Bill Donahue on Apple's in the AI catbird seat - 'And the link to the media story: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/ai-scribe-system-hallucinations-9.7197049'
on Apple's in the AI catbird seat - 'Here’s the link to the Auditor-General’s report: https://auditor.on.ca/en/content/specialreports/specialreports/en26/2026_AI_EN.pdf'
on Apple's in the AI catbird seat - 'They aren’t even partially-functioning-brain-like. They’re statistical phrase generators, with zero intelligence or thought.'
on Apple soars to a new record close: $298.97 - 'Darren – I ran your comment through Gemini and here’s the short answer… “Premarket is often just low-volume ‘noise’ where macro jitters drag prices down on thin liquidity. The 9:30 AM reversal marks the entry of institutional ‘real money’ that ignores these early head-fakes to buy high-quality names at a relative discount.”'
on The delayed launch of Samsung's Galaxy 26 gave Apple's iPhones a boost - 'A bit OT: Since late May I’ve made 4 trades, all deep in the money, moving the Strike progressively higher with each trade because AAPL wasn’t content to laze around. Tomorrow is the last day I can trade my MAY $272.50/$275 Call Spreads. They are going to finish the cycle about $25 in the money. That’s huge. My main tranche still has two months to go before expiry, with WWDC occurring in about 3 weeks. That trade is up ~41% with ~25% remaining before expiry and requires a Close above $275 to achieve max profit. I’m thinking of rolling all of my contract into JUL $280/$285 Call Spreads. With the little bit of cash I have left over from my initial $40,000 to test the waters, I will net a little over 104% ROI on my March investment by July expiry, all the while targeting a 30% ROI, while moving my positions up, exploiting AAPL’s run. After July earnings I’m thinking of increasing my ROI goal to 40%-45% (still in the money) for OCT. If I’ve calculated this correctly, those contracts will be ~$10 in the money when purchased. Does anybody see anything fundamental with Apple that would cause AAPL to decline more than $10 after July earnings and GUIDANCE by OCT expiry? Of course GUIDANCE will be key, but I’m expecting another round of strong GUIDANCE. Unless there is no interest in my options trades I will continue posting them.'
on Apple soars to a new record close: $298.97 - 'AI still delivering. I just sold a parcel of MRVL for $181. I bought that parcel only 12 months ago for $55. With an AAPL ATH that got me a small sale at $299.80 it’s been a good day.'
on Apple soars to a new record close: $298.97 - 'I have been monitoring premarket the last week or so. Premarket opens at 6pm Aus time. I am pretty sure the last 5 days AAPL has been in the red for the most of each pre-market session and then starts climbing right on 9:30am open. What can we learn from this disconnect between pre-market and regular trading?'
on Apple soars to a new record close: $298.97 - 'Cisco, which jumped $2.58 to close at $101.87 after setting an all-time high of $102.01 earlier in the day, is up $22.10 or 21.69% after hours following the release of earnings. It’s been a very good day for many of the leading names in the tech sector. Micron also jumped 4.83% to close at $803.63.'
on The delayed launch of Samsung's Galaxy 26 gave Apple's iPhones a boost - 'With integrated memory, Apple’s SoC costs would STILL be driven by the production costs for the wafers. It seems to me there’s no significant incremental costs for Apple’s SoC based memory, unlike those vendors who have to pay the price for, and compete for -separate- memory components. Now that wouldn’t hold for persistent storage, where Apple would still have to compete for similar products.'
on The delayed launch of Samsung's Galaxy 26 gave Apple's iPhones a boost - 'Here’s the relevant data from Samsung’s 1Q26 quarterly report: Samsung smartphone portion of MX revenues last quarter (by my estimations) had a +3.5% YoY revenue increase to ~$20.4B and using IDC sales of 62.8M, gives an ASP of $324, yet saw a -35% DROP in YoY operating profits, down to just ~$1.43B, again divided by 62.8M = net smartphone profits around $23/$324 sale = net profitability of just 7.0%. This drop was due to decreased low/mid sales, memory costs, delayed & a very short Galaxy S26 sales quarter. Here’s their color commentary: 1Q 2026 Results ➢ MX • Sales & profit increased centered on premium product mix • Secured single-digit profitability via proactive cost optimization 2Q 2026 outlook: (includes full quarter of profitable premium Galaxy S sales and newly released A series midrangers and budget phones w/price increases) ➢ MX • Amid diminishing launch effects, drive revenue growth YoY via flagship sales & new A series • Decline in profitability expected despite flagship-centric sales & resource optimization 2H2026 outlook (includes 8th Gen Z Foldables launch in late July/Aug) ➢ MX • Solidify flagship-led sales & upselling initiatives to pursue comprehensive growth • Address evolving customer needs through strengthening foldable product development • Pursue efficiency initiatives to mitigate impact of rising cost pressures on profitability (If you thought Apple earnings reports were heavy on jargon, Samsung’s are riddled with Corporate-Speak cliches and vague goals of “efficiency”) (increase prices vs sales promotions which see-saw revenue vs profits, culling lower priced models & ranges, reduce costs by going to even lower cost, lower tier Samsung Exynos or Qualcomm CPU’s & MediaTek versions for budget models, push users to higher margin models, etc.) yet despite all this mitigation, MX will likely lose money over the entire year. Why? Because Samsung can’t control all of its external costs and because they already have lower margins in these low/mid service ranges, they have little margin buffer to work with. I suspect if we search and examine Xiaomi, Huawei, Vivo, Oppo, Lenovo/Motorola, earnings, we will see the same thing. For some, they, like Samsung, have other divisions to ease the pain or even mitigate any losses in smartphones, but that can’t last forever. It’s not clear how long this AI memory surge will persist but somewhere, smartphone makers will face losing money for a while and hard decisions will occur.'
on Apple soars to a new record close: $298.97 - 'NVIDIA rose $5.05 or 2.29% to $225.85 while setting a new all-time high of $227.84 earlier in the day. Alphabet jumped $15.27 or 3.94% to $402.62 while also setting a new all-time high earlier today at $403.70. Apple, in the #3 spot on market cap, advanced $4.07 or 1.38% to $298.87 and set a new all-time high of $300.92 in afternoon trading. The AI trade certainly isn’t over!'
on The delayed launch of Samsung's Galaxy 26 gave Apple's iPhones a boost - 'Hi Bill, there was a story out before Samsung’s and Apple’s earnings regarding SVP TM Roh, MX Smartphone division, warning about profitability issues for Samsung smartphones in the coming years if memory prices remain high: Report: Samsung execs worried company could lose money on smartphones for the first time The AI-driven memory shortage is hitting Samsung’s bottom line. RYAN WHITWAM – APR 24, 2026 9:58 AM | https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/04/samsung-may-be-bracing-for-first-ever-annual-loss-in-smartphone-business/ “Selling smartphones used to be easy—everyone wanted one, & every new phone was a lot better than the one that came before. Things are different now that smartphones are mature products. Plenty of manufacturers have thrown in the towel, leaving big players like Samsung to sell a new phone every couple of years. But even Samsung may find it tough to turn a profit in 2026 due to the ongoing race to build more AI capacity. According to Money Today (Korean), Samsung MX (mobile experience) head TM Roh has warned company leadership that it could be headed for the first net loss on smartphones in the company’s history. Even during times of economic strife or amid pandemic-related supply chain chaos, Samsung still made money on smartphones. The skyrocketing price of DRAM and NAND may be what finally breaks the streak despite strong Galaxy S26 sales. Shortages of these components have affected all types of computing hardware, from consumer laptops to servers. The LPDDR5x memory found in most mobile devices is increasingly important for AI. Nvidia’s Vera AI CPU…which will have up to 1.5 TB of LPDDR5x memory…The CPUs in a single (36 Vera rack) server will consume enough RAM for 4,600 Galaxy S26 Ultra devices (12GB each). Until recently, the application processor (which includes the cellular radio) was the most expensive component of most smartphones, & the display usually came in right below that. The AI era has upended the formula, roughly doubling the cost of memory & storage. According to Counterpoint Research, RAM will account for more than a third of the cost of building a budget phone in mid-2026. Even with more expensive devices, memory is still north of 20 percent of the cost… Higher demand, higher prices There are already signs that RAM & storage costs are making phones more expensive. Motorola recently raised the price of its Moto G budget phones by up to 50 percent. Low-cost devices like the Moto G will feel the rising cost of components the most, making the very idea of a budget phone in the coming years suspect. With the prospect of sinking profitability in 2026, Samsung is also making changes. The recently released Galaxy A37 and A57 mid-range devices come with a $50 price hike over the last generation. The company has also increased prices on some more expensive devices, adding $80 to the Galaxy Z Flip 7 (512 GB) and Z Fold 7 (512 GB and 1 TB). Some of its tablets are also more spendy, including a $100 increase for the Galaxy Tab S11. With profitability in doubt, Samsung is on the verge of releasing new, ultra-expensive phones. This summer, the company will debut a new generation of Galaxy Z foldables, which are always priced even higher than the Galaxy S series. These devices come w/ample storage & RAM to help justify the exorbitant price tags. That makes them prime candidates for price hikes that leave foldables even more unrealistically expensive.” As we said before, even Samsung MX Mobile cannot get better memory prices from Samsung Semi, they have to get in line w/everyone else, incl. Apple, & MX has similar needs to Apple but much lower margins. Servicing the mid & low price range w/paltry margins depends heavily on keeping BOM costs under control, or risk raising prices & losing sales altogether. Android’s literal dependence on 90% of sales NOT being premium devices now makes them highly vulnerable to decreasing sales volume & share due to price hikes by makers desperate to salvage some margins. ALL non-iOS makers face this situation. Continued.'
on Apple at $300: Why now? - 'Hi, Cy. I’m guessing our average split-adjusted purchase price was about $4.50/share. That comes to a present ROi on the remaining shares of 66.666…X. That’s nothing compared to NVDA’s rise, of course, but it has served to keep the wolf from our door since the Great Recession. Tough times, those years….'
on The delayed launch of Samsung's Galaxy 26 gave Apple's iPhones a boost - 'It’s -really hard- to argue the statistics from cell carriers on consumer preference. Companies like Verizon have a clear financial incentive to push Android phones, yet their iPhone base continues to grow.'
on Premarket: Apple is red - 'Well, a little bit of profit taking right in the last 5 minutes pulled AAPL back to close at $298.87, still up $4.07, +1.38%, volume was an above average 45M shares at close of regular session, we’ll see how much happens AH. All of this on a day with all but MSFT and NFLX of the Mag-7 green. GOOGL climbed over $400 close today. AAPL will likely consolidate here a bit, retest $300+ levels for awhile until any number of external factors may help or hinder AAPL from climbing a bit higher. (Big gains from any China deals, tariff reductions, Iran Conflict and SofH reopens maybe in the next 10-30 days?, Russia-Ukraine resolves (fat chance on that one, but at least Iran is spending some of its drone production on its own use rather than sending to Russia), or some other external positive white swan. There’s always possibility for any number of black swanlets to occur as well. Since it’s mid-May, there isn’t any real new or additional Apple news unless we get 1) updates about chip supply improving so Neo and Mac production and delivery times improve, 2) iPhone constraints improve, or monthly reporting suggesting continued iPhone strength in important markets like China, US, and India (some India news I sent to PED last night). 3) more rumors about WWDC developments.'
on Apple at $300: Why now? - 'Finally, Apple had a split-adjusted 26.5 B shares when buybacks started, and has spent $800+ B on buybacks. Per the Q2 10-Q, the share count was 14.7 B at the end of March. Apple has sold about 11.8 B shares at an average price of about $68/share. That’s a decent ROI IMO….'
on Apple at $300: Why now? - 'My best purchase at $3.33 from Oct 27, 2008 (and a bunch of other lots around then ranging up to $3.78) have done some heavy lifting for sure. An 8,888% gain! I know others have done a lot better and I’m happy for them! Wishing I’d pulled the trigger on AAPL around the Microsoft bailout time. Thought about it and I was (stupidly) investing high risk back then so made sense. Would have been (an even bigger) game changer!'
on Apple at $300: Why now? - 'If you still own pre-March, 2012 shares (we do), from back when shares were a split-adjusted $20, then you’ve seen a 15X $ valuation. And when (not if) AAPL’s price doubles to $600/share, assuming no further splits, each will double to a 30X $ valuation for each of those pre-split shares.. Simultaneously, that pre-split share now owns closing in on twice as much Apple Inc., thanks to negative stock dilution.'
on Apple at $300: Why now? - 'I certainly hope that AAPL keeps going up. I suspect it may go a bit higher then flatten out till the next earnings report comes out showing higher earnings.'
on Apple at $300: Why now? - 'If you are looking for a 33% ROI, and believe Ives’ PT is correct, then AAPL’s Present Value is $300. It would also mean that AAPL is going to flatten until something (WWDC) is announced to make you believe a $400 PT is too low (or too high). Ives targets are aggressive (he’s called several supercycles that didn’t happen), but compared to all but a couple WS analysts he’s damned good.'
on Premarket: Apple is red - 'Into the last half hour of trading today and Apple is at $299.32, up $4.56 on the day and just shy of the new all-time high minted during the 1pm hour in New York. A big day for Apple (trading above $300 for the first time) and for the market cap sitting just below $4.4 trillion. Let’s see how the shares close out the day…'
on Premarket: Apple is red - 'Hi, Gregg. It’s about what you can and can’t control. Apple is about as rock-solid a company as you can find. In these times, when just staying ahead of inflation is huge. For long term investors, a year’s a blink. AAPL’s “only” up 1.33X over 5 years. It is, however, up 12.2X over the last decade. But for traders, it’s the short term they’re interested in. For example, this year’s selloff yet again pulled back the Apple slingshot and just got a ride higher. The yearly low hit in mid-June, ‘25 was just south of $200/share, so that’s a 50% gain if AAPL is still $300 in mid-June, ‘26. Then jump off, create some fake negative Apple news, buy back in at the bottom, rinse and repeat. In 2 years of 50% ROI, a $10 bet gave you $22.50! Over 4 years, you get $50.63!'
on The delayed launch of Samsung's Galaxy 26 gave Apple's iPhones a boost - '“Apple grew its market share in each of the Big 3 US carriers. Its share grew the most at Verizon to 77% in Q1 2026.” Wasn’t it Verizon which really preferred not to deal with the Iphone way back so they favored Android devices. How is that working out for them now? Maybe they don’t care anymore but subsidizing iPhones is usually more expensive to the carrier. I guess if your customers want high end phones and Samsung hasn’t delivered the new one then the users on the margin will switch. What is really telling is there aren’t as many High end Android models from different manufacturers for them to choose so they leave the ecosystem. A bit different than Iphone users behavior.'
on Apple's in the AI catbird seat - 'so basically, what we here already knew … that the iphone installed base with its massive size will be the most important player when the time comes to roll out profitable AI in smart phones … am I right?'
on Premarket: Apple is red - 'Steven Philips said: “Yeah, two Schwab advisors didn’t like my all Apple approach – so I ditched them.” **Steven, I had a similar experience with my previous Schwab advisor. He presented an alternate investment opportunity several times and was disappointed my wife and I decided to stay 100% invested in AAPL.'


