David Emery on Who's interested in an Apple 3.0 face-to-face in Palo Alto? - 'I’d be interested in a Northeast US meet-up… (I can’t travel much these days.)'
on Who's interested in an Apple 3.0 face-to-face in Palo Alto? - 'Actually, PED already gave y’all my email, so even less complicated….'
on Who's interested in an Apple 3.0 face-to-face in Palo Alto? - 'Thanks, PED! That should get the ball well and truly rolling! So far, folks, we’ve got Ron Fredrick, Robert “Bob” Stack, me, and our wives committed. We’re waiting on deciding the venue to see how many folks might attend, and also waiting on those with dates between, say, June 20th and July 11th, if they would like to attend but can’t on certain days within that window. That will lock down the day and the venue. Also, you can let me know here, and ask PED to give you my email address as the contact person. I’ll answer your emails and put you on the email list so we can all decide collectively where and when. Donna and I, btw, will be staying overnight in the area on the night of the dinner. If others are doing so, maybe we can get rooms at the same hotel…. Joe'
on This week's Apple trading strategies (6/1-6/5/26) - 'Roger: I’m in this with you! As a recent retiree I’m well aware of the “sequence of return risk” of a major downturn early in one’s retirement years. I’m no johnny-come-lately to Apple and was investing in Apple with the scant dollars I had years before Steve Jobs returned to the company. In other words I was like a young kid walking into a bank and reaching up to the counter to put his crumpled few dollars in the bank with dreams much bigger than the small size of his account. I really do expect Apple to deliver at WWDC 2026 and at least modestly beat already high expectations. Apple has come through for us before and I expect the company to deliver again! In other words, I expect the announcements at WWDC 2026 to be so big and so bold they will be like the brightest of lighthouses of yore along the rocky New England coast that for generations lit the way for weary sailors battling stormy seas to find their way home! Go Apple! Bring it home for Apple customers around the world and for the steadfast shareholders that have remained with the company during uncertain times!'
on Mark Gurman: Look for Apple-branded smart glasses by Dec. 2027 - 'Jony Ive’s Ferrari Design: https://www.cnet.com/cars/ferraris-first-ev-gets-pope-leos-blessing-but-everyone-else-hates-it'
on This week's Apple trading strategies (6/1-6/5/26) - 'David: Yes. The youngest of the Boomers (my brother’s birth year of 1964) is turning 62 this year. The youngest members of that cohort are in late-stage retirement planning or retirement now. The Boomer cohort contains those born from January 1, 1946 through December 31, 1964. This year Boomers range in age from 80 years of age (born 1946) to 62 years of age (born 1964). Yes. There is a definite concentration of wealth in this generation. In fact much has been written about the trillions that will be passed from Boomers to their heirs through 2045. Wikipedia, in an entry titled, “Great Wealth Transfer” estimates the number at $84.40 trillion in assets with $72.6 trillion distributed to heirs. Understanding the size and wealth of the Boomer generation has underpinned my investment approach for the past 25 years. Back in 2001 I understood the oldest members of the cohort were turning 55. Among the older Boomers there was higher incidence of employer-provided defined benefit pension program coverage and heavy inflows into 401(k) accounts as more of the cohort reached their peak earning years. There’s also the wealth dynamic of long-term marriage that greatly benefited the generation and fueled greater wealth accumulation. None of this is politics and little of it relates to economic policies. It’s just today’s economic reality. I had great confidence in investing in equities over the past 25 years because of the heavy inflows of the Boomer cohort into retirement accounts through the early years of this century. The wealth of the Boomer generation is just massive, in part due to its size. The Silent Generation (1928 to 1945), mostly comprised of Depression-era children, such as my parents, is smaller in size due in part to the severity of conditions during the period and smaller birth numbers during WWII.'
on Mark Gurman: Look for Apple-branded smart glasses by Dec. 2027 - 'Fred, I actually think he’s on to something. Apple could *also* be targeting the prescription glasses market. That’s a market that’s ready for disruption. Could Apple be looking at something like active vision correction? Glasses give you what they give you but they’re not actively “smart.” To be fair, AI summarized this for me: “While prescription glasses excel at correcting refractive errors (like nearsightedness, farsightedness, and astigmatism), they cannot solve all vision challenges. Their structural and optical limitations can leave people struggling with peripheral distortion, specific lighting needs, and uncorrectable eye diseases.” This is an area where Apple could completely disrupt the current market. Current iterations of smart glasses seem to have solutions for problems that don’t exist and/or unimportant gimmicks. Apple could really move the needle with a game changing device. They’ve long been rumored to be studying eye issues and even a contact lens type product. This would be a more logical first step. And potentially an extremely lucrative one.'
on Mark Gurman: Look for Apple-branded smart glasses by Dec. 2027 - 'At least that’s not a recommendation to buy Space/X at the bargain price it should command once the scale of Musk’s “financial engineering” is realized.'
on Back in the U.S.A. - 'Hah! Something all long term AAPL investors no doubt have in common…. I hinted that Rodney’s wife would find good company at what will undoubtedly become the first of many Apple 3.0 Bay Area meet-and-greets. I’m even considering asking a good friend who lives in that area and is also a beneficiary of holding AAPL long and strong. Others can do the same….'
on This week's Apple trading strategies (6/1-6/5/26) - 'Hi, David. “I will choose not to go down that rabbit hole.” Allow me. It all started with Ronald Regan and his destruction of the graduated tax, which was improperly set up for changing with inflation, forcing folks into higher and higher tax brackets. Reagan, rather than properly force an adjustment for inflation into the tax code, talked pissed off folks into replacing it with a kind of bastardized flat tax, the result of which, even putting aside tax shelters for the wealthiest, created a very low top tax rate/flat tax, above which, no matter how much you earned, your taxed percentage never changed. A few decades pass – and suddenly the vast majority of wealth is in the hands of the wealthiest of the wealthy. Hmm. I wonder why? /s'
on Back in the U.S.A. - 'Actually, Joseph, I suspect Rodney’s wife, your wife *and* my wife would have “much to agree on” when it comes to their husbands spending “too much time on all things Apple”. And, I would hope Rodney could convince his wife to ignore the circumstances that brought us all together and just pretend she’s at a mini-sized class reunion. 🙂'
on This week's Apple trading strategies (6/1-6/5/26) - 'Great upward channel following both intraday high and intraday low trend lines. I’ll be tickled to death should AAPL continue to follow the continuation of the intraday low trend line.'
on This week's Apple trading strategies (6/1-6/5/26) - 'Robert, I respectfully disagree that the youngest of the Boomers are only just now turning 65. My father is 83 and was born during WW II. My mother, however, is about to turn 80, and she was born *after* WW II, so she is a legit Boomer. So I think your timeline is off by about 15 years. (Wikipedia says 1946 to 1964.) The war recovery years certainly contributed to the world economy they entered, so I am sure that they are doing better than their parenting generation, but the timescale is still important. And the obvious reason that the Top 20% of wealth holders are disproportionately contributing to the economy is the fact that they hold two thirds of the wealth. I will choose not to go down that rabbit hole.'
on Mark Gurman: Look for Apple-branded smart glasses by Dec. 2027 - 'Bill wrote: “I believe Gurman is predicting launch “at the end of next year,” meaning late 2027.” Right you are! Fixed. Thanks.'
on This week's Apple trading strategies (6/1-6/5/26) - 'BTW, if you want to see a classic saw-tooth week of AAPL trading, check out the weekly AAPL chart!'
on If Apple's AI needs its partners in the cloud, how private is it? - 'I worked at DEC from 1984 (hay days) until 1994 (the beginning of the end) OpenVMS was/is a great OS. Definitely missed the boat on the X86 server/workstation onslaught. At my last client/future employer we even had WNT (VMS +1) running on a Alpha workstation.'
on Mark Gurman: Look for Apple-branded smart glasses by Dec. 2027 - 'When the smart glasses don’t arrive by the end of the year, Eddie’s next story will be that contact lenses are now being delayed too and are several more years behind schedule as a result of the glasses being held back. In fact, just like the Apple Car, these smart contact lenses might never be released and Apple poured bazillions down the drain on a product that not only failed to materialize, but never hit the market. Eddie will then double down by saying that John Ternus, being a hardware guy, is primarily responsible for both of these Apple Boondoggle’s and should have never been named Apple’s next CEO. Tim Cook needs to return immediately just as Bob Iger did at Disney. Then Tim Cook needs to make the Mother of all acquisitions and buy Disney.'
on If Apple's AI needs its partners in the cloud, how private is it? - 'Yes, exactly just as the DEC Vax11/780 is required to run any graphics intensive applications. Those limited power personal computers are sad substitutes for the mighty Digital Equipment Corp Vax. DEC will rule the computer space for the foreseeable future. Or NOT.'
on Mark Gurman: Look for Apple-branded smart glasses by Dec. 2027 - 'IF it can replace regular prescription glasses I’d be in the potential market. What I’ve always wondered is why Apple has never sold branded merchandise. Like t-shirts. Sweatshirts, hats etc. A billion customers at $10+ each item in profit?'
on This week's Apple trading strategies (6/1-6/5/26) - 'And remember, it’s not just the top 20% in USA, but in the world. A huge market for tech.'
on This week's Apple trading strategies (6/1-6/5/26) - 'Greg: Not to dismiss your point about the so-called K-shaped economy and the economic realities of fast-rising costs for consumers which are quite real and painful, but members of the top 0.1%, 1%, 5%, 10% and even the top 20% of the American wealth scale have a lot more to spend. The Boomer generation, by far the wealthiest in US history, has been at the foundation of my investment thesis for the past 25 years. Stock prices are rising not based on aggregate economic numbers but on double-digit growth in earnings and the spending power of the wealthiest Americans, primarily members of the Boomer generation with the youngest members of that cohort only now approaching 65 year in age. Growth in consumer spending is coming disproportionately from the top 20% of the wealth scale. Another factor driving record corporate profits for now is the $1 trillion plus per annum in AI-related capex that’s flowing into corporate coffers. Rising home prices and stock prices are fueling spending due to the “wealth effect.” I’m not saying this is good necessarily. I am saying at least for now the proverbial party can continue on into the night so-to-speak for a while longer. The money flow and its velocity into AI-related development isn’t being understood or appreciated at this time. Its impact on the economy is real while also boosting shares prices of many associated enterprises to record levels. IF Apple delivers to modestly above already high AI-related expectations at WWDC, I expect the share price to move significantly higher over the remainder of the calendar year.'
on Mark Gurman: Look for Apple-branded smart glasses by Dec. 2027 - 'Gurman mades me laugh, with his exaggeration shtick. “even bigger than Apple Watch”. No. Apple Watch does so much more than eyewear, and yet, it doesn’t impose on you. The wrist is beachfront property. Eyewear devices don’t easily step aside, relegating them to a niche of dedicated users who want an ‘in your face’ experience. As for the rumor, the timing, just ignore Gurman.'
on Mark Gurman: Look for Apple-branded smart glasses by Dec. 2027 - 'I believe Gurman is predicting launch “at the end of next year,” meaning late 2027.'
on This week's Apple trading strategies (6/1-6/5/26) - 'Below are the one-year share price performances of the Terrific Ten equities ranked by percentage gains over this time and the percentage gains in the major stock indexes over the same period. Micron Technology – up 903.10% Alphabet (GOOG) – up 117.64% Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM) – up 113.34% Broadcom (AVGO) – up 84.64% Apple (AAPL) up 56.07% NVIDIA (NVDA) – up 51.69% Russell 2000 – up 40.71% NASDAQ Composite – up 40.66% S&P 500 – up 28.21% Tesla (TSLA) – up 21.58% DJIA – up 20.88% Amazon (AMZN) – up 17.25% Microsoft (MSFT) – down (1.84%) Meta Platforms (META) – down (1.94%) The top performer over the most recent one-year period is the newest member of the Terrific Ten, Micron Technology. Apple ranks fifth among the components with a 56.07% gain. The Russell 2000 is the best performing index in the list, narrowly besting the NASDAQ Composite. Meta has dropped to the bottom of the list with a negative share price return and sits just below Microsoft in performance over the period.'
on This week's Apple trading strategies (6/1-6/5/26) - 'Entering this week’s trading, below is the market cap scoreboard of the Terrific Ten. These are the 10 largest enterprises ranked by this metric. This week Micron joins the Terrific Ten for the first time. This fast-rising tech stock has pushed its way past the $1 trillion dollar market cap marker. Can Apple return to the top of the list? WWDC 2026 may be the catalyst. Apple is very close to moving back into the #2 spot and may do so this week. NVIDIA (NVDA) $5.11 trillion Alphabet (GOOG) $4.61 trillion Apple (AAPL) $4.58 trillion Microsoft (MSFT) $3.34 trillion Amazon (AMZN) $2.91 trillion Broadcom (AVGO) $2.12 trillion Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM) $1.94 trillion Tesla (TSLA) $1.64 trillion Meta Platforms (META) $1.61 trillion Micron Technology (MU) $1.10 trillion'
on If Apple's AI needs its partners in the cloud, how private is it? - 'Local models have been making significant improvements in the past 6 months. The open source Google Gemma models targeting smart devices are impressive for their size. I have been building/playing around with app generation and hypothetical design documents with larger local models on my M4 Max, and the results are very good. Not perfect but quite usable.'
on Mark Gurman: Look for Apple-branded smart glasses by Dec. 2027 - 'Thank you David. Saved me the trouble.'


