Michael Goldfeder on Bernstein hikes its Apple price target $15 to $340 - 'Does this mean that Rod Hall will be returning too?'
on He was about to return his Apple Vision Pro, then... - '”I am sooooo looking forward to using mine to watch Real Madrid Real Madrid is just completing a multi-million dollar renovation of its stadium. The owner has test drove the Vision Pro and stated he’d like to see it installed there. Says he (paraphrasing), “there are millions of Real Madrid fans that would like to see a game live, but can’t. The Vision Pro could be the next best thing to live.” https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6821120/2025/11/19/real-madrid-apple-news-sponsorship-documentary-perez/'
on Apple tops the active installed base charts - 'A little chart reading and interpolating: If Motorola is approaching 200M and Honor is already over 200M IB, the charts roughly says that’s about 3.3% of the total. Apple appears to have 24.6% while Samsung has 19.4%, together ~44%. If 200M is 3.3%, then Apple’s 24.6% is 7.45X larger, so that’s 1.491 billion install base, pretty close to the 1.5B most people are showing for Apple’s install base as of 2025, and as mentioned above, that’s just iPhones. Samsung would have roughly 19.4/3.3 = 5.88 x 200M = 1.176B, in line with Counterpoint’s estimate. Xiaomi comes in at 12% or 727M, Oppo 8% or 485M, Vivo with 7.4% or 449M, Transsion with 4.6% or 279M, Huawei with ~4.1% or 249M, and Honor with 3.6% or 218M. Poor little Google seems to have less than 1%, about 0.8% or ~50M And remember, not all active devices are equal. Given that 4 of every 5 Samsung devices are A series mid and low priced tiers, better than 80% of Samsung’s install base are these cheaper smartphones getting replaced every 2-3 years, especially because their OS and security support is limited to less than 3 years. Even among the Galaxy S models, the S21 (released in 2021, so 5 years total) just was removed from OS and security support, even though most users feel the phone could run newer OS’es. This is why Samsung has little ecosystem revenue and keeps pushing for some kind of recurring revenues besides hardware sales. ALL of the other Chinese OEM’s have ASP’s below $270, as far down $150 for Xiaomi and $100 for Transsion, so the vast majority of Chinese OEM install base are also mid to low priced budget smartphones, barely conducive to long term ecosystem or recurrent revenues, again pretty much dependent on hardware sales. Meanwhile, Apple told everyone to watch their Services revenues double by end 2020 ($14.5B) and now double again by end 2025 ($30B), now pushing $110B for CY2025, all because having an integrated ecosystem, App Store, large install base, tremendous breadth of services, and economically advantaged user demographic is something Apple planned for, executed for, and keeps happy with value for the money they spend. Apple’s install base is a very productive install base, Android’s is, well, a lot of hardware, a lot ending up as e-waste, and not terribly productive for their makers. ya, doomed I tell ya….'
on The New York Post accuses Apple News of left-leaning bias - 'I was referring more to a balance of sources (right vs left), and not to the content of those sources. I can understand why you would approve of the content of Apple news. My question would be, would it be acceptable to you if Apple was more balanced in regards to the sources of news, again not looking at the content?'
on Apple tops the active installed base charts - 'Upvoted. Yes your number are in line, closer to 33% per checks with AI. That’s why I’m a nut case about IB and “new to”, especially when analysts freak out about temporary lulls in unit sales.'
on He was about to return his Apple Vision Pro, then... - 'Before buying, I am waiting to see if Apple / F1 actually announce something in terms of dedicated content dedicated for the Vision Pro. The 2026 cars now have three camera bumps on top instead of the previous two, perhaps for better 3D capture. All speculation till the first race weekend, which is about three weeks away.'
on Apple tops the active installed base charts - 'I was looking up some other numbers. According to a website called backlinko in an article from January of this year, Apple has over 1.5 billion active users of the iPhone. Other sites say that Apple has sold a total of 3 billion iPhones over the years, as of last year. With active users of 1 to 1.5 billion, that would mean that 33-50% of all iPhones sold are still in use. If my math and numbers are correct. Those are decent numbers'
on Apple tops the active installed base charts - 'Just doing a quick calculation, if both Samsung and Apple each have a billion of the installed base and that equals 44% of the installed base, that puts the installed base at around at least 4.5 billion. How much over the 4.5 billion depends on how much over a billion is in the installed base for Apple and Samsung. It is probably higher since using this 1 in 4 number on 4.5 billion would put Apple’s installed base at at least 1.1 billion users.'
on In the 'navigation wars,' Apple Maps gains ground on Google - 'Khan’s work is always good – unbiased. I’ve never been comfortable with Google Maps it just never felt intuitive. (Not that Apple’s is perfect.) Glad they’re making headway. Do non-Apple people actually use Apple Maps?'
on In the 'navigation wars,' Apple Maps gains ground on Google - 'Exactly Gregg. What most people don’t get, is the value of Apple’s remarkable, sustained leadership and CULTURE (something some folks here now and in the past seemed to miss). The most basic example: Apple must be the only company left on Earth where I still consistently enjoy my customer service experience. Staying the course on Maps another great example. Let’s hope Siri and Vision Pro the next.'
on Apple tops the active installed base charts - 'Thrilled to see data confirming what many of us been saying for many years. Love this one stat; “one in four active… being an iPhone”. We can infer: 1) There’s a lot of ‘new to iPhone’, buried in hard to measure, hand-me-down category. 2) iPhone’s share among people with disposable income is well over 50%.'
on Apple tops the active installed base charts - 'And this is just Smartphones, imagine if they included tablets….'
on In the 'navigation wars,' Apple Maps gains ground on Google - 'Apple Maps was far more disastrous than SIRI. It even cost a senior Apple exec his job. Now if Apple can fix Maps, who says it can’t fix SIRI?'
on The New York Post accuses Apple News of left-leaning bias - '“The Media Research Center, a conservative watchdog group focused on tracking media bias, analyzed a total of 620 stories that were featured by Apple News in high-traffic morning time slots between Jan. 1 and Jan. 31.” **I’m absolutely shocked, shocked, I tell you…that a *conservative* watchdog group found that Apple’s news app has been promoting articles from *left-leaning* news outlets. 🙂 It’s such a shame that Apple News isn’t fair-and-balanced like the New York Post. /s'
on He was about to return his Apple Vision Pro, then... - 'I am sooooo looking forward to using mine to watch Real Madrid, Premier League, Champions League, and even sports that don’t yet interest me. That is not even considering concerts (which I am too old to go to, but love).'
on Bernstein hikes its Apple price target $15 to $340 - 'welcome, Toni … all is forgotten, but you are never forgiven'
on Bernstein hikes its Apple price target $15 to $340 - 'I always thought his previous underwater price targets were ‘buy-in’ points rather than 1-year targets.'
on Bernstein hikes its Apple price target $15 to $340 - 'I thought so too. He was always wrong Toni. Now that he is an Apple bull (finally) should we be afraid?'
on The New York Post accuses Apple News of left-leaning bias - 'Yes. But I only read it for the Sports as a long-suffering Mets & Jets fan – although it does try to lure me in with Enquirer type stories. Oh and it very MAGA biased. In other words, they are a bunch of lying liars who lie.'
on Bernstein hikes its Apple price target $15 to $340 - 'Am I wrong in believing that Sacconaghi had retired?'
on Bernstein hikes its Apple price target $15 to $340 - 'This is exactly what the majority of us have been saying for many, many years. (Only took the professional analyst 8 years to come to the same conclusion).'
on He was about to return his Apple Vision Pro, then... - 'It is going to change the way we think about events, like the ipod changed music. Just like Stereo changed HiFi audio recording, and color changed TV only Apple owns over 5,000 patents (and growing) on the technology and is the only producer of such devices capable of using them.'
on The New York Post accuses Apple News of left-leaning bias - 'I bet you could “algorithmically load” an account to get this kind of result, by liking/clicking on all of the ‘left wing’ stuff and denigrating (if Apple News has a “don’t show me this again” option) the ‘right wing’ stuff. (I stopped using Apple News because the ads were WAY too annoying. I use Google News ‘headlines’, with NO login or customization. Surprisingly, news.google.com doesn’t feed me ads. Increasingly, the big advantage of webpages over apps is the ability to load adblockers and other privacy tools in the web browser that are not available for individual apps!)'
on He was about to return his Apple Vision Pro, then... - 'So, it’s taken longer than planned. As far as I can tell, that does not mean it is a flop. It just means they miscalculated. It is going to change the way we think about events, like the ipod changed music. Just give it time. It is going to be huge.'
on He was about to return his Apple Vision Pro, then... - 'I think the Vision Pro micro-led display issue is the last thing holding AAPL down. When Apple announces this is no longer the case I would expect a strong surge in AAPL’s valuation. The acquisition of FIA broadcast rights (Apple already owns US MLS rights) and the broadcast of Lakers games for Vision Pro consumption leads me to believe Apple is going to announce at WWDC 2026, with delivery in time for the December quarter, if not sooner. I’ll bet movies released on AppleTV during the past year were also filmed in Vision Pro format, with those versions being released at the same time.'
on The New York Post accuses Apple News of left-leaning bias - '“But I would have thought that Apple’s standard would be a little higher than Fox News…” Which implies that you think Apple’s standard isn’t, Rodney. To which I take exception. And I read Apple News and Apple Business News a lot.'
on He was about to return his Apple Vision Pro, then... - '”And remember we learned that Sony had a hard limit on MicroOLED display production of about 900,000 displays annually which translates to a maximum of 450,000 Vision Pro’s per year. Given process and yield issues, it’s likely only 400,000 maximum Vision Pro’s could reliably be produced per sales year.” Bart I’ve posted that little bit of info several times, and the naysayers continue to attribute lack of sales volume as evidence that the Vision Pro is a failure. Hopefully, with you saying the same thing the naysayers will take notice. By the way Apple no longer lists Sony as a Vision Pro supplier, instead are listing two Chinese firms (BOE and SeeYA) for the Vision Pro displays and have for almost two years. From the same article published December 1, 2023, comes this tidbit: “According to the report Apple chose SeeYA primarily due to the low yield of micro-OLED panels from Sony, which made it difficult [impossible?*] for Apple to fulfill market requirements.” * My thoughts In the over 3 years since this article was published, hopefully SeeYa has been able to ramp production sufficient to lower prices and satisfy demand for a WWDC 2026 relaunch. https://appuals.com/vision-pro-chinese-display-suppliers/'


