Recent Comments

  • Rodney Avilla on If AI is a bubble, where does that leave Apple? - '“ is it really more savvy to be renting a dependency on the very companies you say can’t survive?” Yes, as long as it’s not a long term binding lease.'
  • Daniel Epstein on Horace Dediu has a cool new way to preview Apple earnings - 'Somehow I have to really concentrate to understand the charts and the underlying information so not sure I would call it “cool”. Useful information for sure.'
  • Neal Guttenberg on Dan Niles on Apple AI: 'Sometimes you get lucky for being incompetent' - 'The unfortunate things about these programs is that their guests usually have an agenda that they want to get across and they aren’t held accountable for the statements that they make. It would be nice if there was a real back and forth with the guests answering real questions about their opinion from the past as well as the present. It would probably make for fewer guests appearing on these shows which is probably the reason why they don’t do it. As for negative opinions, when I am in the right mood, I don’t mind seeing them. It helps me look at my investments and see if there are issues I haven’t taken into account. I dislike the echo chamber. Probably the place where most of the mistakes get made.'
  • Richard Gayle on AI funding is giving Jim Cramer dot-com deja vu - 'We still have about $7 trillion sloshing around our money supply since the pandemic. That money is mostly sitting in the hands of rent-seeking investors – ie private equity, banks, investment firms, and even insurance companies – who have to put their money into something. They can’t be conservative when everyone else is making money by this circular investing. FOMO is likely driving their investments more than critical reasoning. If it were not the AI bubble, it would likely be something else. They have to put the money somewhere. The Fed could do something monetarily about this, but I think those measures would be politically untenable. Congress could do something fiscally about this, but I think those measures would be politically untenable. It seems to me that the main way the money will be removed is a collapse of the bubble and an economic crisis. As it usually is when investors get nuts.'
  • Jonny T on Apple says Micron's profit margins are too high - 'Bloody hell Bart, this is 5 analysts’ support jobs going down the tubes.'
  • Rodney Avilla on AI funding is giving Jim Cramer dot-com deja vu - 'I am visiting Victoria, BC, and a shop has a sign ‘We sell sustainable foods’. I thought, sustainable, that’s a good word for aapl. Apple’s price is sustainable because of strong fundamentals- demand, silicon, AI privacy, new products and cutting edge incremental changes (existing products). Nvidia’s price is built on unsustainable demand; a demand that everyone knows will taper off. Maybe not this year or 2027. But it will. And many NVIDIA investors already have their hand on the lever, ready to pull when signs indicate that may happen soon.'
  • David Emery on If AI is a bubble, where does that leave Apple? - 'Where does that leave Apple? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FnH_zwVmiuE (AWB “Pick Up the Pieces”)'
  • Jonny T on Dan Niles on Apple AI: 'Sometimes you get lucky for being incompetent' - 'I very rarely get angry at people, even though I know that one should never underestimate how many very dim people with dodgy motives there are out there. But this is one vile little man. Thought so for as long as I’ve seen his name and I have said before that PED should NOT be giving him such airtime. It isn’t constructive, or ‘balanced’, or informative. It is downright malicious.'
  • Steven Philips on AI funding is giving Jim Cramer dot-com deja vu - 'Reminds me of a ‘60s dance craze! Take a step forward, look back over your shoulder and shake your body. Let’s all do the Dot Com Deja Vu! 🙂'
  • Steven Philips on Premarket: Apple is green - 'That opening spike to 342 was nice! But it quickly settled back to a red 336.'
  • George Kiersted on If AI is a bubble, where does that leave Apple? - 'I’m not sure where this idea comes from: “It was a mass-radicalization of its users against AI”'
  • Steven Philips on If AI is a bubble, where does that leave Apple? - 'OK, I see bits and pieces, but for the most part I don’t really understand his thinking. That might just be me. But overall my gut says he’s mostly wrong. But I would like to see his weightless version of AVP. 🙂'
  • Greg Lippert on Dan Niles on Apple AI: 'Sometimes you get lucky for being incompetent' - 'He’s on my shortlist of people I’d like to punch in the face. It’s a shame Apple has missed out on all that lucrative AI revenue open AI, etc are raking in. SMH'
  • Greg Lippert on CNBC talking heads talk about Apple's new highs - 'Dan Nils? Master of being spectacularly wrong!'
  • Romeo Esparrago on Premarket: Apple is green - 'Will the fate of hyperscalers be like that of Old Valyria? And for today, investors selling off chipmakers for … 🙂'
  • Steven Philips on Premarket: Apple is green - '!!!!!!!!!! 🙂'
  • Les Surdykowski on Dan Niles on Apple AI: 'Sometimes you get lucky for being incompetent' - 'So CNBC (in the interest of being “fair and balanced”) trots out Mr (I got rich by betting against ) Niles every time Apple starts to move higher for longer. I’m not impressed by the commentary as it’s typically something along the lines of Apple is up but it doesn’t deserve to be. Rinse and repeat. What actual value does Mr Niles bring to the table? His Zoom backgrounds change from time to time but that’s about the only thing different when he comes on to talk about Apple. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯'
  • Bill Donahue on Dan Niles on Apple AI: 'Sometimes you get lucky for being incompetent' - 'Let’s all pause and think about the time when Sam Altman said publicly that he had no idea how OpenAI would make money from AI, but that when they achieved AGI they’d simply ask the model how to make it profitable and do whatever it says. I guess maybe that’s Dan Niles’ preferred corporate strategy and approach to AI as an actual business and investment.'
  • Bill Donahue on Dan Niles on Apple AI: 'Sometimes you get lucky for being incompetent' - 'It’s like insisting the Boston Red Sox got lucky when they won the World Series, because they’re completely incompetent at football. Apple isn’t OpenAI*, never intended to be, and will never be. And thank Glooscap for that. [* Fill in other LLM-peddler’s name, as preferred] Mainly because Apple has an actual business in which it has amply demonstrated its strategic, operational, and financial advantages that have combined to create significant leads and moats that keep its competitors fighting to catch up. And all of that is because of the very unique culture that Steve Jobs created, protected, promoted and preserved, above all else, to the point that it’ becamse part of Apple’s corporate DNA.'
  • Ben Gepp on Apple touches $339.57, closes at a record $336.91 and overtakes Nvidia - 'I’m sure there will be creeps out there that will use AVP inappropriately, in the same way that Apple Tags are sometimes used inappropriately. But given Apple’s commitment to privacy I’m confident they are considering ways to mitigate inappropriate use and avoid dumb design choices.'
  • Ben Gepp on Apple touches $339.57, closes at a record $336.91 and overtakes Nvidia - 'yes, I think the fact that you can see the (uncanny) eyes of the wearer, you know what they are looking at, and the fact that Vision Pro stands out like a sore thumb de-creeps them in comparison to Meta glasses, which feel like they are very much intended for inconspicuous public use. I just can’t see a case where Vision Pro is going to be used in public that much. I have used Meta Quest in a trade show context in a VR mode – which was public and it didn’t feel creepy at all. But it’s not hard to imagine Meta glasses being used for non-consensual live streams by nefarious types because they look so innocuous. And that’s creepy.'
  • Steven Philips on CNBC talking heads talk about Apple's new highs - 'I’d even take Laura Martin over Dan Niles.'
  • Steven Philips on Dan Niles on Apple AI: 'Sometimes you get lucky for being incompetent' - 'Or start using A.I. to fact check him! “But Dad! I checked on Apple Intelligence and it says you’re wrong!” 🙂'
  • Michael Goldfeder on CNBC talking heads talk about Apple's new highs - 'Dan Nathan has never uttered a complimentary word about Apple anytime I heard him on a broadcast. But I fell out of my chair when the “Chartist”, Carter Worth(less), said several superlatives about Apple including: “Stay Long, Be Long.”'
  • Michael Goldfeder on Dan Niles on Apple AI: 'Sometimes you get lucky for being incompetent' - 'Dan “C” Niles has never liked Apple from the first time I saw him babbling away back in 2019 after I made my first and only Apple purchase. Throughout the years he has always crowed about selling Apple short. Said Apple was done when Warren Buffett started selling shares. The China exposure will end Apple. The only minuscule benefit that Niles brings to the table is all of his kids love Apple products. So perhaps his wife overrode their youngsters DNA with more of her own. I hope his kids upgrade every year just to annoy him.'
  • Rick Landsman on Dan Niles on Apple AI: 'Sometimes you get lucky for being incompetent' - 'Niles is simply gaslighting us for why he’s been so wrong about AAPL for at least the last 6 years.'
  • Neal Guttenberg on Laura Martin: Apple's existential risk - 'Bart, Lots of good information here. Thanks.'
  • Neal Guttenberg on Dan Niles on Apple AI: 'Sometimes you get lucky for being incompetent' - 'I thought I heard Niles say that even though Apple was overpriced, it can grow into its present valuation. I also think that the share price is a bit overextended here but do feel that Apple will grow into its valuation. I also don’t care if Nvidia or Apple has the largest market cap. I will disagree that Apple’s incompetence led to the present state of affairs. But if you want to say that some things taking longer than analysts think they should is incompetence, you can use that phrase with any tech company that delays implementation of things. I don’t see this as incompetence at Apple. I see it as something that was much more difficult to achieve than what was anticipated.'