Recent Comments

  • Fred Stein on Seeking Alpha recommends selling Apple puts - 'As one who makes these sorts of trade, thanks. Yes, If assigned you need $30K, or buy back the put in the last minute for a lot less. (A lot less, assuming AAPL doesn’t crash in the next 2 months.)'
  • Dan Scropos on Premarket: Apple was green, turned red - 'Apple’s anticipated release schedule could provide a tailwind. With the premium models expected to debut and ship this fall, the likely higher prices will be introduced to The Installed Base’s far less cost conscious consumers. That does two things. First, it allows Apple time to negotiate supply chain pricing and/or seek new component suppliers for the base models in the spring. Second, it may see impatient base model buyers move into the premium segment. Relative to competition outside of China (Huawei), I think Apple is in the best position possible for the current memory shortage. In the long run, today’s higher prices will eventually be tomorrow’s increased revenue. This memory crunch will be relatively short lived, especially as the AI losers start to capitulate.'
  • Robert Paul Leitao on Premarket: Apple was green, turned red - 'On this Tuesday the DJIA hit a new all-time high, the S&P 500 reached a new all-time high and the NASDAQ Composite rose a lofty 2.59%. The Russell 2000 small cap index came within just a few points of reaching back to the current all-time high set on July 11st. Apple jumped $5.96 or 1.96% to close at $309.38 and is up overnight $1.77 at close to midnight in New York. Apple supplier Broadcom rose $25.93 or 6.61% to finish the day at $418.16. It was definitely a good day to be an equities investor. I’’m looking forward to Wednesday!'
  • Mark Visnic on Apple-AI enthusiast Errol Brandt looks forward to Oracle's comeuppance - 'Hi Robert. I’d be happy to talk to you and share my views. Philip can provide you with my cell phone number. Feel free to call me. Best, Mark'
  • Rick Povich on China Renaissance cuts Apple target $49 to $280 - 'The German banking powerhouse DZ bank also chimed in today and downgraded AAPL to a hold at $310. I don’t know what the bank’s previous position was, however. Maybe $312?'
  • David Emery on China Renaissance cuts Apple target $49 to $280 - 'A drop of 10% in a year would be a ‘significant move’. The idea that Apple would be -more impacted- than competitors by memory price increases shows a disregard for Apple’s business practices. And of course this would ignore any potential revenue from AI. I do agree that regulatory challenges are Apple’s biggest threats, but the EU has laid a lot of these same threats on Apple’s competitor Google, too.'
  • Ben Gepp on China Renaissance cuts Apple target $49 to $280 - 'Irrespective of what we think Apple is doing and how much we think Apple has the ultimate business prowess, it doesn’t matter a damn if the sentiment goes the other way. Whilst we may not like it, analysts do weigh on sentiment. Best not to dismiss out of hand.'
  • Fred Stein on China Renaissance cuts Apple target $49 to $280 - 'Last quarter, Apple bought over $25.8B of their own shares, while knowing all the issues Jack Zhou listed. That $25.8B is at the high-end of their normal. Let’s assume Apple knows more than Jack; And Apple would be cautious with all expenditures prior to bringing on a new CEO.'
  • David Emery on China Renaissance cuts Apple target $49 to $280 - 'Another one that fell out of the clown car…'
  • Gregg Thurman on Nate B. Jones: Apple is playing a 20 to 30-year AI game (video) - '” Nate nails it about long term.” We’ve talked about that Apple’s long term vision often. I don’t think we’ve ever framed it as a 20 year vision, but it makes sense. Apple has long since picked the low hanging fruit. It’s been cultivating the higher fruit for some time. That’s more difficult and not as readily discernible to the uninitiated (media). By the time the competition catches on (now?) it’ll be too late, Apple’s lead will be insurmountable. It has all the tools, silicon, dev tools, softwares and a trusted consumer device base (2 billion?) to sell into that on one else has.'
  • Fred Stein on Nate B. Jones: Apple is playing a 20 to 30-year AI game (video) - 'Yes Neal, really simplistic. And most was off topic. The chip guy was Johny Srouji, who clearly had the vision more than a decade ago. Ternus had all the devices which includes chips. Now Johny has Ternus’ remit. Hats off, I’m in awe of both leaders. Looking forward to hearing from the new chip leader, reporting to Johny. Nate’s wrong that sw doesn’t matter if you have the right chips. Apple understands this and has several initiatives, as MLX, Automated CUDA-to-Metal/MLX Translation, and Metal and Tensor APIs. It’s way above my pay grade. No worry, Apple’s genii get it and bust their butts for us achieve. Nate nails it about long term.'
  • Bart Yee on Nate B. Jones: Apple is playing a 20 to 30-year AI game (video) - 'Benjamin Franklin: “The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten.” Karl Albrecht: “You seldom improve quality by cutting costs, but you can often cut costs by improving quality.” Mac Duke: “Low prices attract cheap customers with luxurious demands.” ((applicable for Android))'
  • Bart Yee on Premarket: Apple was green, turned red - 'Well, at the close, AAPL was back up $5.96, 1.96%, to $309.38, off its day’s high of $310.42. Volume was above average at 60M shares, Apple being back in the market. So far, AAPL has recovered 16% of its 37 point drop. As we get further from earnings and guidance, we move into pre-iPhone introduction news and that should provide some positive news.'
  • Daniel Albaugh on Apple sales in India hit $10B - 'I could be way wrong, or I could be stating the obvious, but without his CEO duties, I can see Tim Cook doing a 6 month “tour” of South and Central America, Europe, India, China and all the southeast Asian countries in an attempt at improving Apple’s relationship within each region.'
  • Robert Stack on Apple sales in India hit $10B - '” To put that $10 billion in perspective, Apple’s latest quarterly sales in China came to $18.8 billion.” If I’m getting this correctly, the $10B number for India is for the year whereas the $18.8B PED quotes for China is for the quarter. Thus India is still a small fraction of sales for China – hence an enormous opportunity for growth.'
  • Gregg Thurman on Apple sales in India hit $10B - 'It’s burning in a northwesterly direction away from the population centers into more rural parts of Spokane. There were 3 major fires that have combined into one. Total acreage burnt so far >11,000 and although the winds have died down it is not yet contained. It’s going to take more than a couple of years to recover from this. The area burnt was such a naturally beautiful area.'
  • Steven Philips on Nate B. Jones: Apple is playing a 20 to 30-year AI game (video) - 'And then mining was outlawed and all the mine suppliers went out of business! No. You can’t predict long term.'
  • Steven Philips on Apple sales in India hit $10B - 'Only double digit increase? Not triple? Yup, doomed!'
  • Steven Philips on Apple sales in India hit $10B - 'Gregg, how’s your fire situation?'
  • Joseph Bland on Nate B. Jones: Apple is playing a 20 to 30-year AI game (video) - 'BTW, I need to take another sabbatical from Apple 3.0 to deal with patent deadlines. See everyone next month!'
  • Neal Guttenberg on Nate B. Jones: Apple is playing a 20 to 30-year AI game (video) - 'Definitely worth listening to as an Apple investor. If I am getting this correct, simply put, Nate’s premise is that Apple’s lead in chips and how they interact with AI is what puts Apple at an advantage in the AI race and that advantage puts them in the drivers seat for, potentially, decades. And since Ternus works with chips, he was the ideal choice for the next Apple CEO. Seems a bit simplistic but it seems to me that, if he is correct, this puts Apple into sort of the same position that NVDA has found themselves in, whether planned or not, in terms of AI. This would seem to validate the continued long term investment in Apple that many here have made.'
  • Joseph Bland on Nate B. Jones: Apple is playing a 20 to 30-year AI game (video) - 'Hi, Steven. From the long term POV some of us have, “hope” is not exactly the right word. Think of Apple as the retail store selling supplies to the gold miners – and I don’t mean just for AI! I recall, back in m concrete worker days, needing a new framing hammer. Rather than buy another steel-handled hammer, II bought a great-looking Chinese hammer with a wooden handle that was a quarter of the price. And I’d always had good use with a wooden handled framing hammer. The first day, as I was pounding in my double-headed concrete framing nails, I noticed that the hammer head, which is criss-crossed with a series of grooves to prevent slippage on the nailhead, was very quickly flattening out, because the steel was evidently not hardened. As a result, about two hours later, the inevitable happened, and that now-slippery head bent a framing nail. So I flipped to the claw side, pulled back – and the handle broke completely off right at the head! That nice-looking hammer lasted less than a day…. Gold miners need equipment that they can depend on, and that’s going to be Apple for many, many years to come. IMO. BTW, in those days, if a nail bent, we’d say “G. D. Japanese nails!”….'
  • Gregg Thurman on Apple sales in India hit $10B - '” You can see a Four Seasons hotel right next to a shanty town. It is a a country of great contrasts!” And very little in the way of zoning laws, except where it benefits a certain group of people.'
  • Joseph Bland on Premarket: Apple was green, turned red - 'Sure, the short term cadre can gang up in the post-and-premarket just following earnings, and hold the Apple Beachball down in the quarter before earnings where Apple is direct-buying out of the open market, but that’s pretty much all they have left, and even that is slim pickings. Used to be the stampede off the AAPL cliff was good for a good 40-50% drop following the Great Recession. This last one? Maybe 10% low to high. Not much of a slingshot anymore…. Of course, on the long term investor side, the buybacks are losing their power to magnify wealth, as Apple gets closer and closer to being fairly valued. But if you’ve been on board for every double in split-adjusted valuation, then even one more double looks astoundingly good. And right now it’s clear that at least one more is in the bag in the next couple of years, and I’d guess more than that in the years ahead. IMO.'
  • David Emery on Apple sales in India hit $10B - 'You beat me to it… (I’m sure there’ll be home-grown competition, but I suspect the ceiling in India is higher than China because there’s less local competition.) And I’m sure someone with data/graphing skills could project ‘growth in China’ and ‘growth in India’ and predict when India sales would match/overtake China. (Yeah, prior performance does not guarantee future performance, but if nothing else, it’ll be a fun graph to see….)'
  • Daniel Epstein on Apple sales in India hit $10B - '“pricey devices” snark aside the India market has a very large middle to upper class even though it is a smaller portion of it’s overall population than other countries. So if Apple can deal with the Indian government and other political issues it is a great opportunity that they are focusing on. And if they can make a profitable lower cost device I am sure they would compete strongly with the less wealthy population there as well. The long term cost of many Apple devices is actually lower than cheaper devices which don’t last. One of the striking things I came away from in India is how the high and low end of the economic range are right next to each other. You can see a Four Seasons hotel right next to a shanty town. It is a a country of great contrasts!'
  • Joseph Bland on Premarket: Apple was green, turned red - 'As I expected, the “falling knife” AAPL had a very short run. Nowhere to go but up from here. The lemmings are rushing in and out of the stock on a quarterly basis now, but the direction is relentlessly upwards. Why? Because the whole short trading premise is based on stampeding investors, and the cadre of AAPL long term investors is continuing to grow with each quarterly buyback. The future for Apple is just too bright.'
  • Greg Lippert on Apple sales in India hit $10B - '#doomed'
  • Gregg Thurman on Apple sales in India hit $10B - '” To put that $10 billion in perspective, Apple’s latest quarterly sales in China came to $18.8 billion.” 10% annual compound growth exceeds $18.8 Billion in less than 7 years. China sales are approaching saturation. India is not.'
  • David Emery on Apple-AI enthusiast Errol Brandt looks forward to Oracle's comeuppance - 'A related thought/question: It seems the Wall St consensus is that “only hyperscalers will be relevant in AI.” Given the huge investment, if they’re right, are we doomed to a oligarchy run by the hyperscaler companies? I could certainly argue that’s a possibility, where ‘everything is done by AI’ and ‘a few companies totally dominate AI’. And I saw that Palantir had incredible profits. I still think that’s the most scary Big Brother company, the kind that shows up in dystopian SF novels…'