Recent Comments

  • Bart Yee on Apple's solid Q4 2026: What the talking heads are saying - 'As for some of the China sales comments: “Apple’s Greater China sales expectations and actual Q4 FY2026 results: • Expectations: Wall Street consensus estimates expected Greater China revenue to come in around $18.55 billion to $18.75 billion. ((~28.7% growth and I’m not sure why the Street estimated quite that high?)) • Actual Results: Greater China revenue reached $17.54 billion (up about 21% year-over-year). • Did they come in lighter than expected? Yes. The results missed Wall Street projections by roughly $1 billion to $1.21 billion, with management citing supply constraints that limited their ability to meet local product demand.” So yes, “only” 21% instead of Q3’s 22.4% and FY2026’s overall 28% growth in China revenues compared YoY. Why could that be? The three biggest issues is delayed upgrades due to price hikes, as mentioned supply constraints on current iPhone 17 models (running out of popular Pro models), OR waiting for not only the iPhone 18, and/or the iPhone Duo and deciding between the iPhone Duo and 18 Pro/Pro Max or standing pat till the 20th anniversary model appears. A fourth issue is the across the range $100 price increase which could reduce demand, at least in the last 3 weeks of sales. Certainly there will be interest in other Domestically produced Foldables vs the Duo for those who can afford them, but I’m confident iPhone Duo will take some of those sales away, assuming supply is adequate. I believe Apple China sales for Q1 against tough robust Q1 compares should still be good, in the 21+ range if not higher, but overall sales volume may be lower due to price hikes and lack of iPhone 18 base models. Since there were no discounted models to get deals on, that probably plays a role in slightly decreased sales.'
  • Gregg Thurman on Premarket: Apple is red - 'Couldn’t find a better place to post this Election results are in. As an investor one of the most interesting things to note, is the leadership changes at the Governor level. A few Governors that embraced Data Centers lost their jobs. Their replacements campaigned against them. This puts a lot of proposed data centers at risk of being canceled. If they are, how is this going to impact the AI stocks (including Nvidia). If they drop even further will they take Apple down with them?'
  • Bart Yee on Apple's solid Q4 2026: What the talking heads are saying - 'I’m actually happy that Gurman was able to purchase one on his own, probably a local store pickup, and that’s he’s enjoying it. If Gurman, the finicky tech obsessed guy that he seems to be, can find and get comfortable with using a Duo in productive workflows, then plenty of other uses can do that too. Remember, Gurman wasn’t given a demo unit to “review” since Apple considers him a leak source and not an “influencer”, and Bloomberg officially says he’s not a reviewer either but an investigative, breaking Tech reporter / analyst. The fact that Gurman admonishes other to give the Duo a one to two week try, and give it a chance to grow on one’s self is important because the Duo and Foldables is a very different user experience compared to a regular iPhone and iPad combo. As much as so many Apple users wanted something new, different, an challenging, I find it ironic that many found they didn’t like the Duo experience because it IS different, optimized for the format, instead of being a strict adaptation of an iPhone or iPad to a foldable, something that Android already tries to do with predictably just ok results. If Apple Duo developers succeed in optimizing Apps for the Duo format, that will become a true differentiator. Aside from that, Gurman was, IMO, pretty fair in assessing Apple’s reported numbers for what they are. Neither of his co-hosts nor many of the other talking heads mentioned the heavy foreign exchange hits that Apple has to deal with (4% last quarter and upcoming Q1) in weighing heavily on revenue results from China and other international regions. Recall in Q4, 57.5% of revenue is from international sales, and for Fiscal 2026, its 58.6%. So Fx is a big issue for Apple and a specific reason for pricing and margin pressures, as well as memory costs continuing to be a problem. Somehow everyone else is facing the same issue, including Hyperscalers, yet Apple gets flak for having to deal with it too, weird.'
  • David Drinkwater on Bloomberg calls Apple's Ternus 'timid' and 'scripted' - 'Hey, man, he sold really well in LA. Just saying.'
  • Ron Fredrick on Bloomberg calls Apple's Ternus 'timid' and 'scripted' - 'With regard to the AAPL share price dropping considerably yesterday and today, I think it’s important for long-term investors to remind themselves that they’re not investing for a day, week or month. They’re investing for the long term. And for the long term, certainly for 2026, AAPL is doing very well. Stock Today YTD =================== AAPL -1.9% +22.08% NVDA +2.29% +10.83% AMZN +2.06% +8.61% MSFT +2.74% +7.73% META +2.63% -5.72% GOOG +0.08% -11.32% TSLA -1.32% -11.39%'
  • Rick Povich on Apple's solid Q4 2026: What the analysts are saying - 'Congress sets the tax rates and if a self-acknowledged under-taxed (law-abiding) billionaire wishes to do so, they can write a generous check to the Treasury. I don’t recall hearing anything like this happening'
  • Robert Stack on Apple's solid Q4 2026: What the analysts are saying - 'Hi David – yes. And I used your favorite term, ANALyst, to throw a pie back at them. 🙂'
  • Michael Goldfeder on Apple's solid Q4 2026: What the talking heads are saying - 'Eddie just said he loves the Duo. Hell has officially frozen over.'
  • Michael Goldfeder on Bloomberg calls Apple's Ternus 'timid' and 'scripted' - 'So is my understanding that Bloomberg’s Dave Lee is a journalism savant? One of a kind since he was an instant success at birth also known as: “Full Bloom from the Womb? Easy to write drivel from the cheap seats. But that’s what most of the critics from Bloomberg are known for since they never had anything positive to say or write about Apple since I’ve been an investor.'
  • Joseph Bland on Premarket: Apple is red - 'AAPL closed down 1.9% for the day and down 4.1% for the week. It’s also down 0.5% for the month. But it’s also up 7.3% for the quarter, 19.9% for the half-year, and just gets greener the more back in time I go. I fully expect that, barring any black swans, we’ll see a return to a 40 valuation and (8.98×40=) $359.20/share sometime before the next Apple earnings call. And $400/share sometime next year wouldn’t surprise me,'
  • Gregg Thurman on Bloomberg calls Apple's Ternus 'timid' and 'scripted' - '”Of course some people are better at impromptu answers, some are not.” I remember Jobs would pause a fairly long time before answering what could have been a difficult question. During those times he would “script” his response, practice it in his head, then he would answer the question, all within 15-20 seconds. Not many have the ability to do that. For those that do, even they benefitted by being on the job a bit more than a month.'
  • Bill Donahue on Bloomberg calls Apple's Ternus 'timid' and 'scripted' - 'I don’t care who you are, most likely anyone who is promoted to CEO of Apple is going to feel some significant nervousness in their first earnings call, given that person’s awareness of the history and standards of the position, and the importance of the company not only to him/herself but to the entire world. And anyone who wouldn’t be nervous is not the right person for the job, because false or overwhelming self-confidence is antithetical to what’s needed. I want someone running Apple who’s super-smart, capable, cautious, passionate, collaborative, and decisive, and a product of the “Apple school” that Steve Jobs built. And by all accounts John Ternus is all of those.'
  • Bill Donahue on Premarket: Apple is red - 'I sold a bunch of AAPL on Friday, and bought back today. Unfortunately, I missed the early lows of the day. But I still saved ~$15/share from sell to buy, which is a nice bonus on top of the excellent results reported yesterday. Now to see what the midterms result in, for tomorrow’s decisions… We are definitely living in the “interesting times” of the apocryphal curse.'
  • Joseph Bland on Premarket: Apple is red - 'It’s now almost 13:30, Raj, and volume is over 43 M shares (and remember, there’s about a 15 minute time-lag between the act and the actual number being reported). And we’re still down over 4%. So no, the knife is still falling.'
  • John Konopka on Bloomberg calls Apple's Ternus 'timid' and 'scripted' - 'Color me shocked. A guy with an engineering degree and a life-long career in engineering fails to come across as a sparkling Hollywood personality.'
  • Joseph Bland on Premarket: Apple is red - 'That equals $251.44$/9,285.92=0.0271 or about 2.7% What is the percentage of EPS to stick cost today? Presently, AAPL is about $331/share, so: (8.98/331=0.0271) Of course. A ratio is a ratio, no matter the relative numerator and denominator. So an average EPS gain of 2.7% over the last 13 years increased a stock from about $56/share to 9,285.92/share. I find that to be pretty impressive….'
  • Joseph Bland on Premarket: Apple is red - 'I take it back. The 37 valuation is including the new EPS of $8.98. BTW, has anyone ever calculated EPS adjusted for stock splits since buybacks started 13 years ago? (7×4=28 and 28×8.98=) $251.44/share. Interesting….'
  • Ron Fredrick on Bloomberg calls Apple's Ternus 'timid' and 'scripted' - 'Richard Gayle said: “Considering how skittish the market is today, I think any good CEO would be scripted and very, very careful. A single wrong word could tank the stock.” **Richard, I mentioned in a reply to one of your recent comments, that our 100% AAPL portfolio was worth 56.2 times the worth it had when I retired in 2008. And, even if the “skittish market” caused our AAPL portfolio to eventually reduce its worth by half, we’ll still be doing much better financially than we ever expected to do thanks to AAPL/Apple! At the current AAPL share price, prior to market close today, our portfolio is now down to 54 times the worth it had when I retired. And the reason, IMO, is the “skittish market”…not Apple’s performance. I’m confident that the only result of this reduction in share price will be that our November, auto-reinvested AAPL dividends may buy an extra AAPL share. 🙂'
  • Joseph Bland on Premarket: Apple is red - 'Hi, Rodney. Upvoted. “It just takes the thinkers a few more days to, well, think.” Hopefully sooner than that. Once the knife has clearly stopped falling, this is a golden opportunity to salt away some more undervalued AAPL. IMO.'
  • Robert Paul Leitao on Apple's solid Q4 2026: What the talking heads are saying - '@PED: Thank you for all of these clips! Your posts today are a wonderful resource for a researcher like me! Personally, I’m not concerned about yesterday’s and today’s price action in Apple. In my view, the shares were, as the saying goes, “priced to perfection” going into the print. In general, multiples are contracting market wide even on strong results like Apple delivered yesterday. There’s obviously concern about GM pressure this quarter and throughout the new fiscal year. As a long-term investor I believe the growth story remains intact and Apple will be gaining market share in its primary product markets over the next 12 months. The share price will eventually return to its recent all-time highs.'
  • Joseph Bland on Premarket: Apple is red - 'Nothing to get excited about. The new P/E ratio hasn’t even dropped yet (it’s still 37 on Apple Finance). And when it does, will that drive the stock even lower? It means nothing, except as an opportunity for the smart money to pick up severely undervalued AAPL. Which some will – and then some of them will promptly sell it when Apple ascends back to a fair valuation, rinse, and repeat, ad infinitum. Meanwhile, Apple’s float shrinks even more, and its EPS and net income grow even bigger.'
  • David Emery on Apple's solid Q4 2026: What the analysts are saying - 'The clown car has pulled up and the clowns are piling out to throw pies at Apple…'
  • Joseph Bland on Apple's solid Q4 2026: What the analysts are saying - 'Morning, Robert. “The biggest risk to AAPL remains geopolitical – not just China, but Trump too.” Thumbs up. And if the American public has finally gotten its collective head out of its collective ass, then today this President and his enablers are about to have their strings cut, to eventually be removed from a massive excess of power they should never, ever have been given access to in the first place. And that includes a lot of under-taxed billionaires. And the cancer cannot be too quickly removed'
  • Rodney Avilla on Bloomberg calls Apple's Ternus 'timid' and 'scripted' - '2 thoughts come to mind. I don’t mind scripted. I WANT a well thought out answer. Off the cuff responses tend to be more subjective and prone to errors or comments that need further explanation. Of course some people are better at impromptu answers, some are not. I want the most correct answers. 2nd, I never understood why someone would ask a question they know cannot or will not be answered, and then whine when it’s not answered. Bottom line, I watch the quarterly reports to gain info. If you’re looking for entertainment, watch a movie.'
  • Joseph Bland on Apple's solid Q4 2026: What the analysts are saying - 'Bottom line: Apple literally has a burgeoning supply of cash that it has to shovel somewhere because it literally can’t spend it fast enough, so it came up with the genius move 13 years ago of buying back its own shares with it and rewarding its long term investors at the same time. Yes, I suppose Apple could have gone the direction of torching it on AI, but instead it just made its shares more valuable with cash that was given ZERO value by Mr. Market. In the meantime, it was meticulous in its focus on benefitting its users, giving them the best of the best on every front. How DARE you criticize the way Apple has chosen to invest its profit, Ms Martin! You who have contributed nothing to the common weal but carping and sniping a vast enterprise that is literally responsible for lifting the quality of life itself for countless individuals over the course of its existence! What a contemptible troll! (Sorry, folks, but that just pissed me off.)'
  • Robert Stack on Apple's solid Q4 2026: What the analysts are saying - 'IANAA (I am not an ANALyst): For me it’s pretty simple. Apple is basically selling everything it can make. Market share and user base continue to grow globally for both Mac and iPhone. If the company takes a slight margin hit this quarter or next because of high memory costs, I accept this as a consequence of a wise decision to not increase the cost of the Neo. The biggest risk to AAPL remains geopolitical – not just China, but Trump too.'
  • Joseph Bland on Apple's solid Q4 2026: What the analysts are saying - 'Morning, Bill, Another lulu from Laura Martin: “…slowing its installed base growth by not using FCF to aid device sales are risky decisions…” Wow. Just – wow. “Come on, Apple! Quit throwing money away! Snap your fingers and get that production up!” It’s nothing short of an accusation that Apple is purposefully holding back production capacity in order to – what? Enrich its long term stockholders with buybacks? Do you really think Apple isn’t burning the midnight oil trying to increase production of hugely complex, highest quality products for short term appeasement of long term investors? You must think we’re awfully dumb. But guess what? We think YOU are the dumb bunny!! The Master of Supply Chain, Tim Cook, may not be CEO any more, but he presides over its Board. Time to wake up from your fever dream and get yourself an extra-strong cup of Java.'
  • Robert Stack on Bloomberg calls Apple's Ternus 'timid' and 'scripted' - 'David Lee: “In front of Ternus on Monday night was a chance to counteract the gloom and doom by instilling in Wall Street the fundamentals of the Ternus Doctrine…” There it is – sigh. Apple is still doomed. Add one more clueless critic to the tally…'
  • Gregg Thurman on Bloomberg calls Apple's Ternus 'timid' and 'scripted' - '”As time progresses, we’ll hear more of the unscripted Ternus.” Unscripted? No. More natural/relaxed? Yes.'
  • Bill Donahue on Apple's solid Q4 2026: What the analysts are saying - 'A couple of questions: First, what the heck is Laura Martin referring to when she writes “META, OpenAI and others want to take AAPL’s 15%-30% rev share via glasses, and/or other new form factors”? Revenue share of what? And by what “new” but unidentified form factors, and how? This is an analysis?? Second, does anyone have any idea what Richard Windsor is referring to with “I suspect that Apple is buying compute capacity in the spot market given how uncertain it is about how much compute it is going to need. This means that initially, Apple is probably paying around 2x the price that it would be paying if it signed a long-term agreement with one of the usual cloud providers”? I find that a confounding comment, given that everyone is selling AI compute power/capacity at below cost, and the price of tokens has been plummeting over the last year. Or at least that’s what the financial reporting of GOOG, META, MSFT, Anthropic, OpenAI and others is telling us. Does anyone have any insight into AI compute spot market prices?'