Recent Comments

  • Gregg Thurman on Premarket: Apple was red, turned green - '”Now I’m really eager to see and hear what they report next week.” Me too, although I’ll bet the one thing we won’t hear, is that the CEO’s workload these last three or four years has gotten untenable. This afternoon I remembered something I predicted after the Vision Pro was announced, and before WWDC. That was that the iPhone 15 would include the ability take spatial photographs and videos, in order to create personal libraries of spatial content for buyers of the Vision Pro. The iPhone 18 will be the start of 4th generation iPhone since Vision Pro announcement. That’s about 550 million (1st through 3rd generation) Vision Pro capable iPhones currently roaming the planet with spatial capability. By the time iPhone 19 hits the stands that number will have increased to about 775 million. My thought is, when does Vision Pro capable iPhones hit critical mass, and if Vision Pro general release is tied to that metric?'
  • ben luna on The tragedy of Tim Cook - 'I think that the heart of the matter is that Tim was faced with the most difficult choice: smell the glove or I will kill your family, your company, etc.. I think that if the choice was: smell the glove or I will kill you, he would have acted differently. It is relatively easy to be a martyr when compared against the loss of everyone, everything else that you love more than yourself. That is why it is a tragedy, because Tim is willing to suffer, to endure, so much because of his love for Apple. I think we all should offer him a show of support so that he can at least know that we understand his sacrifice, and are grateful to him for being willing to make it. Not many with his power and wealth would choose to do that.'
  • Steven Philips on 13 myths busted in David Pogue's 'Apple: The First 50 Years' - 'I thought they were totally out of ARM. Guess I need to investigate. Or someone post to correct me.'
  • Rodney Avilla on The tragedy of Tim Cook - '“an equivalency where none exists” That I can agree with you. But that doesn’t mean one side is right, and one side is wrong. Both can be wrong, or both can be part right and part wrong. And one side can be 100% right, and the other 100% wrong. But both do have a right to their beliefs, and both have the right to argue their case in public. But I agree- there is no equivalency. I believe that is where humility (I realize that I may not always be right) and tolerance (others have the same right I have to believe what they want).'
  • Rodney Avilla on The tragedy of Tim Cook - 'The point of my comment was not to claim Trump has done anything OK. Whether I know of anything ok is irrelevant. One can argue that he has not done anything ok. And that may be true. But I believe to determine that would require much more objectivity than I am seeing in public discussions. Please note that I am not pointing a finger at anyone on this blog. I do not know anyone here personally, have not discussed politics with anyone to any degree. This is just something that appears to me to be true, if only on a superficial level. My main point was that I hate to see Tim Cook being demonized because of it.'
  • Joseph Bland on The tragedy of Tim Cook - 'Sounds good on paper, Don, but two wrongs don’t add up to a right. The latest threat from on high: Trump Threatens Companies That Seek Tariff Refunds They’re Owed – The New Republic “The president is sending a clear message to corporations as tariff refunds become available…Donald Trump is still not happy that his tariffs were struck down by the Supreme Court, and he said Tuesday that he would “remember” the companies that don’t seek refunds…” This dude got where he is with threats. And every time folks give in, he gains more power. Apple chose to stand with the timid. And we all are paying the price. I seriously doubt Steve Jobs would have gone this route….'
  • Joseph Bland on The tragedy of Tim Cook - 'Hi, Ron, We keep wanting to give an equivalency where none exists. But those stoking division are NOT symmetrical!'
  • Rodney Avilla on 13 myths busted in David Pogue's 'Apple: The First 50 Years' - 'I believe some of these myths are a bit forced (and not really myths?). 2. Myth: Apple was Woz and Jobs’s first startup. -Developing products is not the same as developing a company, as already pointed out. 3. Myth: Apple was founded by Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak. – Wayne was not involved in founding the company. He was involved in 1 mediation between the 2 founders. He was a ‘founder’ in name only. He did write a manual, but his name was on the paperwork for only 12 days. From what I read, he had zero input into the founding of the company (determining the purpose, goals and functioning of Apple). 6. Myth: Steve Jobs ripped off the graphic interface from Xerox PARC. -Not a myth. Pogue can argue that Jobs didn’t steal much, and that most of what he later sold was mostly his development. But his starting point came from PARC. Well documented. 8. Myth: John Sculley fired Steve Jobs. – So what’s the difference between firing Jobs, and using his influence to have Jobs fired? Also well documented. 10. Myth: Jobs randomly fired people he’d just met in the elevator. – There is a big difference between not being able to prove something is true, and assuming it’s false because you can’t prove it’s true. In 2010, Apple had over 47,000 employees. I’m not saying the event was true; I just saying because one doesn’t know it’s true, doesn’t make it false. Not sure where ‘firing 1 employee in the elevator’ became ‘randomly fired people’. Pogue didn’t say that the firing was a myth, just that it happened in an elevator. 11. Myth: Apple failed completely during the 11 years of Jobs’s absence. An AI search: “At the end of Steve Jobs’ 11-year absence (1985–1996), Apple was on the verge of bankruptcy, struggling with a bloated product line, ineffective marketing, and a critically outdated operating system. By 1996, the company had completely lost its focus, with market share evaporating and the brand becoming an historical footnote. ” Doesn’t sound like a myth. 12: Myth: Jobs wrote the “Think Different” ad. – I have never heard anyone say he wrote it by himself, but that he was involved in it’s writing. To be fair, I think it’s pretty common for any writer to take editorial liberties, once in a while. Despite sounding so negative, many of the comments I have read about the book makes me think it’s a definite worthwhile read, and it’s definitely on my list.'
  • Richard Gayle on 13 myths busted in David Pogue's 'Apple: The First 50 Years' - 'The focus on RISC from the early days has been a far sighted decision by Apple And then getting a license in perpetuity for ARM designs made Apple Silicon possible (as was buying a chip design company when it was small that made Apple silicon a reality). Everyone else has to pay hefty fees to get that sort of design. ot so much for Apple. That is one reason they can produce such powerful chips for a reasonable cost. Thus giving us the smartphone and Mac Neo. And Apple always does this early one for tech. They only spend billions whne trying to rectify a mistake (ie Beats). So look at the small companies they buy.'
  • Richard Gayle on 13 myths busted in David Pogue's 'Apple: The First 50 Years' - 'Just got the book for my birthday. So much fun. My favorite Jobs myth that Woz later debunked. Myth – Jobs would park in thae handicapped spot in Cupertino so he did not have to walk far from the parking lot. Not true. Apple did not have reserved spots for executives — something Jobs fostered. So yes, he probably did have to walk far sometimes. Sure he hated it, like everyone else. But he came up with a ‘creative’ solution — he handpainted a parking spot to look like a handicapped spot, closer to the entrance. And, because he knew it was not official, he would park there. But he banked on the consideration of others not to park there. Everyone knew it was him in the spot because he never had license plates on his car (in fact, there are a ton of pictures online of his car in that spot, posted in anger). People keyed the car all the time but he did not care. At the time, CA did not require license plates for the first 6 months a car was leased. So Jobs would always get a new lease at 6 months.(The dealer was happy to have Jobs as a customer.) He took the damage without complaint because it was not really his car. So Woz and some others called the police out, because everyone thought it was a real space that the asshole was using. The police showed up and found it was not an official spot (apparently CA had no law against impersonating a handicapped space). Jobs did not take away any official spots and did not break any laws. Woz, et al. did the “Well, that’s Steve.” It was an asshole thing but was also kind of creative. He got to keep his egalitarian claim of access but maintain some for himself (All employees are equal but some are more equal than others). It helped him, did not really hurt any disabled people. Kind of a creative solution to get the selfish thing he wanted but without really hurting others. You know that Musk or Zuckerberg likely would not have been as creative. I always wonder what would have happened if Woz had a disabled friend park in the space when Steve came in? Or sent Jobs a memo that the spot had been designated an official spot? That would have been fun 😉'
  • Stephen Gordon on 13 myths busted in David Pogue's 'Apple: The First 50 Years' - 'I’m at the part where Jobs is about to return to Apple. I didn’t know they were instrumental in creating ARM, and I believe they still own a percentage of the company, akin to their investment in Globalstar. Some good bets on their end, I must say.'
  • Ron Fredrick on The tragedy of Tim Cook - 'Rodney Avilla said: I believe some people’s hate for Trump is so great that it is distorting their perception of other people and events. TC is a perfect example. Whenever they hear the word Trump (or any word that makes them think of Trump) their blood pressure goes up. Whenever they speak about Trump, it’s always in hyperbole- they take anything that Trump has done or said and exaggerate and distort it to the max. They could never even consider anything Trump has done as ever being even OK, much less good. **I’m afraid I’m not following your comment, Rodney. I believe I understand what you were saying in these two bolded sentences, but I can’t think of what *highly criticized*, *important* thing that Trump has said or done as president that HAS to be exaggerated and distorted. Instead, I very much see corruption and mismanagement in his presidential actions. As much as I abhor Donald Trump, I believe I’m willing to consider what you’re saying…so, would you mind giving a few examples of something *significant* that Trump has done, as president, that you consider OK or good?'
  • Joseph Bland on The tragedy of Tim Cook - 'Coincidentally, I came across the following future dystopian scenario this AM. This is the true price the oligarchs, wannabe oligarchs, and flat tax-paying US billionaires are gifting the world. Read it and weep. Excerpt From “Opinion | A catastrophic climate event is upon us. Here is why you’ve heard so little about it” George Monbiot The Guardian https://apple.news/AyuVZgHcAQlKAftpI5xDLOQ This material may be protected by copyright. “Scientists say a crucial Atlantic system is more likely to collapse than previously thought. But the billionaire death cult that steers humanity’s destiny doesn’t do existential crises… …The poor and middle pay taxes, the rich pay accountants, the very rich pay lawyers – and the ultra-rich pay politicians. It’s not an original remark, but it bears repeating until everyone has heard it. The more money billionaires accumulate, the greater their control of the political system – which means they pay less tax, which means they accumulate more, which means their control intensifies…”'
  • John Konopka on Perplexity endorses Apple's privacy-first AI strategy - '@David It is really interesting how the topic du jour among the analysts changes so quickly. Yet, for a manufacturer like Apple, planning has to be carried out on a multi -year time frame. That is a huge disconnect.'
  • Steven Philips on 13 myths busted in David Pogue's 'Apple: The First 50 Years' - 'Re: #2. Collaborating on building and selling devices is not establishing a business intended to continue. A “startup” is. So I think Apple WAS Woz and Job’s first actual startup.'
  • Steven Philips on Perplexity endorses Apple's privacy-first AI strategy - 'Sorry, but for me, nothing is worth watching X.'
  • Joseph Bland on The tragedy of Tim Cook - 'Thanks for telling your tragic story, David. It speaks on no uncertain terms of what this decision has cost Apple, since I strongly suspect that there are huge numbers of similar stories that can be told. The “justification” of “necessary appeasement” that I have seen here on Apple 3.0, and that has been assumed in the many articles I’ve read, makes logical sense. I separate that from being the right decision, especially in light of the Supreme Court decision that gutted this President’s autocratic decision to impose tariffs unilaterally and at his personal will. I myself have decided to lay Apple’s decision at the feet of the Apple Board, not Tim Cook. That he is now being designated Executive Chairman of the Apple Board seems to me to give this opinion extra weight. In other words, I’m back to my original position: This move to appease this President was a massive mistake, and one which Tim Cook may or may not be responsible for. If he’s only the messenger, we need to hold our fire, and I seriously hope I never know the degree to which he went along with the it. We owe him so much.'
  • Bill Donahue on Premarket: Apple was red, turned green - 'In the lead-up to next week’s earnings release and call, the smartest responses to the announcement about TC’s move to Executive Chairman and Ternus stepping up to CEO is that there is no way that’s announced pre-earnings unless they’ve absolutely nailed the latest quarter’s earnings, and have a really great message to convey in the earnings call. Now I’m really eager to see and hear what they report next week.'
  • Don Donofrio on The tragedy of Tim Cook - 'To get some context on where people fall you can listen this weeks Macbreak weekly podcast, where a few of the hosts start dinging Cook to various degrees it gives a good take on where many people land. In particular some feel that going to the Melania preview was unnecessary and too far. For my take FWIW, Tim is like someone who has found himself in a relationship with a toxic relative. Someone with extreme behaviors. He is forced to do somethings he doesn’t want to do. The focus should be on the toxic behavior of the relative, but instead it’s about Tim. Some might say that is giving Tim a pass I guess but that is how I see it. Also Gruber has been unrelenting in criticism of Cook, enough that I think he has lost some of his golden access. I don’t think we will ever see and exec at his WWDC show ever again.'
  • Richard Gayle on The tragedy of Tim Cook - 'The people I see hating on Tim Cook are almost invariably people who haye all “Big Tech”. Apple is not separated out from Meta, Google, Amazon, Tesla, etc. I suspect that even if Cook/Apple outright fought back, they would still find something to hate. I’ve pointed out that Apple has held onto DEI, that Cook has said protecting migrants is important, etc. all while protecting its 150,000 employees. That while other Big Tech are laying off tens of thousands, Apple is not. To no avail. They have their simple narrative and they are sticking to it.'
  • Joseph Bland on 13 myths busted in David Pogue's 'Apple: The First 50 Years' - 'Great read to begin the day! Thanks, Mr. Pogue! And thanks, PED, for asking him! What a special site this is.'
  • David Emery on The tragedy of Tim Cook - 'Personally, I distinguish the ‘conforming to Chinese legal requirements’ from ‘participating in Trump’s events.’ Many of the criticisms I’ve seen of Apple/Tim Cook lump these together. Tim has been clear “We obey the law where we operate.” (Although in many cases there have been substantial legal actions to establish exactly what that law is, e.g. for the App Store.) But when Tim himself, and Apple as a company, has contributed to Trump initiatives, or bowed to pressure (as distinct from legal orders) such as the ICE tracking apps, I think Tim and Apple have taken actions that are not defensible, or at least not as defensible as “following the law.” Sure, special case tariff treatment was a big deal (financially) for Apple. But that came at a different kind of cost.'
  • David Wilson on Perplexity endorses Apple's privacy-first AI strategy - 'There was a time when I was convinced that Apple needed to make a big AI acquisition, like buying Perplexity back when that particular idea was being bandied about. I am so glad that didn’t happen.'
  • David Emery on 13 myths busted in David Pogue's 'Apple: The First 50 Years' - 'Good point. Greg. And yes, buy the book, it’s a great read.'
  • Greg Lippert on Perplexity endorses Apple's privacy-first AI strategy - 'What we here have been saying long-time.'
  • Greg Bates on 13 myths busted in David Pogue's 'Apple: The First 50 Years' - 'Great question on PED’s part. A fascinating list. Can we take a sec to recognize Pogue’s generosity here? And maybe his marketing prowess? Such a list should feature prominently in his book, and a lesser person might have hoarded it for the second edition. That he would do the considerable work at PED’s request then toss it off for free…that’s it, I’m buying the book.'
  • Rodney Avilla on Perplexity endorses Apple's privacy-first AI strategy - 'Hope this goes viral (in Wall Street)'
  • Rodney Avilla on John Ternus' turnaround - 'He’s now leading the charge on a trio of home products” Hopefully he’s now leading the charge because it is something he now strongly believes in and has great ideas, and not because of being pushed into that position because of his promotion. I am ready (have been ready) to make my home a ‘Smart Apple Home’; just been waiting for Apple to get it’s products (and Siri) ready.'
  • David Emery on 13 myths busted in David Pogue's 'Apple: The First 50 Years' - 'I really enjoyed “First 50 Years”. Some of those ‘busted myths’ are things I didn’t believe in the first place, though. Others were “inside baseball” rumors. What I liked the most about ‘First 50 Years” was the nostalgia for all the Macs I had. The capsule biographies, including “after Apple”, were also very interesting. The one thing I would have added to the book, if the information was available, would have been a discussion on how the curriculum at “Apple University” has changed over the years.'
  • Mordechai Beizer on John Ternus' turnaround - 'For me Sonos integration would be the must have. Being able to simply say “Alexa play…” and then hearing the music on our in-wall speakers is something we do many times a day. I’ve seen no indication to-date of any Siri integration with Sonos. AirPlay 2 compatibility doesn’t cut it, Apple needs to just do what Alexa has been doing for years.'