Recent Comments

  • Gregg Thurman on Mark Gurman: What Apple needs from Broadcom and vice versa - 'Could this AI server, that Gurman alludes to, be an extension of the Mac Mini/Mac Studio servers, that are way back ordered, whose purpose will be to power on site AI agents, thereby bypassing the need for tokens, being much more highly specialized and very protective of proprietary data? Have I got the application right? It seems to me that these servers will address a very large market (bigger than general purpose data centers?) where privacy and security is extremely important.'
  • Bart Yee on How Apple hedges foreign exchange fluctuations - 'Key Takeaways from the Data The $66 Billion Vulnerability: Roughly $66.1 billion of Apple’s $111.18 billion quarterly revenue came from outside the Americas. When the U.S. dollar is exceptionally strong, the growth rates in Europe, China, and Japan look smaller on paper than they actually are in local currencies. [1] Europe as the Primary FX Target: Because the Europe segment has quietly surpassed Greater China to become Apple’s dominant international market, fluctuating exchange rates against the Euro and Pound have the largest single impact on Apple’s international bottom line. [1, 2] Defying the Headwinds: Despite a stronger dollar dragging down conversion values, Apple managed to post 17% year-over-year revenue growth in Q2 2026. This was heavily driven by robust global demand for the iPhone 17 lineup and an all-time record high in Services revenue ($30.98 billion). [1, 2] If you want to keep exploring, we can look into how Apple’s Services division protects its profit margins against currency drops, or see how a strong dollar changes things for U.S. travelers going abroad. What sounds best?” The excerpt that PED posted follows the above, goes here, and illustrates how Apple can hedge against currency fluctuations.'
  • Bart Yee on How Apple hedges foreign exchange fluctuations - 'Here’s where I started: “has the dollar been stronger or weaker over the past 12 months?” “The U.S. dollar has been generally stronger over the past 12 months, though its momentum has fluctuated.[1, 2, 3] The U.S. Dollar Index (DXY)—which measures the currency’s performance against a basket of six major global currencies—is up by approximately 3.8% to 4.1% over the last year. The dollar saw significant surges leading up to mid-2026, often fueled by hawkish signals regarding Federal Reserve interest rates and labor market resilience. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] Despite this 12-month net gain, the dollar’s trajectory has been uneven. It experienced sharp drops in late 2025 before rebounding, and more recently saw minor pullbacks following softer-than-expected U.S. employment data and shifting investor rate-cut expectations. [1, 2, 3, 4] Would you like to know how the dollar performed against a specific currency (like the Euro, Yen, or British Pound), or are you looking for details on how this affects international travel or investments?” “AI responses may include mistakes. For financial advice, consult a professional.” “what does that do to a company like Apple’s revenues?” A stronger U.S. dollar generally depresses the reported revenues and profit margins of U.S. multinational companies like Apple. Because Apple generates roughly 60% of its total revenue from international markets, shifts in foreign exchange rates directly alter its financial statements. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] The Two Main Pressures of a Strong Dollar 1. The Conversion Loss (FX Headwinds) When Apple sells an iPhone in Europe, the customer pays in Euros (€). If the U.S. dollar strengthens against the Euro, each Euro collected converts back into fewer U.S. dollars. [1, 2, 3] Even if Apple sells the exact same number of physical devices abroad, its reported revenue in U.S. dollars shrinks. This effect is known on Wall Street as a foreign exchange (FX) headwind. [1, 2, 3] 2. The Pricing Dilemma To combat conversion losses, Apple is often forced to make a difficult choice in foreign markets: Raise Local Prices: Apple frequently increases local prices in foreign countries to maintain its profit margins. However, this makes products more expensive for local consumers, which can lower demand and drop unit sales. [1, 2, 3, 4] Absorb the Hit: If Apple keeps local prices flat, its products stay competitive, but the company must accept lower revenue and thinner profit margins on each sale. [1, 2] How Apple Minimizes the Damage Despite these pressures, Apple uses specific financial tactics to insulate its bottom line from currency volatility: [1, 2] Foreign Exchange Hedging: Apple’s corporate treasury purchases financial contracts (derivatives) that lock in specific exchange rates months in advance. This delays and smooths out the financial impact of a suddenly surging dollar. [1] Global Supply Chain Sourcing: While sales suffer from a strong dollar, purchasing power improves. Apple can buy certain component parts from foreign suppliers at a cheaper relative cost, slightly offsetting the revenue losses. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] Would you like to see a breakdown of Apple’s latest revenue by global region to see where it faces the most currency risk, or explore how a strong dollar impacts U.S. consumers instead? [1, 2]” “Yes” “Apple’s international segments account for roughly 55% to 60% of its total revenue, making its financial reports heavily exposed to foreign exchange risks. [1] According to Apple’s Q2 Fiscal Year 2026 Earnings Report (for the quarter ended March 28, 2026), the company’s regional revenue breakdown reflects exactly where it faces currency translation pressures. [1] Apple Revenue Breakdown by Geographic Segment (Q2 2026) Geographic Segment – Revenue (Billions USD) – Percentage of Total Revenue – Currency Exposure Risk Americas $45.09B 40.6% Low (Mainly insulated USD sales) Europe $28.06B 25.2% High (Exposed to Euro & British Pound) Greater China $20.50B 18.4% High (Exposed to Chinese Yuan) Rest of Asia Pacific $12.14B 10.9% High (Exposed to Australian Dollar, INR, etc.) Japan $9.41B 8.5% Very High (Exposed to highly volatile Yen) Total Revenue $111.18B 100% ~59.4% Total Foreign Exposure'
  • Gregg Thurman on J.P. Morgan raises Apple target $20 on price elasticity - 'Nice to see an expansion of PT from anybody, but $345 in the next 18 months is weak. Just a reminder, it’s been 19 sessions since AAPL established it all-time high of $317, and 7 sessions since AAPL declined to $273, and yet AAPL is poised to establish a new all-time high today, exceeding my July target of $310 by at least $7. On June 25, when I bailed on my July $305/$310 Call Spreads, AAPL was $37 below my target. Now AAPL has reversed that selloff by $42, a remarkable turn around just as unexpected as its decline. Clearly Investor Sentiment, sans Black Swans, is very strong. Samik’s earnings multiple of 32 ($315/$9.85) reflects current prints and not the earnings multiple of his $345 target, which is 35 ($345/$9.85). I think Samik’s earnings and multiple estimates are severely understated.'
  • Robert Stack on Premarket: Apple is green - 'Re: “[Samsung] reported stellar preliminary results on Tuesday, but its shares still cratered 6.9%.” It’s almost comforting to know this phenomenon applies to companies other than Apple…'
  • David Emery on Still no Siri AI for EU, despite Tim Cook's efforts - 'They did redesign the Switch 2 to conform to the battery regulations. And that makes me wonder, what liability Nintendo will have when a 3rd party battery goes bad and sets one on fire, or burns a kid?'
  • Fred Stein on J.P. Morgan raises Apple target $20 on price elasticity - 'Perspective: Service life for iPhones has gone up in the last 10 years from about 3 – 4 years then and 4 – 7 years now, per AI search. In that view, TCO has barely increased. Cumulative inflation over the last 11 years was over 40%. Finally, used iPhones address the price-sensitve market, and more as low-end vendors must raise prices.'
  • David Emery on Horace Dediu: Where is Nvidia in a decade? - 'But the “obsolete in 3-4 years” argument is one for continued NVIDIA purchases. With an investment in software and infrastructure, when the current generation of chips is ready for replacement, the likely ‘least effort’ would be to buy the latest NVIDIA chips, assuming NVIDIA retains that software moat. That’s not a recipe for growth, but it sure is a recipe for substantial continued cash flow!'
  • Daniel Epstein on J.P. Morgan raises Apple target $20 on price elasticity - 'To me the interesting thing in this call is the specificity of the price target dates. Dec 26 target is still 325. Dec 27 target is 345. So incremental growth in the stock price over the next 18 months. A little over 10% from yesterday’s closing price. Not a very strong expectation.'
  • Steven Philips on Ming-Chi Quo: The foldable iPhone will sell out on Day 1 - 'Folding money?'
  • Rodney Avilla on Ming-Chi Quo: The foldable iPhone will sell out on Day 1 - 'When Apple is doing well, like to get my kids, Apple gift cards for phones, laptops, watches, etc. It will be interesting to see if any of them use the money for foldable'
  • Gregg Thurman on Horace Dediu: Where is Nvidia in a decade? - 'This sounds very much like Apple’s on device AI direction.'
  • Gregg Thurman on Horace Dediu: Where is Nvidia in a decade? - 'Since the bank meltdown in 2008, AAPL has increased in value an annual average of ~26%. Over the last 50 years there have been several technology transitions that created new market leaders. First there was the personal computer. Apple jumped out front because it was consumer facing, then lost its way when leadership managed it as a commodity. MSFT won the initial OS wars, but lost its status because leadership couldn’t figure out what its second act was going to be. Motorola took an early lead in mobile, but lost to Nokia who pushed digital vs analog networks. Intel led computer processors, when performance per watt wasn’t a factor, but never figured what its second act was going to be. In the meantime Apple, with a change in leadership, pursued the consumer and laptops (formerly luggables) that didn’t require extraordinary strength to carry, digital music players that had capacity and were easy to use, curated centralized online software sales, mobile phones that were really handheld computers, tablets that worked, wearables, internet content store and more. The difference between Apple and all those other leaders, was that Apple routinely reinvented product categories in which it was not a player, making each better than the previous leader’s products. Apple is on the cusp of doing it again with a consumer facing AI and wearable 3D hardware and content. I don’t know what new technologies are on the horizon, or who is going to introduce them. What I do know is that Apple is going to examine them all, determine their respective weaknesses, make them better than anything else on the market, then produce the product that can be integrated into its OSX framework, casting most competitors aside. So it doesn’t matter what flash in the pan company develops the next best thing and lead the industry for a while, Apple is going to examine what emerges, determine whether it has legs and how Apple can improve it to such an extent that people believe Apple created it. In the meantime, Apple’s R&D labs are creating technologies as much as 10 years (more?) before it sees the light of day. Apple doesn’t see itself as a computer manufacturer, or a cell phone manufacturer, a tablet manufacturer etc, Apple sees itself as a consumer electronics developer, using that flexibility of self image to surprise and wow us.'
  • Ben Gepp on Horace Dediu: Where is Nvidia in a decade? - 'The Dot Com era provides a useful analogue to the current AI boom. Back then Cisco was the ‘picks and shovels’ company that shot to prominence, providing the infrastructure until the bubble burst and Cisco’s stock price crashed. It took 20 years to recover. Nvidia is a picks and shovels company and once the data centre build out is complete the frenetic activity will subdue as surely will Nvidia’s stock price.'
  • Bill Donahue on Horace Dediu: Where is Nvidia in a decade? - 'Obviously one has to ignore all the circular financing that Nvidia’s involved in to decide it’s the best company of the future. And that Nvidia’s sales will quake if OpenAI craters, or the AI-investor world wakes up to the fact that there’s no proprietary advantage to any of the mega-scaler LLMs out there (and therefore no business or investment moat), and they are all floating on a buildout of data-centers that have an operational lifespan of 3 or 4 years before they become technologically obsolete and unprofitable. Where will Nvidia be in 10 years? I’d say it’s impossible to tell. But I’m betting heavily that there will be a full-blown shakeout among the big AI stock-plays long before that.'
  • David Emery on Horace Dediu: Where is Nvidia in a decade? - 'Here’s an IEEE Spectrum article on ‘small AI models’. Think of these as great iOS Apple Intelligence enabled applications. https://spectrum.ieee.org/small-language-models-ai-pharmaceuticals'
  • David Thall on Horace Dediu: Where is Nvidia in a decade? - 'Hap, very interesting. Thanks for posting. “The conversation has now changed” is significant. Watching that video commentary is reassuring, because it reminds me that Apple is addressing A.I. very soberly and carefully. As the consumer’s preeminent gatekeeper who actually gives a damn about user’s privacy – they are taking their time to apply it appropriately, and will come out ahead as a result – as will Apple investors like us. MY TAKE Nobody was asking for AI. There are maybe 7 guys in Silicon Valley who’ve been shoving AI down the world’s throat. Half of them act like, or are sociopaths, some are ‘on the spectrum’ – while several are both. I mean, Sam, Alex , Thiel, Mark and Elon are bonafide – with a lack of empathy that could rival Vladimir’s. The daily hyperventilating by the financial media and the drooling by the casino-ologists on Wall Street (Yes, I made that word up) is more hyperbolic than a super-pac of hungry hyenas with too much of other people’s money to chew on. If I was a conspiracy nut, I’d say there are AI aliens from the great beyond remotely manipulating the human race to replace itself and evolve into AIs … just like them. Even if not true, it could make a cool sci-fi movie. Just sayin’'
  • Fred Stein on Ming-Chi Quo: The foldable iPhone will sell out on Day 1 - 'Look forward to hearing your impressions.'
  • Steven Philips on Horace Dediu: Where is Nvidia in a decade? - 'I’m too old to vote for something that I won’t be able to have the satisfaction of proving myself right! 🙂'
  • Steven Philips on Still no Siri AI for EU, despite Tim Cook's efforts - 'I prefer Big Green Apples to small potatoes! 🙂'
  • Steven Philips on Still no Siri AI for EU, despite Tim Cook's efforts - 'This all makes me wonder – which is worse, Artificial Intelligence or Actual Stupidity? Maybe AI can’t come soon enough to the EU.'
  • Daniel Epstein on Premarket: Apple is red - 'As Joseph said Apple is up solidly today. The Monday morning “Premarket: Apple is red” trading often seems to change later after the market opens. And I have an impression it really coincides with the closing of the European market. Of course it is not a perfect pattern and I wouldn’t try and trade on it with serious money. Given Thursday’s rise it wouldn’t be unreasonable for the stock to consolidate its recent gains. But apparently we still have some momentum. Just recovering to the ATH is nice but I wouldn’t be surprised if we go a bit further on the ATH.'
  • Daniel Epstein on The iPhone 17's near-record run won't last much longer - 'Roger, It is interesting that older iPhone models are still being sold by Verizon and others. It has not always been true that Apple made and sold all the older models in an attempt to meet the consumer at every price point. Some of the old phones couldn’t run the latest system so Apple has a choice when introducing the new ones which ones they continue to sell and for how long. Found this on a web search “Apple has officially discontinued the iPhone 16 Pro, iPhone 16 Pro Max, iPhone 15, and the iPhone 15 Plus, along with several other older models. What does this massive catalog overhaul mean for you?Apr 30, 2026” I expect this year with the ram shortage and Apple introducing a foldable along with its other models that they will manage inventory more closely than usual so they can try and keep enough inventory in hand. Of course carriers may have their own stock pile of devices as well. This is going to be a tricky year for Apple as far as introduction and production wise.'
  • Rick Povich on Ming-Chi Quo: The foldable iPhone will sell out on Day 1 - 'I’ll be buying an 18 Pro but I’d be delighted if both the Pro and folding iPhone sell like hotcakes'
  • Hap Allen on Horace Dediu: Where is Nvidia in a decade? - 'I continue to follow Errol Brandt at kiraa.ai. In a recent post he claims that companies will tire of 1) the expense of AI, and 2) the loss of privacy when their data is run through the cloud. If Brand’s approach gets some traction, that could be of great benefit to Apple. “Did Alex Karp Just Agree With Me?”: https://youtu.be/fVC-z4ptOlk'
  • Joseph Bland on Premarket: Apple is red - '“Premarket: Apple is red” Um, Apple is not only solidly green, it’s gotten within $3.20 of its ATH. IMO, he selloffs following the WWDC are two of the dumbest selloffs ever – and apparently Mr. Market agrees with me….'
  • David Thall on Horace Dediu: Where is Nvidia in a decade? - '“The Wall Street Journal just ranked Nvidia the top “company of the future,”” I think this “list” says more about the Wall Street Journal than it does about Nvidia. I have nothing against Nvidia, it’s a fine company and clearly a good investment. However, maybe a more useful report would be, how exactly the current editors of the Wall Street Journal do their calculations to determine what a company will be in 10 years? In other words, who and what criteria is being used to make the list? Many years ago, when I first started investing in the market, I noticed that the mantra from all brokers was the same: ‘past performance does not guarantee future performance’. And yet their entire forecasting approach is built on looking in the rearview mirror. Maybe it’s just me, but I always found that ironical, if not obvious. I mean, obviously a company’s track record is really important. Same goes for hearing every broker giving the exact same advice, to “diversify”. Which I learned from real world experience does not save you when the entire market crashes. My personal experience when I was younger and listened to brokers, can be summed up by what Cramer has famously shouted: “they know nothing!” My personal investment philosophy is, I’d rather be an expert in one excellent company, our favorite fruit – that even Cramer has called maybe the best company in America – rather than investing based on having just a general knowledge of a whole bunch of companies – AKA: diversification. For me, proof is in the results. Apple has one of the world‘s greatest business models, which is still perfectly intact, and they have a vision and a philosophy that, despite the tsunami of economic, political, and misinformation out there – still astonishingly makes it consistently successful long-term. I’ve done exceedingly well by ignoring the broker’s knee jerk mantra, and instead by focusing on the best of breed, I’ve never lost a dime since. In my opinion, diversification is for people who are very busy and don’t have the time to educate themselves much less follow what a specific company stands for, much less separate all the rumors and gossip from the “news”. The Wall Street Journal is in the business of reporting facts and ostensibly even giving their opinions. That doesn’t mean we should believe everything they report, much less agree with their opinions. I mean, it’s owned by fucking Rupert Murdoch. Making a list of the best companies for the next decade is easy. All it takes is an opinion. I suggest making your own. I don’t think I need to tell you which one would be at the top of mine.'
  • Fred Stein on Ming-Chi Quo: The foldable iPhone will sell out on Day 1 - 'Fair enough. I don’t have the tools for predictions and certainly no precision, just perspective.'
  • David Emery on Still no Siri AI for EU, despite Tim Cook's efforts - 'Apple (and Google) aren’t the only companies having problems with EU regulations that mandate reengineering of products: https://www.engadget.com/2208587/nintendo-will-stop-selling-the-switch-1-in-europe-in-2027/ (Nintendo wills top selling Switch-1 due to EU replaceable battery regulations)'
  • Greg Bates on Horace Dediu: Where is Nvidia in a decade? - 'Is Horace right? He implies that Nvidia can’t be the best over, say, the next 50 years and will certainly not do as well as Apple? (I wish the WSJ had specified the length of time they meant by “future” but they didn’t; I pick 50 years arbitrarily.) It’s easy to agree with Horace that ranking Apple, one of only three companies with a CAGR of 20% + on average over 30 years (the other two being Berkshire which did it for 55 years, and Microsoft) at #12 seems silly. 11 other companies will do better than Apple? Possible, but the WSJ claims to know which 11 companies those are, which I am sure they don’t. But picking the top company is tricky. Any company can suffer a bad CEO transition (Apple’s been there, done that), failure to pivot fast enough (looking at you, Intel), or suffer any of a range of calamities that could knock it out of the running for the top spot. Similarly, can a company that got lucky (in phones or chips, for example) extend that win over half a century? And if so, which one will be the winner? I am less sanguine that anyone can know for sure, even as we can agree that Apple (and I would add Nvidia) will be in the top 5. Apple stands at the intersection of consumers and technology, as Horace points out, a great place to be. But we can’t know whether some other company might elbow its way into that spot and nudge Apple aside. Nvidia is already working on PCs, SpaceX is already working on phones, for example. In any case, I am conducting a survey. I’d be interested in other people’s answers to that question: what company will have the best return/CAGR over the next half century?'