David Emery on EU Court: Yes, Virginia. Apple is a gatekeeper - 'A question for Bart or Horace: How much would it hurt Apple to not sell iPhones and iPads in the EU?'
on The days of the $99 smartphone are numbered - 'Apple’s recent “land grab” is starting to come into focus. Not raising iPhone prices until this year (most likely) may have been in anticipation of higher prices leading to a longer upgrade cycle. Get the switchers and upgraders *now* (last year) and they’ll be ready to upgrade again when memory costs are coming back down. The balance of Apple’s IB, for whom price increases aren’t as big a deal, will upgrade at their usual rate. Also, of course, the Apple foldable, which will also sell well, regardless of price. I’d have to imagine they bought up memory from that phone over a year ago, so that may be prices starting at $1,999, and not the rumored $2,300-$2,500. Either way, I’m getting one.'
on The days of the $99 smartphone are numbered - 'And the EU and others will accuse Apple of using its dominant position to wipe out the competition. Calls for penalties, fines, or breakup to follow. In other news “sun to rise in the east tomorrow.”'
on The days of the $99 smartphone are numbered - 'Apple will use this to snuff out the cheaper options by offering quality at a competitive price point.'
on The days of the $99 smartphone are numbered - 'Actually I think Apple will continue their trend of improving iPhones to improve value and drive prices higher. It works because Apple’s demographic is less price sensitive. Also trade-in value increases as used iPhones become more valuable compared to new Android phones with price increases. The only concern is people buying iPhones now to beat price increases, which may cannibalize future sales. We’ve seen iPhone cyclical and seasonal fluctuations forever.'
on Premarket: Apple is green - 'But all is not well among workers at various Samsung Division because not all will share or share equally with huge bonuses earned by DS semiconductor workers whose Division is now earning the vast majority of Samsung’s revenues and profits. Reuters Samsung appliance workers to stage a rally protesting chip workers’ wage deal Workers in Samsung Electronics’ (005930.KS) smartphone, television and home appliance division will stage a rally on July 16, their union said, to protest the big bonuses the company’s chip workers have negotiated. “Workers in the company’s booming semiconductor division recently won a wage deal led by another union. The non-chip division’s workers are expected to receive a bonus of 6 million won ($3,900) in treasury shares for 2026, compared to up to 600 million won for those at the semiconductor division, Yonhap News Agency said. Roughly 2,000 or 3,000 workers are expected to participate in the rally near Samsung’s headquarters in Suwon, Yonhap reported, citing the largest union for workers in the company’s mobiles and consumer electronics division said. The union has about 28,000 members. Samsung is expected to flag its operating profit surged about 18-fold from a year earlier in the second quarter, when it releases its earnings estimate for the April-June quarter on Tuesday. Excerpt From “Samsung appliance workers to stage a rally protesting chip workers’ wage deal” Reuters https://apple.news/AOd5ScRY8QhyB9ylYqlD0kg This material may be protected by copyright.'
on Premarket: Apple is green - 'Jim Cramer says the market’s reaction to Samsung may signal a shift in AI leadership CNBC’s Jim Cramer said Samsung’s earnings sparked a sell-off in AI hardware stocks, while many tech names that have lagged this year rebounded. He said the session may signal investors are rotating away from AI infrastructure suppliers and back toward the megacap companies driving artificial intelligence spending.” Excerpt From “Jim Cramer says the market’s reaction to Samsung may signal a shift in AI leadership” Alexa LoMonaco CNBC https://apple.news/Ar-_-zNtGR4-OtYFl_WJgWQ This material may be protected by copyright.'
on Premarket: Apple is green - 'Samsung’s analysts had various consensus expectations for Samsung Electronics, of course, heavily buttressed by the Device Solutions DS Semiconductor division’s DRAM and NAND chip foundries exponential rise in revenues, price increases, and huge profits. Here’s articles which discuss why 19x revenue YoY of $111.66B USD and operating (not net) income of $58.43B was already priced into the stock price and although at 6% above consensus, lnot enough to surpass whisper numbers, the typical buy the rumor, sell the news reaction. BTW, the operating profit was more than the last 3 years of profits combined. That should have been a blowout, but investors were fearful that AI spending and memory procurement would moderate sooner than much later. The ironic point is all this success at the Memory and RAM level has likely pushed Samsung MX Mobile and consumer electronics division into a ~$750M USD quarterly loss, first one in history, due to excessive memory costs destroying profitability. wccftech com/samsung-posts-a-shocking-miss-on-revenue-for-q2-2026-at-a-time-when-investors-were-positioned-for-a-pristine-print/ www mexc com /news/1198415'
on Horace Dediu: Where is Nvidia in a decade? - 'I have nothing against picks and shovels, metaphorically. I work in manufacturing, albeit semiconductors. But I think I pretty strongly agree with what you are alluding to: There could well be a pin out there to pop the pick and shovel bubble.'
on How Apple hedges foreign exchange fluctuations - 'Very much enlightened- ya gotta ask the right questions ! Tkx !!'
on Horace Dediu: Where is Nvidia in a decade? - 'In the short term, the stock market is a voting machine. In the long term, the stock market is a weighing machine. AAPL has been weighing in for at least the last five years. Sure, 2007 and following were good, but the last five years demonstrate the *stability*.'
on How Apple hedges foreign exchange fluctuations - 'The Least Impacted (USD-Priced Global Supply Chains) While still impacted, these companies are insulated because their products are essential, globally standardized commodities that are almost always traded, negotiated, and settled in U.S. dollars. [1, 2] Nvidia (NVDA) & The Semiconductor Sector: Even though a massive percentage of microchips are sold to hardware manufacturers in Asia and Europe, semiconductors are globally priced in U.S. dollars. A strong dollar makes Nvidia’s cutting-edge AI hardware chips more expensive for international buyers, but Nvidia does not suffer from the same “translation losses” as Apple because it doesn’t collect payment in local retail currencies. [1, 2, 3, 4] Tesla (TSLA): Maintains massive manufacturing hubs locally in Germany and China, allowing it to natively match localized costs (wages, local parts) with local sales revenues. This “natural hedge” deeply minimizes the amount of cash that actually needs to be converted across borders compared to peers. [1, 2, 3] Other Vulnerable Tech Sectors Beyond the Magnificent Seven, specific software and hardware sub-sectors feel the heaviest sting from a strong dollar: Enterprise SaaS (e.g., Salesforce, Adobe): Much like Microsoft, these companies rely on recurring global corporate subscriptions that lose value on paper when translated back to a soaring greenback. Hardware and PC Equipment (e.g., HP, Dell): These companies operate on razor-thin profit margins. Because a strong dollar elevates the price of their consumer electronics abroad, even slight currency shifts can wipe out a hardware manufacturer’s net profitability for a quarter. [1, 2] Would you like to look at the specific hedging strategies these tech companies use to shield themselves, or should we examine how the strong dollar is currently affecting the wider U.S. stock market indices?” And that’s where I stopped. Hope you found this enlightening and some insight into other line items and how they were derived in the 10Q earnings report.'
on How Apple hedges foreign exchange fluctuations - 'Debt Obligations and Net Cash Neutrality Apple’s cash strategy cannot be viewed in isolation from its debt structure. The Debt Stack: Apple carries $85 billion in total debt (primarily long-term corporate bonds it issued at historically low interest rates). [1, 2, 3] Net Cash Surplus: Subtracting its $85 billion debt from its $146.6 billion total cash gives Apple a highly resilient net cash cushion of $61.6 billion. [1, 2, 3, 4] A Major Strategic Shift: Historically, Apple maintained a formal target of hitting a “net cash neutral” state—meaning they intended to bring their net cash balance down to zero by returning it all to investors. However, during the Q2 2026 Earnings Call, CFO Kevan Parekh explicitly announced that Apple is abandoning net cash neutral as a formal target, choosing instead to evaluate its cash levels and debt independently moving forward. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] Where the Outflow Goes: The Capital Return Program Despite moving away from a strict net cash neutral deadline, Apple continues to aggressively spend its excess cash flow to maximize shareholder value via two primary channels: [1, 2, 3, 4] The Largest Share Buyback Program in History: Alongside its Q2 2026 earnings release, Apple’s board authorized a fresh, staggering $100 billion share repurchase program. Over the first six months of fiscal 2026 alone, Apple spent $36 billion buying back its own stock to boost Earnings Per Share (EPS). [1, 2, 3, 4] Growing Dividends: The company also raised its quarterly dividend by 4% to $0.27 per share, returning roughly $3.8 billion to shareholders every single quarter. [1, 2] “which of the Mag-7 and other tech stocks are affected by US dollar strength?” “Every single member of the Magnificent Seven and nearly all major U.S. technology companies are negatively affected by U.S. dollar (USD) strength. Because these tech behemoths operate globally, a powerful dollar acts as an automatic tax on their international sales, dragging down growth and compressing margins when foreign currencies are translated back into USD. [1, 2, 3, 4] However, the severity of the impact depends heavily on where their revenue originates and how they structure their businesses. [1] The Most Impacted (High Foreign Consumer & Enterprise Exposure) These companies sell physical goods, software licensing, or localized services directly into foreign currencies, providing them with the highest exposure to USD fluctuations. [1] Apple (AAPL): Generates roughly 55% to 60% of total revenue outside the Americas. Highly vulnerable to localized consumer purchasing power drops. When the dollar surges, Apple must either hike device prices overseas (which harms demand) or take a lower profit margin per unit. [1] Microsoft (MSFT): Derives nearly 50% of its revenue internationally. Because it sells massive, multi-year cloud (Azure) and enterprise software contracts globally, even a 1% shift in the dollar can shave hundreds of millions of dollars off its reported quarterly revenue guidance. [1] Alphabet (GOOGL): Generates over 50% of its revenue outside the United States. Global businesses cut back on digital advertising budgets or demand lower local currency ad rates when their own local economies are pressured by a strong USD, dealing a double blow to Google’s primary revenue engine. [1, 2] The Moderately Impacted (Global but Mixed Structures) These companies have massive international operations but possess structural buffers—like local distribution networks or strict USD-denominated global pricing models—that partially dull the blow. Amazon (AMZN): Receives about 35% to 40% of its revenue from international markets. Its e-commerce segment faces severe foreign exchange translation headwinds, but its highly profitable cloud computing arm, Amazon Web Services (AWS), is frequently priced in USD globally, offering a strong financial cushion. [1, 2, 3, 4] Meta Platforms (META): Maintains a high international ad exposure (nearly 60% of revenue originates abroad). However, Meta’s capital expenditures are almost entirely dollar-denominated in U.S. data centers, and the company has historically utilized highly aggressive currency hedging programs to flatten out quarterly revenue volatility. [1, 2, 3, 4]'
on How Apple hedges foreign exchange fluctuations - 'Next up: Would you like to see how these hedges are reflected on Apple’s actual income statement or explore how other Mag-7 peers—like Nvidia or Microsoft—differ in their currency strategies? “Yes” On Apple’s financial statements, currency hedging does not completely rewrite the top-line revenue numbers. Instead, it acts as a secondary financial filter that offsets or smooths out losses, showing up in two primary areas: the Income Statement and the Statement of Comprehensive Income. [1] Here is exactly how Apple maps out these changes in its financial reporting. 1. The Income Statement Impact (Realized Hedges) When Apple’s hedges mature, the actual gains or losses are moved onto the primary Income Statement to offset the bad exchange rates. Where it lands: Apple typically records the financial results of its revenue-related hedges directly into Net Sales or under Other Income / (Expense), Net. [1] The Effect: If a strong dollar causes Apple to lose $500 million in converted European iPhone sales, but its forward contracts gained $450 million over that same period, the realized derivative gain is injected into the statement. This effectively shrinks the reported FX revenue loss from a severe $500 million down to a manageable $50 million hit. [1] 2. The Comprehensive Income Impact (Unrealized Hedges) Because Apple utilizes a “layered” strategy over rolling 12-to-36-month windows, it holds billions of dollars in active derivative contracts that haven’t expired yet. These live market values are tracked outside normal net income. [1] According to Apple’s Q2 Fiscal Year 2026 10-Q SEC Filing, these future protections sit in a specific holding bay called Other Comprehensive Income (OCI): Change in Fair Value of Derivatives: For the three months ended March 28, 2026, Apple reported a positive $162 million change in the fair value of its derivatives as the U.S. dollar moved. [1] Reclassification Adjustments: During that same quarter, Apple shifted $44 million out of this holding bay and directly into Net Income because those specific contracts matured and were ready to offset real-world sales. [1] Accumulated OCI: Until a contract expires, its fluctuating daily value is parked on the balance sheet under Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss (which stood at a total negative $4.85 billion across all macro assets as of early 2026). [1] Summary: What Investors See on the Bottom Line Without these line items, Apple’s gross margin and revenue figures would swing wildly every time a central bank altered interest rates. By creating this buffer zone via OCI, Apple effectively “stores up” currency gains to deploy them exactly when a strong dollar begins to threaten its quarterly earnings metrics. [1, 2] Would you like to look at the financial disclosures of another peer—like Microsoft or Alphabet—to compare how they structure their currency protections, or look deeper into Apple’s balance sheet cash allocation?” “look deeper into Apple’s balance sheet cash allocation” “According to Apple’s Q2 Fiscal Year 2026 Balance Sheet, the company holds a massive $146.6 billion in total cash and marketable securities. [1, 2, 3] While this sounds like a massive pile of idle money, Apple actively distributes it across three distinct liquidity tiers on its balance sheet to optimize safety, flexibility, and investment yield. The Three-Tier Cash Breakdown [Total Cash & Marketable Securities: $146.6 Billion] ├── Tier 1: Cash & Cash Equivalents ──> $45.57 Billion (Liquid checking/money markets) ├── Tier 2: Short-Term Marketable Securities ──> $22.94 Billion (Bonds maturing $78.09 Billion (Bonds maturing 1–5 years) Tier 1: Cash and Cash Equivalents ($45.57 Billion) [1, 2, 3] This is Apple’s immediate, hyper-liquid capital. It is primarily held in checking accounts, high-yield institutional savings, and ultra-short money market funds to seamlessly cover day-to-day global operating expenses and payroll. [1, 2] Tier 2: Short-Term Marketable Securities ($22.94 Billion) [1] These are highly liquid, low-risk investments that can be converted to cash within 12 months. Apple routinely layers these funds into high-grade corporate bonds, commercial paper, and U.S. Treasury bills nearing maturity. [1, 2] Tier 3: Long-Term Marketable Securities ($78.09 Billion) [1] This represents the lion’s share of Apple’s capital reservoir. Rather than letting cash sit dormant, Apple places these funds into safe, fixed-income vehicles (such as corporate bonds and government debt) with maturities ranging from 1 to 5 years. This longer timeline allows Apple to generate a higher interest yield on its cash buffer. [1] Continued…'
on Mark Gurman: What Apple needs from Broadcom and vice versa - 'It was as if Nostradamus himself was holding court with these two talking heads. The blond especially was hanging on every word Eddie spoke. I also didn’t know that he was an expert on ordnance and the time table for when they will explode and under what conditions. I’m saving this snippet and will be referring back to it 250 years from now to ascertain whether or not Eddie was correct on the explosion taking place inside that time capsule when they dig it up.'
on How Apple hedges foreign exchange fluctuations - 'It looks like Apple’s previous Chief Financial Officer Luca Maestri left a larger footprint than I realized.'
on Mark Gurman: What Apple needs from Broadcom and vice versa - 'Apparently Broadcom’s ASICs are for scale out, Baltra to Baltra servers in a rack. Apple / TSMC handle the local cache and HBM connections. Baltra will a massive step up from Apple’s current servers. From AI: Apple’s In-House Memory Architecture: Apple already possesses deep, industry-leading expertise in designing unified memory architectures and integrating high-bandwidth physical interfaces. For Baltra, Apple is natively designing its own on-die memory physical layer (PHY) and controllers to interface directly with TSMC’s advanced SoIC 3D packaging. Broadcom’s Real Value (Scale-Out): In AI infrastructure, the biggest performance bottleneck isn’t just reading data from local memory, but sharing that data between servers. Broadcom is injecting its world-class PCIe Gen 6/Gen 7 switches, custom interconnect fabrics, and custom ASICs.'
on Mark Gurman: What Apple needs from Broadcom and vice versa - 'This SOUNDS like something I suggested some time back. But it’s unclear (to me anyway) what this actually is. I hope we learn more. It seems like a good idea – IF.'
on J.P. Morgan raises Apple target $20 on price elasticity - '“Bring out your results! Bring out your results!” Apple’s not dead yet. 🙂'
on J.P. Morgan raises Apple target $20 on price elasticity - 'https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/07/02/what-to-expect-from-apples-q3-2026-results-on-july-30 Apple has confirmed that its financials for the third quarter of 2026 will be reported on July 30. It certainly will be an event with a lot of talking points from the quarter, and it might be the last one with Tim Cook in attendance. Every three months, Apple issues a quarterly report revealing how well it’s performed during the period. The third quarter results arrive at the end of July. In a notification to investors and analysts, Apple states that it will be bringing out the third quarter results on July 30. The results will be followed by Apple’s usual conference call at 5 p.m. EDT, featuring both current CEO Tim Cook and CFO Kevan Parekh to talk about the numbers. As always, AppleInsider will be analyzing the results as they are released, as well as reporting on the questions and answers in the conference call. Apple’s Q3 expectations from Q2 As part of Apple’s quarterly financial results for Q2, Parekh provided some forward-looking statements for the third quarter figures. That included expectations of revenue growth at between 14% and 17% year-over year. That would translate into revenue going from $94 billion in Q3 2025 to a possible $110 billion for Q3 2026. At the same time, the gross margin is anticipated to reach between 47.5% and 48.5%. Operational expenditure should lie between $18.8 billion and $19.1 billion. Cook’s last hurrah? The second quarter results were unusual for having a large number of events happening during the three-month period. One that was spiced up with the revelation that John Ternus will become Apple’s next CEO as Tim Cook steps down'
on J.P. Morgan raises Apple target $20 on price elasticity - 'Apple announces FY2026 Q3 earnings call and results date: Investor Updates FY 26 Third Quarter Results Apple’s conference call to discuss third fiscal quarter results and business updates is scheduled for Thursday, July 30, 2026 at 2:00 p.m. PT / 5:00 p.m. ET. Listen to the conference call webcast At the link on the page below. https://investor.apple.com/investor-relations/default.aspx'
on Premarket: Apple is green - 'Today I rolled the July Call Spreads just purchased a couple sessions ago into AUG $310/$315 Call Spreads at $3.58 (low today was $3.52). Even after selling off at the end of today’s session, these Spreads remain within $4 of maximum value, with more than six weeks tio go before expiry. I’ve launched several predator drones overhead, each programmed to destroy potential Black Swans.'
on Mark Gurman: What Apple needs from Broadcom and vice versa - 'Could this AI server, that Gurman alludes to, be an extension of the Mac Mini/Mac Studio servers, that are way back ordered, whose purpose will be to power on site AI agents, thereby bypassing the need for tokens, being much more highly specialized and very protective of proprietary data? Have I got the application right? It seems to me that these servers will address a very large market (bigger than general purpose data centers?) where privacy and security is extremely important.'
on How Apple hedges foreign exchange fluctuations - 'Key Takeaways from the Data The $66 Billion Vulnerability: Roughly $66.1 billion of Apple’s $111.18 billion quarterly revenue came from outside the Americas. When the U.S. dollar is exceptionally strong, the growth rates in Europe, China, and Japan look smaller on paper than they actually are in local currencies. [1] Europe as the Primary FX Target: Because the Europe segment has quietly surpassed Greater China to become Apple’s dominant international market, fluctuating exchange rates against the Euro and Pound have the largest single impact on Apple’s international bottom line. [1, 2] Defying the Headwinds: Despite a stronger dollar dragging down conversion values, Apple managed to post 17% year-over-year revenue growth in Q2 2026. This was heavily driven by robust global demand for the iPhone 17 lineup and an all-time record high in Services revenue ($30.98 billion). [1, 2] If you want to keep exploring, we can look into how Apple’s Services division protects its profit margins against currency drops, or see how a strong dollar changes things for U.S. travelers going abroad. What sounds best?” The excerpt that PED posted follows the above, goes here, and illustrates how Apple can hedge against currency fluctuations.'
on How Apple hedges foreign exchange fluctuations - 'Here’s where I started: “has the dollar been stronger or weaker over the past 12 months?” “The U.S. dollar has been generally stronger over the past 12 months, though its momentum has fluctuated.[1, 2, 3] The U.S. Dollar Index (DXY)—which measures the currency’s performance against a basket of six major global currencies—is up by approximately 3.8% to 4.1% over the last year. The dollar saw significant surges leading up to mid-2026, often fueled by hawkish signals regarding Federal Reserve interest rates and labor market resilience. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] Despite this 12-month net gain, the dollar’s trajectory has been uneven. It experienced sharp drops in late 2025 before rebounding, and more recently saw minor pullbacks following softer-than-expected U.S. employment data and shifting investor rate-cut expectations. [1, 2, 3, 4] Would you like to know how the dollar performed against a specific currency (like the Euro, Yen, or British Pound), or are you looking for details on how this affects international travel or investments?” “AI responses may include mistakes. For financial advice, consult a professional.” “what does that do to a company like Apple’s revenues?” A stronger U.S. dollar generally depresses the reported revenues and profit margins of U.S. multinational companies like Apple. Because Apple generates roughly 60% of its total revenue from international markets, shifts in foreign exchange rates directly alter its financial statements. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] The Two Main Pressures of a Strong Dollar 1. The Conversion Loss (FX Headwinds) When Apple sells an iPhone in Europe, the customer pays in Euros (€). If the U.S. dollar strengthens against the Euro, each Euro collected converts back into fewer U.S. dollars. [1, 2, 3] Even if Apple sells the exact same number of physical devices abroad, its reported revenue in U.S. dollars shrinks. This effect is known on Wall Street as a foreign exchange (FX) headwind. [1, 2, 3] 2. The Pricing Dilemma To combat conversion losses, Apple is often forced to make a difficult choice in foreign markets: Raise Local Prices: Apple frequently increases local prices in foreign countries to maintain its profit margins. However, this makes products more expensive for local consumers, which can lower demand and drop unit sales. [1, 2, 3, 4] Absorb the Hit: If Apple keeps local prices flat, its products stay competitive, but the company must accept lower revenue and thinner profit margins on each sale. [1, 2] How Apple Minimizes the Damage Despite these pressures, Apple uses specific financial tactics to insulate its bottom line from currency volatility: [1, 2] Foreign Exchange Hedging: Apple’s corporate treasury purchases financial contracts (derivatives) that lock in specific exchange rates months in advance. This delays and smooths out the financial impact of a suddenly surging dollar. [1] Global Supply Chain Sourcing: While sales suffer from a strong dollar, purchasing power improves. Apple can buy certain component parts from foreign suppliers at a cheaper relative cost, slightly offsetting the revenue losses. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] Would you like to see a breakdown of Apple’s latest revenue by global region to see where it faces the most currency risk, or explore how a strong dollar impacts U.S. consumers instead? [1, 2]” “Yes” “Apple’s international segments account for roughly 55% to 60% of its total revenue, making its financial reports heavily exposed to foreign exchange risks. [1] According to Apple’s Q2 Fiscal Year 2026 Earnings Report (for the quarter ended March 28, 2026), the company’s regional revenue breakdown reflects exactly where it faces currency translation pressures. [1] Apple Revenue Breakdown by Geographic Segment (Q2 2026) Geographic Segment – Revenue (Billions USD) – Percentage of Total Revenue – Currency Exposure Risk Americas $45.09B 40.6% Low (Mainly insulated USD sales) Europe $28.06B 25.2% High (Exposed to Euro & British Pound) Greater China $20.50B 18.4% High (Exposed to Chinese Yuan) Rest of Asia Pacific $12.14B 10.9% High (Exposed to Australian Dollar, INR, etc.) Japan $9.41B 8.5% Very High (Exposed to highly volatile Yen) Total Revenue $111.18B 100% ~59.4% Total Foreign Exposure'
on J.P. Morgan raises Apple target $20 on price elasticity - 'Nice to see an expansion of PT from anybody, but $345 in the next 18 months is weak. Just a reminder, it’s been 19 sessions since AAPL established it all-time high of $317, and 7 sessions since AAPL declined to $273, and yet AAPL is poised to establish a new all-time high today, exceeding my July target of $310 by at least $7. On June 25, when I bailed on my July $305/$310 Call Spreads, AAPL was $37 below my target. Now AAPL has reversed that selloff by $42, a remarkable turn around just as unexpected as its decline. Clearly Investor Sentiment, sans Black Swans, is very strong. Samik’s earnings multiple of 32 ($315/$9.85) reflects current prints and not the earnings multiple of his $345 target, which is 35 ($345/$9.85). I think Samik’s earnings and multiple estimates are severely understated.'
on Premarket: Apple is green - 'Re: “[Samsung] reported stellar preliminary results on Tuesday, but its shares still cratered 6.9%.” It’s almost comforting to know this phenomenon applies to companies other than Apple…'
on Still no Siri AI for EU, despite Tim Cook's efforts - 'They did redesign the Switch 2 to conform to the battery regulations. And that makes me wonder, what liability Nintendo will have when a 3rd party battery goes bad and sets one on fire, or burns a kid?'
on J.P. Morgan raises Apple target $20 on price elasticity - 'Perspective: Service life for iPhones has gone up in the last 10 years from about 3 – 4 years then and 4 – 7 years now, per AI search. In that view, TCO has barely increased. Cumulative inflation over the last 11 years was over 40%. Finally, used iPhones address the price-sensitve market, and more as low-end vendors must raise prices.'


