Recent Comments

  • Steven Philips on The Information: We won't see the best of Siri's Gemini-powered features until WWDC - '🙂 (The only negative being that it was – partly – at AAPL’s expense.)'
  • Steven Philips on Baltra, Apple's in-house accelerated computing chip, is late to the party - 'Yes, but I thought that was the whole idea behind Apple’s interface between Apple and various LLMs. And I still think Apple could do well with mini-servers with built in AI specific to businesses that don’t necessarily need LLMs but could access it in this way – and for the same privacy reasons.'
  • Steven Philips on When will OpenAI go broke? - 'Mostly! Now that Dr. Evil is gone.'
  • Steven Philips on When will OpenAI go broke? - 'Outright thievery was the dirty secret to Google’s success. Where are they now and who’s still complaining? It’s always been how the world works. Governments, companies, Churches/religions etc. Once they’re established everyone accepts them as “truth”. (Or else! 🙁 )'
  • Joseph Bland on The Information: We won't see the best of Siri's Gemini-powered features until WWDC - '“…what’s in it for [Alphabet]?” Have you checked their Market Cap lately?'
  • Joseph Bland on BofA sees a 'bullish setup' into Apple's Dec. quarter earnings - 'That’s a pretty bullish estimate. If it’s true, then what’s AAPL doing way down around $260:/share. The large disconnect between options expectations (as reflected in Max Pain) and targets like this continues….'
  • Joseph Bland on When will OpenAI go broke? - 'Great reference to Pluribus, Rodney! But when I started reading it out to Donna, guess whose little ears perked up…. I immediately stopped reading….'
  • Joseph Bland on Baltra, Apple's in-house accelerated computing chip, is late to the party - 'From the previous article, “When will OpenAI go broke?”: “At some point in the not-so-distant future, a model will probably know its user so well that it will be painful to switch to a different one. It will remember every detail of conversations going back years; it will understand shopping habits, movie tastes, emotional hangups, professional aspirations. When that happens, abandoning a model might feel like a divorce — doable, but unpleasant. At this point, the A.I. builders would turn profitable…” Apple is a gatekeeper protecting its user’s personal information. So how will they square this circle – or will they? Those are the two questions that keep rolling around in my brain. I suppose one way is to “build a virtual personality” inside a personal computer that is what interacts with LLMs but is anonymized outside of the PC. Call it Personality 154AB6. The connection to the real person is anonymized. But how easy would it be to deduce who that person might be? Not hard at all if sufficient clues were within P154AB6, IMO. Which leaves you at square one – unless Apple uses its own LLM that “hides” P154AB6 from any outside LLMs. Of course, that raises the “trust” issue. But I far more trust Apple than, for example, Alphabet….'
  • Rodney Avilla on When will OpenAI go broke? - 'Hey Siri, can you send me the directions and list of components to build an A-bomb? And then order all the components and have them send to my man cave. Then afterwards, can you erase any references or ‘paper trail’ to my inquiry and order, and any other conversations we have had on this topic from the internet? I think I have been watching too much TV.'
  • Gregg Thurman on BofA sees a 'bullish setup' into Apple's Dec. quarter earnings - 'Historically, March quarter revenue declines 30-35% from the December quarter. Moran’s iPhone estimate reflects a 36% decline QoQ. I find this entirely accepts because revenue volatility is greater in the iPhone segment than in Computers or Services. I think we’re going to see an overall revenue decline within historical range, so when Apple reports JAN 29 we can factor historical decline and management’s guidance to come up a fairly accurate March quarter revenue projection. This kind of analysis doesn’t do well with unit forecasts.'
  • Michael Goldfeder on BofA sees a 'bullish setup' into Apple's Dec. quarter earnings - 'Wanted to pass along to everyone, even though it’s probably not necessary based on the wealth of knowledge all Apple 3.0 subscribers provide, but make certain you vote your Apple shares. I received my notices from Schwab yesterday and voted my shares. I’m really looking forward to this earnings report as it ought to be one for the ages across all categories.'
  • Gregg Thurman on Baltra, Apple's in-house accelerated computing chip, is late to the party - 'Maybe the talking heads are full of speculative sh*t. I’ve never seen a new development faithfully follow a strict schedule. Neither has the talking heads. Click bait.'
  • Gregg Thurman on The Information: We won't see the best of Siri's Gemini-powered features until WWDC - 'Since Cook said Summer of 2026 I have interpreted that as WWDC. With so much going on this year I could multiple tranches of the event happening simultaneously. After all it is rebroadcast in its entirety, so nobody is going to miss anything.'
  • Bill Donahue on When will OpenAI go broke? - 'I’m guessing that too, along with the long mutually beneficial working relationship the two companies have had, and Alphabet’s similarly deep pockets and the fact that it’s run by adults.'
  • Bill Donahue on When will OpenAI go broke? - 'It’s also a strange thing to point to when you’re talking about whether (mostly) corporations are going to continue to spend money on a premium AI service. Something tells me the AI interests of most paying customers won’t revolve around things like shopping preferences, movie tastes, and emotional hangups. For me, any professional decision to pay and continue to pay and use a particular AI product would depend on returns in the form of efficiency improvements, quality of output improvements, cost reductions (i.e., less time to completion of projects), and reliability and security. And if something either failed on any of those or something else better came along, I wouldn’t hesitate to stop or switch.'
  • ben luna on When will OpenAI go broke? - 'Our iPhones, Macs, etc. have a lot of this data already on device. So an eventual (not necessarily this year’s release, but at some point in the future) Apple solution could use it for the user’s benefit without having access themselves to it. That sounds like a win, win situation to me.'
  • Ted Kluger on When will OpenAI go broke? - 'Agreed, John, and bonus points for the Star Trek reference!'
  • Digant Jariwala on Baltra, Apple's in-house accelerated computing chip, is late to the party - 'Or, you know, maybe Apple started designing their AI server chip *after* they decided on the strategic path forward'
  • Michael Goldfeder on When will OpenAI go broke? - 'Wasn’t Open A I going to dominate this entire space once they partnered with Jony Ive? Or was that just another “Apple is Doomed” headline?'
  • John Konopka on Premarket: Apple is red - 'How could there be a put peak at $150? Maybe they are anticipating war with Iran and high tariffs on all goods from Asia?'
  • John Konopka on When will OpenAI go broke? - '“It will remember every detail of conversations going back years; it will understand shopping habits, movie tastes, emotional hangups, professional aspirations.” Sounds like dystopia to me. I don’t think they intended it, but I look at the hive mind in Pluribus as AI. The few remaining individuals have the choice of living their individual lives or seeking happiness by being swallowed up by the Borg.'
  • Jonny T on When will OpenAI go broke? - 'Or it went with Google because it would allow it control the data thievery that will follow all other iterations of AI..?'
  • David Wilson on When will OpenAI go broke? - 'I was thinking that might be a reason why Apple went with Gemini, simply that it will be working with a company that’s more likely to be around for longer. Forgive me if everyone else already thought that.'
  • Joseph Bland on Apple TV engagement grew 36% in December - 'I’ve watched a few episodes of The Studio, which I’d categorize as frenetically funny. And of course, it’s a great commentary on the flaws in human nature. Apple television and movie productions clearly benefit from both Apple’s commitment to quality and deep pockets, but are also a sideline business that happens to reward Apple’s hundreds of millions of product users. In that regard, it’s a no-lose setup, and Apple was very smart to have gotten into it. In addition, there’s the whole new market just beginning to open up for the Vision Pro, which is very clearly a product far ahead of its time. Creating productions is a great segue into what may eventually become something far more substantial than just a sideline business.'
  • Joseph Bland on When will OpenAI go broke? - '“It will remember every detail of conversations going back years…” Yikes! And people actually want this? I doubt that many do, but they may not have any choice. Without a doubt, if AI were to be given access to everything I ever wrote here, it could begin to build a pretty good picture of me. Since I have never given my permission for that kind of invasion of my privacy hidden behind Apple 3.0’s paywall, that would, from my POV, be tantamount to theft. And all it would take is for a paying member of Apple 3.0 to access my written history here and feed it to the AI monstrosity. Yes, it would be a betrayal of my trust, but there’s nothing to stop it from happening. I keep asking myself why it is that we never hear this issue being raised. The closest to it is a discussion now and then regarding Apple’s position on personal information. My guess why: because outright thievery is the dirty little secret to the “success” of AI, and since it’s making people rich, it’s continually swept under the rug.'
  • Roger Schutte on Apple: Bull vs. bear - 'PED, I just started listening to SITM’s presentation at this Needham conference. As a presenter, can you get the audio recording for us to listen to? Thanks!'
  • Jacob Feenstra on When will OpenAI go broke? - 'Mallaby writes: “….if A.I. appears unlikely to live up to its hype. This is the wrong worry; A.I.’s promise is real.” I agree, the promise is real, but the hype is exuberance. The dot-com promise was real, but the hype was exuberance. Up to half of the dot-com companies died. It is not inconceivable that OpenAI and other AI dedicated companies will die or be swallowed up (as Mallaby implies).'
  • Joseph Bland on Premarket: Apple is red - '“Max pain moves [grudgingly] up $5 to $230…” Big of them. /s'
  • Jonny T on When will OpenAI go broke? - '“My take: Running out of money is not Apple’s problem. Stickiness is its superpower.” Sounds like you know what Apple’s problem really is. Spill the beans Philip..!'
  • Stephen Gordon on When will OpenAI go broke? - 'An FT headline put it this way… OpenAl needs to raise at least $207bn by 2030 so it can continue to lose money, HSBC estimates'