Recent Comments

  • Bart Yee on Mark Gurman and pals break down Apple's HomeView event (video) - 'Claims are made that Apple has huge bezels, why couldn’t they avoid them? Well, for an always on display with fixed or unchanging elements, burn in can be a real problem. In most applications OLED displays are much more prone (due to individual pixels being lit much more than others so that ages them faster) to burn in without a number of mitigation strategies. LCD panels are preferred due to separate backlighting from the pixel layer. “Amazon Echo Show and Google Nest Hub smart displays utilize LCD panels and feature prominent display bezels. When compared to the Apple HomeView, all three devices rely on LCD-based display technology and include bezels, but they differ significantly in screen shape, resolution, and overall design aesthetic. • Bezels: • Older models featured thick, raised plastic frames or white lips around the screen. • Newer generations (such as recent Echo Show and Nest Hub models) transition to a flatter, near-flush border design, though a distinct physical black or colored border/bezel still surrounds the active display area to house the camera or sensors. Comparison with Apple HomeView • Display Technology: Apple’s HomeView steps up to a Liquid Retina display (Apple’s marketing term for high-resolution, high-PPI IPS LCD panels), which provides sharper visuals, higher pixel density, and truer color calibration (True Tone support) than the standard LCD panels found on Amazon and Google hubs. • Screen Shape & Orientation: • Apple HomeView uses a 7-inch square display format mounted on a domed, HomePod-style speaker base (plus a wall-mounted variant). • Amazon and Google rely predominantly on rectangles/widescreen orientations (ranging from compact 5.5-inch/7-inch/8-inch models up to large 15-inch and 21-inch wall panels). • Bezels & Build Quality: • Apple HomeView features a refined industrial design built with a recycled aluminum body and a stainless steel hinge mechanism, leaning into a cleaner modern tablet-on-a-stand aesthetic. • Amazon and Google frames are built primarily from plastics, glass, and fabric wraps, with more traditional functional bezels designed to blend into counter or wall environments.'
  • Bart Yee on Mark Gurman and pals break down Apple's HomeView event (video) - 'And for funnies: “what did Xerox do with the 100,000 aapl shares and what would they be worth today?” Xerox quietly sold off its entire stake in Apple stock shortly after Apple’s historic December 1980 Initial Public Offering (IPO). As part of their risk management strategy in an uncertain market, Xerox corporate executives chose to lock in immediate gains, walking away with roughly $1.2 million (a modest $200,000 profit on their initial $1 million pre-IPO investment) ((but a nice 20% gain so decent for 1980.)) there are conflicting historical records regarding the exact exit price. While some records show Xerox offloading the shares gradually in the mid-1980s for around $17 million, a widely cited historical account states that Xerox executives grew impatient and dumped the entire block shortly after the IPO for just $1.2 million, pocketing a meager $200,000 profit. If Xerox had held onto those 100,000 pre-IPO shares, their value today would be $7.66 billion. Splits multiplying the shares 224x to 22,400,000 shares at $342 = $7.66 Billion in raw stock value. With dividend and reinvestment, roughly $7.84 billion if all dividends had been continuously reinvested. Xerox’s Fumble: Missed a 765,980% return on their initial $1 million investment. ((You can see how Xerox just wasn’t a visionary company nor could they see the potential of Apple. Today, As of October 2026 Xerox has a market cap of just $0.35 Billion USD. (350 million USD). Xerox reached its highest historical market capitalization of approximately $38.77 billion in 1998. It’s been all downhill ever since. They did pay a good dividend for a long time. This now makes Xerox the world’s 8164th most valuable company by market cap. If they had held onto those shares, they would be worth almost $8 Billion USD and may have had a chance to do a lot better. Apple as you may now know is worth now $5 Trillion dollars and is ranked #2 highest market cap company in the world, all by buying the rights to see and license what Xerox PARC invented but wouldn’t develop, and Apple modified and improved it into the operating systems everyone (including Windows) uses today on computers.'
  • Bart Yee on Mark Gurman and pals break down Apple's HomeView event (video) - 'Here’s a response I posted to the claim that Jobs just stole the GUI from Xerox PARC and the mouse concept, and stole the iPhone concept too. “You’re wrong and perpetuating incorrect information: From Gemini: “Apple did not rip off or steal the Graphical User Interface (GUI) from Xerox PARC. Instead, Apple legally purchased the rights to view the technology through a formal pre-IPO stock agreement. They then completely re-engineered the concept to turn a slow, laboratory prototype into a fast, cheap, mass-market consumer product. How Apple Got It: The Legal Agreement In late 1979, Steve Jobs made a deal with Xerox’s venture capital division. Apple allowed Xerox to purchase 100,000 shares of Apple stock at a discounted, pre-IPO rate of $1 million. In exchange, Xerox corporate headquarters ordered the scientists at the Palo Alto Research Center (PARC) to give Apple engineers two guided demonstrations of their experimental computer, the Xerox Alto. Some PARC scientists, like Adele Goldberg, fiercely resisted because they knew they were giving away the crown jewels. However, others, like Larry Tesler, were frustrated that Xerox corporate executives refused to commercialize the technology and were happy to show it to someone who understood its power. (that’s right, PARC demoed their research to Xerox execs who didn’t care at all about computers because they were focused on copier technology, something dominated. They didn’t help PARC at all to figure out how to develop it further.) How Apple Applied & Changed It what Xerox had was incredibly crude and expensive compared to what Apple actually shipped. Apple took the basic concept of a visual desktop and radically re-invented it for the Apple Lisa and Macintosh: • The Mouse: The Xerox mouse had three buttons, was mechanically complex, cost $300, and broke constantly. Apple completely redesigned it into a durable, single-button mouse that cost $15 to manufacture. Direct Manipulation: On the Xerox screen, clicking an icon popped up a static text menu—you couldn’t directly grab things. Apple invented the ability to drag windows around dynamically, resize them by pulling corners, and drop files directly into a Trash Can. • The Interface Paradigm: Apple invented the top-of-the-screen overlapping menu bar, pull-down menus, and the concept of “double-clicking” to open a file. • Performance: The Xerox Alto cost over $16,000 (roughly $50,000 today) and relied on a massive, refrigerator-sized hardware cabinet. Apple’s software engineers rewrote the graphics code from scratch so it could run smoothly on a machine costing a fraction of the price. Was it Stolen? As a consensus of historians and tech experts notes on platforms like Reddit and Quora, it is a myth that Apple “stole” the GUI. Xerox was fully compensated with valuable stock, and the technology they showed was published and shared quite openly at the time. Xerox eventually tried to commercialize their own GUI machine—the Xerox Star in 1981—but it failed because it was too expensive and corporate-focused. Many top Xerox scientists (including Larry Tesler) eventually left PARC to work for Apple because they realized Apple was the company that actually knew how to bring the future to the public.”'
  • Gregg Thurman on OpenAI promises not to use Apple trade secrets — for now - '”Now, if we can just get past this memory price tsunami…” How many AI firms are right behind Meta and Oracle, caught between a rock and a hard place. If, for any reason, firms such as these (and these are just the first) cannot complete construction of planned data centers, what happens to the memory they ordered? They become available to others that are not building data. centers. My estimate of a 2030 collapse of the AI infrastructure buildout may occur earlier than forecasted. When memory prices ultimately collapse the value of every AI firm is going to drop like a lead balloon. Further, the elimination of all that data center projected future capacity is going to transfer to on device providers. Could there be an on site rack mount Mac in Apple’s future? Probably not, a Mac Mini/Studio server farm would suffice. Think Broadcom. Think custom ASIC for Apple. Think Different. Think Apple.'
  • Jonny T on OpenAI promises not to use Apple trade secrets — for now - 'Most remarkable was that it is THE most aerodynamically efficient Ferrari ever made!'
  • Jonny T on Under Ternus, Apple closes above $5T for first time - 'It seems funny now reading: ‘Tim Cook’s act will be a hard one to follow’ – after all the flack he took for – supposedly – not innovating.. It now feels like Tim latterly has played the ultimate altruistic game.. allowing JT to accumulate the innovation credits right at the beginning of his tenure.'
  • Robert Paul Leitao on OpenAI promises not to use Apple trade secrets — for now - 'Richard: I’m about to reference Dan Niles. Yes, Dan Niles! He was on Closing Bell Overtime today and talked about the challenges with the neocloud stocks as the conversation about financing against higher interest rates and possible changes in future demand. He says straight up toward the end of this 4-minute clip Alphabet (Google) and Apple will be winners on the consumer side. I bring this up because the economics of many things from the cost of memory to the cost of compute will be changing and more competition may enter these spaces. What Anthropic and OpenAI offer may be at reduced prices to both enterprise customers and consumers soon. In other words, the economic landscape may be changing rapidly. This is influencing Anthropic’s and OpenAI’s timetable for their respective IPOs. Among the other issues presently is as capital costs rise to borrow, more AI-related enterprises may see the benefit of an IPO versus rising capital costs to borrow at rising interest rates. Here’s the video clip with Dan Niles from earlier today: https://apple.news/AVoD9YDjDTVuE6FNClmQvyQ'
  • Robert Paul Leitao on Premarket: Apple is green - 'I listened to Fast Money earlier this evening. The episode’s conversation with Dan Ives on Meta and Apple came up in my Apple News+ feed. Here’a link to the video: https://apple.news/Av0bJhbaSRGq7-XFU-CDJwQ'
  • Richard Gayle on OpenAI promises not to use Apple trade secrets — for now - 'You got the right version of “this”. IMHO, they are trying to get this lawsuit out of the way for the moment. And your other point is right on the money. OpenAI thinks this will give them time to get a huge IPO. I think the Meta collaboration with Apple to run no-cost to download Open weight models locally on the Mac will destroy the business model and long-term viability of the AI companies. But then, I am not sure how Meta ends up making any money from this, but I know Apple will. Now, if we can just get past this memory price tsunami. WHich I think we might when the hyperscaler plans collapse next year and all of a sudden there is a lot of memory capacity. I hope.'
  • Richard Gayle on OpenAI promises not to use Apple trade secrets — for now - 'His video is one the the things about the AI bubble bursting I have been pointing out. If lenders are becoming leery of lending money, that throws a wrench in everything. Higher interest rates are a part of this. Then, seeing Oracle declare a force majure saying it might not be able to provide its contractors with the money they need on time due to things outside Oracle’s control (ie lack of mermitting for the natural gas pipeline needed to run the datacenter) is very worrisome. Then reading that Larry Ellison put up 20% of his Oracle stock as collateral for the playtoy studio for his sun added to that worry. These Ai companies should have gone public 6 months ago (Musk lucked out) because it is possible they never go public.'
  • Richard Gayle on OpenAI promises not to use Apple trade secrets — for now - 'What I read said Meta is working with Apple to move its Muse Spark Open AI model to run on local hardware. I am not an expert but think that is different from the Muse app and the collaboration would allow its use on 2-4 Mac Studios for about $38,000. And have no further costs. So not sure just what Meta gets out of this (as the models are free) other than the cachet of being the most used Amerfican Open weight model? Maybe charge money for local hardware usage?'
  • Stephen Gordon on Mark Gurman and pals break down Apple's HomeView event (video) - 'Gurman mentioned the next event happening 10/23, and pointed out that Apple will be covering hotel fare and business class travel for influencers on the invite list. Standard practice these days for the creator economy, he noted, especially since they no longer host live keynotes for fanboys and journalists who attend on their own dime. How times have changed.'
  • Bart Yee on Apple investors: Set your calendars - 'https://youtu.be/DZkRGgQn6CA?is=QXFPSv6Pbk9Uf5X2 Gurman and friends take on the HomeView, 4th gen Apple TV 4K, Home Pod Mini plus additional MacBook event at end of October.'
  • Bart Yee on Apple investors: Set your calendars - 'There will always be profit taking when Apple/AAPL reaches a new high, because there are those who feel that new high is pretty much as high as you’ll get for some time. (AAPL is over its ski’s, the stock and some investors have gotten ahead of themselves, there is nothing in the hardware, products and revenue growth that can support a PE this high, especially compared to the 5, 10, and 20 year retrospective PE averages, Apple will always be a hardware company so should always be valued as such, like a steel mill going out of business, etc. etc.) This was shown on July 28 when Apple hit $5T and a new ATCH only to encounter a tepid response to guidance, or the guidance wasn’t nearly good enough, or Apple was falling back with the rest of AI/Tech stocks even though fundamentally Apple is moving revenue and AI in a completely different way than AI companies are, save another hardware company, NVidia. So there will be a few selling to lock in profits, some taking RMD’s and DAF contributions for end of year financial and tax planning, and of course hedge funds and institutions that feel there will be another tech company or sector rotation where the escalator is going up faster. It’s always been that way with fund manager humans thinking they will outsmart and out move the market or Apple short term and long term. Maybe yes, maybe no. But the reality is, Apple just keeps chugging along, working diligently to serve their users, stick to their knitting, and manage and control what they can, and not get caught up with what other are doing. What was that that Steve said? “Your time is limited, so don’t waste it living someone else’s life.” Apple lives its own life, its own way, guided by principles and ethics that Jobs, Cook, and now Ternus espoused, live, and put into action for the benefit of users, the company and its investors, and broadly, humankind. Apple never has been interested in living/building out someone else’s AI fueled machinations, life and dreams, especially the way the rest of the MANGOTS (MSFT, AMZN, NVDA, GOOGL, ORCL or OpenAI, TSLA, SPCX) are heading. (Could have been MAG-SNOT too). In that sense, AAPL is the market’s ATM, a place to withdraw money to use elsewhere, then rush back to when elsewhere pans out. Meanwhile, Apple will keep innovating, grow its portfolio of products and services, and just keep growing, perhaps not nearly fast enough for some market movers, but grow nonetheless, and keep making money the old fashioned way, they earn it. Can the AI companies say the same if the true spend and expenditures are correctly assessed against return on investments?'
  • David Emery on OpenAI promises not to use Apple trade secrets — for now - 'Detecting and proving either company is using knowledge from the other strikes me as difficult. It would need A LOT of discovery.'
  • Roger Schutte on Premarket: Apple is green - 'Already seeing extended delivery dates. I just ordered a starlight colored HomeView and the delivery date is 11/20 (7 days after the 11/13 available date). Also ordered an AppleTV and its delivery date is 11/23 – 11/27 (10 to 14 days after 11/13). Silver and gray HomeViews were available for delivery on 11/13 but I wanted a little color on this guy.'
  • Greg Lippert on OpenAI promises not to use Apple trade secrets — for now - 'Speaking of Meta, I saw Apple is working to allow Muse to run locally on Macs, for better or worse.'
  • Greg Lippert on OpenAI promises not to use Apple trade secrets — for now - 'They stuck (and still stand with) the pedo-in-charge. Corruption junction…'
  • Gregg Thurman on OpenAI promises not to use Apple trade secrets — for now - 'In the last 6 – 15 months we’ve heard several advisals that the demand for AI, while very large, isn’t to be big enough to pay for the Data Center build out it requires, that the cash demands of AI buildout will, at some point, hit a cash availability ceiling. And that will occur before the builders of these money pits attain positive cash flow. Now throw in Apple’s on device Apple Intelligence, and Mac Mini and Mac Studio, and a major amount of that AI demand will never see the inside of a Data Center. The TAM for Data Centers not only has hit a growth ceiling, but that ceiling has become lower. I don’t see investors in Data Centers, or the firms building them, getting their money back. Meanwhile, Apple will make hay (profits) on the fact that its products (revenue/profit generators, not expense centers) can support on device AI, while protecting user data and privacy. As I’ve stated before, I think by 2030 we will see the hype over Data Center AI implode, leaving an incredible amount of financial wreckage in its rubble. The first to collapse will be those requiring venture capitalist financing and debt. Off Balance Sheet accounting sleight of hand isn’t going to save them. Long AAPL.'
  • David Emery on OpenAI promises not to use Apple trade secrets — for now - 'Altman just lies. Zuckerberg is a sociopath.'
  • Bart Yee on OpenAI promises not to use Apple trade secrets — for now - 'Regarding any OpenAI, Anthropic or other AI company IPO (so that the founders can cash in / out and slide debt onto investors), this recent video by Dr. Earl Brandt from Kiraa AI about whether IPO investors and finance are soon to be drying up, and does that portend the inevitable AI bubble slowdown, deflation, or bubble pop? The canary in the coal mine, indeed. Heed the warnings. https://youtu.be/0V7KONODqIY?is=OYgBj6Skuah5hefG'
  • Robert Paul Leitao on Premarket: Apple is green - 'It was a good day for the market with over 75% of S&P 500 components rising on the day and the DJIA gained 556.21 points or 1.08%. As Bart points out above, Apple gradually moved south in afternoon trading to close off $0.96 or 0.28% at $342 even. In other news CFRA has announced a rise in its Apple price target to $380 per share from $350 while maintaining a 4-star Buy recommendation. This follows the “Welcome Home” event on Tuesday morning.'
  • Bart Yee on Premarket: Apple is green - 'AAPL closed down $0.96 to exactly $342.00 on very mediocre volume of 35M shares, just a quiet sideways move. Last 5 sessions have shown spiky openings up $4-6 and then slow rest of session declines on subdued volume except for Wednesday. I expect a little positivity tomorrow as Duo preorders open and optimism that Preoprders will point to better than expected demand, say over 5-6M for 2026, and delivery times extending well into December and January.'
  • John Konopka on OpenAI promises not to use Apple trade secrets — for now - '@Richard The big problem they have for the IPO is showing that they have any useful revenue. This is the big mystery about AI: enormous expenses, little to no revenue.'
  • Steven Philips on OpenAI promises not to use Apple trade secrets — for now - 'It was panned – until they actually drove one.'
  • John Konopka on Apple investors: Set your calendars - 'Curiously, one day before the elections. Could be spun different ways. Whatever Apple announces on Monday will be swamped by the news on Tuesday. Apple’s P/E is just under 40. It has been a bit higher in the past. On the other hand, Tesla’s P/E is 342 and AMD’s is 152 so P/E is not the sole indicator of value. In Apple’s case, I’d say it is an indicator of future revenue.'
  • Gregg Thurman on OpenAI promises not to use Apple trade secrets — for now - 'In any settlement Apple force Open AI to bond its word for at least $10 Billion. Then if found guilty of breaking a non-use agreement Apple get paid by the bond holder.'
  • Steven Philips on Under Ternus, Apple closes above $5T for first time - 'Yeah, but you’re “smarter than the average bear!” 🙂'