Recent Comments

  • Greg Lippert on RAMageddon has turned existential for smaller tech - 'That doesn’t mean there will be a someday reckoning'
  • Michael Goldfeder on Apple's contempt in Epic case goes to the Supreme Court - '@Rodney. Guilty as charged.'
  • John Konopka on Premarket: Apple was green, turned red - 'Volume was pretty high, ~50M shares. Looks like $300 is just around the corner.'
  • Joseph Bland on RAMageddon has turned existential for smaller tech - '“Politicians are losing their seats, as in Utah, because of their datacenter support.” I actually think that’s sad, Richard, because it may be their support is firmly grounded in being tech supporters in general. And there’s nothing intrinsically wrong with the concept of data-centers, provided they “play nice”. But, like the gold-miners in the US, much bad can be done in the name of getting rich, or even having the chance of getting rich. And that’s where we are in this laissez faire political environment: Which, ironically, isn’t “fair” at all, since this modern day gold rush for wealth is burying fairness, and the most vulnerable are the ones being injured the most.'
  • Neal Guttenberg on Horace Dediu expects iPhone prices to go up $100 - 'Bart, What may happen is that some people may push their phone purchase forward a quarter in order to have a new phone(albeit an older model) instead of having to pay for the price increases. We will have to see how that all goes. Lots of different pathways for this to go down. Although a new model phone with extra capabilities has always enticed many people to pay for the upgrade. Thinking about it, the companies that may be somewhat bigger losers in this are the carriers if they absorb the cost increases to try to entice people to switch services with a low cost to a new iPhone, especially if they don’t have a way to pass the costs onto their consumers.'
  • Robert Paul Leitao on Premarket: Apple was green, turned red - 'Now in the last hour of trading and Meta is up 9.46% at $616.55 on news the company is building a cloud infrastructure business to see excess AI computing capacity to outside customers. Corning is selling off after a recent fast and strong run-up in the share price. The shares are off 13.53% today at $220.86. Apple is up today $5.19 or 1.79% at $294.55. Apple first traded in today’s range in early May.'
  • Daniel Epstein on Horace Dediu expects iPhone prices to go up $100 - 'One of the issues about how much impact high ram/memory prices for Apple turns into higher prices for the products it sells does depend somewhat on the architecture of the device being talked about. I think the price rises on Mac and Ipad storage and memory may be harder for Apple to maintain margins on due to the expected specifications of the devices involved. For instance the Mac I am typing this on has Ram of 48GB, and an SSD of 2TB. When I bought this in December 2025 I paid around 3300 dollars. Now in July of 2026 with an upgraded processor, an extra 24GB of ram to 48GB and an upgrade of standard 1TB to a 2 TB SSD Apple price ends up at $4099. (Without any sales which many shoppers take advantage of.) As part of the higher price Apple now charges $500 for the upgrade of the SSD from 1 TB to 2 TB. Might be considered a bargain compared to a Ram upgrade. For the Ram Change the price is an extra 600 to go from 24GB to 48GB. 600 more for 24GB in memory does seem high. But for many users it might not be necessary so this might be something users will pass on. I bet economies of scale are involved in these prices and increases. Many people buy too much computer compared to the way the actually use it. Throwing extra Ram into an Apple device is not as needed for most software as people think. But who wants to guess wrong. If I look at my Iphone 17 Pro a search reveals it comes with just 12 GB Ram and a 512GB storage capacity. So a fairly robust Iphone 17 Pro does not use as much Ram/Storage as a high capacity Mac (not the highest) So if the new Iphone comes out with a small increase in Ram as standard like 4 more GB (to 16GB) a smaller price increase would seem to be predicted in the range . Of course if there was no shortage of fabs prices likely wouldn’t be going through the roof as manufacturing changes and efficiencies would allow upgrades to Ram and storage to grow without much extra manufacturing costs. Ipad Pros are somewhat more like iPhones in terns of Ram and Macs in terms of storage. It may be that the storage is driving the increases for iPads not as much the Ram use. So based on the various capacities needed I could easily see 100 to 200 dollar price increases for an Iphone compared to the larger increases we have seen for Macs. And larger storage capacity Ipad’s as well.'
  • Neal Guttenberg on RAMageddon has turned existential for smaller tech - 'Some questions for the thread. What happens to the old chips when a data center becomes obsolete and needs significant upgrades? Do the memory chips need to be replaced in these data centers? If they need replacement, can they be reused? Is it possible that there will be a glut of used chips entering the market as more data centers get upgraded?'
  • Richard Gayle on RAMageddon has turned existential for smaller tech - 'I think a datacenter bust will change Micron’s opinion. And one reason I might support your idea of Apple buying its own memory foundry — use it as as a threat inm negotiations, especially with Micron. It would really put them back into line. Losing 15% of their revenue would hurt. That is business they might never get back. Especially when the memory glut reverses.'
  • Richard Gayle on RAMageddon has turned existential for smaller tech - 'There is no political party to stand up to it. Yet. It is still making too much money for too many people and they fund a lot of Republicans and many Democrats. But ultimate power does reside in the people and many are starting to make their views known. A few smart politicians, in both parties are recognizing this (oh and just to clarify, being a smart politician does not necessarily mean one is smart ;-). Governors as far apart as Abbott in Texas and Sherrill in NJ are pushing back on datacenter buildouts. Politicians are losing their seats, as in Utah, because of their datacenter support. I suspect datacenters will be a campaign issue these midterms especially in rural areas.'
  • Bart Yee on Horace Dediu expects iPhone prices to go up $100 - 'Neil, those would be great numbers but even Apple faces some demand destruction with increased prices. If you assume enough sales to drop the hardware revenue in some combination to say $25B, about 63% (down 37%) of $40B, that’s still $25B in additional hardware revenues over $307B hardware revenues in FY2025, +8% for hardware growth conservatively. That compares favorably with 4% growth Hardware growth in FY2025 YoY. Looking at Q2 results without major visible price hikes, for 1H FY2026, hardware revenue is already running at 16.4% growth YoY, and that was capacity constrained in some respects. But add in the additional services revenues growing at 14-15%/yr and now we’re talking about back to 10% to 15% overall revenue growth.'
  • Joseph Bland on RAMageddon has turned existential for smaller tech - 'And now this from Apple Business News and Barron’s: https://stocks.apple.com/A0ga28RU1Qpe555VjJvKHEg “Micron and Apple Trade Blame as Prices Soar on Laptops, Phones, and More Micron told Barron’s that purchasing decisions made by large customers in 2023 are partly to blame for the current shortage of memory chips. …. In an interview with Barron’s, Micron Chief Business Officer Sumit Sadana said that purchasing decisions made by some large customers in 2023 are partly to blame for today’s constrained supply. He points to the crash in memory prices coming out of the pandemic, as demand for PCs and other electronics fell. …Apple didn’t respond to Barron’s request for comment on Sadana’s statement.”'
  • Rodney Avilla on Apple's contempt in Epic case goes to the Supreme Court - 'I sure hope you are a lawyer, because if you are not, then you missed your calling.'
  • Steven Philips on Premarket: Apple was green, turned red - 'I hope this is the July low that Gregg’s model predicts the increase from.'
  • Daniel Epstein on Premarket: Apple was green, turned red - 'Apple stock is up about 1.8% $5.39 at about 12:41 PM EST. Still rebounding from the overly dramatic fall when they raised prices the other day. Welcome to July! Stay cool in the heat.'
  • Joseph Bland on RAMageddon has turned existential for smaller tech - 'Again, Richard, who is standing up against the drunken spree? Certainly not the Republican leadership, since they control nearly all the levers of power, and want above all to keep it that way. And even if there are still some sane Republicans left, this Administration is doing everything it can to let the drunken spree continue. After all, they can claim the job growth for themselves…. Apple pivoting towards building their own RAM manufacturing base in the US and elsewhere can be seen as a major political card they can play, right now, and look good. And the can certainly afford it.'
  • Richard Gayle on RAMageddon has turned existential for smaller tech - 'IMHO Hyperscalers have a lot of hurdles coming and if they fall, there may be lots of memory available. First, I think Apple on-device AI is going to have a huge impact on the business models of hyperscalers. Fewer tokens generated. Then add in plugins that reduce the number of tokens used for LLM work (ie Claude caveman mode.). Generating the cash flow they need to sustain the business is being disrupted. How long this will take is an open question. We focus on the memory shortages these datacenter buildouts produce but the ‘gold rush’ aspect also hits wrt temporary construction jobs. Just about everyone with the specialized skills needed is already working. The hyperscalers need 500,000 more workers than they now have (which is about 4 million). Meta and others are paying large amounts of money to train more. That takes time. So they may not be able to build out the centers as fast as they need to. Not because they cannot get memory but because there are not enough workers to build the centers. Now add in pushback from localities to prevent these datacenters and there are both internal and external pressures, besides commodity aquisition, that I think may impact the rate these companies can produce their required datacenters. Over and above the impact of on-device AI to their business models. If these pressures burst the AI bubble, all those contracts the memory companies have may not be worth much. Apple would be in a very good position. Of course, it could well lead to a recession with 4 million people out of work and debt loads that provoke a cascading effect. Which scares the crap out of me.'
  • Joseph Bland on RAMageddon has turned existential for smaller tech - 'As much as I want to agree with you, Mordechai, I don’t see any sign of things slowing down anytime soon, since there are “winners” the casino stock market can keep promoting in spite of the unreasonableness of the underlying premise. “There’s gold in them thar hills!” has always been a siren song. And the present Republican leadership very much wants the drunken spree to continue….'
  • Joseph Bland on RAMageddon has turned existential for smaller tech - 'Hi, David, Horace’s argument, as I understand it, against Apple getting into the RAM business is that (1) it takes years to build out the capability and capacity, (2) it’s generally a low margin business, and (3) commodities generally revert back to the low margin mean. My counter-argument is that (1) even the beginning of a move in the direction of Apple RAM independence will give them leverage to keep prices lower, (2) Apple can easily “afford” an “insurance plan” that keeps their products affordable, (3) even Horace admits that world-wide cartels can exist, which is exactly what this is shaping up to be, and (4) Apple cannot afford to be held hostage by a cartel. Also, I’d note the immediate attack on Apple from the left for “raising prices when they’re filthy rich”. Of course it’s not right, since the guilty party isn’t Apple but the AI data center push, but it’s also a fact of political life that politicians purposefully fire up knee-jerk reactions of their constituents, especially in an important election year. Apple appearing to move in the direction of building RAM capacity in the US in order to rein in these price hikes is a smart political move. Apple versus the RAM cartel has a good ring to it .'
  • Mordechai Beizer on RAMageddon has turned existential for smaller tech - 'I’m not convinced that this tremendous rush to build out data centers will end well. Nothing like pouring money into assets that depreciate rapidly combined with business models that all feature hockey-stick growth in revenues. Meanwhile, lots of collateral damage as too much money chases resources with long scale-up times. There’s no market discipline on this build out when capital is so easily raised for the “next big thing”.'
  • Greg Lippert on RAMageddon has turned existential for smaller tech - 'It’s gonna hurt smaller devices, and consumers. Badly. Ouch.'
  • David Emery on RAMageddon has turned existential for smaller tech - 'Gregg, I think Horace laid down a strong argument for Apple to not do that, but to dig deep to establish other suppliers. Do you know of a similar list of US flash memory manufacturers? I’d submit that’s the more critical resource for Apple, since so much of Apple’s chips have integrated memory these days, but ‘persistent storage’ is still a commodity that Apple has to buy on the market.'
  • Gregg Thurman on Premarket: Apple was green, turned red - 'At the Open the Nasdaq dropped as much as ~$459 (~1.8%), while AAPL is printing gains of about $3.xx.'
  • Gregg Thurman on RAMageddon has turned existential for smaller tech - 'Another reason for Apple to design and manufacture its own memory, perhaps even going so far as to buy a lesser known manufacturer and expand their capacity. Here is a list of 30 US DRAM manufacturers: https://us.metoree.com/categories/dram/'
  • Gregg Thurman on Premarket: Apple was green, turned red - 'AAPL Closed yesterday @ $289.30. In this morning’s pre-market AAPL has traded (so far) in a tight range of $288.90 to $289.70 (up/down ~0.10%). AAPL’s RSI has risen to ~47.xx from last week’s ~27.xx. Since Apple’s price increase announcement last week, AAPL’s intraday low has risen from $273.75 to $274.21 to $279.85 to $289.695, and appears poised to rise again today. Meanwhile the Nasdaq is trading down this morning ~$230 (~0.60%).'
  • Greg Lippert on Apple's contempt in Epic case goes to the Supreme Court - 'From day 1, the contempt ruling stunk like rotting fish. Glad to see the Supreme Court take this case. Hopefully they do the right thing. With this political court, that’s always a crapshoot.'
  • Gregg Thurman on Horace Dediu expects iPhone prices to go up $100 - 'Bart, I don’t doubt your list of needs in order to create a memory fab. I’d just like to point out that conquering that list is just a matter of financial resources. The equipment and Human Resources exist. There is no need to reinvent the wheel. Apple could partner with any number of DRAM memory manufacturers (there are lots) to expand their capacities specifically to address Apple’s needs.'
  • Robert Paul Leitao on Premarket: Apple was red, turned green - 'The DJIA closed above 52,000 for the first time on Tuesday. The index is now up 8.85% year-to-date and 18.65% over the past year. Apple ended Tuesday trading up $7.62 or 2.70% at $289.36. The current all-time high for the shares of $317.40 was set on June 8th. Apple is now up 6.44% year-to-date and 41.03% over the past year.'
  • Fred Stein on Apple's contempt in Epic case goes to the Supreme Court - 'Agree. The judge set herself up to be the regulator of one vendor’s digital marketplace fees. But that is not the role of judges, IMO. It’s a huge slippery slope. As we transact digitally more and more, digital marketplace fees grow larger everyday.'
  • Neal Guttenberg on Horace Dediu expects iPhone prices to go up $100 - 'Just some rough calculations here. These numbers are predicated on Apple selling around 250 million iPhones, 25 million Macs and 60 million iPads for the year. If Apple increases iPhone prices by $100 and still sells around 250 million iPhones, that is an increase in revenue for the year of $25 billion. If Apple increases the Mac price by an average of $200 and sells 25 million Macs, that is an increase in revenue for the year of $5 billion. If Apple increases iPad prices by an average of $150 and sells 60 million iPads, that is an increase in revenue for the year of $9 billion. All told, the rough calculation shows an increase in revenue of close to 40 billion dollars for the year, or about a 10% increase in revenues for the year. All this is assuming that the price increases don’t affect/delay/cancel some sales in the next year. It will be interesting to how the price increases actually affect revenues and margins/profitability.'