep people from seeing nudity or sex yet you are free to watch, murder, shootings, violence, gore, etc. We have our priorities backward.'


