Recent Comments

  • David Drinkwater on Who's interested in an Apple 3.0 face-to-face in Palo Alto? - 'I have to beg out. I am celebtrating my mom’s 80th Birthday in England in late July, and I am pretty well booked for a long (loooong) vacation that will include visiting the British Family (dad is directly English, as are uncle, aunt, cousins and their kin). Enjoy the event, all. I hope to make one sooner or later! It’s a really good proposal, Joe!'
  • David Drinkwater on Who's interested in an Apple 3.0 face-to-face in Palo Alto? - 'That sounds awful. I can’t imagine how you don’t just give that up and head to California!'
  • Robert Paul Leitao on Is this new Nvidia chip the reason Apple shares fell Monday morning? - 'Thank you all for the thoughtful comments in this topic! It’s an honor to a member of this community with you!'
  • Robert Paul Leitao on Premarket: Apple is red - 'NVIDIA gained 6.26% today to finish at $224.36 as Qualcomm dropped 8.78% to end the session at $228.99, off from its new all-time high of $259.92 that was set just last week. Intel fell 4.67% today to $109.33. Both QCOM and INTC were pulled down by the announcement of a new chip series by NVIDIA. Apple finished in the red $5.75 or 1.84% at $306.31. The iPhone maker is likely to have its own new chip announcements at next week’s WWDC 2026 event.'
  • Robert Paul Leitao on This week's Apple trading strategies (6/1-6/5/26) - 'Peter: Thank you for sharing your success story! It’s heartening to know our fellow Apple 3.0 subscribers are gaining success with Apple and other enterprises in which they choose to carefully invest! Congratulations! Please keep us updated on your story!'
  • Robert Stack on Is this new Nvidia chip the reason Apple shares fell Monday morning? - 'Jensen Huang is doing all he can to build solid business relationships with TSMC and the Taiwanese semi ecosystem. It doesn’t hurt that he’s throwing some big money around too. digitimes [dot] com/news/a20260528PD242/chairman-ceo-nvidia-jensen-huang-taiwan.html'
  • Robert Stack on Steve Jobs' 'Apple Hierarchy of Skepticism' (video) - 'Bart: I remembered the ending of Macworld Expos had something to do with the decline of Macworld the magazine, or rather its owner, but your comment made me curious to investigate further. Here’s a useful summary: apple.fandom [dot] com/wiki/Macworld_Conference_%26_Expo I was a long-time subscriber to MacWorld, and kept only one copy for posterity: the issue that has Steve Jobs on the cover that they printed after he passed.'
  • Robert Stack on AppleInsider is unimpressed with Nvidia's RTX Spark - 'Agreed. That’s why I own the Stack, and will continue to invest in keeping it state-of-the-art! 🙂'
  • Bart Yee on AppleInsider is unimpressed with Nvidia's RTX Spark - 'This Yahoo Finance from The Telegraph article is more focused on impact on Apple’s market, but note the quote at the end: Richard Windsor, an independent technology analyst, said Nvidia’s new technology appeared to be “aimed at the developer and gaming segments of the PC market, rather than taking the whole market head-on”. “This product is going to be expensive, meaning that in the consumer market, where battery life and price are important, this product is unlikely to be competitive.” https://finance.yahoo.com/news/nvidia-challenges-apple-intel-ai-125147805.html'
  • Bart Yee on Steve Jobs' 'Apple Hierarchy of Skepticism' (video) - 'Whelp, my link was the the January 1998 MacWorld Expo in San Francisco, this was a product intro and didn’t have the above Maslow discussion, obviously, I didn’t realize there was another MacWorld Expo in New York later that year. I’ll try to find that video: Ok, here’s the correct NYC video, bonus with Jony Ive appearance. https://youtu.be/6klXy-25u8c?si=HGcbmFL5_kTGxJW7'
  • Bart Yee on Steve Jobs' 'Apple Hierarchy of Skepticism' (video) - 'It’s interesting to note that even though jobs praised his operations people for getting the G3 Mac series out quickly and efficiently, he was already starting to look for someone to take over operations. He knew that if Macs were going to become even more popular, he was going to need even more production capability and logistical efficiency. Tim Cook was hired in March 1998 two months after this Keynote.'
  • Bart Yee on Steve Jobs' 'Apple Hierarchy of Skepticism' (video) - 'Here is the link to the entire 1998 Keynote. I don’t know about you guys, but I had never heard an entire Steve Jobs Keynote and I’d be remiss if I didn’t say it’s fascinating. Jobs delivers a little bit of a earnings report discussion before getting into his Keynote topics and details and it’s interesting to me to hear how he was not just an innovator, entrepreneur, but he was also a businessman who understood what it took to make and then deliver product. So I hope that if you have a chance to listen to the entire Keynote, you’ll appreciate what he brought to these presentations. The other thing that I don’t know the history of and I probably should look it up, is what happened to the Mac world expositions that Apple was obviously such a big part of and when did they move away from that to standalone Apple events? And what happened to the Mac world expositions after that separation, and does Mac world have a, sour, relationship with Apple today after those presentations or expositions ended? Phil, I sent you the link to this if you want to use it for your Saturday video. https://youtu.be/I3FiBimJSrM?si=rAtWKWUxHK7Mt8YG'
  • Greg Lippert on AppleInsider is unimpressed with Nvidia's RTX Spark - 'When you own the stack you get better results.'
  • David Emery on Is this new Nvidia chip the reason Apple shares fell Monday morning? - 'anyone else KNOW where…. (I’m not seeing all that well right now, in between cataract surgeries. Computer screen is particularly challenging….)'
  • Daniel Epstein on AppleInsider is unimpressed with Nvidia's RTX Spark - 'I agree with you Steve it is too early and was very skeptical reading the article when it mentioned the old test as a reason Apple was ahead. I don’t trust anyone (even Nvidia) who claims high performance without backing it up with some kind of proof. I wouldn’t go as far as the writer of the article did saying Apple was so far ahead. But I think Apple has the advantage since they are shipping products and likely know how to put their product together better than the multiple vendors involved in this. And of course we all know there is a lot of boasting that goes on with new products before release. I for one am not holding my breath for Nvidia’s chips in other manufacturers computers until I see the real product and feel the need to check it out.'
  • David Emery on Is this new Nvidia chip the reason Apple shares fell Monday morning? - 'Anyone else where where NVIDIA will find the foundry capacity to produce these new chips, given their current overdrive for GPU chips?'
  • David Emery on AppleInsider is unimpressed with Nvidia's RTX Spark - 'When we get beyond synthetic CPU benchmarks and into benchmarks built on actual programs running on the operating systems, those numbers will likely suck. Windows on NVIDIA ARM will need A LOT of work to achieve the performance and energy savings as Macs on M-series. Even then, Microsoft and its hardware vendors (plural, NVIDIA, Qualcomm, Intel, ARM) will have a lot of work to do TOGETHER to meet the kinds of trade-offs Apple software on Apple hardware will achieve. (And note that having to deal with 4 different makes that problem probably 2^4, or 16 times worse…)'
  • Fred Stein on AppleInsider is unimpressed with Nvidia's RTX Spark - 'And M5-Ultra, which is rumored to have more cache memory than predecessors.'
  • Steven Philips on Steve Jobs' 'Apple Hierarchy of Skepticism' (video) - 'Good ‘ol Maslow! 🙂'
  • Steven Philips on AppleInsider is unimpressed with Nvidia's RTX Spark - 'It’s really too early to make any kind of valid assessment until an actual product is released. (Just like with Apple.) This year ago “test” info is pointless. (And, in a way, click bait.)'
  • Gregg Thurman on AppleInsider is unimpressed with Nvidia's RTX Spark - 'As I offered in an earlier post, “What happens when Apple introduces an M6, M7 or M8 processor?”'
  • Roger Schutte on This week's Apple trading strategies (5/11-5/15/26) - 'Robert, MU market cap ($1.168T) is up $326B (38%) in the 3 weeks since this post when it was $842B. And many think it’s still cheap if future earnings come in anywhere close to predicted. Crazy!'
  • Fred Stein on AppleInsider is unimpressed with Nvidia's RTX Spark - 'Maybe even iPads can compete with RTX in some niches.'
  • Gregg Thurman on Is this new Nvidia chip the reason Apple shares fell Monday morning? - 'Most excellent Gary. Today’s volume looks like a knee jerk reaction to Nvidia’s announcement. I see a recovery from the knee jerk coming as analysts examine the announcement and see the uphill climb that Nvidia has undertaken. Even if successful, its marketshare is going to languish in the low single digits for years. Mac users aren’t going to abandon OSX and M series processors for a new, unproven platform, and the Mac platform has been growing for quite some time and picking up speed, now exceeding 12% (less than 4% in 1997).'
  • Fred Stein on AppleInsider is unimpressed with Nvidia's RTX Spark - 'MOM – that’s WOW upside down. Nothing to shout about. Competes with low-end of M-series but more expensive. When Apple announces M5 Ultra, it’s not even close. Tough for their PC maker channel to invest in RTX PCs only to cannibalize IA PCs. They have no choice – otherwise lose to other clones or Mac.'
  • Fred Stein on Is this new Nvidia chip the reason Apple shares fell Monday morning? - 'Upvoted. All good. And Google’s deal to sell TPUs to Anthropic threatens cloud infrastructure biz and it’s super high margins. And gotta repeat it. With the Mac you get inference for free if you already own a mac or plan to buy for any other reason.'
  • Gregg Thurman on Is this new Nvidia chip the reason Apple shares fell Monday morning? - 'From the ComputerWorld article: ”It’s almost as if years of carving out its own independent place means Apple now has in place strengths its competitors do not possess.” Ya think? Even with this announcement, even if this new Nvidia chip is better than Apple’s M series of processors, the Wintel industry doesn’t offer a single cohesive, fully integrated stack manufacturer. Apple’s silicon is so good because it was designed hand in hand with OSX. Performance is a function of everything working together in harmony. Like Errol Brandt stated in his discussion about CISC and RISC architectures, developers for Intel’s CISC processors only used 20% of available APIs because those API’s were complicated. Once Microsoft and Intel went down the CISC path they doomed the segment to technological stagnation because it became so embedded (marketshare) with consumers. Moving that base over to a new architecture, without a vertically integrated compute manufacturer, OS developer, processor manufacturer will, and did, lead to failure. Nvidia is following in Microsoft’s footsteps when it tried to modernize Windows. There was no translation layer (Rosetta) that enabled easy upgrade transitions. Data Centers aren’t desktops, having a leading “AI” reputation isn’t going to easily translate to a leading general purpose compute reputation, not when there is an 800lb gorilla already occupying that space, one that isn’t resting on its laurels. To the contrary, that firm (Apple) lead the charge almost a generation ago to RISC software and processors, all under one roof, and suffered the slings and arrows of doing so.'
  • Gary Morton on Is this new Nvidia chip the reason Apple shares fell Monday morning? - 'In the long run, won’t most of the AI inference and usage be at the edge? If so, Nvidia, has massive margins and revenues to lose in the datacenter business. Hats off to them for working to cannibalize their own market, but today’s announcement seems like more of a reason to sell Nvidia than to buy. Over the arc of the next 5-10 years, Apple still ends up being the disruptor in the AI space as the genuine cost of inference and learning will eventually get passed on to users. For those with more powerful Macs or (maybe) Nvidia PCs, the cost is negligible. For those relying on the AI data center providers, the cost of building and running their $1T+ investment becomes an achilles heel. And, the data centers are not like fiber optics of the .com buildout era. The chips will keep getting faster, better, and more power efficient driving a competitive need to keep updating the data centers. It seems like we have read this story before and the devices closest to the users ultimately win.'
  • Roger Schutte on Apple chose RISC over CISC, and that could make all the difference - 'John, both Nvidia N1 + N1X have ARM based cores + gpu’s with Nvidia hooks. Meaning power performance will be similar to Apple’s when running benchmarks but different in real life due to running different operating systems. CUDA is available in Windows on Intel and Linux, but isn’t available in Windows on Arm OS. So, doing ai work specifically for the Nvidia chips in these laptops is reliant on Microsoft getting their ARM OS working pronto. If those 6 vendors ship Nvidia laptops that run the same OS as QCOM based ones, then they’re going to have a lot of egg on their faces unless they switch to Linux or Android OS for running ai workflows.'
  • Ben Gepp on Is this new Nvidia chip the reason Apple shares fell Monday morning? - '…described as “the most efficient PC chip ever built.” Except Apple has unified memory and a decade’s more experience designing CPU’s (caveat – I really don’t know what I’m talking about in this space). I expect M series are by far the most energy efficient silicon on the market. Also Apple has the privacy card. I think Nvidia is a little ‘scared’ that Apple will gain a foothold in the enterprise space. Scared, because outside of data centres there’s not much to prop NVDA up.'