Recent Comments

  • Neal Guttenberg on Patrick McGee blames Apple's Tim Cook for empowering China - 'Greg, Upvoted. If I am remembering correctly, Apple went to China pretty much after most other companies. I guess, according to McGee, Apple just did it better. And Xi just happened to be in power. Now, if helping to create a Chinese middle class actually brings about better things, then all is forgiven according to McGee. But that part doesn’t get as much play as placing Apple in the seat of the main villain. I guess history will have to sort this whole thing out.'
  • Daniel Epstein on It has never cost so little to move into Apple's walled garden - 'Hard to gift someone a product that is sold out!'
  • Gregg Thurman on Patrick McGee blames Apple's Tim Cook for empowering China - 'Patrick McGee? Never heard of him.'
  • Robert Paul Leitao on Premarket: Apple is red - 'Procter & Gamble, which rose $2.86 on Thursday to close at $145.71, is up $4.51 per share on strong earnings reported this morning. Pre-market Apple is off $1.08 at $272.35. Intel has rocketed up $15.80 ahead of the bell to $82.58 on a very attractive quarterly performance. AMD is also moving higher and is up $35.42 at $340.75 on demand for semiconductor shares. Happy Friday! Trading beings in a few minutes…'
  • Neal Guttenberg on Apple bores the Atlantic - 'All Tim Cook did was make the hardest CEO transition in tech/industry appear seamless. Author is probably mad that he didn’t invest more in Apple at the start of his term as CEO.'
  • James Hillhouse on Patrick McGee blames Apple's Tim Cook for empowering China - 'I’m old enough at 63 to remember when we did just that, and in California no less. But for today’s world, your point is well made. Who knows, perhaps having a MechE Product guy running Apple will catalyze design innovations in Apple’s devices that will make them easier to assemble with automation.'
  • Greg Lippert on Patrick McGee blames Apple's Tim Cook for empowering China - 'True with quite a spin. What was the alternative, teach Americans to screw together iPhone? Was not happening.'
  • Stephen Gordon on Apple bores the Atlantic - 'You know what’s boring? This article by The Atlantic.'
  • David Emery on Trump threatens UK with 'big tariff' over 2% digital service tax on Apple et al. - 'Well, it could be that Charles is a cancer survivor.'
  • Steven Philips on Apple bores the Atlantic - 'Thanks! That’s the part of my post I left out! Yours popped while I was typing. 🙂'
  • Steven Philips on Apple bores the Atlantic - 'Read this earlier in the Atlantic. My take: Exactly PED’s take. Can you have “subtle negative hyperbole”? Somehow that’s what he makes me feel. Sending people around the moon? Boring. Just a larger version of my old backyard rocket. Ho Hum.'
  • Greg Lippert on It has never cost so little to move into Apple's walled garden - 'It’s a great time to join the walled garden.'
  • Greg Lippert on Apple bores the Atlantic - 'Agreed Gregg, that’s the worst pile of wordsalad I’ve read by The Atlantic. I usually enjoy them (in Apple News). Why do these writers, pundits expect world changing products on an annual schedule. Sheesh…. AVP, the door is not closed, its just beginning you tool. I dare them to compare Apple products a few generations apart – compare an iPhone 14 to 17 and see the constant innovation, etc.'
  • Gregg Thurman on Apple bores the Atlantic - 'Who cares if Cook seems bland and humorless. He wasn’t hired to entertain us, he was hired to make us money. He has done that better than anybody. Ternus will do that as well, maybe better, who knows? He might exhibit a livelier personality, but who cares if he delivers on his primary function. I expect better than this from The Atlantic.'
  • Gregg Thurman on Trump threatens UK with 'big tariff' over 2% digital service tax on Apple et al. - 'I agree with the sentiment, but that isn’t the right way to handle this. How do I know? SCOTUS said so.'
  • Gregg Thurman on Premarket: Apple was red, turned green - '”Now I’m really eager to see and hear what they report next week.” Me too, although I’ll bet the one thing we won’t hear, is that the CEO’s workload these last three or four years has gotten untenable. This afternoon I remembered something I predicted after the Vision Pro was announced, and before WWDC. That was that the iPhone 15 would include the ability take spatial photographs and videos, in order to create personal libraries of spatial content for buyers of the Vision Pro. The iPhone 18 will be the start of 4th generation iPhone since Vision Pro announcement. That’s about 550 million (1st through 3rd generation) Vision Pro capable iPhones currently roaming the planet with spatial capability. By the time iPhone 19 hits the stands that number will have increased to about 775 million. My thought is, when does Vision Pro capable iPhones hit critical mass, and if Vision Pro general release is tied to that metric?'
  • ben luna on The tragedy of Tim Cook - 'I think that the heart of the matter is that Tim was faced with the most difficult choice: smell the glove or I will kill your family, your company, etc.. I think that if the choice was: smell the glove or I will kill you, he would have acted differently. It is relatively easy to be a martyr when compared against the loss of everyone, everything else that you love more than yourself. That is why it is a tragedy, because Tim is willing to suffer, to endure, so much because of his love for Apple. I think we all should offer him a show of support so that he can at least know that we understand his sacrifice, and are grateful to him for being willing to make it. Not many with his power and wealth would choose to do that.'
  • Steven Philips on 13 myths busted in David Pogue's 'Apple: The First 50 Years' - 'I thought they were totally out of ARM. Guess I need to investigate. Or someone post to correct me.'
  • Rodney Avilla on The tragedy of Tim Cook - '“an equivalency where none exists” That I can agree with you. But that doesn’t mean one side is right, and one side is wrong. Both can be wrong, or both can be part right and part wrong. And one side can be 100% right, and the other 100% wrong. But both do have a right to their beliefs, and both have the right to argue their case in public. But I agree- there is no equivalency. I believe that is where humility (I realize that I may not always be right) and tolerance (others have the same right I have to believe what they want).'
  • Rodney Avilla on The tragedy of Tim Cook - 'The point of my comment was not to claim Trump has done anything OK. Whether I know of anything ok is irrelevant. One can argue that he has not done anything ok. And that may be true. But I believe to determine that would require much more objectivity than I am seeing in public discussions. Please note that I am not pointing a finger at anyone on this blog. I do not know anyone here personally, have not discussed politics with anyone to any degree. This is just something that appears to me to be true, if only on a superficial level. My main point was that I hate to see Tim Cook being demonized because of it.'
  • Joseph Bland on The tragedy of Tim Cook - 'Sounds good on paper, Don, but two wrongs don’t add up to a right. The latest threat from on high: Trump Threatens Companies That Seek Tariff Refunds They’re Owed – The New Republic “The president is sending a clear message to corporations as tariff refunds become available…Donald Trump is still not happy that his tariffs were struck down by the Supreme Court, and he said Tuesday that he would “remember” the companies that don’t seek refunds…” This dude got where he is with threats. And every time folks give in, he gains more power. Apple chose to stand with the timid. And we all are paying the price. I seriously doubt Steve Jobs would have gone this route….'
  • Joseph Bland on The tragedy of Tim Cook - 'Hi, Ron, We keep wanting to give an equivalency where none exists. But those stoking division are NOT symmetrical!'
  • Rodney Avilla on 13 myths busted in David Pogue's 'Apple: The First 50 Years' - 'I believe some of these myths are a bit forced (and not really myths?). 2. Myth: Apple was Woz and Jobs’s first startup. -Developing products is not the same as developing a company, as already pointed out. 3. Myth: Apple was founded by Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak. – Wayne was not involved in founding the company. He was involved in 1 mediation between the 2 founders. He was a ‘founder’ in name only. He did write a manual, but his name was on the paperwork for only 12 days. From what I read, he had zero input into the founding of the company (determining the purpose, goals and functioning of Apple). 6. Myth: Steve Jobs ripped off the graphic interface from Xerox PARC. -Not a myth. Pogue can argue that Jobs didn’t steal much, and that most of what he later sold was mostly his development. But his starting point came from PARC. Well documented. 8. Myth: John Sculley fired Steve Jobs. – So what’s the difference between firing Jobs, and using his influence to have Jobs fired? Also well documented. 10. Myth: Jobs randomly fired people he’d just met in the elevator. – There is a big difference between not being able to prove something is true, and assuming it’s false because you can’t prove it’s true. In 2010, Apple had over 47,000 employees. I’m not saying the event was true; I just saying because one doesn’t know it’s true, doesn’t make it false. Not sure where ‘firing 1 employee in the elevator’ became ‘randomly fired people’. Pogue didn’t say that the firing was a myth, just that it happened in an elevator. 11. Myth: Apple failed completely during the 11 years of Jobs’s absence. An AI search: “At the end of Steve Jobs’ 11-year absence (1985–1996), Apple was on the verge of bankruptcy, struggling with a bloated product line, ineffective marketing, and a critically outdated operating system. By 1996, the company had completely lost its focus, with market share evaporating and the brand becoming an historical footnote. ” Doesn’t sound like a myth. 12: Myth: Jobs wrote the “Think Different” ad. – I have never heard anyone say he wrote it by himself, but that he was involved in it’s writing. To be fair, I think it’s pretty common for any writer to take editorial liberties, once in a while. Despite sounding so negative, many of the comments I have read about the book makes me think it’s a definite worthwhile read, and it’s definitely on my list.'
  • Richard Gayle on 13 myths busted in David Pogue's 'Apple: The First 50 Years' - 'The focus on RISC from the early days has been a far sighted decision by Apple And then getting a license in perpetuity for ARM designs made Apple Silicon possible (as was buying a chip design company when it was small that made Apple silicon a reality). Everyone else has to pay hefty fees to get that sort of design. ot so much for Apple. That is one reason they can produce such powerful chips for a reasonable cost. Thus giving us the smartphone and Mac Neo. And Apple always does this early one for tech. They only spend billions whne trying to rectify a mistake (ie Beats). So look at the small companies they buy.'
  • Richard Gayle on 13 myths busted in David Pogue's 'Apple: The First 50 Years' - 'Just got the book for my birthday. So much fun. My favorite Jobs myth that Woz later debunked. Myth – Jobs would park in thae handicapped spot in Cupertino so he did not have to walk far from the parking lot. Not true. Apple did not have reserved spots for executives — something Jobs fostered. So yes, he probably did have to walk far sometimes. Sure he hated it, like everyone else. But he came up with a ‘creative’ solution — he handpainted a parking spot to look like a handicapped spot, closer to the entrance. And, because he knew it was not official, he would park there. But he banked on the consideration of others not to park there. Everyone knew it was him in the spot because he never had license plates on his car (in fact, there are a ton of pictures online of his car in that spot, posted in anger). People keyed the car all the time but he did not care. At the time, CA did not require license plates for the first 6 months a car was leased. So Jobs would always get a new lease at 6 months.(The dealer was happy to have Jobs as a customer.) He took the damage without complaint because it was not really his car. So Woz and some others called the police out, because everyone thought it was a real space that the asshole was using. The police showed up and found it was not an official spot (apparently CA had no law against impersonating a handicapped space). Jobs did not take away any official spots and did not break any laws. Woz, et al. did the “Well, that’s Steve.” It was an asshole thing but was also kind of creative. He got to keep his egalitarian claim of access but maintain some for himself (All employees are equal but some are more equal than others). It helped him, did not really hurt any disabled people. Kind of a creative solution to get the selfish thing he wanted but without really hurting others. You know that Musk or Zuckerberg likely would not have been as creative. I always wonder what would have happened if Woz had a disabled friend park in the space when Steve came in? Or sent Jobs a memo that the spot had been designated an official spot? That would have been fun 😉'
  • Stephen Gordon on 13 myths busted in David Pogue's 'Apple: The First 50 Years' - 'I’m at the part where Jobs is about to return to Apple. I didn’t know they were instrumental in creating ARM, and I believe they still own a percentage of the company, akin to their investment in Globalstar. Some good bets on their end, I must say.'
  • Ron Fredrick on The tragedy of Tim Cook - 'Rodney Avilla said: I believe some people’s hate for Trump is so great that it is distorting their perception of other people and events. TC is a perfect example. Whenever they hear the word Trump (or any word that makes them think of Trump) their blood pressure goes up. Whenever they speak about Trump, it’s always in hyperbole- they take anything that Trump has done or said and exaggerate and distort it to the max. They could never even consider anything Trump has done as ever being even OK, much less good. **I’m afraid I’m not following your comment, Rodney. I believe I understand what you were saying in these two bolded sentences, but I can’t think of what *highly criticized*, *important* thing that Trump has said or done as president that HAS to be exaggerated and distorted. Instead, I very much see corruption and mismanagement in his presidential actions. As much as I abhor Donald Trump, I believe I’m willing to consider what you’re saying…so, would you mind giving a few examples of something *significant* that Trump has done, as president, that you consider OK or good?'
  • Joseph Bland on The tragedy of Tim Cook - 'Coincidentally, I came across the following future dystopian scenario this AM. This is the true price the oligarchs, wannabe oligarchs, and flat tax-paying US billionaires are gifting the world. Read it and weep. Excerpt From “Opinion | A catastrophic climate event is upon us. Here is why you’ve heard so little about it” George Monbiot The Guardian https://apple.news/AyuVZgHcAQlKAftpI5xDLOQ This material may be protected by copyright. “Scientists say a crucial Atlantic system is more likely to collapse than previously thought. But the billionaire death cult that steers humanity’s destiny doesn’t do existential crises… …The poor and middle pay taxes, the rich pay accountants, the very rich pay lawyers – and the ultra-rich pay politicians. It’s not an original remark, but it bears repeating until everyone has heard it. The more money billionaires accumulate, the greater their control of the political system – which means they pay less tax, which means they accumulate more, which means their control intensifies…”'
  • John Konopka on Perplexity endorses Apple's privacy-first AI strategy - '@David It is really interesting how the topic du jour among the analysts changes so quickly. Yet, for a manufacturer like Apple, planning has to be carried out on a multi -year time frame. That is a huge disconnect.'
  • Steven Philips on 13 myths busted in David Pogue's 'Apple: The First 50 Years' - 'Re: #2. Collaborating on building and selling devices is not establishing a business intended to continue. A “startup” is. So I think Apple WAS Woz and Job’s first actual startup.'