Ron Fredrick on WWDC 26 preview: Mark Gurman empties his Siri notebook - 'Good point, Michael! 🙂'
on WWDC 26 preview: Mark Gurman empties his Siri notebook - '@Ron: Eddie has a better chance of being appointed to be on the Apple Board than invited any Apple 3.0 dinner gathering.'
on WWDC 26 preview: Mark Gurman empties his Siri notebook - 'Michael Goldfeder said: “Eddie is still bitter about not being invited to AVP event.” **Michael, he’s also bitter about not being invited to the Apple 3.0 Bay Area dinner that Joseph is putting together. 🙂'
on WWDC 26 preview: Mark Gurman empties his Siri notebook - 'I’m interested in coverage of Apple that can sketch out the broad outlines of the direction Apple will head in. Spoilers that come out just before the keynote are just that: spoilers.'
on Counterpoint: Apple grows as low-end smartphone makers get squeezed - 'Hi, Bart. Great info, and great analysis! Yep, Apple demand will increase. The 64K question is, how will Apple keep up? In all seriousness, Apple can’t just clap it’s hands and production magically ramps to match demand. Sure, it can ramp quality computers better than anyone else, but fast enough to match a real bump in demand for said high quality computers? And Apple will not build anything that isn’t matching their exacting standards. That’s the conundrum.'
on WWDC 26 preview: Mark Gurman empties his Siri notebook - 'Philip’s opening line and his take are dead on about the coverage by many of the reporters who concentrate in technology and Apple coverage. Gurman being a prime example. Congrats! “To dampen the joys of surprise and wonder, here’s everything he knows in bullets.” “My take: Doing his best to spoil the party.” Usually the Apple presentation holds a few surprises and descriptions which make paying attention to it worthwhile. Thankfully.'
on WSJ: How Apple plans to bring genAI to the masses - '“.,,iPhones already know everything about their users.” Not yet, but with Edge AI, they might. But Apple won’t having access to that information. Unlike every other non-Apple computer device on the planet.'
on Counterpoint: Apple grows as low-end smartphone makers get squeezed - 'Regarding Samsung – I’m split. While Samsung did increase sales (4 to 6%) and revenues 4% in Q1, profitability dropped 42%, to just $1.6B USD. That leaves very little room before profitability goes negative in coming quarters. Remember that Samsung’s 2025 best selling smartphones are the A16 5G ($99 for 4GB/128GB to $135 for 6GB/128GB) and A06 5G ($136 if it was available in US) are truly budget products for most of the world. It’s very possible that with a 4% or more decline in sales, the bottom tiers of Samsung’s offerings will either sharply increase in price or sales will be curtailed by Samsung entirely. Could become very tough for them through the year. • “Among Chinese OEMs, the picture is sharply polarized. Xiaomi’s 19% Q1 decline was the steepest among the top five, with full-year shipments forecast to fall 28% as the company confronts a fundamental question about economic viability in the entry-level market. Huawei grew 1% YoY in Q1; one of the only Chinese brands to post growth, as the company deliberately held prices to gain share in the low-to-mid tier. Transsion, among the most exposed OEMs given its sub-$150 concentration, is forecast to decline 32% in 2026.” As for Chinese OEM’s, I think all of them will have trouble, including Huawei, especially those with more international exposure, unless they can get a lot more and cheaper memory supplied by their own Chinese memory sources, OR for the domestic market, the Chinese government increases their incentive subsidy amount or threshold to compensate. (That would help offset any price hikes, BUT could also help Apple even more because it puts more expensive Apple iPhone models into play. Now that would be fun!) From Gemini: “The primary Chinese RAM (DRAM) memory manufacturer is ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT). Based in Hefei, Anhui, it is the largest domestic memory chip maker in China. CXMT makes LPDDR4, DDR4, and DDR5 memory chips. They represent roughly 8% of the global DRAM market, making them the fourth-largest memory manufacturer in the world (behind Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron). Mainstream Adoption: While they previously supplied mostly to Chinese brands, their DDR5 memory chips have made their way into some mainstream global hardware. YMTC (Yangtze Memory Technologies) supplies NAND flash memory. Apple does not currently use Chinese memory in its production lines. While Apple explored partnerships and even certified YMTC chips in the past, it suspended these plans due to US trade restrictions and geopolitical pressures. Today, Apple’s memory is primarily sourced from Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron. Apple is reportedly exploring new business ties with both CXMT and YMTC to leverage cheaper memory costs and secure supply-chain alternatives, but formal integration into their devices is not yet active.“ Not for lack of exploration and trying. Assuming no back doors or security issues, maybe Apple could use Chinese sourced memory for only Chinese bound and sold iPhones? Per Gemini for the Chinese subsidy program: “The initiative, funded by ultra-long special treasury bonds, offers specific benefits for mobile devices: Subsidy Amount: A 15% rebate on the purchase price. Maximum Discount: Capped at RMB 500 (approximately USD $72) per item. Product Eligibility: Covers smartphones, tablets, smartwatches, and smart wristbands priced under RMB 6,000. ($887 USD) Limit: Consumers are typically limited to one subsidized item per product category.” “Average Chinese smartphone prices are expected to jump between 15% to 25% compared to 2025 tiers, with some mid-to-high-end flagship models seeing direct price hikes of 5% to 8%. This surge is driven by dramatic memory cost increases, where RAM production costs for some flagship models have risen by roughly CNY 1,200 to 1,500. The memory component crunch is forcing major adjustments across the Chinese market: Lower-End and Mid-Range Devices: These segments are hit hardest, as memory takes up a larger portion of the overall bill of materials. Manufacturers are seeing up to a 30% jump in production costs for sub-$200 phones. Price Adjustments: Brands like Oppo and OnePlus have initiated direct, localized price increases of around 5% on entry-level and mid-range lines (such as the A and K series). Flagship Impact: While initial premium devices have somewhat absorbed the blow, upcoming flagship releases are factoring in a substantial markup to offset the soaring costs of DRAM and NAND.” -> All of this makes Apple iPhones more competitive in price and desirability, why buy a Chinese knockoff or copy when now iPhones are the same or competitively priced? Same for any subsidy increase or increased threshold, say a 20% increase to RMB600 ($89 vs $74) subsidy and/or a 10% threshold raise to RMB6600 ($975 vs $887). Either could work heavily in Apple’s favor! However, no changes to the subsidy program or thresholds for 2026 or 2027 has been considered per Chinese news sources.'
on WWDC 26 preview: Mark Gurman empties his Siri notebook - 'Eddie is still bitter about not being invited to AVP event.'
on Wedbush: AI will add $15 billion to Apple's services revenue - 'IMO, UBS’ David Vogt is the person who in the world of fireworks never outgrew his first childhood experience holding sparklers. While the rest of us evolved to pop bottle rockets, cherry bombs, and possibly M-80’s back in the day. David is a perpetual sparkler fireworks child. Which explains his approach to Apple.'
on Counterpoint: Apple grows as low-end smartphone makers get squeezed - 'Some more detail from the Counterpoint article and I’ll add perspective: • ”Global smartphone shipments are now forecast to fall 13.9% YoY in 2026, dropping to 1.08 billion units, the lowest annual volume since 2013, and a steeper contraction than our February forecast of 12.4%.” • A memory supply crisis, driven by capacity reallocation toward AI-focused HBM and server DRAM, is the primary driver of the downturn, with LPDDR4/5 prices expected to treble in Q2 2026 relative to Q4 2025, per Counterpoint’s Memory Service. • “Lower-end OEMs and Emerging Markets face the sharpest pressure, with LPDDR4 memory supply tracking to a decline of over 40% in 2026; the sub-$150 segment faces an effective permanent removal in some markets…LPDDR4 supply is expected to decline more than 40% in 2026 as fabs reallocate capacity toward AI-driven HBM and server DRAM, making it increasingly uneconomical to supply entry-level products.” For reference, here’s where iPhones used LPDDR4 memory: 2GB – 6S/6S Plus (2015), SE, 7 3GB – 7 Plus LPDDR4X, faster variant 2GB – 8 (2017) 3GB – 8 Plus, X, XR, SE Gen 2 4GB – XS, XS Max, 11, 11 Pro & Pro Max, 12, 12 Mini, SE Gen 3, 13, 13 mini, 6GB – 12 Pro & Pro Max, 13 Pro & Pro Max, 14, 14 Plus LPDDR5 (2022) 6GB – 14 Pro & Pro Max, 15, 15 Plus 8GB – 15 Pro & Pro Max, 16, 16 Plus, 17, 17 Air LPDDR5X (2024) 8GB – 16 Pro & Pro Max 12GB – 17 Pro & Pro Max (As you can see, increased memory size and speeds are reserved for iPhone Pro Models first, followed by adoption in next year’s basic or value models) So budget smartphone makers are using memory tech from 2015 to 2017, and because there was long usage from 2015 to 2022, 8 years, plenty of supply sources and fabs leading to cheap and stable prices. Now with high demand for most profitable AI HBM, server, and LPDDR5X and soon 6X memory, memory makers are shutting down less profitable LPDDR4/4X production lines, and focusing on 5X and HBM lines. This is causing huge price increases striking budget Android makers in their crucial and critical BOM chip costs, where they had budgeted 1X and now it might be 2X to 3X for memory. This means $99, $125, $149 up to $199 price tiers may disappear altogether once current supply is exhausted as makers MUST increase prices to get any profits. Obviously this will hurt price sensitive consumers heavily. Whether it will curtail sales or force users to just pay more will be telling. • “Apple and Samsung are the most insulated OEMs, while Huawei is the only Chinese brand expected to grow shipments in 2026.” The 1.08B units falls from consensus 1.26B sales of a robust 2025. Apple had led the way with 240.6M (Omdia), 243M (Counterpoint) and 247.4M (IDC) sales depending on who was measuring, let’s call it the avg of 243.7M iPhones. (ASP = $225,717M / 243.7M = $926) for CY2025. Subtract that from 1.26B and you get 1.016B or 1016M Android (including Huawei with its own Harmony OS) sales in 2025. Now if Apple iPhone sales remain flat that means 243.7M or so. Subtract that from 1016M and now Androids shrinks way down to ~772M, that’s a 24% decline in Android sales, obviously very disproportionate. Now because of price hikes and Android vendors NOT selling lowest priced budget models because of profitability issues, overall sales volume drops, ASP per maker might rise, but likely overall revenue per Android maker will decline by high single to moderate double digits. -> I don’t agree with Counterpoint regarding Apple sales being flat, especially given iPhone 17 popularity in China, rising sales in other regions, and persistent iPhone 17 sales strength overall. The only damper I can see is whether moving the base iPhone 18 to early 2027 will reduce sales a lot or not in Q4 CY2026, Apple’s Q1 FY2027. But maybe over the calendar year it will level out with last year? I would be surprised at that. On the other hand, revenue should remain solid in high single to low double digit growth, even with difficult compares in the December quarter. I believe an $1800-$2000 Apple iPhone Ultra foldable sale covers 2.0 to 2.5 base iPhone 18 sales. Now, there’s no particular reason to think Apple needs to hold the price of the Ultra down to encourage sales, and easily could claim a $2100-$2200 range instead. So it’s quite possible sales of the higher premium iPhone models may still grow revenue over YoY, and 2027 Q2 and Q3 could easily be better YoY. Apple could also justifiably raise prices on Pro Models but will they? In any case, if the iPhone 18 and Ultra, and maybe Air 2 prove attractive and unique, especially with improved AI features (at least to some) sales should continue to unfold. Continued'
on Premarket: Apple was red, turned green - 'Good day and week for LiquidMetal (LQMT). Bought it last year on the rumor Apple might finally use their perpetual license for the hinge in the foldable iPhone. Maybe someone knows something definitive on an announcement next week.'
on Evercore takes a deep dive into Apple Intelligence 2.0 - '“ most analysts do not look at the future. It’s a ‘show me’ state of mind.” And I believe the reason is experience. It doesn’t take long before an analyst makes some predictions that turn out wrong, resulting in angry customers. They are being conservative, trying to survive.'
on WWDC 26 preview: Mark Gurman empties his Siri notebook - 'Yep. I want written answers, succinct, with zero tracking, and sources and secure links for more info if I want it. And zero tracking.'
on WWDC 26 preview: Mark Gurman empties his Siri notebook - 'Rodney, are you still interested in the Apple 3.0 Bay Area dinner, You need to email me! Day, time, place are all set, with 18 people signed up!'
on WWDC 26 preview: Mark Gurman empties his Siri notebook - '“Operational complexity” I agree. The complexity needs to be smooth and hidden, only available to those who want to seek it out. In other words, if I want Siri to read an email and respond, tell me what the weather will be like this weekend, and how’s Apple stock doing, i don’t want Siri asking me 39 questions because AI has created 39 options. Use defaults that I can change or ignore if I so choose. I know Siri will need some info, but keep it to a minimum and use defaults whenever possible.'
on WWDC 26 preview: Mark Gurman empties his Siri notebook - 'MMMV. (My Mileage May Vary.) I read this list and said “meh.” I’m STILL not interested in talking to my phone.'
on Premarket: Apple was red, turned green - 'Although the major indexes are all red this morning, the advance/decline ratio on the S&P 500 tilts positive at this time. Apple is ahead $1.95 at $313.18. Coca Cola is higher by 2.68% this morning at $78.88 and P&G is up 2.47% at $144.25. This contrasts with Broadcom’s continued decline (off 4.64%) and Cisco’s performance (off 3.59%) as the tech sector in general faces selling pressure. This morning’s surprisingly strong jobs report dampened any remaining hope on the Street of any kind of interest rate cut this year. Let’s see what happens in afternoon trading as we close out the week…'
on Premarket: Apple was red, turned green - 'An hour into today’s session the Nasdaq 100 hovers around 26,360, DOWN ~460, while AAPL hovers around $314.25, UP ~$2.80. Post WWDC action is going to be very interesting to watch. Enjoy the moment everybody.'
on WWDC 26 preview: Mark Gurman empties his Siri notebook - 'If this is anywhere near accurate, then iPhone operational complexity will make flip phones attractive to this user.'
on Just in time for WWDC, Apple's App Store billings hit $1.4 trillion - 'Bingo. And, without us you’d have no market, no customers.'
on Just in time for WWDC, Apple's App Store billings hit $1.4 trillion - 'I still don’t understand the Court’s ruling against Apple’s App Store fees. If you want your records in my record store you pay me. If you want your food in my grocery store you pay me. If you want your clothing in my clothing store you pay me. Why is it any different just because your product is digital?'
on WSJ: How Apple plans to bring genAI to the masses - 'Same ‘ol, same ‘ol. Nothing here, just another negative rehash.'
on Evercore takes a deep dive into Apple Intelligence 2.0 - '” A successful fall launch could unlock multiple monetization paths that remain absent from investor numbers” Like I stated previously, most analysts do not look at the future. It’s a ‘show me’ state of mind.'
on Wedbush: AI will add $15 billion to Apple's services revenue - '” In this AI World Apple has more cash, consumers, and brand recognition than any company in the world.” That literally says all you need to know about Apple’s/AAPL’s future.'
on Just in time for WWDC, Apple's App Store billings hit $1.4 trillion - '“ For more than 90 percent of the billings and sales facilitated by the App Store ecosystem, developers did not pay any commission to Apple.” The bitching and whining by the few is the reason we can’t have nice things.'
on Premarket: Apple was red, turned green - 'Just moments to the markers Open. The Nasdaq 100 is down a whopping 430 points. AAPL is up $2.30 @ $312.84, hugging the $313 plateau. 5 minutes into today’s session and AAPL is trading above $314.xx.'
on WSJ: How Apple plans to bring genAI to the masses - 'I don’t want my iPhone doing anything without asking, or really ME telling it what I want.'
on Premarket: Apple is green - 'I agree with both your process and your findings, Gregg. Why? Because I’ve literally arrived at the same conclusions as you and Horace, but in my own idiosyncratic way. I also made the following comment on Asymco One: “ Hmm. I wonder if there’s any data on just how prevalent [analysts’ underestimating of Apple has] been? My guess: bad as it still is, it was a great deal more so in years past. Apple has perennially been doomed….'


