Recent Comments

  • Les Surdykowski on Dan Niles on Apple AI: 'Sometimes you get lucky for being incompetent' - 'So CNBC (in the interest of being “fair and balanced”) trots out Mr (I got rich by betting against ) Niles every time Apple starts to move higher for longer. I’m not impressed by the commentary as it’s typically something along the lines of Apple is up but it doesn’t deserve to be. Rinse and repeat. What actual value does Mr Niles bring to the table? His Zoom backgrounds change from time to time but that’s about the only thing different when he comes on to talk about Apple. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯'
  • Bill Donahue on Dan Niles on Apple AI: 'Sometimes you get lucky for being incompetent' - 'Let’s all pause and think about the time when Sam Altman said publicly that he had no idea how OpenAI would make money from AI, but that when they achieved AGI they’d simply ask the model how to make it profitable and do whatever it says. I guess maybe that’s Dan Niles’ preferred corporate strategy and approach to AI as an actual business and investment.'
  • Bill Donahue on Dan Niles on Apple AI: 'Sometimes you get lucky for being incompetent' - 'It’s like insisting the Boston Red Sox got lucky when they won the World Series, because they’re completely incompetent at football. Apple isn’t OpenAI*, never intended to be, and will never be. And thank Glooscap for that. [* Fill in other LLM-peddler’s name, as preferred] Mainly because Apple has an actual business in which it has amply demonstrated its strategic, operational, and financial advantages that have combined to create significant leads and moats that keep its competitors fighting to catch up. And all of that is because of the very unique culture that Steve Jobs created, protected, promoted and preserved, above all else, to the point that it’ becamse part of Apple’s corporate DNA.'
  • Ben Gepp on Apple touches $339.57, closes at a record $336.91 and overtakes Nvidia - 'I’m sure there will be creeps out there that will use AVP inappropriately, in the same way that Apple Tags are sometimes used inappropriately. But given Apple’s commitment to privacy I’m confident they are considering ways to mitigate inappropriate use and avoid dumb design choices.'
  • Ben Gepp on Apple touches $339.57, closes at a record $336.91 and overtakes Nvidia - 'yes, I think the fact that you can see the (uncanny) eyes of the wearer, you know what they are looking at, and the fact that Vision Pro stands out like a sore thumb de-creeps them in comparison to Meta glasses, which feel like they are very much intended for inconspicuous public use. I just can’t see a case where Vision Pro is going to be used in public that much. I have used Meta Quest in a trade show context in a VR mode – which was public and it didn’t feel creepy at all. But it’s not hard to imagine Meta glasses being used for non-consensual live streams by nefarious types because they look so innocuous. And that’s creepy.'
  • Steven Philips on CNBC talking heads talk about Apple's new highs - 'I’d even take Laura Martin over Dan Niles.'
  • Steven Philips on Dan Niles on Apple AI: 'Sometimes you get lucky for being incompetent' - 'Or start using A.I. to fact check him! “But Dad! I checked on Apple Intelligence and it says you’re wrong!” 🙂'
  • Michael Goldfeder on CNBC talking heads talk about Apple's new highs - 'Dan Nathan has never uttered a complimentary word about Apple anytime I heard him on a broadcast. But I fell out of my chair when the “Chartist”, Carter Worth(less), said several superlatives about Apple including: “Stay Long, Be Long.”'
  • Michael Goldfeder on Dan Niles on Apple AI: 'Sometimes you get lucky for being incompetent' - 'Dan “C” Niles has never liked Apple from the first time I saw him babbling away back in 2019 after I made my first and only Apple purchase. Throughout the years he has always crowed about selling Apple short. Said Apple was done when Warren Buffett started selling shares. The China exposure will end Apple. The only minuscule benefit that Niles brings to the table is all of his kids love Apple products. So perhaps his wife overrode their youngsters DNA with more of her own. I hope his kids upgrade every year just to annoy him.'
  • Rick Landsman on Dan Niles on Apple AI: 'Sometimes you get lucky for being incompetent' - 'Niles is simply gaslighting us for why he’s been so wrong about AAPL for at least the last 6 years.'
  • Neal Guttenberg on Laura Martin: Apple's existential risk - 'Bart, Lots of good information here. Thanks.'
  • Neal Guttenberg on Dan Niles on Apple AI: 'Sometimes you get lucky for being incompetent' - 'I thought I heard Niles say that even though Apple was overpriced, it can grow into its present valuation. I also think that the share price is a bit overextended here but do feel that Apple will grow into its valuation. I also don’t care if Nvidia or Apple has the largest market cap. I will disagree that Apple’s incompetence led to the present state of affairs. But if you want to say that some things taking longer than analysts think they should is incompetence, you can use that phrase with any tech company that delays implementation of things. I don’t see this as incompetence at Apple. I see it as something that was much more difficult to achieve than what was anticipated.'
  • Neal Guttenberg on Goldman Sachs raises Apple target $30 to $370 - 'Hey Bart, Thanks for the information. Very interesting. So a 4-6 billion dollar hit based on EU strategy is what is being predicted. It will be interesting to see what actually transpires. Interesting information on what features drive purchases, with AI at the bottom of your list. I think Dan Niles needs to look at this based on listening to the video in the next article.'
  • Steven Philips on Apple touches $339.57, closes at a record $336.91 and overtakes Nvidia - 'OK, maybe it would actually be MORE creepy to see someone wearing AVP into a locker room! 🙂 But less insidious.'
  • David Emery on Dan Niles on Apple AI: 'Sometimes you get lucky for being incompetent' - 'Clickbait of the worst order. Let’s never speak of this a-hole again.'
  • Steven Philips on Apple touches $339.57, closes at a record $336.91 and overtakes Nvidia - 'Ben: Yes. Thank you. And yes it is less creepy because the circumstances are less likely. It’s not really what AVP is intended for.'
  • Joseph Bland on Apple touches $339.57, closes at a record $336.91 and overtakes Nvidia - 'So Ben; you’re saying Vision Pros are obvious so recording with them is less “creepy”?'
  • John Konopka on Dan Niles on Apple AI: 'Sometimes you get lucky for being incompetent' - 'It made my blood boil a bit to hear him say that Apple was incompetent in their AI efforts. It didn’t happen as quickly as we might have hoped for, but behind the scenes they were working very hard and very productively.'
  • Steven Philips on Dan Niles on Apple AI: 'Sometimes you get lucky for being incompetent' - '“Sometimes you get lucky for being incompetent.” Yes he did! Someone HIRED him! 🙂'
  • Joseph Bland on Apple touches $339.57, closes at a record $336.91 and overtakes Nvidia - 'Upvoted, David! I offer the first candidate for the Apple Doom of the Month Club as an Off Topic comment below. Sacto Joe'
  • Ben Gepp on Apple touches $339.57, closes at a record $336.91 and overtakes Nvidia - 'Except that Vision Pro isn’t exactly something the masses will be wearing in public and the form factor explicitly conveys the presence of recording devices. When someone has a pair of Ray Ban’s on it’s not immediately obvious whether they have cameras unless you’re quite closeup. Google’s fail Glass might have been seen as less creepy today because it is obvious that it has a recording device. There are plenty of applications where AR glasses would be fantastic: construction, maintenance, logistics, medical… But… as a device let wild in the general public….creepy.'
  • Joseph Bland on Apple touches $339.57, closes at a record $336.91 and overtakes Nvidia - 'Off Topic. Not sure where this belongs. “Smart Glasses Are the One Privacy Nightmare Apple Can’t Solve” – Gizmodo I get it. But – Apple has exactly the same “problem” with the Vision Pro. So I think it’s hokum to say this is specifically an Apple problem because nobody but Apple gives a rat’s ass about personal privacy – in fact, the others make book off of their users’ personal data! Apple will still not use the pictures or videos others make, unlike the others. It’ll still be private data, untouchable by anyone unless you personally OK it or a crook or spy somehow breaks through Apple’s security. I personally will have zero compunction about buying and fully using Apple’s iGlasses.'
  • David Emery on Apple touches $339.57, closes at a record $336.91 and overtakes Nvidia - 'We really should start the “Doom of the Month Club”….'
  • Darren DMW on Goldman Sachs raises Apple target $30 to $370 - 'The Indian and EU as counterweights is really interesting and something that I hadn’t considered. Not sure if India will be heavy enough to get the “we reported record revenue in all our geo segments” but I think India becomes more valuable than just it’s individual growth rate.'
  • Joseph Bland on Apple touches $339.57, closes at a record $336.91 and overtakes Nvidia - 'All I want for Christmas is for Apple to still be at a 40+ P/E ratio….'
  • Michael Goldfeder on Apple touches $339.57, closes at a record $336.91 and overtakes Nvidia - 'Even more incredible is that Apple was able to reach this lofty level despite not having any AI strategy. Not spending enough on Capex. Failing to buy Perplexity. Not having a hit product since Steve Jobs passed away. Oops. I almost forgot. Not Buying Peloton. Disney. Tesla. Netflix. Time-Warner. Rivian. Blah, blah, blah. Let’s invite Laura Martin on for a Zoom Call very soon and find out what else Apple has failed to do in her opinion.'
  • Steven Philips on Apple touches $339.57, closes at a record $336.91 and overtakes Nvidia - 'Pass me the smelling salts! 🙂'
  • Joseph Bland on Premarket: Apple is green - 'In comparison to Q1 FY ‘20 (and today’s)(diluted) YOY EPS of $8.26, closing price of $336.91 and 40.79 P/E ratio (aka, Price/(diluted) YOY EPS): December 24. 2020, shows a diluted EPS of $3.27/share, a price of $131.97, and a P/E ratio of 40.36. The following year: December 31, 2021, shows a diluted EPS of $6.04, a price of $177.57/share, and a P/E of 29.18. Note that EPS almost doubled and P/E dropped like a lead beachball…. The point being, if it was worth a 40+ P/E then and it is worth a 40+ P/E now, then it was always worth a 40+ P/E, and anyone who bought AND/OR HELD under that, including Apple Inc, has made a very handsome ROI indeed.'
  • Bart Yee on Goldman Sachs raises Apple target $30 to $370 - '“so is AI really driving smartphone purchasing decisions, or are smartphones still being purchased for all of the standard and typical reason for upgrading or buying?” “No, AI is not driving smartphone purchasing decisions for the vast majority of consumers. While smartphone brands spend billions marketing generative AI features, consumer data proves that actual purchases are still driven entirely by standard, practical reasons. The industry’s marketing hype and consumers’ actual motivations are heavily mismatched. What Actually Drives Smartphone Purchases? Comprehensive market studies from tracking firms like Recon Analytics and CNET Survey outline the primary reasons people choose to buy a new phone: • Hardware Failures: Broken screens, dead batteries, and physical degradation remain the number one driver of device purchases. • Price (62%): The absolute cost or monthly carrier deal is the biggest deciding factor. • Longer Battery Life (54%): Users prioritize a phone that stays alive all day over software tricks. • More Storage (39%): Running out of local space for apps and media forces upgrades. • Better Cameras (30%): Standard hardware upgrades like optical zoom lens improvements. • AI Features (Only 4% to 11%): AI feature priority sits at the very bottom of consumer interests. Over 30% of users state they explicitly do not find mobile AI helpful or desirable. Why Is AI Failing to Move the Needle? 1. The “Gimmick” Gap vs. Paid Features • Many highly publicized AI features (like moving an object in a photo or translating a call) are seen as fun to try once but are not essential to daily productivity. Furthermore, consumer surveys show half of all smartphone users are entirely unwilling to pay extra money or a subscription fee to access AI capabilities. 2. The Upgrade Super-Cycle is Missing Brands expected AI to create a massive wave of immediate device upgrades. Instead, consumers are holding onto their devices longer than ever, with the average age of a traded-in smartphone exceeding 3.6 years. People are keeping their existing devices until they physically give out, rather than rushing out to get an AI-capable phone. 3. AI-Driven Shortages are Driving Prices Up Ironically, the rise of AI is actually hindering phone sales rather than helping them. Because data centers are buying up global microchip and RAM inventory at a premium, a global component shortage has hit consumer electronics. This supply crunch has forced manufacturers to raise prices on retail models or delay certain hardware configurations, suppressing consumer demand. The Reality of “Invisible AI” While consumers actively reject flashy generative AI marketing (like chatbots and text summarizers), they highly value predictive AI that works silently in the background. Features like AI-driven battery optimization, computational photography, call screening, and automatic screen brightness are heavily utilized, though most buyers view them as standard smartphone features rather than “AI”.'