Joseph Bland on Angel investor Jason Calacanis calls Apple a 'screaming buy' - 'And there it is: “Chip Model Maximum Unified Memory Key Features M3 Pro 36 GB High performance for creative tasks M4 Pro 64 GB Enhanced graphics and processing capabilities M5 Ultra 768 GB Designed for extreme computing power M7 Ultra 1.5 TB Targeted at high-end professional workloads” Game over.'
on Angel investor Jason Calacanis calls Apple a 'screaming buy' - 'Safari gave me this from a simple query: “Unified memory is Apple’s term for memory where the CPU and GPU share the same bank of memory in one integrated system-on-a-chip design. On modern Macs, it’s essentially the same job as RAM, but with a more unified architecture to improve efficiency. macpaw securedatarecovery What is Unified Memory? Unified memory is a term used by Apple to describe a memory architecture where the CPU and GPU share the same pool of memory within a single integrated system-on-a-chip (SoC). This design contrasts with traditional systems where RAM is divided into separate pools for the CPU and GPU. Key Features of Unified Memory Shared Memory Pool: Both the CPU and GPU access the same memory, which reduces the need for data transfer between separate memory pools. Increased Efficiency: This architecture allows for faster data access and improved performance, as it minimizes latency and maximizes bandwidth. Dynamic Allocation: Memory can be allocated dynamically based on the needs of the applications, allowing for better resource management. Benefits of Unified Memory Unified memory offers several advantages, particularly for demanding applications: Benefit Description Improved Performance Faster data access leads to smoother operation of applications. Better Multitasking More efficient memory usage allows for handling multiple tasks simultaneously. Enhanced Workflows Ideal for professionals in video editing, 3D rendering, and AI development. Memory Capacity in Apple Devices Apple’s unified memory architecture supports varying capacities across different models. Here’s a comparison of some recent Apple chips: Chip Model Maximum Unified Memory Key Features M3 Pro 36 GB High performance for creative tasks M4 Pro 64 GB Enhanced graphics and processing capabilities M5 Ultra 768 GB Designed for extreme computing power M7 Ultra 1.5 TB Targeted at high-end professional workloads Conclusion Unified memory is a significant advancement in Apple’s computing architecture, providing a more efficient and powerful solution for modern computing needs. It is particularly beneficial for users engaged in resource-intensive tasks, ensuring that their systems can handle complex workloads effectively. fingerlakes1 Wikipedia”'
on Angel investor Jason Calacanis calls Apple a 'screaming buy' - 'I think I get the frontier model thesis. It’s all about “unified memory”, another area where Apple devices are ahead of the game. I’m not sure it’ll work without having multiple nodes, but maybe that’s where AAPL is heading, and why the reference to a “M7 Ultra”. But for small to medium businesses, that should be doable. You can do this now, with like maybe 10 or so Minis – something to give you enough unified memory. As my stepson Martin put it back in May: “You could get 10 used Mac minis with 16 GB of RAM each for about $5000 – $7000, and that’s like 160 GB of shared, unified memory when they are linked with the Thunderbolt port.”'
on This week's Apple trading strategies (7/20-7/24/26) - 'You know Apple & AAPL have been on a tear if 34 of 46 (74%) of Apple 3.0 entries for the April 1, 2027 contest are now underwater. If it ended today, Alan Birmbaum would win. Rodney Avila has the highest entry at $381. Would we be happy getting there? https://www.ped30.com/2026/04/01/apple-target-contest-final-2027/'
on This week's Apple trading strategies (7/20-7/24/26) - 'Thanks Hap. Very helpful. Listen to Errol, tune out Gurman.'
on This week's Apple trading strategies (7/20-7/24/26) - 'More from Errol Brandt at Kiraa on his AI engine. A great opportunity for Apple in the enterprise: “If you’re bulding on Apple you’ve bought a Formula-1 car.” https://youtu.be/UBArQl_KVzo'
on This week's Apple trading strategies (7/20-7/24/26) - 'So I read the research paper this note is based on. Guess which of the 46 companies has created the most wealth over the last century, since 1926? Apple. It is responsible for 5.5% of the total wealth created from the entire stock market over the last century!! Over 10% more than the 2nd place company, Nvidia. Interestingly, he also breaks it down to 1926-2016 outcomes and post-2016. Apple is number 2 in both – 2nd to Nvidia from 2017 to now; and 2nd to Exxon from 1926-2016. Only Microsoft comes close in both periods, being 3rd. Oh, and this was as of December 31, 2025, when Apple was at about $273. So even greater wealth creation.'
on This week's Apple trading strategies (7/20-7/24/26) - 'Hi, Greg. The proof is in the pudding. Apple leadership went back to the drawing board,, recovering from their slip-up, and did the job right. That’s 2 years spent wisely. It was always a slippery slope, and others have slipped all the way down. Isn’t it odd that Mr. Gurman isn’t noticing that? Oh, and really good Apple pudding, by all accounts….'
on This week's Apple trading strategies (7/20-7/24/26) - 'What wth merged memory, Apple Intelligence and on device strategies, and App Specific AI does Apple NEED as much memory as its competitors? How much can AI memory needs be shrunk before you have to add physical memory?'
on This week's Apple trading strategies (7/20-7/24/26) - 'Once again, I’d ask PED to note in the headline any article citing Gurman, so I can avoid it'
on This week's Apple trading strategies (7/20-7/24/26) - 'His backhanded compliment that Apple fell bassakwards into being the AI leader is BS. I believe this was Apple’s strategy all along – not spending like drunken sailors, waiting for AI to become more of a commodity, and bringing AI to on device tasks.'
on This week's Apple trading strategies (7/20-7/24/26) - 'Here’s to the longs. The odds that anyone’s recommendation beats AAPL are pretty slim. This landed in my inbox, from Cache Exchange Fund’s newsletter touting their portfolio. “Of the nearly 30,000 stocks listed in the US markets over the last century, what percentage do you think created all the stock market wealth*? It’s just 3.7% of the stocks. The rest, combined, produced zero net wealth over a 1-month Treasury bill. In fact, just 46 companies accounted for more than 50% of all stock market wealth. That comes from Professor Hendrik Bessembinder’s study of every US common stock from 1926 to 2025.”'
on This week's Apple trading strategies (7/20-7/24/26) - 'First: Devices represent 74% of revenue, not 80%, as Gurman states. Memory is a big deal. They hyper scalars must spend $100B more on memory, which then passes to their customers like OpenAI, Anthropic and many more. The leaders are in a winner take all race, funded by VCs since customer revenue does not cover the current CapEx estimated at $600B this year and growing. Big problem: It’s not winner take all. It will be competitive, which depresses margins long term. Lousy bet for investors. Apple, by contrast easily pass the incremental memory cost to consumers at about $10 a month. With 400M devices sold annually, Apple’s desirable demographic absorb north of $40B in incremental cost for memory. Great bet for us Apple-longs.'
on USBC upgrades Apple to Buy from Hold and raises target $106 to $366 - 'Phil, it’s HSBC, not USBC. Although UBS and David Vogt has a similar neutral rating with a price target of $296 since July 7.'
on Apple at $333.74: Third all-time high in as many days - '@SacJoe We struggle to see what Apple knows internally. They have a different view of the world. Those on the outside are looking for some toehold, some edge, to compete against Apple. You have to step back and look at it from a multiyear perspective to see it.'
on USBC upgrades Apple to Buy from Hold and raises target $106 to $366 - '@Michael That’s a great story.'
on USBC upgrades Apple to Buy from Hold and raises target $106 to $366 - 'Typo: my opening reference quote should be: “Raises target by $106 to $366“ … in one shot?'
on USBC upgrades Apple to Buy from Hold and raises target $106 to $366 - '“Raises target from $106-$366“ … in one shot? Excuse me if I’m being a little snarky, but this begs for it. Despite all the rationale that he may be giving, analyst Nicolas Cote-Colisson is raising his target for one reason and one reason only. If he doesn’t raise it, he looks like an idiot. And by raising his target by such a whopping number all at once, indicates what a truly magnificent idiot he is. I mean, this is an analyst whose judgment has been so lousy for so long, the only reason anyone’s paying attention to him is because after being a devil worshiper for years, he suddenly found Jesus? Seriously, an analyst like this one – to be generous – should seriously consider finding another line of work. Because for useful investing advice, at least regarding Apple, he is totally irrelevant to the conversation. Except maybe as an object lesson to other analysts… about what not to do. Or… let me put it this way: as one of the world’s most insightful observers of human behavior once said: “He may look like an idiot and talk like an idiot, but don’t let that fool you. He really is an idiot.” -GROUCHO MARX'
on USBC upgrades Apple to Buy from Hold and raises target $106 to $366 - 'And to that end Gregg, when the analyst all of a sudden wakes up and has a brain fart that perhaps Apple might be worth more than $260, rather then saying, “well if the stars align you could add on another, say, 30 bucks an be in the vicinity of $400”. They prognosticated a precise $31 to make their wild arse guess look a little more serious… Well if it spruiks the market… I’m all good, but at the same time I’m not fooled by the smoke and mirrors of their WAGs.'
on USBC upgrades Apple to Buy from Hold and raises target $106 to $366 - 'Thanks, Michael? (he said, hesitantly…)'
on USBC upgrades Apple to Buy from Hold and raises target $106 to $366 - 'The most plausible reason for this substantial upgrade can be put into very simplistic terms. I believe that HSBC analyst Nicolas Cote-Colisson was seated at the bar last Saturday at the Pro Bono Cafe in Palo Alto. While everyone else screaming and shouting at the World Cup Match that was on the multiple television screens, there was a lone gentleman that move toward the end of the bar to be closer to where the Apple 3.0 dinner was being held in the special events room. I noticed he kept opening the door wider to hear what was being said, especially while “Jerry” was recording the informative words being spoken by “Sacto Joe” regarding the future of Apple from his perspective. Jerry wanted to play that video for his group of Apple investors when he returned home from Palo Alto. What other reasonable explanation could there be to have a sudden $106 bump up in the stock price? No doubt HSBC analyst Nicolas Cote-Colisson has been a long time lurker on PED’s Apple 3.0 platform and was a ware of this upcoming dinner.'
on USBC upgrades Apple to Buy from Hold and raises target $106 to $366 - 'So, my broker asked me if I wanted to sell some covered calls. Just for S&G, I asked him what the prices were. He said $10 per share with a strike price of $350 on Jan ‘27. I said I was not interested, and also, he just told me what I knew, that the market thinks the shares are going over $360 by January. Mind you, this was BEFORE the shares climbed from $314 to $333.'
on USBC upgrades Apple to Buy from Hold and raises target $106 to $366 - 'BTW, did Kit Norton somehow get a copy of Horace’s story “Why all-in and why all are in”? It would explain why the change from Hold to Buy. THAT was a serious and shocking enlightenment even for me! If there was a Pulitzer for Apple analyst, Horace would win it, hands down. Folks need to start reading him….'
on USBC upgrades Apple to Buy from Hold and raises target $106 to $366 - 'Well, I’ve been saying $350 for years now… #;^) Seriously, though; if AAPP holds its present valuation and EPS goes up 20% a year from now, then (40X$8.24X1.2=) $395.52/share….'
on Saturday Apple video: Lemmings (1985) - 'Pages, Numbers, and Keynotes. Macintosh Office Lives on! Yes, there is life after Microsoft.'
on USBC upgrades Apple to Buy from Hold and raises target $106 to $366 - 'And who has the highest price target here on Ped 3.0? 😉'
on USBC upgrades Apple to Buy from Hold and raises target $106 to $366 - '” What is the “blue sky scenario” that raises the target to $397?” The “blue sky scenario” is the financial industry recognizing Apple’s long history of exceeding estimates. $397 looks awfully similar to Ives’ long held estimate of $400.'
on USBC upgrades Apple to Buy from Hold and raises target $106 to $366 - 'From the thestreet.com article: The bank also outlined what it calls a blue-sky scenario, which adds another $31 per share beyond the base target if both the product cycle and AI execution land better than expected.'


