Ron Fredrick on Bloomberg calls Apple's Ternus 'timid' and 'scripted' - 'With regard to the AAPL share price dropping considerably yesterday and today, I think it’s important for long-term investors to remind themselves that they’re not investing for a day, week or month. They’re investing for the long term. And for the long term, certainly for 2026, AAPL is doing very well. Stock Today YTD =================== AAPL -1.9% +22.08% NVDA +2.29% +10.83% AMZN +2.06% +8.61% MSFT +2.74% +7.73% META +2.63% -5.72% GOOG +0.08% -11.32% TSLA -1.32% -11.39%'
on Apple's solid Q4 2026: What the analysts are saying - 'Congress sets the tax rates and if a self-acknowledged under-taxed (law-abiding) billionaire wishes to do so, they can write a generous check to the Treasury. I don’t recall hearing anything like this happening'
on Apple's solid Q4 2026: What the analysts are saying - 'Hi David – yes. And I used your favorite term, ANALyst, to throw a pie back at them. 🙂'
on Apple's solid Q4 2026: What the talking heads are saying - 'Eddie just said he loves the Duo. Hell has officially frozen over.'
on Bloomberg calls Apple's Ternus 'timid' and 'scripted' - 'So is my understanding that Bloomberg’s Dave Lee is a journalism savant? One of a kind since he was an instant success at birth also known as: “Full Bloom from the Womb? Easy to write drivel from the cheap seats. But that’s what most of the critics from Bloomberg are known for since they never had anything positive to say or write about Apple since I’ve been an investor.'
on Premarket: Apple is red - 'AAPL closed down 1.9% for the day and down 4.1% for the week. It’s also down 0.5% for the month. But it’s also up 7.3% for the quarter, 19.9% for the half-year, and just gets greener the more back in time I go. I fully expect that, barring any black swans, we’ll see a return to a 40 valuation and (8.98×40=) $359.20/share sometime before the next Apple earnings call. And $400/share sometime next year wouldn’t surprise me,'
on Bloomberg calls Apple's Ternus 'timid' and 'scripted' - '”Of course some people are better at impromptu answers, some are not.” I remember Jobs would pause a fairly long time before answering what could have been a difficult question. During those times he would “script” his response, practice it in his head, then he would answer the question, all within 15-20 seconds. Not many have the ability to do that. For those that do, even they benefitted by being on the job a bit more than a month.'
on Bloomberg calls Apple's Ternus 'timid' and 'scripted' - 'I don’t care who you are, most likely anyone who is promoted to CEO of Apple is going to feel some significant nervousness in their first earnings call, given that person’s awareness of the history and standards of the position, and the importance of the company not only to him/herself but to the entire world. And anyone who wouldn’t be nervous is not the right person for the job, because false or overwhelming self-confidence is antithetical to what’s needed. I want someone running Apple who’s super-smart, capable, cautious, passionate, collaborative, and decisive, and a product of the “Apple school” that Steve Jobs built. And by all accounts John Ternus is all of those.'
on Premarket: Apple is red - 'I sold a bunch of AAPL on Friday, and bought back today. Unfortunately, I missed the early lows of the day. But I still saved ~$15/share from sell to buy, which is a nice bonus on top of the excellent results reported yesterday. Now to see what the midterms result in, for tomorrow’s decisions… We are definitely living in the “interesting times” of the apocryphal curse.'
on Premarket: Apple is red - 'It’s now almost 13:30, Raj, and volume is over 43 M shares (and remember, there’s about a 15 minute time-lag between the act and the actual number being reported). And we’re still down over 4%. So no, the knife is still falling.'
on Bloomberg calls Apple's Ternus 'timid' and 'scripted' - 'Color me shocked. A guy with an engineering degree and a life-long career in engineering fails to come across as a sparkling Hollywood personality.'
on Premarket: Apple is red - 'That equals $251.44$/9,285.92=0.0271 or about 2.7% What is the percentage of EPS to stick cost today? Presently, AAPL is about $331/share, so: (8.98/331=0.0271) Of course. A ratio is a ratio, no matter the relative numerator and denominator. So an average EPS gain of 2.7% over the last 13 years increased a stock from about $56/share to 9,285.92/share. I find that to be pretty impressive….'
on Premarket: Apple is red - 'I take it back. The 37 valuation is including the new EPS of $8.98. BTW, has anyone ever calculated EPS adjusted for stock splits since buybacks started 13 years ago? (7×4=28 and 28×8.98=) $251.44/share. Interesting….'
on Bloomberg calls Apple's Ternus 'timid' and 'scripted' - 'Richard Gayle said: “Considering how skittish the market is today, I think any good CEO would be scripted and very, very careful. A single wrong word could tank the stock.” **Richard, I mentioned in a reply to one of your recent comments, that our 100% AAPL portfolio was worth 56.2 times the worth it had when I retired in 2008. And, even if the “skittish market” caused our AAPL portfolio to eventually reduce its worth by half, we’ll still be doing much better financially than we ever expected to do thanks to AAPL/Apple! At the current AAPL share price, prior to market close today, our portfolio is now down to 54 times the worth it had when I retired. And the reason, IMO, is the “skittish market”…not Apple’s performance. I’m confident that the only result of this reduction in share price will be that our November, auto-reinvested AAPL dividends may buy an extra AAPL share. 🙂'
on Premarket: Apple is red - 'Hi, Rodney. Upvoted. “It just takes the thinkers a few more days to, well, think.” Hopefully sooner than that. Once the knife has clearly stopped falling, this is a golden opportunity to salt away some more undervalued AAPL. IMO.'
on Apple's solid Q4 2026: What the talking heads are saying - '@PED: Thank you for all of these clips! Your posts today are a wonderful resource for a researcher like me! Personally, I’m not concerned about yesterday’s and today’s price action in Apple. In my view, the shares were, as the saying goes, “priced to perfection” going into the print. In general, multiples are contracting market wide even on strong results like Apple delivered yesterday. There’s obviously concern about GM pressure this quarter and throughout the new fiscal year. As a long-term investor I believe the growth story remains intact and Apple will be gaining market share in its primary product markets over the next 12 months. The share price will eventually return to its recent all-time highs.'
on Premarket: Apple is red - 'Nothing to get excited about. The new P/E ratio hasn’t even dropped yet (it’s still 37 on Apple Finance). And when it does, will that drive the stock even lower? It means nothing, except as an opportunity for the smart money to pick up severely undervalued AAPL. Which some will – and then some of them will promptly sell it when Apple ascends back to a fair valuation, rinse, and repeat, ad infinitum. Meanwhile, Apple’s float shrinks even more, and its EPS and net income grow even bigger.'
on Apple's solid Q4 2026: What the analysts are saying - 'The clown car has pulled up and the clowns are piling out to throw pies at Apple…'
on Apple's solid Q4 2026: What the analysts are saying - 'Morning, Robert. “The biggest risk to AAPL remains geopolitical – not just China, but Trump too.” Thumbs up. And if the American public has finally gotten its collective head out of its collective ass, then today this President and his enablers are about to have their strings cut, to eventually be removed from a massive excess of power they should never, ever have been given access to in the first place. And that includes a lot of under-taxed billionaires. And the cancer cannot be too quickly removed'
on Bloomberg calls Apple's Ternus 'timid' and 'scripted' - '2 thoughts come to mind. I don’t mind scripted. I WANT a well thought out answer. Off the cuff responses tend to be more subjective and prone to errors or comments that need further explanation. Of course some people are better at impromptu answers, some are not. I want the most correct answers. 2nd, I never understood why someone would ask a question they know cannot or will not be answered, and then whine when it’s not answered. Bottom line, I watch the quarterly reports to gain info. If you’re looking for entertainment, watch a movie.'
on Apple's solid Q4 2026: What the analysts are saying - 'Bottom line: Apple literally has a burgeoning supply of cash that it has to shovel somewhere because it literally can’t spend it fast enough, so it came up with the genius move 13 years ago of buying back its own shares with it and rewarding its long term investors at the same time. Yes, I suppose Apple could have gone the direction of torching it on AI, but instead it just made its shares more valuable with cash that was given ZERO value by Mr. Market. In the meantime, it was meticulous in its focus on benefitting its users, giving them the best of the best on every front. How DARE you criticize the way Apple has chosen to invest its profit, Ms Martin! You who have contributed nothing to the common weal but carping and sniping a vast enterprise that is literally responsible for lifting the quality of life itself for countless individuals over the course of its existence! What a contemptible troll! (Sorry, folks, but that just pissed me off.)'
on Apple's solid Q4 2026: What the analysts are saying - 'IANAA (I am not an ANALyst): For me it’s pretty simple. Apple is basically selling everything it can make. Market share and user base continue to grow globally for both Mac and iPhone. If the company takes a slight margin hit this quarter or next because of high memory costs, I accept this as a consequence of a wise decision to not increase the cost of the Neo. The biggest risk to AAPL remains geopolitical – not just China, but Trump too.'
on Apple's solid Q4 2026: What the analysts are saying - 'Morning, Bill, Another lulu from Laura Martin: “…slowing its installed base growth by not using FCF to aid device sales are risky decisions…” Wow. Just – wow. “Come on, Apple! Quit throwing money away! Snap your fingers and get that production up!” It’s nothing short of an accusation that Apple is purposefully holding back production capacity in order to – what? Enrich its long term stockholders with buybacks? Do you really think Apple isn’t burning the midnight oil trying to increase production of hugely complex, highest quality products for short term appeasement of long term investors? You must think we’re awfully dumb. But guess what? We think YOU are the dumb bunny!! The Master of Supply Chain, Tim Cook, may not be CEO any more, but he presides over its Board. Time to wake up from your fever dream and get yourself an extra-strong cup of Java.'
on Bloomberg calls Apple's Ternus 'timid' and 'scripted' - 'David Lee: “In front of Ternus on Monday night was a chance to counteract the gloom and doom by instilling in Wall Street the fundamentals of the Ternus Doctrine…” There it is – sigh. Apple is still doomed. Add one more clueless critic to the tally…'
on Bloomberg calls Apple's Ternus 'timid' and 'scripted' - '”As time progresses, we’ll hear more of the unscripted Ternus.” Unscripted? No. More natural/relaxed? Yes.'
on Apple's solid Q4 2026: What the analysts are saying - 'A couple of questions: First, what the heck is Laura Martin referring to when she writes “META, OpenAI and others want to take AAPL’s 15%-30% rev share via glasses, and/or other new form factors”? Revenue share of what? And by what “new” but unidentified form factors, and how? This is an analysis?? Second, does anyone have any idea what Richard Windsor is referring to with “I suspect that Apple is buying compute capacity in the spot market given how uncertain it is about how much compute it is going to need. This means that initially, Apple is probably paying around 2x the price that it would be paying if it signed a long-term agreement with one of the usual cloud providers”? I find that a confounding comment, given that everyone is selling AI compute power/capacity at below cost, and the price of tokens has been plummeting over the last year. Or at least that’s what the financial reporting of GOOG, META, MSFT, Anthropic, OpenAI and others is telling us. Does anyone have any insight into AI compute spot market prices?'
on Bloomberg calls Apple's Ternus 'timid' and 'scripted' - 'Considering how skittish the market is today, I think any good CEO would be scripted and very,very careful. A single wrong word could tank the stock. I mean, even with all the good news, the stock is down a fair amount. Tough time for his first call. I also suspect that this quarter could also have all sorts of unknowns. They have introduced a ton of new products with no real track record for how well they will do and how much they might add to the bottom line. Or not. The ramp up of the Duo may also be causing uncertainty. With so many things in the air, don”t criticize the juggler for being careful.'
on Bloomberg calls Apple's Ternus 'timid' and 'scripted' - 'Surprise! Timid Tim picked Timid John. But Tim Cook was no showman, and it didn’t matter; Mr. Cook did a heck of a great job steering the ship. Bottom line: It’ll only matter if it impacts his job. For me, one thing Cook did that was really important was talk slowly and clearly. All those young people jabbering away last night talked WAY too fast! It’s typical of the young of late – it’s almost as if they think talking fast proves they’re intelligent. Hint to the young: It doesn’t. Also, if you’re truly smart, why do you have to prove it? If I wanted stream-of-consciousness I’d read James Joyce – who, so I’ve heard,, took his time writing…'
on Bloomberg calls Apple's Ternus 'timid' and 'scripted' - '”he was somewhat tentative. So what?” So what indeed. How did you do on your first kiss? If ever there was a wooden presenter it was Cook’s first year.'


