Recent Comments

  • Robert Paul Leitao on Premarket: Apple is red - 'Index futures are mixed at close to 9am in the east. In pre-market activity Apple is off $0.48 at $283.67. Amazon is up $0.07 at $232.46 ahead of the bell after dropping $2.04 in Wednesday trading. Oppenheimer just raised its price target on the shares to $305.'
  • Bart Yee on What hyperscalers spend on AI infrastructure, Apple spends on buybacks - 'Every pundit, academic, and analyst wants to spend Apple’s money in their own way, having little knowledge of what it actually buys, creates, or eventually receives for that expenditure. And like a lot of acquisitions, personnel and new businesses, does it actually mesh with what your core business is, what you do best, and how well you run your company? When you try to reinvent yourself, does it always work, or does it cause a lot of disruption?'
  • Mordechai Beizer on What hyperscalers spend on AI infrastructure, Apple spends on buybacks - 'Took a look at Laskin’s CV, he’s a spinmeister with no real experience actually doing anything. Why should his comments on the optics of Apples business mean anything?'
  • Steven Philips on Premarket: Apple is red - '“Challenger, Gray & Christmas”??? Thats a bit ominous for a jobs related company Especially EOY 🙁'
  • Robert Paul Leitao on Premarket: Apple was red, turned green - 'Walmart hit a new all-time high today of $114.89 and reached an intra-day market cap of $0.90 trillion. Over the past year the shares have gained 22.35%.'
  • Robert Paul Leitao on Premarket: Apple was red, turned green - 'Apple did mint a new all-time high today of $288.61 soon after the opening bell before falling back on the day to finish off $2.04 at $284.15.'
  • Robert Paul Leitao on Premarket: Apple was red, turned green - 'Microsoft dropped $2.50 to end the day at $477.73. The shares have recovered $1.28 overnight. There was pressure on the shares following speculation Microsoft missed its internal targets for AI-related sales.and was reducing quotas. The company denied the claim. Over the past month the shares have dropped in price 7.60%. The current all-time high of $555.45 was set on July 31st.'
  • Rodney Avilla on Alex Kantrowitz: A Gemini-powered Siri is 'OK for now' - 'Bussiness Insider: “Google LLC is the largest and primary subsidiary under Alphabet’s umbrella. It retains control over all of the well-known internet-related businesses, including Google Search, Android, YouTube, Gmail, Google Maps, and Google Chrome.” I believe Google is alive and well.'
  • Joseph Bland on Premarket: Apple was red, turned green - 'Hi, Bart. “ Today’s decline…might have been Apple buying back..” AFAIK, the stock drops when sellers outweigh buyers, and vice versa. Please correct me if I’m wrong!'
  • Joseph Bland on Premarket: Apple was red, turned green - '“Max pain rises…to $280 … “ Ergo, today’s selloff at 13 M share trades below the average volume of 51.3 M trades. Apple shorters trying to save their shorts yet again. “RSI rises to 75.18…(Above 70 is overbought…” (Horshit!) Sorry. Had to sneeze….'
  • Greg Lippert on Apple resists, India caves - 'If only the EU could understand the foolishness of their ways…. smh'
  • Steven Philips on Apple's 'lacks juristiction' defense fails in Luxembourg - 'Deja Vu all over again!'
  • Steven Philips on Mr. Market bought the Intel-fabricating-Apple-M-chips 'rumor' on Tuesday - 'Intel Inside??? No stickers please. 🙂'
  • Bart Yee on Premarket: Apple was red, turned green - 'Some of the bears are all excited that AAPL closed down $2.00 today, a drop of less than 0.72%, smallest drop of the Mag-7 today. When you look back at the last 2 weeks and are still holding a 6.8% gain, from $266 to $284, $18 higher, most long term investors aren’t bothered or worried by a $2.00 declines, it’s basically noise around Apple’s share price. If you look at the 6 month chart, it’s even more pronounced, rising from $202 to $284, a gain of $82 and 41%. Today’s decline is a bit of profit taking on a moderate 38M shares. Who know, it might have been Apple buying back at least 5M of them.'
  • Rodney Avilla on Apple resists, India caves - 'My take: That didn’t take long. The shortness just refers to the public discussions. We don’t know how long the behind the scenes discussions have been going on. Also ‘caving’ implies defeat, being forced to change. I am hoping that thru the multiple discussions going on with different groups, that Indian regulators actually changed their mind regarding the use of such apps. Regulators becoming wiser thru discussions with the public? I admit, that is hard to imagine.'
  • Robert Paul Leitao on Premarket: Apple was red, turned green - 'Did anyone else feel the earth move under their feet just a little while ago?! About 15 minutes in today’s CNBC Power Lunch podcast, Dan Niles said something positive about Apple. Not so much about this year for Apple, but next year. Strange. I’m checking my hearing after getting back up from the floor!'
  • Robert Paul Leitao on Mr. Market bought the Intel-fabricating-Apple-M-chips 'rumor' on Tuesday - 'The M1 would best the easiest chip for Intel to fab and thus allowing more production capacity at TSMC for Apple’s current cutting-edge chips.'
  • David Wilson on Alex Kantrowitz: A Gemini-powered Siri is 'OK for now' - 'I love that exchange.'
  • Gregg Thurman on Alex Kantrowitz: A Gemini-powered Siri is 'OK for now' - 'Apple and AAPL are looking better and better all the time…. Yes it is, and by this time next year i expect WS, not seeing the revenue growth (attributable to AI), will be scrutinizing the capex a whole lot differently than they are now.'
  • Romeo Esparrago on Alex Kantrowitz: A Gemini-powered Siri is 'OK for now' - 'Kramer: It’s a write off for them. Jerry: How is it a write off? Kramer: They just write it off. Jerry: Write it off of what? Kramer: They just write it off! Jerry: You don’t even know what a write off is, do you? Kramer: No. Do you? Jerry: No I don’t!! – Seinfeld, Season 8, Episode 5 “The Package”'
  • Alan Birnbaum on Apple resists, India caves - 'I had thought that this was a bargaining chip for India in regards to the Indian Government and Apple in a legal wrangle over new anti-trust laws in India. Maybe I was overthinking this…..'
  • Joseph Bland on Alex Kantrowitz: A Gemini-powered Siri is 'OK for now' - 'BTW, Fortune, last I heard the company was called Alphabet, not Google….'
  • Joseph Bland on Alex Kantrowitz: A Gemini-powered Siri is 'OK for now' - 'Relevant to my above comment, this just in from Fortune: “IBM CEO warns there’s ‘no way’ hyperscalers like Google and Amazon will be able to turn a profit at the rate of their data center spending” stocks.apple.com/A1D_u-CJvQ8udBcRewbp4Xw Apple and AAPL are looking better and better all the time….'
  • Timothy Smith on Apple resists, India caves - 'It almost seems like if you stand up to bullies, they might back down.'
  • Joseph Bland on Apple's 'lacks juristiction' defense fails in Luxembourg - 'It was worth a try.'
  • Joseph Bland on Apple resists, India caves - 'An absurd attempt, and one that pulls the curtain aside to reveal the machinations of India’s present leadership. Absurd because Apple was bound to challenge this.'
  • David Emery on Apple resists, India caves - 'I’m surprised India caved so quickly.'
  • Gregg Thurman on Apple resists, India caves - 'When you’re wrong, and you know it, clap your hands.'
  • Joseph Bland on Alex Kantrowitz: A Gemini-powered Siri is 'OK for now' - 'Apple’s “payment” for renting Gemini, assuming it’s actually happening, will just be a reduction in what Alphabet pays Apple for being the default search engine on Apple products. That will increase Alphabet’s net profit by what, a billion a year? Hardly a massive ROI. And the private info of Apple users will be shielded from Alphabet’s prying eyes. It is, however, going to be a massive payday when Alphabet gains AI access to all the Android AI users’ personal info, which is the real reason behind Mr. Market’s bet on Alphabet….'
  • Joseph Bland on Premarket: Apple was red, turned green - 'Regardless of the granularity of Apple’s stock price history (1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years, or 10 years), what you see is peaks and valleys. And they’re very hard to predict, regardless of the granularity. Of course, broadly speaking, you can see the impact of the various macro economic events, including the dot com bubble recession of 2000-2002, the S&L or Great Recession of 3008-2009, and the Covid recession beginning in 2020 during President Trump’s first term. Now we appear to be heading into what can only be called the Trump Recession. However, in the specific case of Apple, we also appear to be on track for significant technological gains. But we’ve been there before. Following the Great Recession, the technology didn’t matter; the stock submarined, and stayed submarined for years, in spite of the phenomenal growth of what may be the most seminal invention ever to come out of Apple, the iPhone. Apple grew it’s coffers by leaps and bounds year after year, at precisely when AAPL, also year after year, was valued, as Horace Dediu put it, “like a steel mill going out of business”. But that’s why Apple is special. Starting about 12 years ago, and growing more so every year, every single time AAPL has been beaten down, it springs back up to grow even higher. So what happened 12 years ago? Buybacks happened. Not in a vacuum, mind you; technological growth continued as well. But buybacks slowly but surely shrank Apple’s stock float, making it more and more impervious to options traders by shifting the balance of AAPL ownership back towards long term investors, much as it was before institutional owners abandoned the stock in drives during and following the Great Recession. So yes, I expect Apple to be pulled down by the mass stock devaluation of the coming Trump recession. But I also expect that Apple will then regain all the ground it lost, and then some, just like it has done for the last 12 years.'