Recent Comments

  • Romeo Esparrago on Saturday Apple video: 'My model of business is the Beatles' - '“ She loves you, yeah, yeah, yeah “'
  • Romeo Esparrago on Let's kiss Meta goodbye - '’s $700 MacPro wheels woulda stayed on! Keep on truckin’ LOL'
  • Romeo Esparrago on Apple at $293.26: Second record close in as many days - 'I missed out on the 294+ ATH, Darren DMW, but I will be looking at 300 in the next (smaller) squirt limit sell I’ll submit next week.'
  • Gregg Thurman on Apple at $293.26: Second record close in as many days - '”That’s one non-statistical Monte Carlo projection.’” And the dip is real. The low point occurs generally the week before to a week after July 4th weekend. It starts an hour into the beginning of WWDC’s CEO introduction. On average, from that low point until January, AAPL moves upward about 26%. It’s my favorite interim buy point.'
  • Joseph Bland on Apple at $293.26: Second record close in as many days - 'Another way to look at it: Forget everything but the last year, over which AAPL has gone up 50% from about $200/share, closing on $300/share a year later. It is showing every sign of going up another 50% over the following year, Lord willin’ and the creek don’t rise. That’s $450 /share a year from now, and thus an easy double over two years. Some folks here own millions of $ worth of AAPL (we wish but the Fates decreed otherwise), and doubling that is phenomenal wealth acquisition, created just by sticking AAPL in a sock drawer and forgetting about it….'
  • Joseph Bland on Apple at $293.26: Second record close in as many days - '$300/share today? Or even a close over $300/share? How many sell triggers are sitting at that precise number? Fun times….'
  • Bill Donahue on Wedbush raises its Apple target $50 to Street-high $400 - 'I still don’t understand what the commercial value of “consumer AI” is and what the *actual* business case, including for Apple, given that almost nobody is willing to pay to use it. I see Apple’s AI strategy as smart – and the best – because it’s simply allowed them to not burn hundreds of billions of real cash on a financial red herring. Are they going to be getting a percentage of the AI-mediated ad stream that the AI owners are scooping up from Apple users? Charging AI owners massive fees to access Apple users/customers? I guess I still see AI – and especially LLMs – as something I have neither need nor use for, and it’s certainly not something I’d pay extra to buy or for a subscription.'
  • Bill Donahue on Mark Gurman: What AirPods with cameras might do - 'And of course the creeps of the world could simply put a little dot of white over the LED. “Problem” (for them) solved.'
  • Rodney Avilla on Apple at $293.26: Second record close in as many days - 'Dan Ives has now raised his target to $400. So now my $380 is playing second fiddle (and I thought my $380 was filled with hopium). Mr Ives has not immediately responded to my request to see his numbers.'
  • Stephen Gordon on Apple at $293.26: Second record close in as many days - 'Big buildup to WWDC, followed by a slight dip, then a steady climb. That’s one non-statistical Monte Carlo projection.'
  • John Konopka on Apple at $293.26: Second record close in as many days - 'It was encouraging to see that the price pretty much held all through the day. We didn’t see it collapse in the last ten minutes. Even after hours it is up slightly.'
  • Steven Philips on Let's kiss Meta goodbye - 'That’s a brave admission.'
  • Steven Philips on Let's kiss Meta goodbye - 'Where does he come from? If not America he should be deported! (In school I get low marks in deportment – obviously!)'
  • Steven Philips on Apple at $293.26: Second record close in as many days - '“Return with us now to those thrilling days of yesteryear” – when it felt like every day brought a new closing high.'
  • Stephen Gordon on Let's kiss Meta goodbye - 'Meta will reverse the slide with agents that want to be your friend, powered by data centers running on methane in the middle of God’s country.'
  • Steven Philips on Apple's premarket pop - 'Based on this thinking I would assume it also argues for continued upward movement rather than quick profit taking. I hope that’s true.'
  • Steven Philips on Wedbush raises its Apple target $50 to Street-high $400 - 'Very nicely written. That’s exactly what happens.'
  • Steven Philips on Wedbush raises its Apple target $50 to Street-high $400 - 'RPL: Strike that next to the last line. The government is watching you! 🙂'
  • Gregg Thurman on Wedbush raises its Apple target $50 to Street-high $400 - 'I just thought of another way to explain why today’s prints are correct. Buyer’s are willing to pay ~$293 TODAY, because they think APPL will be worth more tomorrow. If market consensus on APPL’s JANUARY valuation is $350, and they want to profit 20% on what they pay, then TODAY they should pay ~$290. However, January’s valuation is fully dependent on Apple achieving certain milestones between now and then. Believing that AAPL should be worth $350 today, without achieving those milestones, is ludicrous and fails to demonstrate the point/mechanics of INVESTING. Like I’ve said many times, there is no such thing as a good or bad multiple, it is what it is by virtue of the interaction between ready, willing and able buyers and sellers. Today, ready, willing and able buyers (seeking a 20% ROI by January) are paying ~$290. IOW, today’s buyers are valuing AAPL at $350, multiples by damned.'
  • Greg Lippert on Let's kiss Meta goodbye - 'He was one of the aholes on my list. Bet you can guess the rest.'
  • Gregg Thurman on Wedbush raises its Apple target $50 to Street-high $400 - '”So yes, Apple, even at a 35.5 trailing valuation, remains SIGNIFICANTLY undervalued.” No, it isn’t. Like anything else that is for sale, AAPL is only worth what a ready, willing and able buyer and seller agree. Today, that ready, willing and able buyer and seller agree on a daily price range of $290.000 – $294.76. Within that price range Buyers aren’t willing to pay anymore than $294.76, and Sellers aren’t willing to Sell below $290.00. Two weeks ago AAPL valuation range was lower. Monday AAPL may be higher, but only within the definition of value above. I, as an individual, may “feel” APPL is worth more, but until someone on the other side (the Seller) disagrees with me: IT ISN’T. What you feel AAPL’s FUTURE is, comes under the same heading as “ready, willing and able”. Until those two essential players are in agreement nothing happens. Until then everything is unsubstantiated theory.'
  • Joseph Bland on Look at the cool things Nvidia is doing with the Apple Vision Pro (video) - 'BTW, I’m posting on the single most impactful Apple 3.0 article I’ve read in months. The Apple/Nvidia spatial computing partnership’s possibilities are completely mind-blowing.'
  • Joseph Bland on Premarket: Apple is green - 'Upvoted, David. Missed the Asymco Office Hours, but saw the story. Thanks for asking the question!'
  • Joseph Bland on Let's kiss Meta goodbye - 'Yeah. Donna actually put a small downpayment on a Cybertruck in advance of actual deliveries. Money down the rathole, thanks to the rodent-in-charge….'
  • Joseph Bland on Apple's premarket pop - 'Yep, John, and David nailed the reason below. It’s all about supply and demand. We keep counseling folks to not wait for the direction of momentum to change, but folks still keep missing the supertanker, or freight train, etcetera….'
  • David Emery on Let's kiss Meta goodbye - 'My comment to a friend who was in charge of Army military vehicles: “If the Wankpanzer was made by the Russians….” 🙂'
  • Joseph Bland on Apple's premarket pop - 'Hi, Bart. My only caveat is that IMO the Apple Beachball is still surfacing – and may even actually launch….'
  • Bill Fouche on Let's kiss Meta goodbye - 'And further to the preceding, The Verge has posted this today: “Tesla is recalling its cheaper Cybertruck because the wheels might fall off.” https://www.theverge.com/transportation/926741/tesla-cybertruck-cheaper-recall'
  • Joseph Bland on Wedbush raises its Apple target $50 to Street-high $400 - 'Agreed, David, and upvoted. As I said on the earlier thread today, this is now a momentum-driven market (i.e. largely options driven), which can move in either direction and make someone a nice profit. AAPL, unlike, say, TSLA, is not nearly as vulnerable to the options’ double-edged sword (thanks to 12 years of buybacks!). But in the short term, it can still be impacted. And in times like these…. The smart AAPL investor is well aware of that, and makes their buying/selling decisions accordingly.'
  • Joseph Bland on Wedbush raises its Apple target $50 to Street-high $400 - 'The price rise today only matched the valuation pre-earnings – which hadn’t yet risen to the level of the valuation at its ATH. It’s essentially valued on LESS than its potential future from more than 4 months ago. So yes, Apple, even at a 35.5 trailing valuation, remains SIGNIFICANTLY undervalued.'