Recent Comments

  • Robert Paul Leitao on Premarket: Apple is red - 'Index futures are red (again this morning!) with the Russell 2000 small cap index off 1.32%. Apple is currently off $0.80 at $260.01. Oracle, which rose more than 9% yesterday to finish up $13.72 at $163.12, is ahead pre-market $0.75 at $163.87. Defense contractor Lockheed Martin which dropped $1.75 on Wednesday to close at $649.47, is off $3.39 pre-market at $646.10. Today’s session begins in fifteen minutes.'
  • Dan Scropos on In September, the Pentagon spent $5.3 million on Apple devices - 'Money well spent. Troop Morale: These premium food items, which also included $15.1 million in ribeye steaks, are traditionally served in military dining halls to support troop morale, particularly before deployments. Department-Wide Contracts: The records reflect institutional purchasing across the Department of Defense (DoD) for thousands of service members, rather than personal “elite banquets” or private events for Hegseth. Institutional Practice: Similar end-of-year spending spikes for luxury food and equipment have been documented under previous administrations as a standard, albeit controversial, federal budgeting practice'
  • Greg Lippert on Apple's MacBook Neo: What the critics are saying - 'A Macro event?… “Macro event” is doing a lot of heavy lifting.'
  • Stephen Gordon on The Computer Museum celebrates 50 years of Apple - 'David Pogue looked like a kid in candy store, and I get it. He gets to geek out with all the Apple legends. Not sure if I should be annoyed by it, but I did enjoy watching the event.'
  • Greg Lippert on Premarket: Apple is red - 'Is President Pervert purposely trying to destroy the economy so he can declare a state of emergency, subvert elections and destroy our democracy? See the SAVE act. Jeez, oil prices will soon be the worst in history. So much for that campaign promise. Prepare for a long war… oh wait we won, right? So much winning while Pete F’in Drunktard is dining on prime rib and crab. WTF!?! Go MAGA. Wait for the oil effect. Prices of goods will rise faster than the titanic took on water. The list goes on and on…. And a 13-year old victims story has been confirmed – Trump sexually and physically abused her. Apple should be $300 but this criminal is destroying everything he touches. We need a miracle.'
  • ben luna on Apple's MacBook Neo: What the critics are saying - 'Let them eat lobster tail.'
  • David Drinkwater on Apple's MacBook Neo: What the critics are saying - 'Rick, you are right, so upvoted. David, you are also right, so upvoted. The death of eaten crowns will not be celebrated, because there are too many vultures hoping for Apple’s demise.'
  • David Drinkwater on Apple's MacBook Neo: What the critics are saying - 'Finding a way to apply previously spent development money is brilliant. Drug companies do it all the time. (I do find this less ethical, because they take granted an outdated applications for a drug that many people may need back off the “generic” market. e.g. the Purple Pill was good for A, but our patent was running out, so now we sell the Purple Pill for B, and you can’t buy it for A as a generic. I get that these companies exist to make money and that drug development is expensive, tedious, laborious, etc., but the development costs did not recur – only the cost to evaluate the drug to fix a new problem – B vs A – are new.) So ultimately, Apple has done well by reapplying iPhone chips (A) in Laptops (B). I don’t care to search for text, but I think I predicted this in the past. I certinaly know I wondered when iPhone chips would be applied in low cost laptops. More optimistically, the laptops are gonna buy a whole lot more users – also stated elsewhere – and here by Dan Scropos.'
  • David Drinkwater on Horace Dediu: Apple's jui jitsu AI strategy - '“Brevity is the soul of wit.” see also “If I Had More Time, I Would Have Written a Shorter Letter” Tommo seems to have too much time on his hands.'
  • David Drinkwater on Horace Dediu: Apple's jui jitsu AI strategy - '“Then, one day, a student who had been left to sweep up after a particularly unsuccessful party found himself reasoning in this way: ‘If such a machine is a virtual impossibility, it must have finite improbability. So all I have to do, in order to make one, is to work out how exactly improbable it is, feed that figure into the finite improbability generator, give it a fresh cup of really hot tea… and turn it on!’ He did this and managed to create the long sought after golden Infinite Improbability generator out of thin air. Unfortunately, shortly after he was awarded the Galactic Institute’s Prize for Extreme Cleverness, he was lynched by a rampaging mob of respectable physicists on the ground that he has became the one thing they couldn’t stand most of all: ‘a smart arse’.” I was lazy, too: I let he Internet look it up for me. hitchhikers (dot) fandom (dot)com/ wiki/Infinite_Improbability_Drive Enjoy the tea!'
  • David Drinkwater on Horace Dediu: Apple's jui jitsu AI strategy - 'Unfortunately, it seems that our President wants Russia to win the conflict in Ukraine, which is probably good justification (in his mind) for him to not invest in technology that will help Ukraine to win.'
  • Gregg Thurman on Premarket: Apple was green, turned red - '”As usual, just who has the sustainable business model?” Which is exactly why I went negative on AI as an investment strategy. The winner in AI development is going to to be the holders of the gateway to AI. There is only one firm that controls its customers as does Apple. And now it’s branching out from the PREMIUM sector to ALL sectors of the desktop and mobile market. This is why Apple didn’t comment on its vision for AI, and why it wasn’t developing another LLM/data center model. Silence is not the same thing as inaction. It won’t be long before Apple is the Master, and everybody else are slaves to it.'
  • Gregg Thurman on PC makers shocked, shocked by Apple's MacBook Neo - 'I remember Apple took on Qualcomm in an antitrust claim. Everybody that thought they knew better (IOW everybody) said Apple was nuts. “You can’t develop a cellular radio without stepping on a Qualcomm patent”, they said. Well, guess what? Qualcomm blinked. “Overview of the Qualcomm and Apple Settlement In April 2019, Qualcomm and Apple reached a significant settlement that ended a lengthy legal battle over patent royalties and licensing agreements. This settlement marked a major turning point for both companies. Key Details of the Settlement Settlement Terms Duration: The settlement includes a six-year licensing agreement, effective from April 1, 2019, with an option to extend for two additional years. Payment: Apple made a one-time payment to Qualcomm, although the exact amount was not disclosed. Chip Supply Agreement: Apple agreed to purchase Qualcomm chips for future iPhones, indicating a return to using Qualcomm’s technology after previously relying on Intel.” Apple products now ship with Apple designed modems, without paying the exorbitant fees charged Qualcomm (which were based on what the finished product sold for at retail). Shit handset manufacturers paid a fraction of that paid by Apple. The exact details weren’t disclosed, but I imagine Apple got a license to Qualcomm’s extensive patent portfolio allowing Apple to design and manufacture its own modems, releasing it from Qualcomm’s onerous fee schedule, and established a fee schedule that closely corresponds with industry essential standard fees. Apple then incorporated modems into its own silicon and added capabilities unique to Apple. Since this settlement, I can’t think of anything significant that Apple doesn’t control in its products. Apple silicon goes way beyond “SOC”, incorporating technologies that Intel, AMD and Qualcomm itself can’t do.'
  • Bart Yee on Premarket: Apple was green, turned red - 'Papa Larry Ellison should use some of his stock profits to immediately retire at least 1/2 to 2/3rd of the $79 billion debt ($54B in new debt financing) his son David’s combined Paramount-Skydance / Warner Bros. Discovery HBO merger is going to have if and when it closes. Of course, they are already eyeing $6-8 Billion in layoff cost savings and redundancies, but since when has any entertainment leveraged transaction actually worked before the financing and debt service costs caught up with them? Most of the cost savings are borne by the regular studio workers and very little in mid to upper management and of course, none by ownership. I swear it’s just a perpetual game of debt service which eventually dooms studios, restaurant and food service and now probably some sectors of AI overspending. All the while Apple maintain fiscal and operating discipline, maybe missing out on initial waves, but also not being sucked out to sea by the eventual vacuum of consolidation and overspending come due. Apple has shown over the past 3 fiscal years + 1 Quarter consumers have been willing to spend $1.33 Trillion on Apple products and services. Cory Doctorow estimates AI companies have “skyrocketed” enterprise AI revenues to about $37 billion in 2025, but net profits remain elusive because of major spending, expenses and operating cost outweighing profits, leading to near zero or negative profit margins. And that’s in 3 years of this “AI boom”. As usual, just who has the sustainable business model?'
  • ben luna on PC makers shocked, shocked by Apple's MacBook Neo - 'Frankly my dear, I don’t give a DRAM. Couldn’t agree more with you. I’ve not seen any mentions, so maybe this isn’t true, but with the unified memory, doesn’t that protect Apple from the DRAM prices since they are just part of the system processor?'
  • David Emery on PC makers shocked, shocked by Apple's MacBook Neo - 'I don’t. First, Windows is very inefficient with computing resources. Second, 8GB of conventional memory won’t cut it, that’s a system architecture constraint. And finally, there are applications where lots of RAM is pretty much necessary. But the Apple integrated memory shows you can be stingy with RAM -if- the rest of the system accommodates paging and other memory management techniques that the user doesn’t notice.'
  • Stephen Gordon on The Computer Museum celebrates 50 years of Apple - 'I set a reminder so I can check it out.'
  • Gregg Thurman on PC makers shocked, shocked by Apple's MacBook Neo - '”They’re putting a stake in the ground that says the Apple ecosystem is now accepting new club members. Apple exploited the premium market as far as it could go (dominance), then turned its sites on the competitions bread and butter – cheaply priced products glommed together with off the shelf, generic (one size fits all) components. This consumer segment desired Apple products, they just couldn’t afford them. Using proprietary technologies that the competition disdained, Apple constructed a superior product that challenged the competitions low price points. Now instead of addressing the top tier (~25% of the TAM), Apple is addressing 100% of the TAM, and doing so with a superior product the competition is going to have great difficulty matching, let alone undercutting. There is going to be a seismic sea change in the world of desktop computing. Old faces are going to disappear, either through bankruptcies, or, more likely, consolidation (mergers and/or acquisitions). The “Other” category is going to flat out disappear.'
  • Rodney Avilla on In September, the Pentagon spent $5.3 million on Apple devices - 'How many government agencies spend (waste) money just so they don’t loose it as a budget item? Count the number of government agencies that exist, and you will have your answer. Find someone who can fix this problem, and they can have my vote.'
  • Gregg Thurman on PC makers shocked, shocked by Apple's MacBook Neo - '”Prepare for the calls to break up Apple.” Starting with the original Macintosh, Apple has always been a “premium” name plate. That’s 42 years, and during that time the x86 crowd copied Apple’s products, and sold cheaper versions of them. During that 42 years the consumer got fed up with substandard components, substandard software, buggy applications and an architecture prone to exploitation by bad actors. They paid for Apple products that “just worked” and designed to protect their privacy. The one thing the Wintels couldn’t copy is the ethos of Apple. Because their products were glommed together using universal, off the shelf components (from processors to radios to memory to OSs) with nothing interchangeable without updating drivers or BIOSs. Apple’s defense against arguments that it competes unfairly is that the x86 community could have built better and developed their own OS, processors, radios, GPUs and unified memory, instead of relying on others to do it for them. Microsoft and Intel could have worked together to adopt a risc architecture (something Intel wanted to do), but under Steve Ballmer’s leadership at Microsoft put a kabash on doing, in fear of obsoleting a ton of proprietary enterprise developed software that ran on Windows. The x86 industry milked the cow until their respective technologies were bypassed by another and it all started with Apple’s acquisition of NeXT, the hiring of a CEO not content on milking and the development of OSX.'
  • Fred Stein on Playing Apple's MacBook Neo for laughs — from both sides (videos) - 'Actually, it’s great to highlight all that’s missing, because …. It negates the cannibalization issue. In contrast it may push buyers to ‘model up’ once in the buying mood. Best of both worlds.'
  • Digant Jariwala on PC makers shocked, shocked by Apple's MacBook Neo - 'Another benefit for using previous year’s iPhone chips is that it allows Apple to amortize the expense of each silicone node over large number of devices instead of just iPhones. As each future node progress requires ever increasing R&D by TSMC which are passed on to its customers, Apple’s cost per chip for node advances go down as well as lengthening the number years that each node remains in production, which may be an incentive in negotiations between Apple and TSMC – I am sure Nvidia is not interested in anything but the latest node, so all that TSMC equipment may sit idle while Apple can continue taking advantage of previous gen nodes for continued chip manufacture'
  • Michael Goldfeder on PC makers shocked, shocked by Apple's MacBook Neo - 'I have a cousin who works for a medical device company “Stryker” who just had their systems hacked by Iran and all data wiped. I told her that they ought to be using Apple products as the iOS operating system is the absolute best. I just read the report online and this quote was inside the article from the Daily Mail: “The company’s ‌staff ⁠found that remote devices running Microsoft’s Windows operating system, such as cellphones, laptops and others configured to connect ​to Stryker’s ​technology ⁠systems, had been wiped.”'
  • Jonny T on Horace Dediu: Apple's jui jitsu AI strategy - 'So funny to me. Poor Tommo_UK (for all his verbiage) just isn’t in the same class as Horace!'
  • Robert Paul Leitao on Premarket: Apple was green, turned red - 'Approaching 3pm in the east and Oracle continues to sit atop the S&P 500 leaderboard. The shares are up 8.63% at $162.29. Data center operator Equinix is up $18.11 today at $974.18. Apple is currently off $0.58 at $26.25. Cisco Systems is ahead $0.55 at $78.25. Let’s see how the markets close out today’s session.'
  • Digant Jariwala on Premarket: Apple was green, turned red - '‘Operation Epstein Fury’'
  • John Konopka on PC makers shocked, shocked by Apple's MacBook Neo - '@Greg I forgot about the Windows license. They also have to pay for the CPU from Intel and probably the customer needs Office from MS. For Apple I’ll bet the CPU is almost free. macOS doesn’t cost Apple much and they supply a free version of iWorks. Using “only” 8GB of RAM works to Apple’s advantage. It’s cheaper and macOS is more tolerant of less RAM.'
  • Neal Guttenberg on PC makers shocked, shocked by Apple's MacBook Neo - 'Digant, That is an excellent point. Upvoted.'
  • Les Surdykowski on PC makers shocked, shocked by Apple's MacBook Neo - 'The Neo is platform expansion move, not just a product launch. Think of it as another leg to the ambient AI context that the iPhone, AirPod Pro (with camera) Glasses, HomePods (with or without robotic arm) enable. They’re putting a stake in the ground that says the Apple ecosystem is now accepting new club members. Come on in, the water is fine.'
  • Bill Donahue on In September, the Pentagon spent $5.3 million on Apple devices - '272 doughnut orders at ~$500 per order??? I’ve never heard of a $500 doughnut order. That’s a lot of doughnuts. And to think they could’ve gotten 272 Neos instead 😉'