Les Surdykowski on The Information: Apple is bringing seven new iPhones to market - 'My all-time favorite iPhone design prediction was the one where the phone looked almost like an iPod with a scroll wheel for selecting numbers. While it wasn’t actually correct, it was a contender that never made it past the design studio. Bonus points for appearing at the iPhone reveal as a joke bait-and-switch by Jobs himself.'
on Raw Data: The U.S. rattling its sabers at Europe - 'The EU was created to create … the EU, reducing trade frictions and increase mobility between the EU nations. As such, there has to be at least some favoritism within the EU, but I will also agree that there seems to be too much pushback against the USA – and a lot of saber rattling to go along with it. Seems kinda childish to me: Trump should very successful at it.'
on Raw Data: The U.S. rattling its sabers at Europe - 'I think you will find that Germany also puts money into Airbus. And also manufactures Airbus planes. I could be wrong, but I don’t think so.'
on Raw Data: The U.S. rattling its sabers at Europe - '“‘reasonable idea, appalling execution’.)” That is a good summation. A comment I have made in the past, which is somewhat similar, is a “bull in a china shop” as a way to reduce inventory.'
on The Information: Apple is bringing seven new iPhones to market - 'Apple will be unforgivably “late” with the designs “we” predicted. Why should “we” be expected to apologize for that?'
on The Information: Apple is bringing seven new iPhones to market - 'And 2 years from now, when Apple hasn’t done what The Information says it is going to do, you will be hard pressed to find a mea culpa emanating from The Information.'
on Raw Data: The U.S. rattling its sabers at Europe - ' So Boeing has a corporate strategy to emphasize commercial aircraft when the business is good, and feed from the Defense Trough when the commercial aircraft business has a slump. David I would agree with you to a point on that. Where I think your argument weakens is that since 1991 (collapse of the Soviet Union) US defense spending, as a percent of GDP has materially declined. That spend decline led Putin to believe that NATO doesn’t have the resources to support Ukraine in a prolonged war, and maintain its strategic armaments reserve for a possible conflict with Russia. To a great extent Putin is correct. The US, France, Germany and Great Britain are all looking at a drastic 5 year plan to restock their respective arsenals to NATO required levels. Italy and Greece continue to struggle with poor economic management. Eastern European countries are still rebuilding after being released from the Soviet yoke. Poland is the sole exception, spending more than is required. France and Germany have the largest deficit to overcome to achieve NATO requirements. This is being complicated by the French genetic fear of a powerful Germany (France fears everyone over one issue or another). My point is this: Boeing is not receiving the degree of military benefit it has in the past, whereas Airbus’ direct government subsidies have not declined.'
on Counterpoint cuts 2026 smartphone forecast. Apple and Samsung will be fine. - 'I think you have to take into account the difference between calendar year and fiscal year. On a fiscal basis 2026 will represent a significant expansion over fiscal 2025. On a calendar basis the December quarter of 2025 will no longer be included, and after significant YoY growth it is natural for the December quarter of 2026 to under perform December 2025. That seesaw motion has been going on for more than a decade. RAM costs will have nothing to do with Counterpoint’s math. All smartphone manufacturers will suffer the same cost increases, but only Apple has a price framework that would enable it to absorb the minuscule overall price increase attributed to RAM. Remember, iPhone prices were flat this year, just in time for the COVID purchase cycle to enter the upgrade window. Apple can afford to absorb RAM cost increases because of increases in high margin Services revenue (attributable to AI and VisionOS streaming sports content alledged to be arriving in 2026). This part of Counterpoint’s article continues a history of under researched speculation, or a deliberate attempt to manipulate markets.'
on Raw Data: The U.S. rattling its sabers at Europe - 'The argument you’ll hear on Boeing, which from my observation has validity, is that the US subsidizes Boeing through its military contracts. So Boeing has a corporate strategy to emphasize commercial aircraft when the business is good, and feed from the Defense Trough when the commercial aircraft business has a slump. (I admit to being biased against Boeing based on Boeing’s performance on the big Army Future Combat Systems program. You haven’t lived until you’ve been part of a $22 billion failure. The Boeing PM was later hired and fired as Boeing’s CEO after the 737 Max catastrophe.)'
on Raw Data: The U.S. rattling its sabers at Europe - 'Instead of developing a progressive framework where innovation is rewarded, the EU is hell bent on protecting industries still making buggy whips. Yes there are a lot of EU firms contributing to the world’s economy, but there are just as many that have done little to nothing, except complain unfair. Their evidence for unfair is that they arrived late, and that they have been unable to catch up. A notable exception, and perfect illustration of the EU mindset is Airbus. It manufactures wonderful aircraft, but without massive subsidies from Great Britain, France, Spain and many others it would have failed years ago, and would fail today without them. Now who is being unfair? Perhaps the US should place tariffs on Airbus aircraft purchased by US airlines? Then use those funds to subsidize sales of US manufactured aircraft around the world.'
on Raw Data: The U.S. rattling its sabers at Europe - 'What we -should have- is global, or at least “the West” international agreement on multinational corporations, including multinational tech corporations. That should include tax and finance, data/privacy protection, market definitions and market rules, and uniform treatment under law for both domestic and international companies. Failing wide international agreements, I have very little trust and faith in the EU and its ability to construct regulations that apply fairly across their markets. So on this issue, I would agree with the intent of the Trump administration. But like so many other issues, we’ll have to see if Trump can actually execute this in any reasonable way. (Prior experience would argue ‘reasonable idea, appalling execution’.)'
on Counterpoint cuts 2026 smartphone forecast. Apple and Samsung will be fine. - 'And Apple is The Master at locking in sufficient supplies of necessary parts at good prices…'
on Counterpoint cuts 2026 smartphone forecast. Apple and Samsung will be fine. - 'I think you have nailed it Fred! I doubt the whole argument that Ram costs will change prices overall. On the premium phones it is unlikely the potential price changes would be enough to slow sales. There might be other reasons for slowing sales and rotation from one manufacturer to another but I think this particular issue should be a short term problem. When commodities are in short supply the market usually responds with increased production eventually leading to enough supply or even over supply. I could see those “others” who are barely profitable or worse deciding not to continue competing but people will still need devices so some other manufacturer would likely pick up the slack. I think phone demand and price sensitivity is not precisely correlated. Profit and revenue maybe.'
on Counterpoint cuts 2026 smartphone forecast. Apple and Samsung will be fine. - 'Wait. Are they saying CY 2026, iPhone sales drop by 2.2%? Hey team, y’all doubt it too? Chime in.'
on Counterpoint cuts 2026 smartphone forecast. Apple and Samsung will be fine. - 'Upvoted everyone. Heck yes, great for used iPhones, likely best in mid-market. Mid-market buyers today grow up in disposable income over time. That means growing IB, growing services. While it’s too small to measure, it’s the ‘ratchet effect’, meaning the lows for AAPL keep getting HIGHER.. over time.'
on Counterpoint cuts 2026 smartphone forecast. Apple and Samsung will be fine. - 'Demand for used iPhones always exceeds supply, that’s why iPhone retains so much value. A boom in used iPhone sales will be caused by a boom in new iPhone sales. Ironically, demand for used iPhone 16s will be higher than it was for new iPhone 16s.'
on Apple joins Trump's 'Tech Force' - 'was the level of mental ugliness behind so many of those faces. All they need are flowing mustaches and big, bushy sideburns and you’re looking at the robber barons of the late 19th, early 20th century. Like Leo Durocher said, “Nice guys finish last” (except that he never really said it that way)'
on As Roomba's iRobot was going bankrupt, its co-founder was talking to the New York Times - 'Not to mention his “I need more control so nobody can remove me after I’ve built a robot army.”'
on Apple joins Trump's 'Tech Force' - 'Apple had better have their lawyers overseeing everything these “early-career” types are supposed to do, to ensure they’re not being tasked to do things that are illegal. Otherwise, this could go a long way to destroying Apple’s reputation with its users. That need was made as plain as day when Elon started this mess of a mission under his “DOGE” debacle.'
on Counterpoint cuts 2026 smartphone forecast. Apple and Samsung will be fine. - 'Hi, David, I have a few minutes to respond while waiting for an appointment: People are generally hanging onto their existing smartphones, so yes, demand is increasing. But supply of non-iPhones is decreasing as a result. Meanwhile, the affluent (i.e. the source of “used smartphones” ) are demanding iPhones over Androids. Ergo, yes, I expect there will not only be a boom in used iPhones, the demand will surpass the supply, driving up the prices. More inflation, of course, which is directly down to the “Trumpites” and their “policies” – if you can call them that. More like fumble-fingered clods, IMO….'
on Counterpoint cuts 2026 smartphone forecast. Apple and Samsung will be fine. - 'Maybe, but even used iPhones don’t play much in the primarily impacted low end market. Still, it might have some impact on the mid level.'
on Apple joins Trump's 'Tech Force' - 'M first thought when seeing the header photo was the level of mental ugliness behind so many of those faces. what a reflection on… something? What the US is becoming? I’m definitely a capitalist at heart, but this???'
on Apple joins Trump's 'Tech Force' - 'I agree. Every initiative to upgrade government systems has failed, because nobody can agree on what needs to be done and Congress won’t allocate the monies to accomplish anything. This is Miss Piggy Lipstick for the masses. Look like you’re doing something, while doing nothing.'
on Apple joins Trump's 'Tech Force' - 'More importantly, what’s the agenda? Accelerate AI for… better surveillance? I don’t trust the POTUS any farther than I could throw him – which ain’t far.'
on Premarket: Apple is red - 'There is no trickier an environment in which to be a Fed governor. Which poison do you prefer? Reduce short-term rates to stimulate demand and you add to inflation. Increase rates to dampen inflation and the economy slows further. This is exactly the scenario that Carter (D) faced back in the late 1970s. A Republican drubbed him (and a lot of Democrat Congressman and Senators) in 1980. I see the same setup happening today, only in reverse.'
on Premarket: Apple is red - 'Wow. This has been a wild and wooly and crazy 7 trading sessions. At the moment I remain profitable (about 18%). I take solace in the fact that JAN $300 Call Open Interest continues to expand (investors are buying). Except for the AI crowd the tech sector is holding up fairly well. It would appear that WS has embraced the notion of an AI bubble, and is taking AAPL down with all the rest. I find this laughable as 2 months ago AAPL was being punished for not having an expensive AI initiative, then rewarded for not having an expensive AI initiative, all the while nothing has changed at Apple. Current ISM is going up and down like a yo-yo as future earnings estimates continue to rise. This last week’s worth of AAPL trading has all the markings of an irrational panic.'
on Premarket: Apple is red - 'Whatever the Fed does, monetary policy is really “the tail” in this macroeconomic story. “The dog” is the larger economy. There has been no net job creation since April. Unemployment is now at 4.6%, the highest it’s been in 4 years. Wage gains are slowing and failing to keep up with inflation. Those Americans who are struggling now face increased healthcare costs and reduced SNAP due to policies of the Trump administration. Tariffs have raised the cost of many things people want and need. And yet the policy has failed to achieve its chief goal. Employment in US factories has been declining for months and continues to do so. This is macroeconomic policy failure across the board. All of it predictable. All of it predicted by leading economists across the political spectrum. There is no trickier an environment in which to be a Fed governor. Which poison do you prefer? Reduce short-term rates to stimulate demand and you add to inflation. Increase rates to dampen inflation and the economy slows further. Is this economy “great again”? It does not feel that way to me.'


