Bart Yee on Mark Gurman: What no more net-cash-zero means for John Ternus - 'Here’s a crazy thought. With just a reduction of a usual $25B repurchase allocation of one quarter, Apple could 1) bid $7B to takeover rights to MLB National Games, World Series, etc. for 7 or more years. 2) bid $3-5B/year for Fox’s NFL rights 3) bid $1B per year for NHL rights in the US, or more for that and Canada Apple would then leap into a large position for all these major sports. NBA would come next. All to grow Apple TV+ and to provide Vision Pro content.'
on Look at the cool things Nvidia is doing with the Apple Vision Pro (video) - 'Cool stuff. Too bad AVP is DOA (sarcasm) Long live AVP.'
on Mark Gurman: What no more net-cash-zero means for John Ternus - 'If this Iran, folly has taught us anything, it’s that we need to quadruple down on renewable energy. We need to stop needing the assets of these crazy regimes. Put solar over existing parking lots and move to electric vehicles. Soon we won’t need their oil. No money will choke them better than bombs.'
on Mark Gurman: What no more net-cash-zero means for John Ternus - 'Yikes sounds like WWIII. If the pedo-in-chief hasn’t already started it.'
on This week's Apple trading strategies (5/4-5/8/26) - 'I’m not sure I understand the pessimism for Microsoft. If they can get past their marketing blunders, they have a large captive Windows audience where they can provide AI services. And that’s part of a broader, more diversified, revenue stream. p.s. Anyone else think GameStop buying eBay is absurd?'
on This week's Apple trading strategies (5/4-5/8/26) - 'No, it hasn’t…it’s: ASYMCOPED30 https://asymco.com/membership-checkout/?pmpro_level=3&pmpro_discount_code=ASYMCOPED30 Kagi search is your friend.'
on This week's Apple trading strategies (5/4-5/8/26) - 'The Apple 3.0 discount seems to now have expired.'
on Mark Gurman: What no more net-cash-zero means for John Ternus - 'For the foreseeable future Apple is likely to continue increasing its net income total each quarter on a year-over-year basis. Leaving behind the so-called “net cash neutral” objective eliminates the burden of explicitly accounting for the company’s net cash position on the quarterly cash return reports as a stated goal to diminish over time (it’s been eliminated on the most recent report released with the March quarter financials) or any expectation either the share repurchase program and/or the quarterly dividend will necessarily be increased in response to continuing increases in net income. There’s no reason to overthink this issue. Management has simply changed what had been a previously stated corporate goal.'
on $185 billion later, Warren Buffett asks Tim Cook to take a bow (video) - 'That’s incoming CEO John Ternus, he accompanied Tim Cook to the BH shareholder meeting. Very likely John was introduced by Tim to Buffet, and the rest of BH management. After all, John will now be looking after and making sure BH’s investment in Apple will grow just fine. Dare I say the Apple investment will easily outpace the rest of BH’s businesses?'
on Mark Gurman: What no more net-cash-zero means for John Ternus - '”My concern is that China may change that scenario.” Fair enough. China has expressed a desire to bring Taiwan back into the fold often enough. But to accomplish that militarily requires crossing 90 miles of open ocean. To even begin the journey requires concentrating troops at a jumping off point, then navigating the Straits. Launching missiles would be devastating, except that Taiwan has been preparing for a Chinese invasion for over 70 years. Bombing wouldn’t do much better than missiles because of US antimissile defenses. Offensively Taiwan looks like porcupine with medium to long range missiles. And then there’s US fast attack nuclear subs, ballistic and guided missile for a total of 71 nuclear subs with an average of 20 launch tubes, each equipped with 4 warheads. Then there are the anti-shipping torpedos. Four US subs surrounding Taiwan have the capacity to launch about 320 warheads (nuclear and conventional). An untoward act by China would be met with overwhelming force by both Taiwanese and US forces. Then there’s the issue of friendly forces. China has North Korea, Iran and Russia. The US has Australia, Japan, Canada, South Korea and the Philippines in the immediate area. China is expanding its naval forces, but they are way behind the USs strength. I’m not concerned about any Chinese attempt to invade Taiwan. Short of launching a nuclear attack they are a paper tiger. In an exchange of nuclear weapons China is toast.'
on This week's Apple trading strategies (5/4-5/8/26) - 'Looking over the past six months Apple’s revenue rose year-over-year 16% to $255 billion. Net income rose 17.3% to $71.675 billion. Net income was 28.11% of revenue. For comparison purposes I discount eps due to the influence of financial engineering through buybacks to increase it. In other words it doesn’t wholly reflect organic growth. Additionally, the amount allocated for repurchases will likely change in futures years. Over this same 6-month period in which net income rose 17.3%, the share price gained in value. While I don’t consider Apple to be an “inexpensive stock,” based on performance metrics it’s less expensive than 6 months ago.'
on $185 billion later, Warren Buffett asks Tim Cook to take a bow (video) - 'Who was the person on the lower left looking up at Tim?? Please someone tell me!'
on This week's Apple trading strategies (5/4-5/8/26) - 'Michael: Laura Martin may have a point on Apple’s hesitance to strategically deploy for capex investments in partners that produce components currently in short supply. I’m delighted Apple is moving away from its net cash neutral policy and I believe the current asset deployment levels for share repurchases provide a diminishing return to shareholders especially when strategic deployments for capex to alleviate component shortages would not only benefit gross margin over time, it would allow Apple with the opportunity to more timely meet customer demand. I’m interested in how the incoming CEO will address component shortages and meet an aggressive timetable for new product introductions. After all, his background is in hardware.'
on Mark Gurman: What no more net-cash-zero means for John Ternus - 'Likewise Greg. I have long thought that buybacks were an effective way to return value to shareholders but a lazy way to do it. I would rather see Apple build adjacent businesses (say, energy, logistics, finance??) infused with Apple culture then spin them off. Flood the market with businesses that think [different] like Apple but in new areas. Their culture is the real and rare intangible source of competitive advantage that has provided so much economic and social value.'
on Mark Gurman: What no more net-cash-zero means for John Ternus - 'My concern is that China may change that scenario.'
on Mark Gurman: What no more net-cash-zero means for John Ternus - 'I find this exciting. The only reason not to do buybacks is because you have something better to do with the money. That’s the implicit promise Ternus is making: I can deploy the cash to make Apple bigger, better, stronger, to do more for its customers and to earn more for its shareholders. Or to put it another way, let’s make a bigger dent in the universe. Given all that Apple has already accomplished, that stance is bold (or, if it turns out to be wrong, dangerous). Given the track record, I have a lot of faith that this alternative deployment, to grow the business before growing investors’ wallets, will turn out well for everyone. Well, for their competitors maybe not so much.'
on This week's Apple trading strategies (5/4-5/8/26) - 'The worst performing equity among the Terrific 10 names measured by share price performance year-to-date is Microsoft. The shares are down over the period by 14.36%. This includes Friday’s $6.17 gain to $414.20. CFRA just reiterated a strong buy rating on the stock and raised its price target to $480. Morningstar has a 5-star rating on MSFT with a Fair Value Estimate of $600.'
on Mark Gurman: What no more net-cash-zero means for John Ternus - '” move away from using TSMC.” I think that would be a mistake. TSMC is indisputably best in class. It would take a long time to replace a vendor that doesn’t need replacing.'
on This week's Apple trading strategies (5/4-5/8/26) - 'At the close of trading on Friday, all of Apple’s year-to-date share price appreciation of 3.05% occurred on Friday. The shares rose $8.79 or 3.24% on Friday to finish at $280.14. The current all-time high of $288.62 was set on December 3rd.'
on Mark Gurman: What no more net-cash-zero means for John Ternus - 'My suspicion is that Apple plans to build its own semiconductor fabrication plants in the US, and move away from using TSMC.'
on This week's Apple trading strategies (5/4-5/8/26) - 'The year-to-date (YTD) share price performances of the Terrific Ten equities ranked by percentage gains in share prices over this time and the percentage gains in the major stock indexes over the same period. With a gain of 3.05% year-to-date, including Friday’s share price gains, Apple places 7th out of the 11 stocks listed. Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM) up 32.74% Alphabet (GOOG) up 22.12% Broadcom (AVGO) – up 21.72% Walmart (WMT) up 18.12% Amazon (AMZN) up 16.22% Russell 2000 – up 12.49% NASDAQ Composite – up 8.06% NVIDIA (NVDA) up 6.41% S&P 500 – up 5.62% Apple (AAPL) – up 3.05% DJIA – up 2.99% Berkshire Hathaway (BRK) – down (5.90%) Meta Platforms (META) down (7.78%) Tesla (TSLA) down (13.10%) Microsoft (MSFT) down (14.30%)'
on This week's Apple trading strategies (5/4-5/8/26) - 'Entering this week’s trading, below is the market cap scoreboard of the Terrific Ten. These are the ten most valuable enterprises traded on US exchanges. This is a look at the numbers as we approach the end of earnings season following the March quarter. For now Walmart has replaced Berkshire in the #10 spot on the list. Berkshire maintains a trillion dollar market cap. NVIDIA (NVDA) $4.82 trillion Alphabet (GOOG) $4.67 trillion Apple (AAPL) $4.11 trillion Microsoft (MSFT) $3.08 trillion Amazon (AMZN) $2.88 trillion Broadcom (AVGO) $ 1.99 trillion Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM) $1.75 trillion Meta Platforms (META) $1.55 trillion Tesla (TSLA) $1.47 trillion Walmart (WMT) $1.05 trillion Berkshire Hathaway (BRK) $1.02 trillion'
on This week's Apple trading strategies (5/4-5/8/26) - 'If and when those AI servers need to be retired in 3-4 years, wonder who might reharvest all of the memory chips for reuse or resale?'
on Mark Gurman: What no more net-cash-zero means for John Ternus - '“engineers who think shareholders don’t deserve to be rewarded” The 2 sides will never agree completely, as people tend to be self-centered, and usually find it hard to be objective when personal gain is at stake. Management needs to play that objective role.'
on Asymco's Horace Dediu: Services is the foundation - 'I believe Services is definitely headed in that direction, but to say it’s there now may be a little premature. How soon it will get there? The sooner the better. In the past, whenever iPhone revenue missed predictions, the stock would take a hit, even if Apple’s total revenue was higher. This quarter, as per my memory, iPhone revenue missed, but aapl did not suffer (at least so far). I thought this was a very good sign that the transition of dependency on the iPhone is indeed changing. Although people normally buy an iPhone before they buy services, services is what keeps them, especially as new changes in the iPhone become less over time (product maturity). Even so, a 10% reduction in iPhone sells would probably still have a greater effect on aapl than a 10% reduction in services. But, it won’t be long before that will not be true.'
on This week's Apple trading strategies (5/4-5/8/26) - 'So Apple’s capex is a fraction of hyperscaler spend cause they aren’t going gangbusters for memory chips that are now more expensive due to hyperscaler demand. And what happens when that hardware depreciates during the next upgrade cycle? Will the hyperscalers have to float more debt? Or will AI run so efficiently that they will soon be regurgitat in profit? We know, however, that Apple’s profit potential will increase over the coming years, in spite of all this. Just thinking out loud.'
on Asymco's Horace Dediu: Services is the foundation - 'I’d love to see a forecast of these sales as Apple customers start utilizing applications that include features provided by the Foundation Models Framework for on-device services that don’t require cloud-based access.'


