Recent Comments

  • Gregg Thurman on Marques Brownlee: Apple's new laptops are putting Microsoft on notice - '”overcome the emotional “sunk cost” Several here have commented on the inclusion of a serial port RCA jack on the Neo. No other Apple product (that I’m aware of) uses RCA jacks as an interface port. Everything is USB because, well it’s better. But if you have headset you like, you don’t have to upgrade it to get Mac laptop. That makes switching even easier and less expensive than just a few weeks ago. Every day the beauty of the Neo strategy sends shivers down my spine, and fear among Windows purveyors. A 1% change in market is going to be worrisome to Windows manufacturers. A 2% or 3% change is going to be devastating. I wouldn’t be surprised to see a 5% change in the next 2-3 years. Windows consolidation in 3-5 years? Entirely possible.'
  • Gregg Thurman on Marques Brownlee: Apple's new laptops are putting Microsoft on notice - '”But getting all the components to play nicely together may also be a problem I can remember when even Macs had driver compatibility problems, having to visit several manufacturer sites to get the right drivers. Then Jobs came back to Apple and drivers were standardized.'
  • Rodney Avilla on Steven Levy: Apple is allergic to nostalgia - '“Cook laughed merrily at the idea…., “there will not be an agentic kind of model on there.” Sometimes I think people treat AI as if it’s some force in our atmosphere trying to break into human reality and eventually take over. AI is only used by humans, when AI can accomplish goals that humans want to accomplish. If and when AI cannot do what is desired, one can and will simply hit the delete button. I believe that Apple is taking its time to make sure that the way it uses AI is consistent with Apple’s character and goals. AI doesn’t determine those goals. That’s up to Apple Mgmt..'
  • Rodney Avilla on In the big tech free-fall this week, Apple stood out - 'My take: Mr. Market, for now, has decided that chasing the hyperscalers in their AI buildout is a terrible business plan. That is probably true of the day traders, option players, and short term traders. For the long-term traders, should they change their perspective on AI then I believe we would see a much greater drop, more slowly overtime. And IMHO, I believe this is when Apple will shine, more slowly overtime.'
  • Hap Allen on Marques Brownlee: Apple's new laptops are putting Microsoft on notice - 'The best that he can say about the Microsoft OS is that it is “functional.” It’s easy to imagine how the Neo price point could overcome the emotional “sunk cost” of users who’ve put up with PCs for years–along with the irritating raves from friends about their Macs–that the dike will at long last burst.'
  • Adam Foster on Steven Levy: Apple is allergic to nostalgia - 'My favorite line: “That of course presumes that superintelligence doesn’t totally rearrange reality in the next 50 years, let alone the next millennium.”'
  • Gregg Thurman on Saturday Apple video: Steve Jobs introduces iMac (1998) - 'I replaced all of my company’s Mac desktops with iMacs. I forget how many there were, but it was about 15. Installing each one took less time than removing the old Macs. Immediately got complaints about the hockey puck mouse. Fixed that with a snap on cover that elongated the shape of the mouse. That was the only problem we had (except for 2 electronic techs who preferred command line) with them. The techs suffered and I didn’t care.'
  • Steven Philips on Saturday Apple video: Steve Jobs introduces iMac (1998) - 'Wow! I’m convinced. I want one. 🙂'
  • Bill Donahue on Steven Levy: Apple is allergic to nostalgia - 'I completely agree with two points in this article: 1. It’s critically important that Apple leadership not be sentimental or nostalgic about its past and past products, and continue to focus on constant improvement and tracking, chasing, and pushing mid- and long-term tech revolutions and replacement; and 2. Sam Altman can definitely be replaced with an AI, mainly because the quality of his vision, decision-making, leadership, and approach to business is similar in the quality of flaws and deception inherent to the output of OpenAI’s LLM. The human factor will always be a critical necessity, when it comes to leading and overseeing any organization that it attempting to do truly significant things.'
  • Bill Donahue on In the big tech free-fall this week, Apple stood out - 'That’s exactly how I looked at the NASDAQ vs the DJIA, 20 years ago: tech vs traditional.'
  • Greg Lippert on In the big tech free-fall this week, Apple stood out - 'I have been thinking that for a while. Outside forces have held Apple down. They should never have fallen from the 280’s given their momentum and product mix. I’ve even put my $$$ where my mouth is and lost.'
  • Greg Lippert on In the big tech free-fall this week, Apple stood out - 'I see a pattern to these market selloffs and panics, a fish rots from the head.'
  • George Kiersted on KeyBanc cheers Apple's monetization push - 'Is Maps free?'
  • Gregg Thurman on In the big tech free-fall this week, Apple stood out - '” AAPL, at 29 Forward PE, looks attractive.” Using my nomenclature for earnings multiples and how the formula it’s based on is defined, and what we know about Apple’s future product pipelines, AAPL is very attractive.'
  • Gregg Thurman on In the big tech free-fall this week, Apple stood out - 'You know what would be interesting? I believe that there are two economies at work in the world: commodity and technology. Create an Index of nothing but commodity firms. And another of nothing but tech firms. Then compare revenue growth, gross margins, EPS and ISMs (Investor Sentiment Multiple). My gut tells that the first Index would show lower growth, lower gross margins and lower EPS, while the second Index would show higher metrics across the board. Importantly, the second (tech) Index would show higher earnings multiples. If that were true I would interpret that to mean that earnings multiples were directly correlated to higher metrics, and that tech multiples that exceeds historical “averages” were justified as investor expectations of future growth were naturally (and justifiably) higher for tech firms than they were for commodity firms. Importantly, it would also demonstrate that Apple, one of the most successful tech firms of the past 25 years is undervalued, even with an ISM of 30. Such a chart, over time, has the potential to be an early indicator of stock growth periods, as well as stock slumps, as ISMs are nothing more than highly distilled averages of Investor Sentiment, derived from an extremely large (millions?) sampling of investors.'
  • Fred Stein on In the big tech free-fall this week, Apple stood out - 'CAPEX: Great in boom times. Not good in down turns. Apple wins. META created their own special hell with a business that relies on exploiting the users. AAPL, at 29 Forward PE, looks attractive. Caveat: The war and Apple entering it’s quiet period, work against the stock near term.'
  • David Emery on In the big tech free-fall this week, Apple stood out - 'I think PED’s take is correct.'
  • Kemble Widmer on Wedbush's Street-high $350 Apple target is nearly $100 above the share price - 'Imagine for a minute the Trump economy if it weren’t for the AI trade. We would have been in recession 6 months ago. Or imagine how the economy would have hummed along if it weren’t for the tariff war (consumer tax) and now a new forever war stoking inflation. Btw- read a good analysis recently that there are finite resources to rebuild oil and gas infrastructure, and that you reach a tipping point where new damage grows repair time exponentially (months to years). We are on that precipice now.'
  • David Emery on KeyBanc cheers Apple's monetization push - 'Who buys Samsung (exploding) appliances?'
  • Joseph Bland on Steven Levy: Apple is allergic to nostalgia - 'Apple’s “direction” was set by Steve Jobs in his first tenure, then honed in his second. We have seen computers become a bigger and bigger part of our lives, in no small measure because of the direction Apple is laser-focused on, where the user is front and center. That the company is astoundingly profitable is completely down to it’s focus on the user, period. So why should that change over the next half-century, or ever? Apple fights out of the user’s corner. And as long as they continue doing that, they will “live long and prosper”. And so will Apple’s long term investors. (Back to lurking.)'
  • Joseph Bland on Mark Gurman: Apple granted iPhone designers anti-poaching stock options - 'Hi, Rodney. “Whenever Apple, or any company, prints stock shares, it dilutes the outstanding number of shares…” Apple isn’t “printing” stock shares: They’re removing them. They’re literally distilling the share count, not diluting it. “But I would prefer that Apple Pay for those bonuses…” Huh? They pay for the stocks they remove out of net profit. Yes, some of them aren’t retired but go into stock options. But check out the net split-adjusted share count over the last 12 years: It’s shrinking, so much so that we’re closing in on half the split-adjusted shares in Apple’s float than was the case 12 years ago! When that happens, anyone still owning shares they bought before then will literally own twice as much Apple Inc per share as they did back then. And that’s a share of a much bigger and much more profitable company. Think of PED’s single stock investment: It’s now 4 shares, but the four shares own a bigger percentage of Apple Inc. Buybacks are definitely not money down the rathole.'
  • Rodney Avilla on Mark Gurman: Apple granted iPhone designers anti-poaching stock options - 'Whenever Apple, or any company, prints stock shares, it dilutes the outstanding number of shares, and reduces what percent of the whole each share represents. Since Apple does not have to buy the shares, they are basically giving money to their employees, and making the shareholders pay the price. Now I agree that Apple is wise to give these bonuses. But I would prefer that Apple Pay for those bonuses, and not the shareholder.'
  • Rodney Avilla on KeyBanc cheers Apple's monetization push - 'If I am paying for a service, then I do not want to see ads. If the service is free, then I would expect to see ads, as there is no such thing as a free lunch.'
  • Shamwil Al-Amin on Mark Gurman: Apple granted iPhone designers anti-poaching stock options - 'Exactly this is more “hey great job here’s something extra” size options. Not “oh lord please don’t leave” size options.'
  • Shamwil Al-Amin on Mark Gurman: Apple granted iPhone designers anti-poaching stock options - 'These amounts are way off if they are anti poaching. Trust me the numbers would be way way higher if that were the purpose of them. I’d bet the vesting period is 4 years and the $200k would only be an extra $50k a year. Thats not stopping anyone who is poach worthy from leaving.'
  • Adam Foster on KeyBanc cheers Apple's monetization push - 'Who saw the Apple ad for Pluribus on a Samsung Refrigerator?'
  • Adam Foster on KeyBanc cheers Apple's monetization push - 'N O A D D S Ever… Please Apple!'
  • Charles A. on KeyBanc cheers Apple's monetization push - 'I’m totally fine with ads in my Apple News+. I just scroll past them. Big deal. I’d also be fine with ads in Apple Maps. (Sadly, we use Google Maps almost exclusively, though, for Car Play navigation — and even for Street View when scoping out locations at home…as Apple’s “Look Around” feature has big gaps in coverage.) Not sure exactly how ads in Apple TV will be implemented but that, too, will likely be something to which I would not object. The major upside, of course, will be the incremental increase in Services revenue, which may, over time, prove to be significant.'
  • Bart Yee on Wedbush's Street-high $350 Apple target is nearly $100 above the share price - 'Then a change of administration and an ill informed Trade & Tariff War with a poorly thought out assault on our biggest trading partner, decimating markets and bankrupting farmers, enhancing and growing competitors nations, and for what? Little to no change in trade deficits and tariffs, because US companies embrace cheapest sources of their products. And then there was the bungling of the pandemic, undermining of science, watching over a 1.2 million Americans die, 3.6M made ill, and still dealing with its aftermath. It took another administration 2+ years to deal with post pandemic upheaval and again, restabilization of the US and world economies, hand that off to the current administration who has grandiose plans to lower food prices, lower oil and gas prices, bring back manufacturing, and raise American prestige back from the 2016 administration’s debacles. Or at least piss off everyone equally and don’t care. Are we winning yet? No? Meat prices doubled, grocery prices STILL high, tariffs still a 10-20% unrepresented tax on consumers, gas prices and oil at 3 year highs, (was $3.72 avg. mid March, highest since Oct. 2023, now AAA reports $3.97, vs 1 yrs ago $3.15, a 26% jump) above the previous administrations, world oil, gas, helium supplies disrupted, another war a republican administration has started to deflect from domestic or political issues with no exit strategy or clear outcome in sight, plus billions in unfunded military expenditures adding to already rising national debt yet again, etc. etc. etc. All again to pummel markets, transfer wealth to rich players (follow the money and the grifting) while the average family sees their nest eggs shrink, their buying power cut, and personal freedoms curtailed if you’re not the right group. AAPL has suffered time and again under these situations, yes, some of it their own doing, but more externally than their business models and successes would imply or result, especially recently. Today, by dropping below $250, AAPL is now approaching -14% down from all time highs reached twice in the last 2 years despite being “late to AI or not spending enough” while now market seeing that maybe Apple’s strategy got it right. The Nasdaq has already entered into -11% Correction territory, as is the Dow too -10% exactly and S&P500 -9%. The only solace is that 2024 AAPL went from $223 to dropping to a $174 April low when Tariff War was restarted, so our 1 year YoY comparison will still look good, yay! /s We were told Repubs want less government in our lives yet it appears this admin wants government to run our lives, to intrude in and dictate our behaviors and actions, how we can vote, and to directly affect our and our investments’ financial well being as some form of blind loyalty, egotistical dictatorial control and patriotic strutting.'
  • Bart Yee on Wedbush's Street-high $350 Apple target is nearly $100 above the share price - 'Long rant, TL:DR if needed. If anyone hasn’t noticed, a number of us like me haven’t submitted an April 1, 2027 price target contest guess or prediction. I like to work up a prediction based on what I think Apple can do with regards to its business model: hardware, software, services, design, anticipatory strategic and tactical moves regarding production, sourcing, marketing, and the reception and sales of all the above, in a reasonably stable if not growing macroeconomic environment. Domestically and worldwide. You know, how a business is run, how it takes advantage of its strengths, how it mitigates its weaknesses, and how it competes vs its competition. A company like Apple should be valued in its merits. Worldwide regulatory and legal issues are common obstacles that Apple has had to deftly address. Periodic, almost predictable geopolitical issues come and go which directly affect Apple’s business market AND its business results. But nowhere have I seen and witnessed how one party, one group, one ideology and then one person has so fucked up markets, economies, consumer sentiment, business sentiment, investor sentiment, domestic and worldwide trade, and sown so much UNCERTAINTY so consistently. It seems science and economic theory, research, and history are upended and ignored in pursuit of some kind of ultimate ideological control over individuals where parts of the populace are stripped of fundamental rights and now economic predictability and strength. In short, chaos and personal retribution politics and economics has taken over running domestic and international policies, trade, regulation or deregulation, and roiled markets everywhere so that, IMO, one guy (I’ll decline calling him a man), one project 2025, one group who has seized and consolidated power, can almost seemingly randomly run roughshod over everyone else, including the population of the United States, and worldwide. There’s no way to guess where AAPL will be in a year, because no matter how great M5/M6 chips will be, how advanced and how well the latest bleeding edge 2nm A20 powered iPhone 18, Air, Pro & Pro Max, iFold, latest Mac’s, Mac Neo+, Vision Air, iPad Fold, and any host of other Apple innovations come about, the company and stock price can be dragged down by completely external forces and sentiment, plus real economic damage, because of the above one guy, group, ideology, economic mismanagement, and multiple pivots between international, trade, tariffs, domestic, international, regime changes, disregard for the law OR Constitution, and anyone who even protests, as is our right, is summarily labeled an enemy of the state, and then hounded by legal threats and “prosecution” or rather state sanctioned harassment, unlawful seizure or deportation. The same has occurred with US residents and citizens without regards to formal due process nor legal recourse. What has that gotten us in regards to AAPL? 2007-2008 recession due in large part to deregulation of financial institutions and inherent greed of people and companies prying money away from normal people, investors, and banks, and getting while the getting was good, and suffering little to no repercussions, while taxpayers footed the bills to restabilize the banking systems and markets. It took the better part of 8 long years to rebuild the economy, restore trust in the US, stabilize the world and see economic growth again, along with AAPL share price growth.'