Recent Comments

  • Richard Gayle on The tragedy of Tim Cook - 'The people I see hating on Tim Cook are almost invariably people who haye all “Big Tech”. Apple is not separated out from Meta, Google, Amazon, Tesla, etc. I suspect that even if Cook/Apple outright fought back, they would still find something to hate. I’ve pointed out that Apple has held onto DEI, that Cook has said protecting migrants is important, etc. all while protecting its 150,000 employees. That while other Big Tech are laying off tens of thousands, Apple is not. To no avail. They have their simple narrative and they are sticking to it.'
  • Joseph Bland on 13 myths busted in David Pogue's 'Apple: The First 50 Years' - 'Great read to begin the day! Thanks, Mr. Pogue! And thanks, PED, for asking him! What a special site this is.'
  • David Emery on The tragedy of Tim Cook - 'Personally, I distinguish the ‘conforming to Chinese legal requirements’ from ‘participating in Trump’s events.’ Many of the criticisms I’ve seen of Apple/Tim Cook lump these together. Tim has been clear “We obey the law where we operate.” (Although in many cases there have been substantial legal actions to establish exactly what that law is, e.g. for the App Store.) But when Tim himself, and Apple as a company, has contributed to Trump initiatives, or bowed to pressure (as distinct from legal orders) such as the ICE tracking apps, I think Tim and Apple have taken actions that are not defensible, or at least not as defensible as “following the law.” Sure, special case tariff treatment was a big deal (financially) for Apple. But that came at a different kind of cost.'
  • David Wilson on Perplexity endorses Apple's privacy-first AI strategy - 'There was a time when I was convinced that Apple needed to make a big AI acquisition, like buying Perplexity back when that particular idea was being bandied about. I am so glad that didn’t happen.'
  • David Emery on 13 myths busted in David Pogue's 'Apple: The First 50 Years' - 'Good point. Greg. And yes, buy the book, it’s a great read.'
  • Greg Lippert on Perplexity endorses Apple's privacy-first AI strategy - 'What we here have been saying long-time.'
  • Greg Bates on 13 myths busted in David Pogue's 'Apple: The First 50 Years' - 'Great question on PED’s part. A fascinating list. Can we take a sec to recognize Pogue’s generosity here? And maybe his marketing prowess? Such a list should feature prominently in his book, and a lesser person might have hoarded it for the second edition. That he would do the considerable work at PED’s request then toss it off for free…that’s it, I’m buying the book.'
  • Rodney Avilla on Perplexity endorses Apple's privacy-first AI strategy - 'Hope this goes viral (in Wall Street)'
  • Rodney Avilla on John Ternus' turnaround - 'He’s now leading the charge on a trio of home products” Hopefully he’s now leading the charge because it is something he now strongly believes in and has great ideas, and not because of being pushed into that position because of his promotion. I am ready (have been ready) to make my home a ‘Smart Apple Home’; just been waiting for Apple to get it’s products (and Siri) ready.'
  • David Emery on 13 myths busted in David Pogue's 'Apple: The First 50 Years' - 'I really enjoyed “First 50 Years”. Some of those ‘busted myths’ are things I didn’t believe in the first place, though. Others were “inside baseball” rumors. What I liked the most about ‘First 50 Years” was the nostalgia for all the Macs I had. The capsule biographies, including “after Apple”, were also very interesting. The one thing I would have added to the book, if the information was available, would have been a discussion on how the curriculum at “Apple University” has changed over the years.'
  • Mordechai Beizer on John Ternus' turnaround - 'For me Sonos integration would be the must have. Being able to simply say “Alexa play…” and then hearing the music on our in-wall speakers is something we do many times a day. I’ve seen no indication to-date of any Siri integration with Sonos. AirPlay 2 compatibility doesn’t cut it, Apple needs to just do what Alexa has been doing for years.'
  • Rodney Avilla on The tragedy of Tim Cook - 'i believe some people’s hate for Trump is so great that it is distorting their perception of other people and events. TC is a perfect example. Whenever they hear the word Trump (or any word that makes them think of Trump) their blood pressure goes up. Whenever they speak about Trump, it’s always in hyperbole- they take anything that Trump has done or said and exaggerate and distort it to the max. They could never even consider anything Trump has done as ever being even OK, much less good. Note that there is nothing in my comment that tries to rationalize or justify anything Trump has said or done. Yet many will not consider any comment about Trump that does not contain a string of expletives, since it obviously must be from a Trump supporter. History will treat TC well, much better than those who cannot contain (much less control) their hate for Trump, spilling onto anyone and everyone in Trump’s vicinity.'
  • David Emery on Perplexity endorses Apple's privacy-first AI strategy - 'Here’s a great piece by TheVerge (and NOT behind their paywall) on how the software community and the rest of the world view AI -very- differently: https://www.theverge.com/podcast/917029/software-brain-ai-backlash-databases-automation Like I said, everyone in tech understands how much regular people dislike AI. What I think they’re missing is why. They think this is a marketing problem. OpenAI just spent $200 million on the TBPN podcast because the company thinks it will help make people like AI more. AI doesn’t have a marketing problem. People experience these tools every single day. ChatGPT has 900 million weekly users, trending to a billion, and everyone has seen AI Overviews in Google Search and massive amounts of slop on their feeds. You can’t advertise people out of reacting to their own experiences. This is a fundamental disconnect between how tech people with software brains see the world and how regular people are living their lives.'
  • Anice Hassim on The tragedy of Tim Cook - 'There is no doubt that Tim Cook made a lot of people very uneasy with his engagements with Trump. Some of it was calculated, for sure, as CEO of a major American and global titan, he doesn’t get to be Tim Cook the person, he has to be Tim Cook the CEO. Some of it was poor optics and unfortunate timing in a fast moving event cycle. But, one of the clear advantages of the approach that Apple is adopting, is that he is being given the latitude to be more himself. And maybe he will be a brave voice of reason and humanity in a cynical world,'
  • Greg Lippert on The tragedy of Tim Cook - 'Sorry David. Losing friends (or family) over politics is awful – and foolish. I have many friends on the other spectrum but do not let it get in the way.'
  • David Emery on John Ternus' turnaround - 'The 2 keys to success in home automation are obvious: (1) the control system has to be very reliable (Matter the standard AND its implementation in Home.app) (2) there has to be enough (critical mass of) components that work with the control system. Even with my HomePod Mini, Home.app has not been completely bombproof. AirPlay to the HomePod is problematic, although I suspect part of the problem is with the Mac Music.app. Beyond that, I tried and failed to get a Matter-based smart plug to connect to Home.app. Apple needs to do more to make a market for (3rd party) devices that work with its home automation infrastructure. Maybe there should be a special section in Apple Stores dedicated to home automation, with Apple vetted 3rd party devices and staff trained on how to configure and demonstrate them doing useful things.'
  • David Thall on The tragedy of Tim Cook - 'Yes. I lost an old dear friend because of that. True story: Months ago, one of my oldest, closest friends who moved to Los Angeles from North Carolina last year, called me up – and immediately started to lambast me for owning Apple stock. Reason? Because he thought Tim Cook was not standing up to Donald Trump enough. My friend, who also owned some Apple stock – in addition to other stocks, but far more diversified than I am – knows that I’m 100% invested in Apple stock. And have been for decades, and that I’ve made my fortune by doing so. He’s also knows I’ve been recommending Apple to my close friends like him – and from time to time keep them up-to-dated on the latest Apple news. As very old friends, we are quite familiar with each other’s political leanings. Both of us have never liked Trump and share a common distaste for his nasty behavior, and his destructive policies. In other words, although he tends to be a little more far left than me on occasion, we’re pretty much in agreement politically. Apparently, Tim Cook not standing up to Trump, combined with the tsunami of reports about ICE brutalizing and murdering Americans in the streets with impunity, must have pushed him over the edge – and so my friend called up to berate me and tell me to SELL all my Apple stock…. in protest. Well, when I tried to remind him of the significant life changing rewards of owning the stock long term – as I have – and that what Tim Cook has accomplished by meeting with the president of the United States – getting tariffs removed – and that protecting the company is in fact a CEO’s priority – my old friend took it very personally, got very upset, and hung up the phone on me. And has not responded to me reaching out to him ever since. This was months ago. If you think losing an old friend because the CEO of Apple didn’t take a political stand against Donald Trump is odd, I would agree. I’m just sharing this here for obvious reasons. BOTTOMLINE: What I’ve learned, now that we’re well into Trump’s second term of retribution, is that extremists on the far right and the far left share one thing in common. Their complete intolerance for those on the other side. In my unfortunate case, to such a degree that even if someone who is not on the other side, but simply doesn’t agree with them 100%. I believe that intolerance is the root cause of a lot of the problems in the world today. I also believe that Tim Cook’s tolerance – and respect for human dignity – is the primary reason he was able to so successfully navigate the political threats from Trump, Xi Jinping, and the EU for decades. That, and good lawyers. As Apple investors, we were lucky that Tim Cook has such innate decency and wisdom. Maybe that’s what’s so appealing about him as a CEO. Growing Apple into a $4 trillion company didn’t hurt either.'
  • George Kiersted on John Ternus' turnaround - 'How about Airport 2, while we’re at it?'
  • Robert Paul Leitao on Premarket: Apple was red, turned green - 'Following Wednesday’s rise of exactly $ 7 per share to $273.17, Apple’s share price has moved up $1.75 to $274.92 in pre-market activity. Index futures are mixed heading into today’s opening bell. Broadcom, which gained $20.48 yesterday to $422.65, is off $2.76 pre-market. IBM is currently down about $18 per share at $234.22 on concerns about growth in its software segment moving forward after reporting earnings yesterday.'
  • Les Surdykowski on John Ternus' turnaround - 'Having a new CEO taking ownership of these new products is an interesting choice on Apple’s part. It also strikes me as interesting that this is getting highlighted on the heels of Cook reflecting on Apple Maps.'
  • Les Surdykowski on The tragedy of Tim Cook - 'The easiest decision to make is the one that is of no consequence to the decision maker and of no consequence to the environment in which it’s made. Everything else is a pain in the ass!!!!'
  • Romeo Esparrago on The tragedy of Tim Cook - 'These are of course incredibly extraordinary examples. But I couldn’t help thinking of them regardless.'
  • Romeo Esparrago on The tragedy of Tim Cook - 'Schindler, Wallenberg, Rabe, Sugihara, Bernadotte, de Sousa Mendes, Perlasca.'
  • Jonny T on The tragedy of Tim Cook - 'No, only those who’d find something to despise anyway..'
  • Greg Lippert on The tragedy of Tim Cook - 'Nope. Disgusted that it came to that.'
  • Ben Gepp on Ternus as Apple CEO: What the analysts are saying - 'As an architect, I agree that there are use cases for AR/VR that I would find very useful. But it would have to have low latency( eg Vision Pro) oomphy processing power (eg Vision Pro) and would have to have the right apps developed. I’d love to design is 3D (proper bifocal 3D, not 3D displayed on a 2D screen) I think it would be very intuitive.'
  • ben luna on Ternus as Apple CEO: What the analysts are saying - 'Agreed. They are providing a nice tailwind of positivity leading into the Ternus transition, which will provide the ideal conditions to build on for his future success.'
  • Joseph Bland on In theory, Apple's market share should grow with the rise in memory costs - 'Afternoon, Rodney. “…a better value for the buck…” Bang per buck. Simple idea, but so many miss it.'
  • Robert Stack on Barron's is bullish on Ternus - 'David: That was an excellent article – thank you.'
  • Les Surdykowski on Ternus as Apple CEO: What the talking heads are saying - 'As soon as the tea leaves started pointing at Ternus, my thoughts were exactly what you articulated. And I have for many years now thought that one of, if not the most important challenges, had nothing to do with Apple’s position in the marketplace and everything to do with regulatory and political headwinds. I can’t think of a better division of labor here, as it seems to me that Ternus (the hubris of youth, etc.) would make a good CEO choice because he would be more eager to break the mold.'