Recent Comments

  • Gregg Thurman on WSJ: Sam Altman's AI math doesn't add up - 'OpenAI’s future is tied directly to the success of its IPO. Except for well heeled retail trader (who aren’t real good at research) funds, this IPO is going to be a massive failure. Is OpenAI going to be the first “AI” casualty. It wouldn’t surprise me. IMO, any “AI” initiative that requires investor funding is doomed. Only those being funded by a successful enterprise will survive, but even those are going to be seriously damaged by the financial burden they took on following the data center model. NVDA’s time at the top of the market cap heap is over. I give Jenson and Company 2 more years before its collapse.'
  • Cy on Nate B. Jones: Apple has made a hardware bet against cloud AI (video) - 'My sense on AAPL Car is the primary factors were it became clear to AAPL mgmt that there was no competing against China’s industrial policy, China was going to dominate a dynamic market, and differentiation and reasonable profit in a long tail product such as automobiles while being subject to volatile China and US policies was too risky. The China electric car industry is fascinating from what I’ve seen on YouTube.'
  • Gregg Thurman on Big bet on Apple puts - 'If SIRI was Apple’s entry into “AI” (and in hindsight I think it was), then Apple recognized early on that “AI” was a beast requiring massive compute power, power that then did not exist. So Apple didn’t fund anymore SIRI research, instead chased computer power in a uniquely Apple way. Enter A and M Series silicon. In early 2015 TC described “AI” as the “mother of all “AI” projects”. As reported by Bloomberg: “We’re focusing on autonomous systems,” Cook told Bloomberg. “Clearly one purpose of autonomous systems is self-driving cars. There are others. We sort of see it as the mother of all AI projects.” In other words, before this interview, Apple had explored “AI” and rejected it in favor of silicon. That’s at least 12 years ago, maybe even before Jobs’ death. And here we are in 2026, Apple is about to own “AI” because of its hardware.'
  • Greg Bates on Nate B. Jones: Apple has made a hardware bet against cloud AI (video) - 'Great post. The question becomes, who will challenge Apple on its bet? OpenAI with its rumored phone? Maybe but it isn’t making silicon. Google? How about Nvidia–it’s already making pcs with its chips. Google and Nvidia seem like the most likely to challenge Apple in the race that Apple is trying to win. Maybe Samsung? Apple has the best installed base, obviously. So it would seem that Apple can win this. I’d be interested in Nate’s assessment (and everyone else’s)–who are the competitors, their strategies, and whether Apple will likely remain/be victorious.'
  • Charles A. on Nate B. Jones: Apple has made a hardware bet against cloud AI (video) - 'Check his bio, posted above!'
  • Charles A. on Nate B. Jones: Apple has made a hardware bet against cloud AI (video) - 'True. But the video is still VERY worth listening to. Brilliant guy!!! Check out his bio: https://www.natebjones.com/about'
  • Gregg Thurman on Nate B. Jones: Apple has made a hardware bet against cloud AI (video) - 'It shouldn’t be surprising that Apple management figured this out a decade ago, and if an Apple Car ever existed, was one of the reasons management dropped it.'
  • Gregg Thurman on Nate B. Jones: Apple has made a hardware bet against cloud AI (video) - 'I’m thinking of the massive write offs in data center expenditures coming from MSFT, AMZN, GOOG, ORCL, OpenAI, et al. Here’s a must read for backers of data centers: ”OpenAI recently saw revenue and new users growth that were below its own targets, according to a Wall Street Journal report. The report added that CFO Sarah Friar told leadership she was concerned OpenAI may not be able to pay computing contracts in the future if its top line doesn’t expand fast enough. The report sent tech lower. Nvidia lost more than 2%, while Broadcom pulled back more than 4%. AMD and Intel were down nearly 6% and 4%, respectively. Oracle dropped more than 7%.” Available in “Stocks” and OpenAI news.'
  • James Murphy on Big bet on Apple puts - 'I am now thinking that the large put position is a remnant from trades done long ago and only now noticed by the max pain software. According to my broker’s option chain screens, there are big out-of-the-money OI positions for this Friday’s (01-May-2026) expiration. That screen is showing an open interest of 21,942 in the 135 puts. AAPL hasn’t been trading near 135 in nearly five years. It is possible those contracts were initiated as LEAPS which became nearly worthless and it cost more to pay transaction costs to close out the position than to just let them expire.'
  • Dan Pallotta on Nate B. Jones: Apple has made a hardware bet against cloud AI (video) - 'Not fair that any one individual should possess this much intelligence and communication capability. Brilliant. Thank you for sharing it.'
  • Gregg Thurman on Nate B. Jones: Apple has made a hardware bet against cloud AI (video) - 'How stupid of me, I forgot to include iMacs and MacBooks.'
  • James Murphy on Big bet on Apple puts - 'No, those were options expiring on 4/27. After I saw your article I went to my broker’s option chain screens for AAPL and those contracts were indeed for Monday expiration.'
  • Bill Fouche on Nate B. Jones: Apple has made a hardware bet against cloud AI (video) - 'You know what? Apple wins either way. They’re ahead on computing power and battery life per dollar, an edge Ternus is likely to magnify. And If the future is cloud-based AI, Apple’s devices will run it better and more privately than its cloudy competitors, with better direct access to each user’s data. And for that Apple will get its cut without the massive capital outlay.'
  • Gregg Thurman on Nate B. Jones: Apple has made a hardware bet against cloud AI (video) - '“The Ternus pick is Apple admitting — structurally — that they cannot win a software race in the age of AI.” What the headline failed to announce is that nobody is going to win the data center race. Oh, I listened to Nate’s podcast yesterday. His observation regarding industries regulated around privacy (legal and health) is spot on. I’m in total agreement. The winner of the “AI” race is going to be the manufacturer of local “AI” servers and devices powered by Apple’s A and M Series chipsets. That would be everyone in Apple’s supply chain and Apple itself. Long live Mac Mini, Mac Studio, iPhone and iPad, data center killers all.'
  • David Emery on Ming-Chi Kuo: OpenAI's Apple killer is an AI Phone - 'Another entry in the overflowing “Claim Chowder” folder…'
  • David Emery on Nate B. Jones: Apple has made a hardware bet against cloud AI (video) - 'Without listening to the video, this seems to be consistent with so many (ignorant) people who believe that AI is all about Large Language Models.'
  • David Drinkwater on Ming-Chi Kuo: OpenAI's Apple killer is an AI Phone - 'William Gibson, “Neuromancer”'
  • David Drinkwater on Ming-Chi Kuo: OpenAI's Apple killer is an AI Phone - 'Maybe they should just order a nice cup of tea. 42.'
  • David Drinkwater on Ming-Chi Kuo: OpenAI's Apple killer is an AI Phone - 'Read “Shoe Dog”. We’re actually literally discussing it in our in-office book club. I’m a bit behind on my reading, but it seems pretty interesting.'
  • Stephen Gordon on High praise for Apple TV - 'I did like Mythic Quest, but only after several failed attempts to finish the pilot. They placed too much emphasis on the funny moments versus narrative pacing, so it became difficult to develop any sort of rapport. However, each season included a background episode covering a particular cast member that was as good as any of the great shows out there. Completely out of left field, as if they actually cared for once. The COVID episodes were great, too.'
  • David Drinkwater on Evercore: iPhone revenues grew 20%-plus in the March quarter - 'Such a large tape-out has its advantages in performance, but also disadvantages in overall yield. Because all the units (or “most of them”) are on one piece of silicon, the connections are very intimate and quick and clean. High performance is a major plus. Because all the units are on one piece of silicon, one failure may scrap the whole die – leading to lower overall effective yields. Low yield is a minus. This is essentially a cost/benefit analysis that I am sure Apple has modeled conservatively. “Binning” may be a way to mitigate some of the losses: Let’s say a completed die is 95-100% of what we want it to be: that goes into Bin One “very good”. MacBook Pro. Another die is 85-95% of what we want it to be: it goes into Bin Two “Pretty good”. MacBook Neo, Another die is 75-85% of what we want it to be: it goes into Bin Three “Minimal passing”. MacBook Neo, Less than 75% of what we want it to be: it goes into Bin Four – trash can. By this process, you can maintain high usable yields, which reduces the cost of the overall stack, and still gives the customers what they want or expect from their purchased product.'
  • Jonny T on High praise for Apple TV - 'Also a 100% vote for Down Cemetary Road from us.'
  • Steven Philips on High praise for Apple TV - 'I saw an article – I think it was a Bullwark author – about exactly that. Except it was regarding movies and how there was high demand but no supply for movies that were family friendly so you could take your young children out to the movies.'
  • David Drinkwater on Big bet on Apple puts - 'I have this question, too! 🙂'
  • Jeff Daniel on Big bet on Apple puts - 'go on YouTube and watch the Craig Federighi and Joz interview right after WWDC with the WSJ from June 2025. This is when they were a year late on AI Siri and watch it again… They were suppose to come out with AI Siri Light in Feb./March 2026. Nothing. Maybe they delayed with the new CEO annc. Craig F and Joz should be on the way out. If Apple has missed or is very very late to AI since Siri was 6-7 years ahead of everyone and this is what Steve Jobs spent his last year of life on then that is terrible. They should clean house. The stock should be 50%-75% higher than now if they executed.'
  • Richard Gayle on High praise for Apple TV - 'Might try “Down Cemetary Road”, starring Emma Thompson and Ruth Wilson (from Luther), produced by those behind Slow Horses. It has a Rotten Tomatoes of 80%. There will be a second season. Very British synopsis: A woman hires a private investigator after an explosion occurs and a girl goes missing on the same night in a quiet suburb of Oxford.'
  • Rodney Avilla on High praise for Apple TV - 'Apple has mastered PG-13 and R rated TV shows and movies. I’m hoping that maybe someday it may feel brave enough to venture into more family friendly categories.'
  • Rodney Avilla on Ming-Chi Kuo: OpenAI's Apple killer is an AI Phone - 'Over 80% use of an iPhone requires a screen for viewing graphics, charts, animation, video, entertainment, social media, YouTube, eBay, Amazon, shopping, education, gaming, pictures, etc. etc. etc. In order to be an iPhone killer, it has to be a device that does everything iPhone does and does it better or does more. Tim Cook made sure that did not happen under his watch (pun intended) and now it’s up to John Turnus to make sure it does not happen under his watch. Nothing is going to replace the iPhone in the foreseeable future except for maybe newer and better iPhone editions. Perhaps someday, brain implants will make screens unnecessary. How’s that for science fiction.'
  • Bill Donahue on Ming-Chi Kuo: OpenAI's Apple killer is an AI Phone - 'But the wagon drives itself!'
  • Greg Lippert on High praise for Apple TV - 'I can hardly keep up on the AppleTV shows I like. Overall quality blows everything else away.'