Recent Comments

  • Daniel Albaugh on Premarket: Apple is red - 'Debrovnik is an amazing, beautiful city. My wife and I were there a few years ago. Many scenes from the HBO show Game of Thrones were filmed around the city. Scenes from the Red Keep and one other castle (I forget which one) from the show were shot there as was Cersei’s walk of shame, and many other memorable scenes. If you’re a Game of Thrones fan, it’s a must visit city and tour.'
  • Darren DMW on Apple at $310.85: May's ninth record close - 'Is anyone else worried that should the base model be rescheduled to early in the following year that it will disrupt Q1 which is always apple’s biggest quarter? How will the market react in the short tern? Sell first, ask questions later?'
  • Bart Yee on Apple at $310.85: May's ninth record close - 'Regardless of why Apple is shifting to two release dates, high end premium Pro/Pro Max and Foldable Ultra sales in Fall still puts a lot of competitive pressure on all Android Premium models and buyers. If Apple shift its second wave of “value” base iPhone, iPhone Air, iPhone 18e models, plus discounted prior base models and leftover Pro/Pro Max models, plus larger supply of refurbished models traded in, IMO, this puts huge competitive pressure on Samsung’s January-February Galaxy S and Galaxy A-series introductions. Sure, they will still sell (some), but imagine your mid-January intro, and early February release only to be completely swamped by press coverage and consumer attention of what Apple will intro and release in mid-Feb to Early March. ANY Samsung sales momentum could be directly blunted by having to go against Apple iPhones head to head. Not so much the A-series but if A-series gets price increases, that puts them in same range as refurbed 3-4 year old iPhones. I would almost guarantee Samsung and other Android/Chinese OEM makers will shift “their” intro and release dates yet again to either take on Apple directly, or avoid Apple at all costs, because sales and margins into 2027 are going to be tough to maintain due to the memory cost crunch. Like it or not, Apple has all the leverage here, and even though Androids have had split intros for awhile, they did it and kept it knowing Apple was a one time September through December Q4 – Into Q1 March sales juggernaut. This also siphons off the higher value buyers ahead of Galaxy S intro. Now Android makers will have to react (and will) to Apple’s release date splits and potential conquest sales in Q1 & Q2. Yes, Galaxy S26 sales are off to a fast start, just as S25 were last year. But notice Samsung themselves for Q2 note waning effects from Galaxy S introduction as sales taper off quickly. Will the Galaxy S26 manage to top the 37M Galaxy S25 series sold? The same things happened with Z Foldables the last two years, hitting a wall at 11-12M in 2024 and plateaued around 10-11M for 2025, Huawei being formidable competition, both IMO quite worried about what an iPhone Fold will do to the market. This all coincides with reports that TM Roh, head of Samsung MX Mobile division warns that smartphones may end up losing money (negative profits) this year due to sharply rising costs and faltering demand due to price hikes and competition. IMO, you’ll see some Android makers quietly scramble to avoid Apple’s release schedule. We’ll see. Oh, PS – recall that the iPhone 17 base model is selling hugely in China, being the best selling premium model there by 3-5x nearest competitor. Now imagine Chinese buyers delaying purchases into Jan-March waiting for the newest base iPhone, juiced by Lunar New Year and 618 sales festivals promotions, discounts and sales push plus local Chinese subsidies. Apple could potentially take Q4 and Q1 lead in sales in both quarters. This tweak to Apple’s release schedule maybe real trouble for Android, not just in sales volume, but overall revenues taken by Apple and what’s left for Android.'
  • Bart Yee on Apple at $310.85: May's ninth record close - 'https://www.macrumors.com/2026/05/26/android-brands-may-copy-iphone-launch-strategy/ Some of you may not remember this but at one time Samsung was releasing its original Galaxy S through S5 in May-June. The S6-S10 were moved earlier to late February. from S20’s to present, the release dates moved into Mid January-Early February. There’s plenty of speculation as to why Samsung kept shifting release dates – some say Samsung needed to have more time for Galaxy S sales before Apple stole the spotlight and sales from September through March basically unopposed, some say Samsung wanted to curb Apple’s momentum and take back the consumer mindspace by earlier and earlier in the year challenges to Apple iPhone sales, plus visibility at MWC. The same can be said for Note phablets in early September at IFA, and then moved into August with Note 5 (mid-Aug), 7 (early-Aug), 8 (late-Aug). Z Foldables shifted a lot – OG Fold introduced in February, released in September 2019. From there: • 2020: The Galaxy Z Flip was unveiled on February 11 and released on February 14. The Galaxy Z Fold2 was announced on August 5 and released on September 18. • 2021: The Galaxy Z Fold3 and Galaxy Z Flip3 were unveiled and released in August. • 2022: The Galaxy Z Fold4 and Galaxy Z Flip4 were announced on August 10 and released on August 26. • 2023: The Galaxy Z Fold5 and Galaxy Z Flip5 were announced on July 26 and released on August 11. • 2024: The Galaxy Z Fold6 and Galaxy Z Flip6 were announced on July 10 and released on July 24. • 2025: The Galaxy Z Fold7 and Galaxy Z Flip7 were unveiled on July 9 and released globally in July. As you can see, progressively earlier and earlier from September to July. Speculation is so Foldables had a clear 1-2 sales months before being upstaged and competed with by iPhone introductions in mid-September. Continued'
  • Robert Paul Leitao on Premarket: Apple was red, turned green - 'David: What do you wonder about American Tower? It’s highly rated with an attractive 3.77% dividend yield and it’s a REIT with about 180,000 sites all over the world. Are you concerned there’s competition from satellite-based solutions?'
  • Bart Yee on Apple at $310.85: May's ninth record close - 'How AT&T, Verizon and T‑Mobile aim to end cell phone dead zones 7:50 pm EDT May. 27, 2026 https://apple.news/Ax7PtirkRQIm259Cd6Z7b-g'
  • Bart Yee on Apple at $310.85: May's ninth record close - 'Yesterday and today’s new all time closing highs were on 48M and 50.3M shares traded, well above the 43.8M 3 month average. This suggests retail, institutional, and Apple itself are active in trading. Sentiment seems high, RSI fell to still way above overbought at 77.37.'
  • Bart Yee on Apple at $310.85: May's ninth record close - 'Table of new highest intraday lows per trading session, best viewed in landscape. * = streak broken What will Th & Fri bring??? May 29, 2026 F $311-312 est.? May 28, 2026 Th $310 est.? May 27, 2026 $308.30 +0.63 W May 26, 2026 $307.67 +1.83 Tu May 22, 2026 $305.84 +5.44 Fr May 21, 2026 $300.40 +2.32 T May 20, 2026 $298.08 +1.56 W May 19, 2026 $296.35* Tu May 18, 2026 $294.91* M May 15, 2026 $296.52 +0.74 F May 14, 2026 $295.38 +1.88 T May 13, 2026 $293.50 +0.94 W May 12, 2026 $292.56 +2.33 Tu May 11, 2026 $290.23 +$.23 M May 8, 2026 $290.00 +4.22 F May 7, 2026 $285.78 +4.70 T May 6, 2026 $281.07 +$2.70 W May 5, 2026 $276.50* Tu May 4, 2026 $274.86* M May 1, 2026 $278.37 +$10 Fr Apr 30, 2026 $268.14* Th (Earnings Call after close) Apr 29, 2026 $267.04* W Apr 28, 2026 $268.66 Tu'
  • Ben Gepp on Premarket: Apple was red, turned green - 'The original iMacs were also a huge risk and look where they are now. Ive and Newson are hugely talented, intensely rigorous and considered designers, I don’t think this is a bit of a punt. Too early to tell with the Luce and Vision Pro. Apple Tv was a ‘hobby’ for a long time. More than likely it give some idea as to where Titan may have ended up.'
  • Bart Yee on Premarket: Apple was red, turned green - 'No offense taken. For clarity, these vehicles are “electron” donor powered, regardless of source of where the electrons got their initial Energy push or potential energy from, and regardless of whether they remained plugged / connected to their energy supply (grid) or storage (battery). In this manner, battery gives up or donates the electrons as the vehicle requires them to generate magnetic and electric fields that are then turned to rotational power then to motion. In this way, we don’t call the ICE cars “gas tank” powered, we describe the actual fuel, not the storage device. Because electrons when moving are called electricity, the term electric (motor) cars isn’t inappropriate or inaccurate. Gasoline requires additional atmospheric oxygen (or nitrous for the adventurous), pressure and spark, plus oxidative fueled expansion to produce rotational work. Here, because of inability to capture all the energy of hydrocarbon oxidation (mostly heat, the expanded combustion mass, and subsequent loss of energy) conversion efficiency is much much less. Per Gemini: “Electric Cars: Convert roughly 77% to 91% of the electrical energy from the grid into power at the wheels. Gas Cars: Convert only 12% to 30% of the energy stored in gasoline into moving the car.” The rest of the hydrocarbon energy is lost to heat and the waste products of unburned hydrocarbons, oxides of nitrogen, CO2 and water. Any excess unburnt fuel or oxides of nitrogen are catalyzed in the catalytic converter, yet another producer of “waste” heat, although the desired outcome of harmless CO2, water, N2 nitrogen and O2 Oxygen is achieved. The acoustic noise (Vroom, vroom!) and waste hydrocarbons of internal combustion (love the smell of hydrocarbons in the morning) have become very ingrained in the experience of driving, flying, and motorcycling. This part of the transportation experience is quite emotional for many and a reason they cling to ICE or hydrocarbon burning engines. Although transport with little engine noise like in some buses, trains, light rail is great when you’re a passenger, drivers miss the sound and fury associated with the loud pedal, hence EV makers adding artificial acoustic sound and cues to the EV driving experience. I’m reminded of a tear down of a BMW EV “exhaust” system which has an “tail pipe” with an electrical connection. If the electrical connection is hooked up to an audio source, it can play music, demonstrating it’s an audio transducer to project engine exhaust sounds from an EV! Could also serve as audible warning to pedestrians and cyclists. It’s a slow Apple News day outside of the new highs.'
  • Bart Yee on Premarket: Apple was red, turned green - 'It might be Newsom’s hand but it’s Ive’s company and reputation to the fore, and both he and Ferraro signed off on it to bring it public. While a bold departure, it’s risky, but then isn’t all art that way? I’m sure the designers of the Vision Pro felt the same way.'
  • Bart Yee on Premarket: Apple was red, turned green - 'While this design “might” appeal to new or younger millennial millionaires who would compare the Ferrari EV to other EV designs, the Ferrari faithful, older and fairly fixed in perspective of previous ICE Ferrari’s see none of the swoopy, sensual curves, or sharp angular, even outrageous design cues that says you have something unique, rare, and most of all, desirable. Oh, it may have breathtaking technology, best in class interior, and wonderful performance, but if it has no eye appeal as an emotional (and very expensive) purchase, then it really turns out to be just another EV, almost, heavens, Germanic in execution. The fact that it carries few, if any design cues with any previous Ferrari, road or track, may be the point, but it won’t win over older and current buyers. And that may be the point of Ferrari carries on “courageously”, they may be trying to broaden the appeal of Ferrari to a wholly different audience, which is risky. Porsche tries that with the 914 (sales successful, but derided at the time, became a classic in the 2000’s), the front engines water cooled 928/924/944/968 series (great technology, so so sales), then gasp, blasphemy, started making SUV Cayennes!! But that actually worked, people eventually bought them in droves, old (some) and new buyers, and spawned even crossover sized Macan. What did work was Porsche stubbornly kept design cues to other Porsche’s intact, even advertising to that lineage, so that you can instantly say “That’s a Porsche!” And Porsche built EV Hybrid sports cars (918) before embarking on performance hybrid SUV’s, and the very powerful All Electric Taycan with clearly Porsche styling. Unfortunately Ive’s design could have been ordered by ANY Chinese, Asian, or mass European carmaker and it probably would be well received, but if it was a Ferrari, Lamborghini or other specialty maker, it will get scrutinized heavily and fight against the company’s own history. Apple has faced the same with the 5C, SE, mini, Plus, iPhone Air (still evolving), Vision Pro, FineWoven, Magic Mouse, and to some extent, HomePods and Mac Pro, so nobody’s perfect.'
  • Bart Yee on Premarket: Apple was red, turned green - 'Additional from the Autoblog article regarding the Luce impact on Ferrari stock: “And then there’s the stock markets’ reaction to it. Ferrari shares (RACE) fell almost 8.4% today in Milan and roughly 4% in New York. The sharp decline is attributed by analysts cited by CNBC to a mix of “design hate” and the classic market adage of “travel and arrive,” where a stock’s price steadily increases in anticipation of a major event, only to drop or stagnate once the event actually happens.” “But there may be more to it. The markets’ reaction to the Ferrari Luce reveal may also have something to do with the fact that the Italian luxury brand is placing a bet in the EV space even as other luxury carmakers, such as Porsche and Lamborghini, have backtracked on plans to launch new EVs due to weak demand. Related to this point, some investors may fear that if the Ferrari Luce does not sell well, Ferrari will have to assume losses derived from high research and development costs, which in turn will affect its profitability.” The author is Romanian and “Travel and Arrival” is a British financial term essentially the same as “buy the rumor, sell the news”. Ferrari stock RACE is certainly feeling what AAPL has experienced with WWDC and iPhone intros except Luce acceptance and sales is very much uncertain at this point. Who knows, it may end up being a “Ferrari Electric vehicle Concept Car” if they don’t get enough preorders. From Gemini: “The exterior of the Ferrari Luce was designed by the outside design firm LoveFrom, led by renowned product designers Jony Ive and Marc Newson. The LoveFrom collective collaborated closely with Ferrari’s Chief Design Officer, Flavio Manzoni, and the internal Ferrari Design Studio to shape the radical look of the brand’s first EV. Because of Jony Ive and Marc Newson’s industrial design background—most notably their work at Apple—the Luce’s exterior features a highly minimalist, aerodynamic, and heavily rounded wedge design compared to traditional combustion-engine Ferraris.“ IMO, I’ve was probably chosen because of his rep AND probably had some designs in mind from Project Titan drawings or mockups. But Ferrari’s ex-CEO, who vowed never to have an electric Ferrari on his watch, probably said it best, “they are destroying the myth. I hope they take off the Prancing Horse.” And there’s the rub – a historic brand with history and multitudes of iconic designs and looks farmed out/collaborated w/Ive, Newson’s Apple-like minimalism and Ferrari signed off on this, rather “generic looking” design. A scan of Apple News headlines says: “Angry Ferrari Fans say…It Looks Too Californian” – LA Times “This Ferrari Should Have Been A Volkswagen” – The Verge And interestingly: “Ferrari’s Electric Car – Divisiveness is the Point” – The Economist Continued'
  • Gregg Thurman on Premarket: Apple was red, turned green - '” For now, he can choose between satellite and 5G terrestrial radio internet.” For over a year I relied exclusively on 5G cellular for internet connectivity. Last month I finally got TDS Fiber in my 130 yo neighborhood. Speed test on my WiFi says I’m getting about 400 gig up and down now. Except for being a little bit more reliable I’m not seeing a discernible speed boost. Cellular for my iPad cost me $10/month. TDS Fiber WiFi costs me ~$50/month. I’ll be interested in seeing what satellite service, when it’s available, will cost.'
  • David Emery on Apple at $310.85: May's ninth record close - 'Insert your favorite recording of Joni Mitchell’s “Big Yellow Taxi” here….'
  • Steven Philips on Apple at $310.85: May's ninth record close - 'It clearly needs a shopping center and big parking lot! Maybe a Trump Tower Hotel to attract more tourists! 🙂'
  • David Emery on Apple at $310.85: May's ninth record close - '(Nothing about Apple in this post….) The towns along the Croatian coast have always had a very risky history from attacks from the interior. The Romans fended off several serious revolts from Dalmatia. Arguably, that’s in part due to the position of the Balkans at the intersection of Europe and Asia, with invaders/migrations from Asia overwhelming colonies settled from invaders from the West (including Greece.) Geography is history, sometimes.'
  • Gregg Thurman on Premarket: Apple was red, turned green - '” Why are they called “electric” vehicles?” To differentiate them from gasoline powered vehicles? You don’t need to differentiate flashlights or radios because they’ve never used gasoline to power them.'
  • David Emery on Premarket: Apple was red, turned green - 'I wonder about American Tower with the potential for Amazon to challenge StarLink for satellite internet. A friend has StarLink in his new house, but will switch to land-line fiber when that shows up probably within 2 years. For now, he can choose between satellite and 5G terrestrial radio internet.'
  • Robert Paul Leitao on Premarket: Apple was red, turned green - 'Today’s trading session is now history and Apple made history just a few minutes ago by setting yet another new all-time closing high of $310.85, up $2.52 or 0.82% on the day.'
  • Robert Paul Leitao on Premarket: Apple was red, turned green - 'Michael: I just sent you a DM through the Apple 3.0 Slack group with a link to a Barron’s article titled, “6 High-Yielding BDCs Safe Enough for Dividend Investors”. I found the article of interest. I am partial to select names in the financial sector, especially a few of the majors that may be involved in the huge IPOs coming to market over the next several months.'
  • Robert Paul Leitao on Premarket: Apple was red, turned green - 'Into the last half hour of trading and Apple is on track for a record close. The shares are currently changing hands at $309.81, up $1.48. While that’s not as pretty of a number as the all-time high of $313.26 set earlier today, it’s a gain on yesterdays’ closing price and reflect market’s confidence in the announcements to be made next month at WWDC 2026. The S&P 500 is marginally in the green with Applovin being the standard bearer on the day. The shares are up 9.87% at $565.01.'
  • Ben Gepp on Premarket: Apple was red, turned green - 'On the Luce… The shrill voice of mockery. No objectivity or critique. Reminds me of when the iPhone was released. I’m not sure quite what to make of it yet (which is possibly an indication that I will come to highly regard it) I think all should see how it sells. As for the designer, looks more the hand of Marc Newson than Ive.'
  • Robert Paul Leitao on Premarket: Apple was red, turned green - 'Bart: Thank you for the thoughtful response. The “EVs” of today use stored energy in the batteries to power the cars and those batteries are charged from many different sources from fossil fuels, to wind, solar and nuclear sources, etc.. Many different fuel sources were also used in the mining and manufacture of the components (including the batteries) as well as the assembly of the vehicles. For my purposes and maybe for my purposes only I see them as battery-powered cars. Without the batteries there is no power to the vehicles. If I’m breaching some kind of geek or tech etiquette in my description, I mean no slight or harm to those involved. If “EVs” were tethered directly to an electric cord and the cord was necessary to power movement of the cars I would consider them “electric vehicles” similar to the “electric” lawn mover I used to cut the lawn as a kid. When someone inadvertently ran over the cord – it happened from time to time – the mower would stop. It didn’t have a battery to power it like today’s “EVs.”'
  • Gregg Thurman on Premarket: Apple was red, turned green - 'Upgraded my JUL $190/$195 Call Spreads (160) to JUL $300/305 Call Spreads (190) this morning. I did this based on the continued strength on AAPL’s intraday low upward trend line that now exceeds $308. I now hold 219 JUL $300/$305 Call Spreads. I continue to trade within the confines of my original capital budget ($42,500).'
  • Steven Philips on Premarket: Apple was red, turned green - 'Well, I guess you could say it’s “Luce-ly” a Ferrari. 🙂'
  • Michael Goldfeder on Premarket: Apple was red, turned green - 'On the topic of Jony Ive and his EV Ferrari that he designed, for those of you who have Apple Newstand+, there is an article in Barron’s dated May 26, 2026 regarding this vehicle and in particular this rather derogatory snippet: “Social-media users panned the new EV, which bears little resemblance to some of Ferrari’s best-known supercars. (It also isn’t red in the picture.) Some compared the Luce to budget EVs such as Nissan’s Leaf, which sells for about $30,000.” Ouch.'
  • Gregg Thurman on Why BofA Securities raised its Apple price target $50 to $380 - 'Joseph, what’s the average annual gain since 2010?'
  • Gregg Thurman on Why BofA Securities raised its Apple price target $50 to $380 - 'Bill, yours is a great summary of the weakness in “AI” revenue assumptions. How on God’s green little acre Wall Street made the financial calculations that said, “Spending $200+ Billion to develop a new, untested product, with zero history of revenue generation is smart”. But it wasn’t just one firm that drank the Kool-Aid, it was several, meaning that even after successfully developing this new technology, you’re going to immediately have competition, and what does competition do? It drives prices down. The goal of all the “AI” companies is to sell tokens. In any market there is a finite demand for the product. What happens when the demand beyond “early adopters” fails to appear? I think we are in the “early adopters” stage, but instead of that group influencing the main body of large scale purchasers to join them, they are discovering painful truths, such as: humans may be cheaper than “AI”. I think, as I have for a long time, that data center “AI” is a house of cards. Successful “AI” will occur on device or localized servers. In both cases Apple is the clear leader. Excepting Apple, nobody has mobile/desktop products to operate on-device. Excepting Apple, nobody has an OS capable of running on-device. Excepting Apple, nobody has a Server (Mac Mini/Mac Studio) to operate a localized “AI” (both of which are back ordered 90+ days). Apple is going to reduce the TAM for “AI” users with its on-device strategy. Now add privacy to your “AI” success formula. How so many smart people failed to see the financial limitations of data center LLMs is beyond me. It’s only conjecture but I think they were seduced by what a properly functioning “AI” could do, to the point they didn’t do a financial analysis of what it would cost and where the revenue was going to come from to pay for it, only to discover that humans may be cheaper. Rather than being behind the industry Apple did those calculations and chose on-device, an area where it excels. Apple Intelligence improves the functionality of OSX and the features/apps it supports. Revenue to develop Apple Intelligence and the silicon that powers it is parsed into every device that Apple sells. In on-device “AI” Apple has no competition, to the contrary Apple has pricing power, and is using that power to attack the competitions’ only competitive edge – price. How long before the data center developers recognize their error and decide to change direction? Will Microsoft and Google be up to the challenge of upgrading Windows/Android to support on-device? Will the chip makers (Intel, AMD, Samsung, Qualcomm) have the time to catch up with Apple’s silicon? Will anybody have the capital resources after investing so heavily in data center and LLM’s to change gears? My money is following Apple/AAPL, not for the next 2-3 years, but for a long time after that.'
  • Bart Yee on Premarket: Apple was red, turned green - 'Robert said: “Why are they called “electric” vehicles? I don’t call my battery-powered flashlight an electric flashlight or my battery-powered radio an electric radio.“ That’s because a flashlight or radio with batteries were never powered by gasoline or engines to generate their power source. A lantern or candle’s effect and purpose (light) was originally powered by tallow, wax, or hydrocarbon fuels (kerosene, whale oil, naphtha, etc.) so were simply called candles and lanterns, power source not specified, but if you want to use “modern battery powered” versions of those, they are called electric or battery candles and electric or battery powered lanterns, all to clarify what their power source is. The automotive field referred to gasoline engines as Internal combustion engines till recently because they all were, but when fuel injection, Turbochargers and superchargers became common for air intake, those appellations were added, as were variable valve timing and other mechanical and ultimately computer controlled enhancements. Diesel engines had their own combustion cycle dynamics as well as fuel source, hence called diesels. Then hybrid, plug in hybrids, fully electric, fuel cell, and who know what next will be needed to specify to the buying and using public what energy source besides gas or diesel engine cars and trucks will be. Yes, I’m being very pedantic, but accuracy and precision in medical, electronics, automotive, and language usage is important, if just to be sure we can agree on what is being talked about and communicated, instead of just making assumptions, and word usage gets generalized and diluted. If some in the general population think that make us sound like techies, know it alls, or elites who want to lord it over “the average joe” or common folks, sorry about that, we took education seriously, took advantage of learning opportunities, have genuine interest in learning more, gaining skills, and becoming reasonable experts or at least knowledgeable in many things, most of all a professional career. We didn’t want to be lowest common denominators. If that sounds arrogant, sorry again, that’s a you problem for that interpretation (not you Robert and other members here). TL:DR – Words and meanings matter. Use it or lose it.'