Recent Comments

  • Robert Paul Leitao on Premarket: Apple is green - 'It was a good day for the market with over 75% of S&P 500 components rising on the day and the DJIA gained 556.21 points or 1.08%. As Bart points out above, Apple gradually moved south in afternoon trading to close off $0.96 or 0.28% at $342 even. In other news CFRA has announced a rise in its Apple price target to $380 per share from $350 while maintaining a 4-star Buy recommendation. This follows the “Welcome Home” event on Tuesday morning.'
  • Bart Yee on Premarket: Apple is green - 'AAPL closed down $0.96 to exactly $342.00 on very mediocre volume of 35M shares, just a quiet sideways move. Last 5 sessions have shown spiky openings up $4-6 and then slow rest of session declines on subdued volume except for Wednesday. I expect a little positivity tomorrow as Duo preorders open and optimism that Preoprders will point to better than expected demand, say over 5-6M for 2026, and delivery times extending well into December and January.'
  • John Konopka on OpenAI promises not to use Apple trade secrets — for now - '@Richard The big problem they have for the IPO is showing that they have any useful revenue. This is the big mystery about AI: enormous expenses, little to no revenue.'
  • Steven Philips on OpenAI promises not to use Apple trade secrets — for now - 'It was panned – until they actually drove one.'
  • John Konopka on Apple investors: Set your calendars - 'Curiously, one day before the elections. Could be spun different ways. Whatever Apple announces on Monday will be swamped by the news on Tuesday. Apple’s P/E is just under 40. It has been a bit higher in the past. On the other hand, Tesla’s P/E is 342 and AMD’s is 152 so P/E is not the sole indicator of value. In Apple’s case, I’d say it is an indicator of future revenue.'
  • Gregg Thurman on OpenAI promises not to use Apple trade secrets — for now - 'In any settlement Apple force Open AI to bond its word for at least $10 Billion. Then if found guilty of breaking a non-use agreement Apple get paid by the bond holder.'
  • Steven Philips on Under Ternus, Apple closes above $5T for first time - 'Yeah, but you’re “smarter than the average bear!” 🙂'
  • Joseph Bland on OpenAI promises not to use Apple trade secrets — for now - 'Please permit me to clarify; There is the physical threat ((WWIII, biological agents, nano-machines creating Grey Goo, etcetera) to humanity (and even biological life itself), but there’s is also a oligarchic threat from too much power in the hands of too few.'
  • Joseph Bland on OpenAI promises not to use Apple trade secrets — for now - 'Hi, Richard. I agree, if by “this” you mean trying to wriggle off the hook, which I think it does, and consequently upvoted. That said, there’s a much more insidious push behind AI more generally than meets the eye, and “this” reveals it. And why Apple almost alone is working to counter it. IMO..'
  • Joseph Bland on OpenAI promises not to use Apple trade secrets — for now - '(timed out) …co-opting the acronym ASI not only doesn’t work, it reveals to anyone with half a brain what you dirtbags are up to. This naked power grab is the real threat that ASI represents, not just to humanity, but to freedom, justice, and the American way of life.'
  • Joseph Bland on OpenAI promises not to use Apple trade secrets — for now - 'This. Thanks, Daniel, for pointing out the intellectual property damage that results from theft of proprietary information. Knowing where Apple is going instructs how to get to the same place slightly differently and first – and throw up barriers. Dirtbags. No wonder they’re at this President’s beck and call: Like him, they have zero morals when it comes to the almighty buck! And then there’s the power that AI, let alone true ASI, gives them to “invent the future”. And no, President Trump/Republican toadies; there is a huge difference between AI and ASI, so co-opting the Acronym'
  • Bill Donahue on OpenAI vs. Apple: The plot thickens - 'Not to slice things too thinly, but unless OpenAI has evidence that the person emailed those files under inducement by Apple, their legal beef is solely limited to the ex-employee. Especially if all they’ve got is evidence that he emailed them to himself.'
  • Bill Donahue on OpenAI promises not to use Apple trade secrets — for now - 'Apple should seek the injunction anyways. Because a promise not to do something that is broken doesn’t have the same legal consequences as an injunction that is not followed. Especially when that promise comes from a company that is i) run by a pathological liar, and ii) based on technology entirely trained using stolen IP. At best, even if it’s in the form of a contract with Apple, the broken promise allows Apple to seek civil remedies, which would simply put them back in the exact position they are in today. Whereas a broken injunction lands them in trouble for contempt.'
  • Daniel Epstein on Apple investors: Set your calendars - 'Kind of like this year’s fall IPhone release schedule. Staggered and some models delayed. Also a lot of new product releases and a new CEO to organize. They aren’t rushing to get out the results but haven’t warned either. Not the most important quarter but the guide will be important to the street reaction. An extra week could be useful.'
  • Rodney Avilla on Apple investors: Set your calendars - 'Why the extra week? It will give them more data on new products for their forward guidance.'
  • Gregg Thurman on OpenAI promises not to use Apple trade secrets — for now - 'I’ve always felt that Zuckerberg was the lowest of the low. It appears that Altman may be lower. If I was an investor I would be super concerned how this proposed settlement (an indirect admission of guilt) would impact sales. As a potential IPO buyer I would be more than concerned. I would not trust my money to the likes of Altman. I think Altman’s career at ChatAI may be over. How many Board members, senior executives, senior employees, potential customers are going to distance themselves from this stain?'
  • Gregg Thurman on Apple investors: Set your calendars - 'With this upcoming Earnings Report Apple has extended the period between end of quarter to day of report by a full week. Historically, Earnings Reports occurred four weeks and 2 or 3 business days after the reporting period The next Earnings Report will occur five weeks and 1 business day after the reporting period. Why the extra week?'
  • Richard Gayle on OpenAI promises not to use Apple trade secrets — for now - 'I think this is all about OpenAI getting to its IPO. There was no way that was going to happen any time soon with this mega-case hanging over it. Altman already delayed it to next year (He said for security and safety reasons. As a known liar, I suspect it was this case that was scaring off the investors.) So it has come to an agreement that may make this go away long enough for OpenAI to cash in. Any court case will then happen after the IPO when they can then drag it out forever.'
  • William Baggs on OpenAI promises not to use Apple trade secrets — for now - 'Ive’s move looks like betrayal. What a nice pile of a AI billion or two will do. I do like the new electric car however. I have seen it in flesh both inside and out at the factory in Maranello, moving through the hight tech production line. It has a very carefully thought out design and blistering performance. Talking of IP theft, the movable monitor in the car is very much like the swivel neck iMac. It has no heads up display however and the range needs improvement.'
  • Richard Gayle on Apple investors: Set your calendars - 'Still lots of time for real-world events to have an effect, but I suspect you could be right. I expect some analysts to react harshly (“Ternus disappointingly was unclear about …”) but mostly to shake out any weak hands so the institutions can bulk up on more. However this also gives Apple a chance to buy back cheap shares. So I’ll be happy either way.'
  • Daniel Albaugh on OpenAI promises not to use Apple trade secrets — for now - 'OpenAI: “I promise not to use your trade secrets, for now. I need more time to study them.”'
  • Neal Guttenberg on Apple investors: Set your calendars - 'Apple seems somewhat overvalued here. I keep wondering if this latest surge will be given back at any time, especially since Apple seems to be able to grow into the present valuation. I wouldn’t be surprised that, with the earnings report, no matter what they report, that there will be some profit taking.'
  • Neal Guttenberg on OpenAI promises not to use Apple trade secrets — for now - 'Greg, Upvoted. It is an interesting dilemma for Open AI as well as for Apple. Open AI may try to get something to market that has, in some way, traces back to Apple’s trade secrets. How much will be too much for a court to decide that Open AI did not live up to their part of this agreement and what will the penalties be? I don’t trust Open AI to be truthful or straightforward about any of this. Will there be a list that includes all the things that they stole from Apple? It should be an open ended list since it seems they haven’t been as forthright with Apple about disclosing all the information that Apple wanted. For me, there is a lot of ambiguity here. I am not sure it will be all sorted out by this admission or this case. As with all things, time will tell.'
  • Robert Paul Leitao on Premarket: Apple is green - 'Rising interest rates are not only impacting formerly high-flying AI companies that are now confronting much higher borrowing costs, the cause of the higher rates – inflation – is spurring share price gains for Walmart and Costco. Walmart is up 7.88% over the past 5 days and Costco is up 4.23% over the same period. NIVIDA is off 6% over the past five days and CoreWeave is down nearly 22%. Rising rates and more timid lenders will reshape the direction of the market and the sectors that are favored.'
  • Greg Lippert on OpenAI promises not to use Apple trade secrets — for now - 'How does this work in practicality? If a person knows about a trade secret, how can they “unknow it”. If Open AI ever makes anything remotely referenced in any of the Apple documents, whether by theft or dumb luck, they should be liable. And would you trust this promise? Or would they try to out-litigate?.'
  • Robert Paul Leitao on Premarket: Apple is green - 'In late morning trading Apple is up $1.91 or 0.56% at $344.87. The shares opened at $346.95, nearly $ above yesterday’s closing price and have gradually moved down during morning trading. Yahoo! Finance is covering Apple moving higher while much of the AI trade moves lower. https://finance.yahoo.com/technology/article/as-ai-stocks-plunge-apple-is-riding-high-150412052.html
'
  • Greg Bates on OpenAI promises not to use Apple trade secrets — for now - 'This reads like an admission by OpenAI: Yes, we stole your trade secrets. Might not bode well.'
  • Michael Goldfeder on OpenAI promises not to use Apple trade secrets — for now - 'Open AI is doomed after this stunt. No integrity. Zilch. What a corporate stain and the stench will be with them forever. Anyone doing business with them will be cast under the same scrutiny and viewed as lower than whale sh*t. What a corrupt outfit and any semblance of a reputation that Jony Ives possessed has been obliterated faster than a Usain Bolt 100 meters race. His last notable act was the electric Ferrari he designed. That vehicle was panned by everyone in the automotive industry. Nice legacy. What a collection of dirtballs and outright thieving trash.'
  • David Emery on OpenAI promises not to use Apple trade secrets — for now - 'Well, it’ll be interesting to see how the court and Apple will enforce this agreement.'