Recent Comments

  • Joseph Bland on Premarket: Apple is green - 'Hi, Gregg: “ Max pain starts the week at $250 (down $25)….” The little options tail trying to wag the AAPL St. Bernard?'
  • Miguel Ancira on Evercore: Ten days before Christmas, iPhone lead times are expanding - 'Services and AVP for sports are going to drive the stock in late 2026 and beyond.'
  • Gregg Thurman on Evercore: Ten days before Christmas, iPhone lead times are expanding - ' My guess is that we might see some whipsawing of the share price due to some end of year profit taking. Or tax selling.'
  • Neal Guttenberg on Evercore: Ten days before Christmas, iPhone lead times are expanding - 'Nice to hear this from an investors standpoint, but not from a consumer’s standpoint. Interesting that we hear this news and Apple stock is down about 4 bucks at this time. My guess is that we might see some whipsawing of the share price due to some end of year profit taking.'
  • Bart Yee on About IDC's estimate of Apple's impact on the foldables market next year - 'Thanks to all for comments on my analysis of the Foldables market forecast as seen by IDC. However, the link above goes to a Counterpoint Foldables report I had sent earlier to Phil, even though it’s titled the IDC report, and quotes above come from the Counterpoint report, not the IDC report or graphs images. Here is the proper link: my idc com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS54017625 Phil has now fixed the link above. For those interested, replace the Counterpoint comments with the IDC comments and graphs, and then my analysis makes more sense. It was striking to me to see IDC showing their forecast graph spiking growth in demand for Foldables with Apple’s 2026 entry, and then the demand swiftly declining over 2027 to 2029. That told me the entire Foldables market was not expected to expand along with Apple’s growth nearly as fast, almost considering the Android (including Harmony OS Huawei) Foldables market “mature and saturated”, or in my view, limited in population and economic expansion ability, as I’ve been saying about the entire Android premium market, at least within the current worldwide macroeconomic environment. This is particularly evident in China still. I will say that the contrasting different forecast expectations of these research companies have always been highly optimistic in regards to the Android & Huawei Foldables sales numbers, seeming to believe they can get more Android/Chinese buyers to pony up, or lure Apple users away from iOS. But the actual market has fallen way short of those lofty expectations of the 75M-100M or more expected by 2027-28. Samsung themselves wishfully had predicted nearly 1 in 4 sales would eventually become Foldables, or that Foldables would eventually surpasss Galaxy S sales (currently at 35-40M/year) and that certainly has been way off the mark, Samsung Foldables stalled at around 9-11M for 2025. Now I suspect they are underestimating Apple’s potential in the Foldables market, or maybe IDC and Counterpoint see Apple’s Foldable production capacity constrained mainly by Samsung’s display supply, expected high Apple pricing, or the same limitations of size and economic capability for Apple’s users, that may be incorrect. Ultimately, if proven popular, the iFold could easily take 35% or more of the market within 2 years, not 4 IMO.'
  • Neal Guttenberg on About IDC's estimate of Apple's impact on the foldables market next year - 'There used to be a commercial for EF Hutton that went “When EF Hutton talks, people listen.” The same can be said for Bart. He always does an excellent job of analysis and running the numbers.'
  • Greg Lippert on Premarket: Apple is green - 'And AAPL taking a small beating this a.m. Any news?'
  • Robert Paul Leitao on Premarket: Apple is green - 'Fifty minutes out from today’s opening bell and it’s green across the board. Pre-market Apple is ahead $0.46 at $278.74. Broadcom, among Friday’s big losers, is up $0.92 at $360.85. Morgan Stanley is positive by $1.59 at $179.99 and Big Blue is in the green $0.31 at $309.56. It’s looking like a good way to start the day!'
  • Gregg Thurman on Evercore: Ten days before Christmas, iPhone lead times are expanding - 'As important as iPhone revenue is to the Company, there is another half of total revenue doing its thing. In that latter group is Services, that has showing real growth, not just a rebound from a poor prior year showing.'
  • Robert Paul Leitao on This week's Apple trading strategies (12/15-12/19/25) - 'Index futures are decidedly in the green at 2:30am in the east. Overnight Apple is up $0.30 at $278.58. Broadcom, which fell $46.44 on Friday, is down $0.49 at $359.44. I’m looking forward to the new trading week.'
  • Steven Philips on This week's Apple trading strategies (12/15-12/19/25) - 'The eccentrics had nothing to do after they left the camshafts so they went into politics and shafted the population. Careful or we’ll all be ASMLated. 🙂'
  • Gregg Thurman on This week's Apple trading strategies (12/15-12/19/25) - ' Would be fun to see a chart tracking that over the last ten years or so. Wouldn’t work because each new CFO structures guidance differently. When I first started tracking guidance you could increase it by 30% and damn near be spot on. You need to determine the current CFO’s style before you can infer anything from it. For the December quarter Parekh guided revenue/EPS growth of 10% – 12% YoY. My revenue in this quarter’s smack down is based on 11% YoY growth. No other data added. $137,937 made Oct 31, 2025.'
  • David Emery on This week's Apple trading strategies (12/15-12/19/25) - 'I used to know a little bit about statistics. Seems to me there are a lot of correlations you could do against Apple quarterly results. There’s ‘match to guidance’. There’s ‘match to estimates for each ANALyst (where you have enough data, and make assumptions about the period envisioned for the estimates.) There’s ‘match to statistics on PED’s quarterly wrap-up, both on individual estimates, and on the 2 groups (pro and independents) as a whole’ All of these are attempts to measure how well/poorly various individuals/groups are at predicting Apple results. My gut would be something like “Apple estimates correlate in the long run, but are generally too low by a relatively consistent amount’. (I like the idea of trying to correlate that data to individual CFOs.) “Apple estimates by the independents both track better and are consistently over-optimistic. Apple estimates by the pros are consistently pessimistic, and are on average less accurate (larger standard deviation) than the independents.” But I could be well off-base. (A lot of what I did professionally was to suggest to my boss possible trends or questions, that he would then task someone, on his staff or more usually the prime contractor, to answer. Then we’d compare the reported results to my gut. My gut was usually pretty good… )'
  • David Drinkwater on This week's Apple trading strategies (12/15-12/19/25) - 'I really enjoyed the 48 minute romp through high tech, but that should be expected from a semiconductor manufacturing engineer. I don’t work for TI, so I safely say that I don’t work for TI. (I won’t name my own employer here.) What TI are doing here in North Texas (AKA DFW Metroplex) is pretty remarkable. They are making their wafers bigger (300 mm = 12″) and with smaller feature sizes (especially if they pick up the highest end ASML printers that were discussed in the opening stanza). I think TI only started 300 mm manufacturer on Renner Road at RFAB (“R” stands for Richardson, the “near Dallas” suburb) in the late 20teens. So the fact they they are doing so much more out in Sherman is pretty remarkable (but that is a 70-100 minute commute that does not interest me at all). Semiconductor manufacturing is a very interesting business, and I think that the analog aspect of what TI does isn’t immediately obvious. The video talks about it a bit, but I think something doesn’t get very clearly expressed. It is the processing of real-world stimuli and transforming them into digital information that drives many, many, many of the Internet of Things things that we experience each day that enable so much of what we just take for granted. (Sorry, lotta words there.) Cars today can do things that my 19 and 21 year old beaters certainly can’t do (backup cameras! whoa!), and chips replace ancient internal technologies that were “always there” (there aren’t eccentrics on cam-shafts nowadays: there are computer chips – and we make some of them at my workplace!). So anyway, that was fun for me. Thanks for that, PED!'
  • Gregg Thurman on This week's Apple trading strategies (12/15-12/19/25) - ' A more simple data set would be comparing Apple’s (generally conservative) guidance to actual results in the next quarter. I used to do exactly that, then calculated average variations to forecast future results. Investing results were very good. The only fly in the ointment was estimating Investor Sentiment to those results. Investor Sentiment (ISM) X EPS = AAPL Print This is one of the reasons I harp on ISM vs PE. There is no good or bad ISM. It is what it is, unlike PE where WS and the media has bastardized the true meaning of the calculation. We are in a unique position to resume these calculations. Each new CFO modified how Forward Guidance is presented. Kevan Parekh took over the position of CFO on January 1, 2025. He has had plenty of time to stamp his style on presenting Guidance. It’ll take 4 quarters to discern his style. Most (nearly all?) investors don’t have the attention span to maintain such a database, instead relying on 3rd party reports, rumors, etc to come up with “gut” estimates. I like estimate.com contributors. 10 years ago there were more than 1200 of them. That number steadily declined as the “hobby” forecasters got bored (forecasting requires constant disciplined effort) and stopped. Today there are about 100 very good ones. They should not to be confused with Seeking Alpha contributors. Most of them (nearly all?) don’t do any more than regurgitate the same old shallow tripe. estimize.com revenue and earnings consensus is routinely more accurate than WS. I calculated quarterly Guidance variances independently of each other, as I found that there seemed to be some seasonality to them. A better mathematician than I (just about everyone) might be able to concoct a better method. I DO NOT ABIDE BY TECHNICAL ANALYSIS. I don’t require Head n Shoulders patterns, etc to tell if AAPL is going up or down.'
  • David Drinkwater on Peter Kafka: Latest Epic ruling not yet a 'turning point' for Apple - 'I wonder what portion of Epic’s revenue comes from iOS devices. I also wonder why they continue to stab at the goose rather than eat the golden eggs. Maybe Sweeney just doesn’t like his nose very much: and then I wonder what the technology equivalent of rhinoplasty is. My answer to that latter question is “symbiosis”, rather than the parasitology that we are seeing.'
  • Romeo Esparrago on About IDC's estimate of Apple's impact on the foldables market next year - 'Bart : I suspect a lot of Foldable users now are ex-iPhone users. I believe your suspicion. I’ve always wanted to try one but just could not step into buying hardware/software fun in that AND having to leave the  iOS environment/ecosystem I’ve invested heavily in (and its ties to the Mac, TV, and Vision OS’s I’m also heavily vested in). With the rumors swirling around ’s own foldable, I only need to wait with hopeful earnest.'
  • Steven Philips on This week's Apple trading strategies (12/15-12/19/25) - 'I always thought that would be interesting. Would be fun to see a chart tracking that over the last ten years or so.'
  • Robert Paul Leitao on This week's Apple trading strategies (12/15-12/19/25) - 'Fred: Thank you for the thoughtful feedback. I’m looking for ways to expand the reach of my work. The reason why I focus currently on market cap is because it’s a gauge of market capital allocation. Forward multiples vary by industry. For example, I don’t compare the forward multiples of, for example, Walmart, JP Morgan and NVIDIA or Apple in making investment decisions. 

What I have observed from following the mark cap numbers so closely for the past several months is a moderation in investor interest (though the mark caps remain very high high) in NVIDIA, Microsoft, and Oracle as the market gets a bit fatigued on the timeline for a return on the absolutely massive AI capital deployments and concerns about the circular investment agreements now being signed. 

As a component of the Fabulous 15 I’ve been tracking the rise in Walmart and expect revenue and profit growth to continue at the expense of other traditional retailers such as Target. In following the number I’m liking Walmart, Costco and Amazon and have positions in all three entperirsces. I loaded up on more Walmart into and following the recent split, have a long standing position on Costco and just entered a position on Amazon. By following the market cap numbers I’ve seen the big increases in valuations (and hence the share price gains) of Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs, for example. Following this sector from watching the number rise I did well with BNY Mellon and other large banks. The sector has provided for some very attractive total returns in both the national and regional banks. I also have position in a few of other majors and for the sake of brevity I won’t mention them all. I do expect with a continued cycle of Fed easing, an end of QT and some rollback of regulations for the sector to continue to perform well. I expect a pick-up in IPO activity into 2026 and there’s a whole lot of money tied up in private equity investments that I expect to see hit the IPO market over the next couple/few years. Back to tech and Apple. Despite the concerns about Apple’s lack of a conspicuous AI strategy the market appears to have gained comparative confidence in Apple as the breadth and scope of AI-related capital deployments continue mostly unabated and without a timeline for an attractive return onboard capital. I wouldn’t be surprised if Apple regained the market cap crown from NVIDIA in the coming weeks. The market pulled down Broadcom’s market cap at the end of the week and following the release of results. After watching the meteoric rise in the market cap over the past year I consider the pullback quite mild It’s nothing like the rise and fall of Oracle’s market cap over the past four months and I have confidence in Broadcom’s ability to prosper. The point is I glean far more from the market cap numbers than a ranking of enterprises. It’s one metric I follow as my own gauge of investor sentiment and gauge of market capital allocation. It’s worked really well for me as one metric and gauge in selecting industries and enterprises for investment.

In the tech sector currently I’m watching AMD and consider it a more attractive investment than NVIDIA at this time. I recently opening a small position. Following the market cap trends I maintain an interest in Cisco and IBM. Those are not glamour stocks but with attractive dividends and market cap appreciation potential. Cisco up up over 31% year-to-date and IBM is up over 40%. This may be too much information. I just wanted to provide an understanding of why I follow the numbers and the trends in market cap values.'
  • David Emery on This week's Apple trading strategies (12/15-12/19/25) - 'A more simple data set would be comparing Apple’s (generally conservative) guidance to actual results in the next quarter. 🙂'
  • Michael Goldfeder on About IDC's estimate of Apple's impact on the foldables market next year - 'As always, Bart’s outlook warrants him a seat on the Board at Apple.'
  • Gary Morton on Peter Kafka: Latest Epic ruling not yet a 'turning point' for Apple - 'The world according to Sweeney: “My IP is worth $Billions!! IP of others is maybe worth $hundreds. Nothing else is fair, and I’ll sue anyone that disagrees.'
  • Gregg Thurman on This week's Apple trading strategies (12/15-12/19/25) - 'Because this is an investment blog, and investors buy the future, may I suggest that a Price Target Smack Down, complete with EPS estimate and FPE multiple be created 1 week following Earnings Report. Let’s see what Investor Sentiment looks like AFTER management’s GUIDANCE, and well before the end of the quarter. Structured in this way it will force greater scrutiny and discussion of Apple’s guidance. After all, nobody knows better than Apple, how it’s going to perform during the period. Why create this Smack Down? I’ve noticed that the more accurate revenue and earning estimates on estimize.com, are made shortly after Apple’s Earnings Report and Guidance, indicating that those estimators are focusing on Apple’s Guidance and not WS reports of shipments, supply chain checks, etc. I, for one, will be making purchase decisions long before the end of the quarter. By then AAPL has already moved up in anticipation of Apple’s report.'
  • Gregg Thurman on This week's Apple trading strategies (12/15-12/19/25) - 'While FPE is just an estimate it provides a view of market sentiment. Y E S ! ! !'
  • David Emery on This week's Apple trading strategies (12/15-12/19/25) - 'Fred’s idea is a good one. It helps balance the ‘market cap’ by showing the “investor sentiment multiple’ used to produce that market cap.'
  • David Drinkwater on About IDC's estimate of Apple's impact on the foldables market next year - 'I think a foldable will be incremental for Apple, but highly detrimental to the competition, as Bart suggests.'
  • Fred Stein on This week's Apple trading strategies (12/15-12/19/25) - 'Robert, I appreciate and read all your contributions. Thanks. May I ask to add forward PE to the above list. While FPE is just an estimate it provides a view of market sentiment.'
  • Greg Lippert on Peter Kafka: Latest Epic ruling not yet a 'turning point' for Apple - 'Sounds reasonable Gregg.'