Recent Comments

  • Neal Guttenberg on Proof that the Chinese prefer to buy new iPhones that look different from the old - 'I didn’t see any “proof”. Did anyone else? Seems like lots of word salad going on here. Apple’s phone business growth has, from memory, always been a bit spasmodic. I don’t think that changes.'
  • Neal Guttenberg on Apple delivers a pair of post-blowout pops - 'Mr. Market has been known to change its mind suddenly and without reason so, while I like the share price action of the past few days, I won’t take it too seriously unless it is maintained for a while. Or, maybe, someone on the short side decides to get people, like a Mark Gurman and those others that are like minded, to talk up the downside of Apple and get at least some momentum to the downside which benefits them. At least in the short term and allowing them to escape bigger losses. It seems like even big companies, like Apple, can have their shares manipulated. So I wouldn’t be surprised is something like this happens.'
  • Gregg Thurman on Premarket: Apple is green - '”Thank goodness for a cooler heads.” Long live the can’t innovate king of Apple management…Tim Cook.'
  • Gregg Thurman on Apple delivers a pair of post-blowout pops - 'With that revelation, maybe, just maybe, we’ll see a change in blogger subjects. Nah. They aren’t interested in truth or genuine insight. They are more interested in “incite for clicks”. They are lazy and financially insecure, so take the easy way to lining their pockets.'
  • John Konopka on Premarket: Apple is green - '@Kemble Mr. Market is not happy with the forecast of ~$180B in CAPEX. I was listening to the call and watching the after hours stock price. It had been up about 2-3%. Just after the CAPEX was announced the price dropped and went negative 1-2%. They touted Gemini a lot but it was all generalities saying that it is growing, improving, getting more useful. The one hard number I recall is that there are now ~750M users. No mention of how engaged they are or whether any of them are paying customers or just window shoppers.'
  • John Konopka on Premarket: Apple is green - 'The article about the dividend is misleading. Yes, the dividend is up from a year ago, but they didn’t just raise it. They raised it last May as per usual. There have been four payments of 26 cents per share. The last one was declared on 1/29 and is payable on 2/12 to shareholders of record on 2/9. The next one will likely be 27 cents per share per quarter, payable in early May. I’m hoping for a penny or two more than that, but I’m not holding my breath.'
  • John Konopka on Premarket: Apple is green - 'The Wells Fargo analyst asked a question about monetizing the Apple deal. They talked around this without answering it.'
  • Kemble Widmer on Premarket: Apple is green - 'Google beat on top and bottom lines, with a noteworthy 47% revenue growth in Google cloud, but forecast 2026 Capex end of 180B vs street estimates of 120B. Clearly Goog leadership believes the AI trade still full steam ahead, (SMCI results showed same yesterday). Still, my guess is Apple will continue to benefit as a safer AI play with some level of rotation into Apple from other AI large Capex plays over the next year (I own both names and many more, but Apple still my largest position by far). I mentioned mid last year I had sold a lot of Apple in 2024 and early 2025 to de risk my Apple concentration somewhat, had stopped only due to tax implications, and planned to sell more Apple once the new tax year started to continue my diversification strategy. Now that we are in the new year, I’m going to hold all Apple for a while looking for the steady tick up over months as they have proven material growth for multiple quarters, their headwinds are FAR less than mid 2025, and some exciting growth theses in the hopper. Most importantly IMO, Apple leadership once again shows, like the Millenium Falcon, “they still got it where it counts”, as they have proved material growth in advance of revamped Siri/AI infrastructure consolidation, etc. (and the ability to still be consistently raising margins, I mean my goodness……).'
  • Rodney Avilla on Apple delivers a pair of post-blowout pops - '“Apple’s decision to stay out of the AI arms race seems like a smarter play today than it did six months ago.” They have been saying it for a while, but now I think they believe it.'
  • Jonny T on Apple delivers a pair of post-blowout pops - 'Investors nor voters don’t always know best, do they.'
  • John Konopka on Premarket: Apple is green - 'Sundar Pichai just mentioned that they are cooperating with Apple by providing Gemini. No mention of the timeline or financial details.'
  • John Konopka on Premarket: Apple is green - 'Odd day. Apple closed up about 2.6% on a volume of about 89M. MSFT bounced back up, just above $3T. Google down ~2% on high volume. NVIDIA down again, far off its 52 week high. AMD down 17% on very high volume. Tesla down again. Maybe people are nervous about AI.x merging with SpaceX and Musk saying Tesla is canceling some car manufacturing to build robots. Tesla is now ~$400. 52 week high $498. 52 week low $214. Beta is 1.98 Apple’s beta is 1.11. Oracle is down another 5%. Is there a bottom to this fall? It will be interesting to see if Google provides any more color to the deal with Apple over Gemini. I doubt it.'
  • David Wilson on Premarket: Apple is green - 'If the analysts were anything other than reactive, if they had any foresight, they could’ve seen this coming months ago. Just like, as you said, it is old reasoning for us. If only Apple had pumped a 100 billion or two into infrastructure that will quickly depreciate. Missed that opportunity! /s/ Thank goodness for a cooler heads.'
  • Bill Donahue on Premarket: Apple is green - 'And Google’s reported earnings: Google Cloud revenues up 48%, consolidated Alphabet operating income up 16%, operating margin at 31.6%, net income up 30% and EPS up 31% to $2.82/share. And the stock spiked down 6% after-hours before bouncing almost straight back up to being off 0.6%. Someone just lost and someone else just made a lot of money!'
  • Bill Donahue on Premarket: Apple is green - 'This just in from Ryan Vlastelica at Bloomberg: “(Bloomberg) — Apple Inc. is trading in the opposite direction of technology stocks and the broader market as investors increasingly view it as an oasis of safety amid fears of artificial intelligence disruption.” https://ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-beats-tech-stocks-most-174832890.html Poor Mark. Not even his own colleagues are on-side with him any more, and even the Bloomberg editors finally appear to be able to see through the doomsaying. Further on in the article: ““Apple’s decision to stay out of the AI arms race seems like a smarter play today than it did six months ago,” Eye said. “It should still benefit from AI, but it isn’t forced to run up a hundred billion in debt and capex to fund a lot of infrastructure and projects.”” It only seems like a smarter play today than six months ago for people who are unable to read or have been intentionally ignoring all the red flags and growing skepticism on the whole “AI is NOW!!!” story that’s been pumped about LLMs, over the last 12-18 months.'
  • Digant Jariwala on Ben Thompson: Apple's got the TSMC blues - 'Yeah, This stuff gets planned out 3-6 years in advance, not 6 months as Ben suggests'
  • Joseph Bland on Premarket: Apple is green - 'BTW, AAPL just caught up with the market cap of GOOGL, and NVDA is now in range…. Also: “Beloved 50-year-old tech giant quietly raised dividends in 2026 Apple fans got some welcome news tucked into the company’s blockbuster earnings report: the tech giant is raising its dividend. The iPhone maker announced its Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.26 per share, payable on February 12, 2026, to shareholders of record as of February 9. That’s up from the $0.25 per share Apple (AAPL) paid in the year-ago quarter. It’s not a massive increase, but for a Dow Jones Industrial Average component sitting on $145 billion in cash and marketable securities, it signals confidence in the business despite some challenging headwinds ahead. “During the quarter, we returned nearly $32 billion to shareholders,” CFO Kevan Parekh shared during the earnings call. “This included $3.9 billion in dividends and equivalents and $25 billion through open market repurchases of 93 million Apple shares.” Valued at a market cap of $3.8 trillion, Apple accounts for nearly 6% of the S&P 500 index. Read on to discover if Apple is a dividend stock ripe for your portfolio.” – The Street'
  • Joseph Bland on Premarket: Apple is green - 'Finally, note that the REAL underlying trailing P/E valuation is only 34.8, as I type: In short: Apple, right now, is undervalued. With all it has going for it, the future is so bright that it literally deserves a 40 trailing valuation! And if you do the simple math and multiply the present EPS by 40, then you get (40×7.9=316) $316/share. Right now. To say nothing of what the future holds….'
  • Joseph Bland on Premarket: Apple is green - 'My guess is Apple’s back in the market today. A casual glance at a 3 month chart will show you something very interesting: A beautiful V shaped selloff that began at the beginning of January and ended just now almost exactly where it started. To me that’s proof positive that AAPL and Apple was “played” by options folks, who drove the stock down when Apple was in blackout by selling, bought back in at the bottom, and have now started cashing in on what has been known here on Apple 3.0 and Apple 2.0 before that as “the Apple Slingshot”. Now, in the old days, the Apple Slingshot would play out, not over a lousy month, but over years, with Apple being submerged to a valuation of less than 10 about every 2 to 3 years. What happened? Well, buybacks happened. And with those buybacks, a major shift in Apple ownership to buy and hold investors and away from short and even medium term traders. Now, folks just aren’t as easy to send over the cliffs, where traders that spooked them could pick up all those pelts at a fraction of their actual worth. And all that time, Apple stuck to its knitting, building the company and reducing its stock float with the burgeoning cash flow that the investment world had so completely devalued. So here’s to the Apple longs, who refused to be buffaloed, and instead have reaped a gift that only is destined to keep on giving!'
  • Joseph Bland on High praise for Apple from Bloomberg Technology - '“How much greenhouse gas has SpaceX added to create StarLink? And how much greenhouse gas is that saving?” You can’t even DO what StarLink is doing – literally serving any part of the world – any other way. And what’s THAT worth? Well, among other things, it’s managing to keep Russia from taking over Ukraine…. …which may actually force Putin to end the war and accept a compromise…. It’s just possible that someone like myself who has more knowledge of space issues than 99.99 percent of the human race knows more about this than you do. I’d note that still leaves about 7 million people who know as much as I do….'
  • Joseph Bland on High praise for Apple from Bloomberg Technology - 'Okay, Steven; I’ll play. It sounds like you’ve done the calculations, so exactly how much greenhouse gas would it cost to move servers into orbit where solar energy is available 24/7/365/ad infinitum? Or – you could stop making fun about something that is in fact a very serious issue. Here’s a primer for you: How much greenhouse gas has SpaceX added to create StarLink? And how much greenhouse gas is that saving? Not everything Elon Musk is doing is increasing global warming, like a little company called Tesla…. …which is not to say that Elon Musk isn’t full of himself….'
  • Steven Philips on High praise for Apple from Bloomberg Technology - 'Ahhh! Now we know Elon’s secret. Of course there’s the pollution issue in launching all those climate saving satellites. “The only winning move is not to play.” Plus “unintended consequences” of blocking the sun. Agriculture? Let’s just go to first cause and limit population growth.'
  • Joseph Bland on High praise for Apple from Bloomberg Technology - 'facetiousness aside, Steven, this is a serious issue. It actually IS a way to visibly reduce where we’re heading vis-a-vis global warming and AI. What’s THAT worth to the world?'
  • Steven Philips on Proof that the Chinese prefer to buy new iPhones that look different from the old - 'What’s a “de facto monopolist”? Whatever suits your argument, i guess.'
  • Joseph Bland on High praise for Apple from Bloomberg Technology - 'Hi, Fred, Gregg. “Surely Apple is working on this.” One hopes. John Konopka had a response to this in yesterday’s “Premarket” thread, to which I responded: “…by your definition, Mr. Musk’s StarLink constellation SHOULDN’T EXIST…” Make no mistake: Mr. Musk is no dummy. And Apple, with its investment in GlobalStar, can at least match where Mr. Musk is going – if they have the brains on tap to understand it. If not, I’m sure PED can serve as a go-between, and I can quickly educate them….'
  • John Konopka on Ben Thompson: Apple's got the TSMC blues - 'Yes. I’ve had some exposure to the semiconductor industry. I’m skeptical that one could simply go back and have them ramp up production very quickly.'
  • Joseph Bland on Premarket: Apple is red - 'Hi, John. I truly appreciate your POV. However, by your definition, Mr. Musk’s StarLink’s constellation SHOULDN’T EXIST, let alone be making an ROI. It’s just a hop, skip and jump from StarLink to Keith Lofstrom’s ServerSky concept…. wikipedia.org/wiki/Keith_Lofstrom (Mr. Lofstrom is on my Sacramento L5 Society email list, btw…)'
  • David Emery on Macalope: Now is the winter of our Apple discontent - 'This article, on the Wyden/Van Hollen letter on ‘Trump playing favorites with tariffs’ https://www.npr.org/2026/02/04/nx-s1-5698264/trump-wyden-van-hollen-tariffs-politically-connected-companies ?'
  • Digant Jariwala on Ben Thompson: Apple's got the TSMC blues - 'I think what the analyst meant to say is that when Apple made the initial order it under estimated and the extra capacity was then sold to Nvidia, so when Apple later went back to TSMC for more chips the capacity was no longer available. Either way, I think the reasoning is simplistic'
  • Ron Fredrick on Macalope: Now is the winter of our Apple discontent - 'Greg Lippert said: “I remember Apple seemed to stand more on its principles.” **I understand, Greg…and I remember when I used to run 6 miles every day at lunch when I was in my forties…but that was then. As you’ve mentioned many times on Apple 3.0, this administration has changed everything and, IMO, Tim Cook is doing what must be done as the C.E.O. of Apple. Those AAPL shareholders who continue to criticize him would be as upset as the rest of us if he acted according to his own standards and AAPL dropped 50% as a result. I agree with you…Tim Cook is “still a great C.E.O. for Apple”.'