Recent Comments

  • Gregg Thurman on Mark Gurman: Behind Phil Schiller's exit - 'Starz – $10.99/month after seven days free Peacock – $19.99/month after seven days free FOX One – $19.99/month after seven days free HBO Max – from $9.99/month Paramount+ – $7.99/month after seven days free Apple TV – $14.99/month after seven days free Mubi – $14.99/month after seven days free BritBox – $10.99/month after seven days free Acorn TV – $8.99/month after seven days Not listed is Amazon TV, that is included with a Prime subscription at $14.99, but is increasingly a pay per view service. Seems to me that Apple TV’s price is just keeping up with the market, and is the only service broadcasting 100% exclusive material. Also, it’s been a very long time coming, but when Apple Vision Pro content arrives Apple TV will offer content not available on any other service. I’m sure that content will be offered as a separate tier, at a higher cost, but from the reviews of NBA and MLB demo games, will be well worth it. Further, I think AppleTV price increases were the doings of Schiller. I do not think he was opposed to them.'
  • Robert Paul Leitao on This week's Apple trading strategies (9/7-9/11/26) - 'This is a reminder US markets are closed tomorrow (Monday) in observance of the Labor Day holiday.'
  • Adam Foster on The last meeting of Tim Cook's last day as Apple CEO - 'I got one also! Seen the inside many times back then.'
  • Robert Stack on Mark Gurman: Behind Phil Schiller's exit - 'Well, I’m sure I’m not the only one who’s noticed the significant price increases in Apple TV over the years. But since details are hazy, I asked Gemini: Launched (2019): Started at $4.99 per month 1st Increase (2022): Raised to $6.99 per month. 2nd Increase (2023): Raised to $9.99 per month. 3rd Increase (2025): Raised to $12.99 per month. 4th Increase (August 2026): Raised to $14.99 per month That’s about a 300% increase over a 6-7 year period. That could be part of the reason Schiller is pissed, to the extent Eddie’s story has any validity.'
  • Stephen Gordon on The last meeting of Tim Cook's last day as Apple CEO - 'Love that he connected with frontline Apple Store employees. They’re great ambassadors for the company and are part of the reason that I love visiting, even if I don’t need to buy anything.'
  • Stephen Gordon on Mark Gurman: Behind Phil Schiller's exit - 'Yeah, I agree with you, Ron, about Cook’s legacy and the shareholder value he was instrumental in creating. I know that Dalrymple blames Cook for granting Federighi too much freedom to release software that is buggy or incomplete. Siri is the straw that broke the camel’s back. Perhaps Ternus will tighten the leash a bit.'
  • Joseph Bland on Mark Gurman: Behind Phil Schiller's exit - 'Sorry – over the last 15 years, not 25 years….'
  • Joseph Bland on Mark Gurman: Behind Phil Schiller's exit - 'Hi, Ron. Just to clarify for folks, that’s $14.46 in split-adjusted prices. Also, the end of 2011 was about a year before buybacks started. It’s pretty clear to me that it’s no coincidence that buybacks happened so quickly after Tim Cook took control. So since the split-adjusted float has been reduced by 44%, what would the gain in stock price have been absent buybacks (and assuming that the same trader/investor balance of 2013 would have zero impact on where the P/E ratio has ended up – very unlikely, IMHO)? If the buybacks were presently 50%, then we’d just divide the gains by 2. Still, we know that, without buybacks, there would be 26.5 B shares, and we know that, as of the beginning of last July, 14,594,180,000 remain, which is (26,500,000/14,594,180=) 1.816 times, so ($319.97/1.816=) $176.22/share is due to simple gains in net income, and ($319.97-176.22=) $143.75 is due to buybacks. Of course, we also know that ~$850 B was spent on buybacks, and so you’d get to divide the ~$850 B spent by the 26.5 B shares that would exist without buybacks, equal to (850/26.5=) $32.08/share. And yes, you could have made more than the (143.75/32.08=) 450% gain from that invested capital (assuming it was in a 401K or some such and you bet wisely), but it wouldn’t necessarily have kept you in AAPL shares, which are about to go on another growth spurt. For us, I’m convinced an increased dividend that amounted to $32.08/share over the last 25 years would have left us with much less stock of any kind, Apple or otherwise. And in part that’s because I’m also convinced not reversing stock dilution would have kept those extremely vicious short term trader hooks in AAPL, to the long term detriment of its valuation.'
  • Joseph Bland on The last meeting of Tim Cook's last day as Apple CEO - 'Yep. And in storage I have one of those 1984 Macintoshes with the embossed signatures….'
  • Joseph Bland on The last meeting of Tim Cook's last day as Apple CEO - 'Afternoon, Michael. Because Apple treats its employees with respect and properly rewards them. Unions arose because of the exact opposite in working conditions. Treat your employees, users, and stockholders with respect and reap the benefits! Wow! What a concept!'
  • Ron Fredrick on Mark Gurman: Behind Phil Schiller's exit - 'Stephen Gordon said: “Dalrymple also said Apple needed to get rid of three people: Tim Cook, Craig Federighi, Luca Maestri.” **Steven, I’m not sure why Dalrymple disliked Tim Cook as Apple C.E.O., but the Apple share price was $14.46 at the end of 2011, the year Tim Cook became Apple C.E.O., and was $319.97 at market close last Friday. That’s an increase of almost 2113% in about 15 years. Personally, I’m of the conviction that Tim Cook was partially responsible for that gain in the Apple share price.'
  • Gregg Thurman on Mark Gurman: Behind Phil Schiller's exit - 'There are a myriad of reasons for a person to retire. Chief among them at Apple would be: Been there for 39 years You’re a year past SSI retirement age The technology your used to dealing with is changing You are a multi-millionaire a couple time over ” Schiller…seems to believe that such moves will only further irk developers and governments. This reason would be so far down on Schiller’s reason to retire, as to be inconsequential, but it makes for good eyeball bait.'
  • Robert Paul Leitao on This week's Apple trading strategies (9/7-9/11/26) - 'These are the year-to-date (YTD) share price performances of the Terrific Ten equities ranked by percentage gains in share prices over this time and the percentage gains in the major stock indexes over the same period. Year-to-date the Russell 2000 small cap index has outperformed the NASDAQ Composite, the DJIA and the S&P 500. Among the Terrific Ten equities Apple ranks third in performance with a 17.70% gain YTD. Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM) up 43.17% NVIDIA (NVDA) up 23.52% Russell 2000 – up 19.00% Apple (AAPL) – up 17.70% NASDAQ Composite – up 14.05% S&P 500 – up 12.75% Amazon (AMZN) up 12.00% DJIA – up 11.13% Alphabet (GOOG) up 6.85% Broadcom (AVGO) up 3.41% Microsoft (MSFT) 3.32% SpaceX (SPCX)* down (1.37%) Meta Platforms (META) down (6.56%) Tesla (TSLA) down (21.27%) * The year-to-date decline in SpaceX represents the loss in share price since the opening price of $150 on June 12th, the first day of trading.'
  • Gregg Thurman on Mark Gurman: Behind Phil Schiller's exit - '” Dalrymple also said Apple needed to get rid of three people: Tim Cook, Craig Federighi, Luca Maestri.” Just goes to show what the experts in the cheap seats know.'
  • Robert Paul Leitao on This week's Apple trading strategies (9/7-9/11/26) - 'Entering this week’s trading, below is the market cap scoreboard of the Terrific Ten. These are the ten most valuable enterprises traded on US exchanges as we move through the Labor Day holiday and the traditional end of the summer travel season. NVIDIA (NVDA) $5.56 trillion Apple (AAPL) $4.67 trillion Alphabet (GOOG) $4.14 trillion Microsoft (MSFT) $3.71 trillion Amazon (AMZN) $2.79 trillion SpaceX (SPCX) $2.01 trillion Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM) $1.98 trillion Broadcom (AVGO) $1.70 trillion Meta Platforms (META) $1.57 trillion Tesla (TSLA) $1.40 trillion'
  • Rodney Avilla on Mark Gurman: Behind Phil Schiller's exit - 'There are somewhere between 34 and 64 million developers (AI) making apps for the iPhone. Most do so paying zero to use the app store. I don’t believe that asking them to pay a few bucks is ‘squeezing’. It’s definitely not squeezing to require those developers making millions and billions to pay their share (here’s to you, Mr. Sweeney).'
  • Rodney Avilla on This week's Apple trading strategies (9/7-9/11/26) - 'Last week’s pressure on Apple’s price thru FUD articles I believe was for 1 of 2 reasons. First goal was to create a better buy in price before the exciting new products are announced on Wednesday. The second reason was to reduce short losses. Of course there could be a third reason- the articles were true. I, for one, do not think so, but I have no inside information. We’ll see on Wednesday.'
  • Stephen Gordon on Mark Gurman: Behind Phil Schiller's exit - 'Sorry, it was John Giannandrea, not Luca Maestri, though the latter tried blocking spending to develop the M1, so maybe he deserved to go, too.'
  • Stephen Gordon on Mark Gurman: Behind Phil Schiller's exit - 'Don’t know if anyone ever followed Jim Dalrymple (retired Apple blogger), but he said on his weekly podcast that Phil Schiller would’ve been a great CEO had Tim Cook decided to step down several years earlier. We’ll never get to find out. Dalrymple also said Apple needed to get rid of three people: Tim Cook, Craig Federighi, Luca Maestri.'
  • Bill Fouche on Mark Gurman: Behind Phil Schiller's exit - 'I fear Schiller’s concerns are well-founded.'
  • Richard Gayle on Mark Gurman: Behind Phil Schiller's exit - 'Using the word “squeeze” implies there really is no way to add revenue for services but to pressure the developers and users. That only rent-seeking behavior is left. Maybe. But not, I believe, for the main App store. I think of what an AI App store might bring to the table; especially one that also enhances any money Apple gets from the uses of AI. It adds to the hardware ecosystem for AI in ways no one else can (although Nvidia is trying). How Apple monetizes AI, how it charges for tokens used from its own servers or Google’s, is one of the things I want to hear. Will Apple do some rent-seeking here, like the other AI companies? Nickel and dime its users? Is that why Schiller decided to leave? I’m sure we will find out soon.'
  • Richard Gayle on The last meeting of Tim Cook's last day as Apple CEO - 'Jobs could be an asshole but he put the signatures of those who worked on the original Mac in the plastic on the inside so people would know. I may not agree with everything Cook has done as CEO, but I do think he is a good man trying to go good in a tough time of our history. He simply does not speak like those running other tech companies.'
  • Michael Goldfeder on The last meeting of Tim Cook's last day as Apple CEO - 'Let’s put it out there now before it shows up on CNBC or some “Negative Nancy” article, so here it goes: Why didn’t Tim Cook make his final appearance as CEO at an Apple UNIONIZED Store?'
  • Fred Stein on The last meeting of Tim Cook's last day as Apple CEO - 'His words ring true. The first time I went into an Apple store, I felt it, the employees, the customers were ‘my people’. I could take any one of them into my home. From then on, buying the products and stock was a no brainer. It’s still true with every store visit, every support call, every web site visit. Tim repeated, ‘enhancing people’s lives’. Tim says that every time. Call it culture, values, leadership, focus, etc. We can rest assured that everyone at every level will do the right thing.'
  • Robert Stack on The last meeting of Tim Cook's last day as Apple CEO - 'Question to ponder: How many CEOs would get that outpouring of applause and expression of love from their rank and file in a situation like this? Esp tech CEOs…'
  • Jonny T on The last meeting of Tim Cook's last day as Apple CEO - 'Sadly, the USA is not quite like Apple.'
  • Bart Yee on The last meeting of Tim Cook's last day as Apple CEO - 'Mentoring and encouraging right to the end…or the next beginning. Who knows, someone in this group of employees may rise to other heights within Apple, just as Deirdre did.'
  • Greg Lippert on The last meeting of Tim Cook's last day as Apple CEO - 'Please run for president. We need you!'
  • Bart Yee on The Financial Times profiles Apple new CEO - 'If you like to drive, and you like to be able to challenge yourself and your car, it’s very fun to be able to drive with precision, with speed, and with some exhilaration. For the vehicle to respond to your steering inputs, the accelerator, and braking while shifting while turning and accelerating again, all at speeds that demand your full concentration plus what you’ve learned in driving school and countless laps on a reasonably challenging circuit. Man, machine, physics, and control of energy. For some, it is like practicing a piano piece until you know it by heart, but then not only play it rote and off the page, but then to embellish it, play it with emotion and feeling and just your personal touch of interpretation. Physics, music, hearing, touch, soul. Or being able to hit that golf shot “just so” to achieve the effect you want – driver straight and true off the tee, middle iron up close to the green, a pitch with backspin to drop within 10 feet of the hole, and a tough putt to read but curves the ball right into the cup. Concentration, swing mechanics, smoothness, energy coil and release, that certain “thwap” of the club and the feel of a perfect hit. It isn’t necessarily racing but doing something well that counts. Best explained by one Steve McQueen, aka Michael Delaney from the classic movie Le Mans: “Lisa Belgetti: But what is so important about driving faster than anyone else? Michael Delaney: A lot of people go through life doing things badly. Racing’s important to men who do it well. When you’re racing, it’s… life. Anything that happens before or after…is just waiting.” https://youtu.be/xvgpbsr-mCE?is=y845LTI2apleIJQZ When I drive my 2000 Porsche Boxster S, even after 26 years, it still brings a smile to my face. It’s not for everyone, but it is important to some. youtu be/ve7C0CzoNx4?is=kA3UDjiho8XlaQrD'