Recent Comments

  • Bill Donahue on Loop Capital downgrades Apple, cuts target $40 to $330 - 'Talking about Apple, here’s an in-depth interview/discussion about Apple from Deepwater Asset Management, with Gene Munster. Season 1, Episode 1: Apple. “It’s about generational tech companies, not the daily noise. Episode 1 goes back to the company we know best: Apple. What made it great, and what it needs to do to stay great for the next 20 years.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c32AhJTj69I'
  • Bill Donahue on UK to Apple: Loosen your grip on friction-free payments - 'Last time I checked, prices that are too high is what opens the door for increased competition and what drives consumer changes. And lower prices make it harder for competitors to horn in on a market. This is the first time I’ve heard that a regulator forcing a company to lower its price for a highly popular product will create the competitive environment that would allow alternative products to be developed and flourish. Have the rules of economics changed because it involves Apple?'
  • Bill Donahue on UK to Apple: Loosen your grip on friction-free payments - 'And pay more than they’d pay for using Apple Pay.'
  • Bill Donahue on UK to Apple: Loosen your grip on friction-free payments - 'Exactly. The determinant of the fees that Apple receives is not the consumer, it’s the banks! Tell the banks to lower their fees for contactless payments, if they want to make it more competitive. Although, for any regulator to make it more competitive in a way that benefits Apple’s competitors – as opposed to benefiting consumers – they would have to force Apple to charge less and allow its competitors to charge more… and then somehow force the banks to choose the more expensive competitors’ product over Apple’s. There is absolutely nothing about this that makes any sense at all. I eagerly await the day when anti-competition regulators start to try to impose this kind of targeted regulatory actions against every other successful company in every other sector and market, that sells hardware with specifically designed software that makes it better than competing products and finds itself being forced to spend money to make it easier for its competitors to insert their own software into the mix without making their own product, and ensure it makes their competitors competitive on a pricing and functional basis. That would be all auto manufacturers being forced to enable all competitor software and interfaces , all makers of appliances that require software, all banks, all public utilities. Pretty much everything. It’s absolutely ludicrous. Don’t like iPhones or the ease and functionality they enable? Then buy something else! Forget about having your cake and eating it. Regulators seem to insist that its proper that all of Apple’s competitors with crappy products should get a piece of Apple’s – and consumers’ – cake, and get to eat it for free and at Apple’s expense. Hey everybody! It’s free-lunch time!!'
  • Gregg Thurman on UK to Apple: Loosen your grip on friction-free payments - 'It’s just software. What’s preventing non-Apple manufacturers from developing their own that matches Apple’s capabilities? Android. Instead of forcing Apple to open iOS feature and chip (NFC) capabilities to Android, declare Tap to Pay an essential technology requiring standardization. As a contributor to the standard, Apple gets paid SEP rates (which are higher than Apple collects from banks) for its contributions to the standard. What did I miss? The reality is that it is Google that wants this inoperability, so it can bypass Apple’s privacy protections and safeguards so that Google hoover up Apple customer data to sell to advertisers.'
  • Bill Donahue on Loop Capital downgrades Apple, cuts target $40 to $330 - 'This is a bizarre interpretation. It’s as if he thinks Apple chose to manufacture and/or ship fewer iPhones, and that it is or was up to Apple to simply choose to shift that purported past reduction in sales into the next quarter or two. Which would somehow require amping up production high enough to cover that near-past demand that wasn’t satisfied, on top of the “normal” demand. Unless they just chose to not ship iPhones while maintaining normal production rates, and therefore stocked up on enough units during the period of reduced sales? Because that’s the only way that they could have 13 million iPhones available to sell in the next one or two quarters, along with what they’ve been producing at normal rates to satisfy the “normal” demand of the next one or two quarters. Unless he’s expecting them to significantly ramp production to sell an additional 13 million iPhones, and then reduce production once it’s satisfied to return to just meeting the normal demand. Which would be stupid, if possible – but it isn’t possible because there’s a severe global shortage of chips. So, he’s concluded that Apple won’t make up the “lost” sales of 13 million iPhones… but is still increasing his production numbers of iPhones YOY. And calling for an 8.5% reduction in ASP this year, an 11.2% reduction next year, and a lower profit margin. Despite that Apple’s selling out of the Duo even at its huge ASP and that Apple raised its prices on everything this year to compensate for higher chip costs.'
  • Michael Goldfeder on UK to Apple: Loosen your grip on friction-free payments - 'Apparently, if something like Apple Pay works smoothly, perfectly, and consumers are quite pleased to use it for their purchases, these regulators are insisting that you have to use a shit*y competitor? How is that innovation?'
  • Bill Donahue on More analysts weigh in on Apple - 'Brandon Nispel must be getting excited that his years-long insistence that Apple stock is going to decline may be about to come true over the next 4-6 months.'
  • Chris De Armond on Apple to Duo walk-ins: Don't even try - 'I look to the future when memory prices revert to “normal”. Apple will have gotten their customers used to higher prices. As memory prices tumble, Apple will have the option of maintaining prices and pushing GM way up or reducing prices (increasing demand) and only slightly raising GM. A nice problem either way.'
  • Karsten Pater on UK to Apple: Loosen your grip on friction-free payments - 'at the end everything is paid by the consumer'
  • Stephen Gordon on More analysts weigh in on Apple - 'If it drops enough, I’m buying!'
  • Daniel Epstein on Loop Capital downgrades Apple, cuts target $40 to $330 - 'When I first heard about this Loop Capital report I did a search and found they had updated their price estimate last week! So this is a quick turnaround on their part seemingly based on weak info. Putting them in the “don’t think they know anything” analyst pile. And same for those analysts who are underwater with their price targets and have already cost their clients money and likely to do the same in the future.'
  • David Emery on More analysts weigh in on Apple - 'You (Neal) may be right. But that doesn’t mean those maroons have a rational basis for their predictions. Rumors of production cuts AND rumors of insufficient stocks don’t make for consistent prognostication, let alone justify a 22% price drop.'
  • Neal Guttenberg on More analysts weigh in on Apple - 'There may be an economic slowdown on the horizon(or at least the market has seemed a bit overheated to me for a while). The downgrades may be a reflection of that.'
  • Neal Guttenberg on Apple to Duo walk-ins: Don't even try - 'I had thought that Apple was going to have some supply for walk ins to buy. I guess I was wrong about that. From this report, it would seem that everything is going out for either home delivery or delivery into the stores.'
  • Michael Goldfeder on Apple to Duo walk-ins: Don't even try - 'This avoids scalpers on the secondary markets.'
  • Miguel Ancira on Loop Capital downgrades Apple, cuts target $40 to $330 - 'They keep middling with their price targets to keep getting clicks. Why don’t they ever ask anybody here? Any person on this blog will know better. Again, I am so glad I am long.'
  • Greg Lippert on Why Apple's brand value remains unequalled - 'forgot to mention their positions on renewable energy, human rights, and right to privacy.'
  • Greg Lippert on UK to Apple: Loosen your grip on friction-free payments - 'Lower fees? Any lower is free. Apple receives a fee of 0.15% (15 basis points) of the purchase amount. This fee is paid by the card-issuing bank, not by the merchant or the consumer. For debit card transactions, Apple charges a flat fee of $0.005 (half a cent).'
  • Philip Elmer-DeWitt on Apple to Duo walk-ins: Don't even try - 'Also this… Apple is only allowing customers in the United States to purchase a maximum of two iPhone Duos. — Posted Tuesday by MacRumors https://www.macrumors.com/2026/10/19/iphone-duo-order-limit-us/'
  • Steven Philips on Premarket: Apple is red - 'Isn’t it time for Max Pain to be a push instead of a drag?'
  • David Drinkwater on Another week, another invitation-only Apple event - 'I’m hoping to go from 2016 Touch Bar to 2016 Touch *SCREEN* (which I will probably receive in about June 2027 – rolls eyes).'
  • Ben Gepp on Inviting friends of the blog to Apple’s Q4 2026 Earnings Smackdown - 'I think everyone knew what you meant.. I did I have no idea on such matters. Except to say as long as it’s more than the previous equivalent quarter, I’m good!'
  • ben luna on Mark Gurman: 'Apple’s iPhone Duo preorders were an absolute disaster' - 'ISTR that the original Apple Watch had a similar supply shortage?'
  • ben luna on Mark Gurman: 'Apple’s iPhone Duo preorders were an absolute disaster' - 'If only they followed that plan with the Vision Pro. 😉'
  • Gregg Thurman on Inviting friends of the blog to Apple’s Q4 2026 Earnings Smackdown - 'I’m not doing this very well today. Making it simple enough that even I can get it right. Revenue: $115 BILLION.'
  • Gregg Thurman on Inviting friends of the blog to Apple’s Q4 2026 Earnings Smackdown - 'You didn’t see the last part of my equation where it adds a “X 100” notation? Thanks for pointing that out Charles.'
  • Richard Gayle on Another week, another invitation-only Apple event - 'I was going to upgrade my M1 Pro laptop also. I had been thinking of waiting for the M6 Air next year, as most of my real work is done on my M4 mini. The laptop is for lighter roles. But, depending on price, I might be interested in a new Pro. Kinda excited. I’d love something I can ask the whole family to kick in on for a Christmas present 😉'
  • Robert Paul Leitao on Premarket: Apple is red - 'Despite the strong advances today in Western Digital’s share price (up 6.09%) and SanDisk (up 5.53%), nearly 65% of S&P 500 components closed lower on the day. Apple was among the majority of the index’s components that closed in the red. The shares ended off $0.52 at $342.94. Amazon gained 4.98% to finish at $262.45 while IBM moved higher by 1.83% at $236.39. Apple supplier Broadcom gained $5.84 or 1.78% to end the session at $334.59.'