Recent Comments

  • Roger Schutte on Citi hikes its Apple price target $15 to $315 - 'Nope. (Malik also noted the possibility that Apple could push the release of the base model iPhone 18 from fall 2026 to early 2027.) iPhone 17 chip uses TSMC’s N3P technology and their next gen N2 is in full production NOW. To suggest Apple might change iPhone release timing makes me question his thought processes.'
  • Greg Lippert on Schwab graphs Apple's technicals, pitches a vertical call option spread (video) - 'I’ve used Think or Swim for years when it was owned by TD Ameritrade'
  • Fred Stein on Schwab graphs Apple's technicals, pitches a vertical call option spread (video) - 'Yes, Gregg, I’d love to sign up for your options tutorial. Thanks for the offer.'
  • Gregg Thurman on Seeking Alpha: Apple gets an F - 'The problem, and it is a problem, is that they do take into account future revenues, or if they do, they don’t give Apple’s installed base enough credit. Many on WS have the same intellectual limitation.'
  • Bill Donahue on Seeking Alpha: Apple gets an F - 'Especially when they highlight that Apple’s cap-ex has grown almost 3x more this year than its “peers”. Given how pundits and the market have crucified Apple during the last year on its refusal to spend even a fraction of the cap-ex its AI “peers” are spending, and at times the stock price has been hammered because of it, it would seem Seeking Alpha is talking about a different set of “peers” than most people have been talking about over the last year+.'
  • Robert Paul Leitao on Apple was red, turned green - 'It’s about 30 minutes to the closing bell and Apple is off about a nickel at $277.84. Apple supplier Corning is up 2.55% at $90.52. Healthcare giant CVS is ahead today 3.06% at $78.87. On the S&P 500 Apollo Global Management sits atop the leaderboard, rising 5.82% to $145.38. Among the index components about half are in the green on the day.'
  • Daniel Epstein on Citi hikes its Apple price target $15 to $315 - 'We are in the weird time of the year when Apple stock often struggles before an end of year rally. Given the number of Analysts recently who have raised their price targets to well over $300 dollars a share the price action in the stock is giving them the Rodney Dangerfield treatment. Good projections from an Analyst take a while to be believed. Now if someone has bad projections to talk about the reaction or overreaction is usually felt no matter how significant or believable the news actually is. And the overall market moves around the Fed decision on interest rates can easily drown out the lowly analyst calls. At least for the short term.'
  • Neal Guttenberg on Seeking Alpha: Apple gets an F - 'It seems to be essentially the same kind of stuff being said about Apple in the article that PED has links for in the related area after the present article from May 12, 2024. Only Apple is about 90 bucks per share higher than it was back then. Lots of people can have different ways to evaluate stocks and make money in the market. If that works for them, that’s great. Staying invested in Apple has worked for me. I don’t mind seeing the negative stuff. It just causes me to look at my investment again and justify it. I do think Apple is very richly valued here. But they can grow into this present valuation and it usually doesn’t grow in a linear manner like some of the other stocks. Also, part of what goes into that equation for me is the stock buybacks that decrease the share counts. So I stay invested but sell shares to keep up a cash position in retirement, usually at the start of the year so I can get an idea about what taxes I will need to pay for the rest of the year.'
  • Timothy Smith on Schwab graphs Apple's technicals, pitches a vertical call option spread (video) - 'Let’s say I believe Apple will hit 290 by the end of the year. It is 277 now.. I have 2500 cash in my retirement to play with, without worrying about taxes. What would be the play? Then, assume I think it will go down to 260. What would be the play?'
  • Daniel Epstein on Seeking Alpha: Apple gets an F - 'Seeking Alpha site is something I tried to monitor many years ago as it seemed to have some interesting viewpoints on some of the stocks I was following. Gradually I realized that many who used the Seeking Alpha site as distribution where misguided in their financial advice. Now I pretty much ignore it no matter how intriguing the headline. For instance there was a time when I was looking at Amazon when the stock price was around $125 per share. The argument against Amazon at that price seemed reasonable. Of course the stock price climbed for many years and when it split 20 to 1 in June 2022 it was back in the range of when this Seeking Alpha presenter had said it was dead money or worse. So one can say for sure that Seeking Alpha is a forum which has a wide variety of advice from people some of who are giving out bad investing advice. And it is difficult for the reader to know who to listen to. If Seeking Alpha has an article which says “Apple is doomed” rest assured it is there to get clicks.'
  • Rodney Avilla on Schwab graphs Apple's technicals, pitches a vertical call option spread (video) - 'I don’t know enough about options to ask any questions, but I would be interested in reading a primer to learn the basics. Any suggestions would be appreciated.'
  • Gregg Thurman on Schwab graphs Apple's technicals, pitches a vertical call option spread (video) - 'Let me rephrase your question: Can I trade options on Schwab? Yes you can. That’s where I do my trading.'
  • Bill Donahue on Schwab graphs Apple's technicals, pitches a vertical call option spread (video) - 'I would definnitely be interested in an options tutorial, Gregg!'
  • Timothy Smith on Schwab graphs Apple's technicals, pitches a vertical call option spread (video) - 'Basic question. Can I do options on Schwab?'
  • Bill Fouche on Seeking Alpha: Apple gets an F - '“… compared to its peers …” What peers? Give me names and let’s compare.'
  • Gregg Thurman on Schwab graphs Apple's technicals, pitches a vertical call option spread (video) - 'Don, Apple 3.0 is supposed to be about learning so that your investing improves. As my posts have sometimes complained, I think it has morphed into a tracker of Apple rumors. I would be very happy to respond to any Options questions with the understanding that there are no stupid questions. I’ll be happy to explain, in greater detail what, and how, I traded AAPL Options since returning to the market in mid October. I believe an intelligent investor uses more than one strategy to prosper, as there is always more than one scenario facing serious investors. May I suggest we start with terminology? Ask away.'
  • Gregg Thurman on Schwab graphs Apple's technicals, pitches a vertical call option spread (video) - 'Normal people ask questions when they don’t understand, or buy a book.'
  • Don Donofrio on Schwab graphs Apple's technicals, pitches a vertical call option spread (video) - 'Since many PED3.0 users have also bought an AVP, I have sometimes thought it would be fun to get together on a call and have someone explain options / max pain etc.'
  • Gregg Thurman on Schwab graphs Apple's technicals, pitches a vertical call option spread (video) - 'Nothing like options for spraying around the jargon and making normal people flee the room..!! Normal people questions when they don’t understand, or buy a book. What part did you not understand? I’ll be very happy to operate an Options tutorial for anyone interested in learning. Once you know the language they are really quite easy. The hardest part is placing an order. The brokerages Options platforms make it far more difficult than it needs to be. The best, and the one I learned on – OptionsXpress, was purchased by Schwab, who promptly ruined it. Even it, Think or Swim, can be learned though.'
  • Jonny T on Seeking Alpha: Apple gets an F - 'Non sensical comparisons in order to make sense of Apple is an extremely dim way to invest. They’ll get just what they deserve I’ll guess..'
  • David Drinkwater on Mark Gurman: Johny Srouji is not leaving Apple - '“I make a motion that PED not reprint anything from Gurman on Apple 3.0 ever again. All those in favor say aye.” This is a really tough one, Gregg. I don’t like Gurman’s lack of ethics or his use of internal sources who should know better themselves about sharing Apple-internal communications, but I’m also somewhat of the mind to: “Keep your friends close and your enemies closer.“ I’m sure Srouji knew full well that his “internal” announcement would be leaked and that he vetted it with Apple PR before sending it.'
  • Jonny T on Schwab graphs Apple's technicals, pitches a vertical call option spread (video) - 'Nothing like options for spraying around the jargon and making normal people flee the room..!!'
  • Fred Stein on Schwab graphs Apple's technicals, pitches a vertical call option spread (video) - 'Thanks. I’ve covered a few Calls and added some OOM Put exposure, preparing for another long ride higher.'
  • Fred Stein on Seeking Alpha: Apple gets an F - 'AAPL is up 36% from 6 months ago. Looking at their ratings 6 months ago, shows how useless their system is.'
  • Gregg Thurman on Seeking Alpha: Apple gets an F - 'AAPL’s valuation appears expensive compared to its peers. I don’t care what the “sector” does. None are marketing the same product categories Apple is. I care what Apple does, and in that regard Apple is poised to blow the sector away. David, I’m with you “F him”.'
  • Gregg Thurman on Schwab graphs Apple's technicals, pitches a vertical call option spread (video) - 'Any comments on Tom White’s vertical call spread? Good trade? Got better? Ordinarily, before I got a case of the conservatives, I would adopt Tom’s strategy using similar decision criteria. As it is, I opted for the JAN 16 $280/$285 Vertical Call Spread with a $2.30 entry. Tom’s ROI is 150%, mine is 117%. Tom’s breakeven is just $2 below my max profit. If AAPL peaks at $285 I make my max profit (117% ROI), Tom makes $200 (25% ROI). IOW, Tom is sticking his neck out $10 further, on the belief AAPL will print $10 higher, than I am. It all comes down to your confidence that AAPL will print $295, or more, by JAN 16. My personal target is $300, but stuff happens. For that reason I’m taking a less aggressive approach than is Tom. I’m happy to let a paid “expert” take the lead on this. Since re-entering the market in mid October, first taking a conservative OCT position, then taking conservative JAN positions and upgrading them as appropriate, my original investment will return more than 320% (all the while remaining conservative) in just over 4 months.'
  • Jonny T on Mark Gurman: Apple's AI and robotics teams are draining talent - 'Precisely what I was thinking Neal. Certainly Dye going sounded like a win, and pretty sure John Giannandrea as well.'
  • Robert Paul Leitao on Apple was red, turned green - 'It’s time to get this Tuesday party started… Pre-market Apple is up $0.37 at $278.26. NVIDIA is ahead $0.72 at $186.29 on news of permission to sell more chips in China with a Trump twist. Walmart begins trading on Nasdaq this morning because the company considers itself more of a tech enterprise. Pre-market the shares are in the green $0.64 at $114.20. Index futures are slightly below the line ahead of the bell at 9am in the east.'
  • David Emery on Seeking Alpha: Apple gets an F - 'The PED-extracted quotes are full of inconsistencies which don’t seem to be resolved. Profitability is massively greater than ‘sector’ but ‘appears expensive relative to its peers’ who can’t touch that profitability. But then, who exactly are Apple’s peers? My reaction is “F him.”'
  • David Thall on Evercore on turnover: 'Stay calm & Apple on' - 'It’s no coincidence that the recent negative narration just suddenly appeared when Apple was repeatedly hitting new all-time highs every day. The awful truth is, it’s a highly manipulated rigged game. Stock prices are driven up and down using so-called “news“ which are regularly planted stories to manipulate stock prices. Algorithms are programmed to automatically react to planted stories. The gangs who plant the stories know this. A lot of it’s probably done offshore where the SEC can’t track the source. Pardon my cynicism, but you know it’s true. Even Cramer confessed to how easy it was to plant a story, and admitted doing it many years ago – well before he got his TV show Mad Money. On videotape no less. NEXT UP: They are going to say that AAPL is oversold. Run stories reminding us that Tim Cook gave a guidance for a 10% increase for the next quarter. And drive to stock back up…. to hit all their recent raised targets. I’ll even hazard a guess that this will kick in the moment the FED lowers interest rates. They’ll call it a Santa Claus rally. Ho ho ho – and many happy returns everyone.'