David Emery on Will Apple's glasses be less creepy than Meta's? - 'Well. It would be hard to be MORE creepy. George, you’re not thinking hard enough! Imagine: “Hi, we’ll identify that face for you, but first you have to watch this ad for condoms, since this is someone you or a close friend has had sex with previously.”)'
on Can Tim Cook claw back the $3.3 billion Apple paid on Trump's tariffs? - 'Bessent is blowing smoke on ‘unjustified enrichment.’ Companies who paid those tariffs clearly have suffered damages, regardless of whether they passed those costs to consumers or not. I’d expect a single class action suit to force the government to pay up. The class would be “all companies or individuals who paid tariffs (directly) on imports under tariffs ruled illegal.” I don’t think consumers have a cause of action against a company to recover additional costs for a product (e.g. iPhone) that might be due to tariffs. Now if there was an explicit ‘tariff surcharge’, that might work. Otherwise, without anything to document the cause and amount, I can’t see how consumers have a case. I’m sure some lawyers might try to sue on behalf of ‘damaged consumers.’'
on Will Apple's glasses be less creepy than Meta's? - 'Meta’s glasses were designed based on those used in the Roddy “Rowdy” Piper Sci Fi move: “They Live.” A very “Creepy” movie. That’s how I’m going to refer to Meta’s glasses: Meta’s “They Live” Glasses. I remember in the movie they found these glasses in boxes inside or next to large dumpsters. In one scene Roddy had to go inside a garbage truck to find some glasses. A “B” rated Sci Fi movie but not a bad watch.'
on Will Apple's glasses be less creepy than Meta's? - 'Summary of today’s posts: Just creepy More creepy New creep Count me out.'
on Will Apple's glasses be less creepy than Meta's? - 'They will always be with us. As Shakespeare said: “Tomorrow and tomorrow and tomorrow – Creeps.”'
on Saturday Apple video: Elon Musk on Steve Jobs - 'At the end, Elon states: “I think Steve Jobs is way cooler than I am.” It’s nice to see I have at least one point of agreement with him.'
on Saturday Apple video: Elon Musk on Steve Jobs - 'I thought Musk was awful/nasty long before he got into politics.'
on Will Apple's glasses be less creepy than Meta's? - 'These are just creepy! (And like PED, I’m mildly face-blind, but I have ZERO DESIRE to have Big Brother identifying people for me.)'
on Will Apple's glasses be less creepy than Meta's? - 'It’s one thing for government’s and police forces to be able to access private video records, which always requires a warrant and everything is above-board and transparent to the legal person who owns that camera and/or data. It’s an entirely different thing for FB to gain automatic access to and ownership over all video and associated data from people wearing its smart glasses, to be used solely for its own purposes, financial and otherwise. Count me out from intentionally engaging in any of this, and especially by paying Mark Zuckerberg to allow me to do it for him.'
on Can Tim Cook claw back the $3.3 billion Apple paid on Trump's tariffs? - 'PED: Cook did act to reduce Apple exposure to Trump’s tariffs by managing him to the best of his ability, and definitely reduced Apple’s exposure to tariffs. The $1 billion per quarter was the best-case consequence for all that face-to-face time he had to engage in, and that also bought him all the unjustified and hyperbolic criticism from the peanut gallery.'
on Can Tim Cook claw back the $3.3 billion Apple paid on Trump's tariffs? - 'If I’m not mistaken – the majority characterized Trump’s illegal tariffs as an illegal tax or duty. So if consumers faced increased costs from that, then they’ve suffered financial harm, which is normally dealt with through civil suits. Bessent and others in the Administration (including Trump) are already publicly saying that companies that passed on tariffs shouldn’t be reimbursed because it would result in unjustified enrichment because it’s the customers that have suffered the loss. So it seems to me that there could be grounds for class action suits against either big companies who sold imported goods for more because they were passing on the illegal tariffs and then collect that back, or alternatively a class action suit by consumers against the federal government to recover (if they’re refusing to reimburse importers). Either way, the money should be going back to importers and consumers, depending on where the financial harm landed, so that the end result all illegal tariffs have been reimbursed. Of course, Bessent and others have also insisted that reimbursements shouldn’t happen at all, and that they’re going to ensure that it’s as complicated and takes as long as possible.'
on Saturday Apple video: Elon Musk on Steve Jobs - 'Isn’t history replete with examples of human beings working out their self-esteem issues in public? When we’re lucky, they do so in a socially constructive way, and when we’re not, boom, you get Springtime for Men with Unique Grooming Habits. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯'
on Saturday Apple video: Elon Musk on Steve Jobs - 'I sometimes wonder about the extent to which our dystopian politics are now driven by insecure little rich men who have felt disrespected – or in the case of Trump, humiliated – by their betters. Anybody remember Obama’s roast of The Donald at the 2011 correspondents’ dinner? (Video below.) Trump was in the audience, seemingly seething at jokes made at his expense. He had been a leading proponent of the false claim that Obama was a foreign-born Muslim who had fabricated his birth certificate, and as such was an illegitimate president. Obama just rhetorically slaughters him in the speech, in one of the better correspondents’ dinner speeches ever delivered by a president. Nobody likes to be publicly embarrassed. But it is easy to imagine that the narcissistic injury to Trump in 2011 was truly outsized. Here we have a popular U.S. president of a lineage related to what Trump believes to be a “shithole country,” exposing Trump’s “birther conspiracy” lies gently, with class and humor, in a forum in which Trump had no ability to respond. Obama speech here: https://youtu.be/k8TwRmX6zs4?si=jlAPadBZO8J2flsN'
on Can Tim Cook claw back the $3.3 billion Apple paid on Trump's tariffs? - 'Again, IANAL, but ‘timing’ counts. The tariffs payed under the EO that cites IEEPA have been ruled illegal. That should mean a return of those tariffs (but see the discussion with Digant above, this might not be as simple as it should be.) Now new tariffs imposed by Trump using different authority would start when that authority is signed. But I don’t believe they can be enforced -retroactively-. The claims by Newsom and Pritzer for “tariffs paid for by their citizens” are pure political grandstanding. Now if you directly imported something and have documentation you paid a tariff to get your item released to be delivered, that’s probably a legitimate claim. But to say “the people of our great state paid $xxxx because of the tariffs” is frankly not valid. Joe Citizen when he bought, for example, an iPhone, did NOT pay any tariff. The fact that some part of the purchase price was paid by Apple when the iPhone was imported does not give Joe Citizen a tariff claim.'
on Saturday Apple video: Elon Musk on Steve Jobs - 'I’m waiting for the Mel Brooks produced Broadway musical interpretation of this socially awkward moment!!'
on Saturday Apple video: Elon Musk on Steve Jobs - 'What happened to that Elon? When did he board the nuts train?'
on What's the one Apple Service nearly everybody ponies up for? - 'Just picked up Alfred Hitchcock’s Vertigo for $4.99 from the Apple TV store… when I see a Hitchcock for $4.99 there, I snap it up. And then I download it to the Mac so it will never go away.'
on Can Tim Cook claw back the $3.3 billion Apple paid on Trump's tariffs? - 'You may think he wasn’t groveling, but this is the video I received when I asked Gemini for a video of Cook groveling to Trump. https://youtu.be/bMryT5OzEpM?si=S8O7keQhRARBGYqf'
on Can Tim Cook claw back the $3.3 billion Apple paid on Trump's tariffs? - 'If Apple is owed billions paid in now unconstitutionally accessed tariffs paid to US Customs, and if Trump now only has limited tariff powers, seems to this very likely simpleton that the balance of power just shifted toward Cook and other business leaders and gives them a bit more freedom. If so, this could get entertaining.'
on Apple sued for 'child pornography' by W. Virginia's Republican Attorney General - 'I don’t think Vance has any chance'
on Can Tim Cook claw back the $3.3 billion Apple paid on Trump's tariffs? - '@Steven & @Rodney – Upvoted you both. Thanks for pushing back on descriptions of Tim Cook’s actions as “groveling” when he was merely doing what was necessary under the present, unpleasant circumstances. He’s a C.E.O. who understands his responsiblity to his company and its shareholders.'
on Can Tim Cook claw back the $3.3 billion Apple paid on Trump's tariffs? - 'Civil forfeiture is a *whole* another matter, and nothing to do with Tariffs. More importantly, the parties involved are major corporation, not the little guy.'
on Apple is coming to a sports bar near you - 'I think Apple would have to be. I believe they own all US distribution rights.'
on Apple is coming to a sports bar near you - 'They also used to see – or allegedly create – sexual images in ice cubes! 🙂'
on Why are so many people selling their brand new Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max? - 'Aren’t these trade-ins?'
on Apple sued for 'child pornography' by W. Virginia's Republican Attorney General - 'Not enough of them. Enough to not get HIM reelected – but he couldn’t have been anyway. Sooo…. The question becomes how will this affect his successor? Will it have impact on the party or will they just do business as usual with Vance?'


