Recent Comments

  • David Drinkwater on 'For an AI loser, Apple did an awful lot of winning last year' - 'I agree with this wholeheartedly, and it doesn’t hurt to say so. I’m also frustrated with CarPlay. It should be so, so, so much better. On those occasions where I’ve had a loaner car that does support CarPlay (my old beaters don’t), I would often rather still use my iPhone, because the interface is just so much better. I think CarPlay is a big deal. From a very First World perspective: You own a house, and the world looks at that. You own a car, and the world looks at that. You own a phone, and the world looks at that. You own a watch, and the world looks at that. You own/wear clothes and accessories, and I guess the world probably does look at that. You own your own body, and the world looks at that. I don’t totally know how to rank and rate these items (and I do not actually tend to be particularly materialistic, myself, but I am carving out an argument), but I think a car and a phone are things that people definitely notice and they think about them when it comes time to spend money. I would never buy a car that does not support CarPlay, and yet … why am I so disappointed with it???'
  • David Drinkwater on Horace Dediu's answers to Laura Martin's Apple bull-vs.-bear Qs - 'What’s the request? After the statement that you have a request, I see only statements of fact or opinion, but no actual request. Not judging, but curious to know.'
  • David Drinkwater on NJ 'hits' Apple — a $3.8 trillion company — with a $150,000 penalty. Is that joke? - 'I dunno. As a manufacturing guy, I occasionally get involved in Audits (we do our own internal audits – occasionally just to actually get better, but mostly to be sure that we are ready when an external Auditor comes in to certify our ISO status). External Audits are important: they show the world that you are rigorous in your process. Our Quality Policy is “Right the first time in all aspects of our business”. We do pretty well at that. But, naturally, we do have failings. And when we find one, we are supposed to fix it: “how can we make sure that this never happens again?” If we are successful and there are no repeats, we have made ourselves better. But if a one-time finding repeats, it is a two-time finding. That’s bad. If we have a finding on an ISO Audit and we fail it on the next ISO Audit, that is really bad. We could lose our ISO certification. When working with Automotive and now, increasingly, Medical Customers, that may mean that we simply can’t do business with them. They will reject us. While $150,000 may not matter to Apple as a company – or even to me because of my AAPL holdings – a failure is a failure, and a failure to correct a failure is an even worse failure. On to the details of the “case” … From the perspective of the window-shopper – even inside the Apple Store – it is right to have a clearly stated price next to the object that they wish to ogle, sometimes to say “I might be able to choose between this one and that one” or sometimes to say “this is an aspirational product, and I know that, if I do my day-job today right and well so that I may one day be able to buy it, I might one day explore the horizons of my dream creativity”. The customer has a reasonable right to have that data right in front of them, so that they can know which of the two above questions they might be answering.'
  • Romeo Esparrago on Saturday Apple video: Steve Jobs' last Time Magazine cover shoot (2010) - 'I was at the IL (Infinite Loop) Caffé Macs on a visit from Elk Grove, Cali that same year and saw Mr. Jobs from a distance and saw him sideways. Yes, it was sad to see him that way, like a stick, but his posture was straight, true, and confident. As he was. Magnificent.'
  • Gregg Thurman on Horace Dediu's answers to Laura Martin's Apple bull-vs.-bear Qs - 'Apple has long term growth Fred, I’m in agreement with you. Other firms may grow faster, like a sprinter for a short period of time, but not over a long duration. That’s because Jobs instilled, and Cook refined, true long term vision. Apple is willing to invest in its vision of the next big thing over an extended period of years (decades?). The Jackrabbits (META?) may achieve a semblance of the vision quicker, but they won’t flesh out the totality of the vision before Apple. Yes, Apple has had some missteps, but it demonstrated a willingness to cut bait when progress no longer advances that vision. This is where I see the Vision Pro ultimately succeeding beyond our wildest imaginations. By the time the competition recognizes the potential in Apple’s “vision”, it will be years too late to the party, as will be the regulators. Because of Apple’s benign mindset, its philosophical relationship with the consumer will become the regulated standard. Today’s AAPL investors will become tomorrow’s multi-millionaires.'
  • John Konopka on Premarket: Apple is red - 'What’s with the call peak at ~150? Who thinks they need to buy an option to buy Apple at $150? I just checked Yahoo and you can buy $150 calls for next Friday for ~$118. Is this some sort of odd way of moving money around?'
  • Joseph Bland on Premarket: Apple is red - 'IMO, we have 2 more weeks before Apple returns to buying AAPL on the open market. Barring a black swan, the retrenchment back towards a new ATH should start in about a week. Unfortunately, these days there are a lot more black swans….'
  • Joseph Bland on Horace Dediu's answers to Laura Martin's Apple bull-vs.-bear Qs - '“I’ve always maintained that 35 was a sweet spot for Apple P/E even when it was far from that.” On buybacks, it’s a complex picture, so I get why Horace didn’t answer it. But looking at Apple’s valuation struggles since the Great Recession and the simultaneous advent of the iPhone, when he rightly pointed out that Apple was being valued “like a steel mill going out of business”, he must see that buybacks are a big part of why Apple won that struggle and is now much more fairly valued. I’d also note this comment: “Note that [the P/E ratio] inflated by about 3 to 4 points during last 12 months due to EU tax penalty payment.” Which meant that a P/E valuation of 40 was masking an underlying valuation of about 36.'
  • Ross Richardson on Horace Dediu's answers to Laura Martin's Apple bull-vs.-bear Qs - 'Why was Candice Bergen doing the interview?'
  • David Emery on Horace Dediu's answers to Laura Martin's Apple bull-vs.-bear Qs - 'I’ve said for a while that the regulatory risk is the thing that keeps me up at night with respect to Apple. Not only is it a big fat target, but as its ubiquity grows world-wide, the imperative to manage the ‘iPhone as utility’ will grow. And at least within US law, the argument “using a monopoly to build a new monopoly” has relevance to Apple with the growth of ‘services on top of iPhones’. Now I don’t think most of the regulators have really thought this through from the ‘best for the consumer’ perspective, beyond listening to rear ends like Tim Sweeney argue that “what’s best for Epic is best for consumers.” One reason the Apple ecosystem is so beloved by consumers is that the alternatives inhale so vigorously! Apple would do well to champion advances in privacy and security liability, even at the risk of improving their competition, to forestall a lot of the ill-advised regulation we’re seeing now.'
  • Dan Scropos on Inviting friends-of-the-blog to Apple’s Q1 2026 Earnings Smackdown - 'I’m sticking with $2.82. Loose number but The Street has eps far too low. $2.68-$2.73seems to be the range.'
  • Robert Stack on Horace Dediu's answers to Laura Martin's Apple bull-vs.-bear Qs - 'Thank you Horace – and thank you PED. ‘Nuff said…except for and just wait til that (relatively) inexpensive Mac comes out!'
  • Fred Stein on Horace Dediu's answers to Laura Martin's Apple bull-vs.-bear Qs - 'PED, I have a request. Horace marries the art of rigorous data analytics with insight. I believe (and lack the data to back it up), that Apple has long term growth in youth, in addition to long term growth in emerging markets, cited above. We have seen. here, US teen iPhone preferences cited here. That’s great but it’s US only, point in time only, and iPhone only. The on-ramp starts early, often with and-me-down iPhones to kids. It has decades of growth, more so as purchasing power and compute need increase. We see this in growth of services and the Mac+iPad franchise. Note Mac and iPad unit sales growth has been steady while replacement cycles expand.'
  • Jonny T on Horace Dediu's answers to Laura Martin's Apple bull-vs.-bear Qs - 'Seems to be a good number of nails being prepped for the OpenAI coffin. Horace smacks another one in: “OpenAI wants a device to deliver its service, hence the “Ive Pen”. I see it as a mobile Alexa, not in any way a smartphone alternative.”'
  • Jonny T on Horace Dediu's answers to Laura Martin's Apple bull-vs.-bear Qs - 'Horace is in a league of his own.'
  • Fred Stein on Horace Dediu's answers to Laura Martin's Apple bull-vs.-bear Qs - 'Thanks. A delight reading Horace’s bullish insights, his long term (back and forward) perspective.'
  • Les Surdykowski on Horace Dediu's answers to Laura Martin's Apple bull-vs.-bear Qs - 'I love Horace’s right down the middle, no need for hyperbolic rhetoric style of delivery. Just the facts please with a side of here’s the trajectory where these facts can lead. We’re all adults (or at least we should be if we’re playing this game) and can have different opinions about where these facts can lead, but you’d have to come to the discussion with pretty solid facts to bend the trajectory.'
  • David Emery on Horace Dediu's answers to Laura Martin's Apple bull-vs.-bear Qs - 'Great summary! Any particularly interesting questions (both from “Wow, where did that come from?” and from “Here’s the answer to that interesting question”)?'
  • Robert Paul Leitao on Premarket: Apple is red - 'Index futures are mixed an hour out from today’s opening bell. TSMC, which gained $14.53 on Thursday, is ahead $2.90 this morning at $344.60. Apple, which dropped $1.80 on Thursday, is down another $0.72 pre-market at $257.49. Goldman Sachs, one of yesterday’s big gainers, is off $4.40 at $971.48 after gaining $43.19 yesterday. Let’s see what happens after today’s opening bell…'
  • Jonny T on 'For an AI loser, Apple did an awful lot of winning last year' - 'Apple Intelligence isn’t “a product” really is it? Seems to me to be a catchy name for micro applications of AI, individually or coming together where needed. Surely it will quietly pervade our digital lives without a big bang? The weakest spot though has been Siri. Who seems to have been happy in her own little world of stupidity, causing us all to tear our hair out as she determinedly insists on responding incorrectly. For our sanity, let’s hope Siri is really altogether sharper and snappier, if not actually a genius.'
  • David Drinkwater on Richard Windsor: Apple and Google — Desperate Times - '“Furthermore, Google will be incentivised to ensure that Android gets the latest AI features before Apple does, meaning that there could easily be a situation where Apple’s AI is worse than what is available on Android.” I think this thought process by “Radio Free Mobile” is highly misguided. If Apple is paying Google a lot of money, there is no way Google is incentivized to give their best products to someone else!'
  • Robert Paul Leitao on Premarket: Apple is red - 'In Thursday trading the S&P 500 closed up 17.87 at 6,944.47. The day’s high was 6,979.34 and close to the all-time high set on Monday of 6,986.33. The DJIA rose 292.81 and ended the session at 49,442.44. The intra-day high of 49,581.18 was close to Monday’s all-time high of 49,633.35. In contrast Apple fell $1.80 to close at $258.21. Morgan Stanley gained $10.45 or 5.78% to end the day at $191.23. Goldman Sachs, which also reported today, gained $43.19 or 4.63% to close at $975.86. Taiwan Semiconductor rose $14.53 or 4.44% on strong quarterly results.'
  • Gregg Thurman on Omdia: Apple's Macs and MacBooks had a very good year - ' I finally bit the bullet and just replaced my 10-year-old Intel-powered MacBook Air with an M4 Air with a significant memory and hard-drive upgrade. That’s asking a lot of compatibility/upgradeability capability. It took a lot to complete your task. I have to wonder if you could have accomplished as much on a different platform.'
  • Kemble Widmer on Bloomberg: Apple feeling the pinch of soaring memory prices - 'Yep, Neal had same thought. Apple in its wisdom has not raised prices in years past when it certainly could have, thus building trust capital within its user community for when they must raise prices. They also have been growing overall GM for years, as well as managing prepurchased capacity well.'
  • Kemble Widmer on Tim Culpan: Apple can't get all the TLC from TSMC it needs - 'In any event, IF a company drops from the largest to 3rd largest customer, for example, the supplier will still be working feverishly to maintain the relationship. Nothing burger. (Have these authors ever worked in the real world??)'
  • Joseph Bland on 'For an AI loser, Apple did an awful lot of winning last year' - 'Apple is a mammoth business, but as I said today in another thread here, Apple is not standing in place, but continually growing and improving. AND they have more money than they can possibly spend (hence buybacks). There’s not the slightest doubt in my mind that Apple is precisely directing its juggernaut of a business. In spite of all the FUDD about how it has “missed out” on AI, it is fine-tuning its course to more completely take AI into account.'
  • Kemble Widmer on 'For an AI loser, Apple did an awful lot of winning last year' - 'Yep, you beat me to it, Bill. Perhaps AI will have different emergent winners year to year over the next decades and even a company “winning” next year loses out in future years as demand and monetization changes. As the device and service gatekeeper Apple stands to gain whomever emerges year to year with great new AI related products. With their current model to purchase AI backend functionality will they lose out on some opportunity cost/profit potentially? Yes. But also with the current model will they avoid substantial downside risk on Capex while they are increasing margins and have returned to double digit growth? Also yes. Let me repeat. Apple is returning to double digit growth, have been increasing margins for years, and all this with a still rock solid balance sheet allowing for stockholder returns. I like.'
  • Joseph Bland on Tim Culpan: Apple can't get all the TLC from TSMC it needs - 'Good points, Bill. I’d add that Apple is not standing in place, but continually improving and growing. If TCM can’t keep up with Apple’s pace, Apple WILL find a solution, just like it did with Intel and with Motorola before that.'