Recent Comments

  • John Konopka on Premarket: Apple is green - 'I saw an article the other day that Anthropic had asked Apple for several billion dollars (per year? ) to use their AI. Apple declined. Anthropic tried to spin it like they had turned down Apple. Sounds like sour grapes. Anyway, the number is interesting. Let’s say it was $5B a year. Presumably Apple is paying less than that to Google for their AI. But I wonder if Google will somehow monetize this connection and then give Apple a cut of the action? Anthropic is desperate for cash and all they could think they could get from Apple was several billions per year. It is yet another data point showing that AI is not worth much monetarily. After all, Google was paying Apple ~$20B for access to customers to sell them ads. If AI was really that great then Anthropic, as the putative AI leader, should have demanded much more than about $5B. I wonder if we’ll get any comment from Tim on Thursday about this deal?'
  • Robert Stack on More blowback for Apple's Tim Cook, starting with M.G. Siegler - 'Not to quibble Rodney, but it wasn’t “one shot.” Two ICE agents fired ten shots over five seconds, all while he lay sprawled out on the ground. This was an execution.'
  • Steven Philips on Premarket: Apple is green - 'Too true. I’m really not much interested in professional sports anymore. Just popped up for Seattle because that’s where I am. 🙂'
  • Daniel Epstein on Premarket: Apple is green - 'Joseph, I don’t think you have the perfect answer either. Despite your claim to be using “Occam’s razor”. If it is such a consistent answer for the magnitude and direction of the stock movement every quarter then everyone would have noticed the pattern and it likely wouldn’t work as a strategy. The chartists would be all over it for sure. Instead we have many people coming up with different explanations for a drop in Apple stock price. Some ridiculous and some well thought out. Besides the stock buyback by Apple even though it is large by revenue standards it gets dwarfed buy the magnitude of the change in the stock price over the short term when for instance the stock price drops 10% over a short period of time. I am not saying your idea doesn’t contribute to the direction of the stock price I just think it is not big enough to account for the kind of price action we have seen when Trump has announced Tariff’s that the market think could hit Apple. (Now it would be interesting to correlate Trumps Tariff announcements with timing to see if he always seems to make them with Apple in its so called dark period before earnings.) With a market cap of around 3.8 trillion a stock move of 10% is about 380 billion in market cap swing. Apple buyback is usually less than 25 Billion per quarter spread out so on any given day it likely is less than 2 billion in buying. Price stabilizing maybe but not a huge wall that would prevent a stampede from happening. And what we have seen in both the down stock action and the up stock action is a bit of a stampede. That we agree on.'
  • Steven Philips on Premarket: Apple is green - 'Lots of unexploded mines still to be found. Intentionally or – unexpectedly! 🙁'
  • Steven Philips on Premarket: Apple is green - 'Hard to say what the actual truth is, but I don’t think your explanation is any simpler than Daniel’s. Occam’s Razor can still nick the user.'
  • Joseph Bland on Premarket: Apple is green - 'So far, this year is playing out like a repeat of last year. I don’t expect the pattern to repeat much longer, though, because last year’s crazy tariff bombshells have all pretty much fizzled.'
  • Steven Philips on More blowback for Apple's Tim Cook, starting with M.G. Siegler - 'Band wagon lemmings. To copy Gregg, ain’t gonna say no more!.'
  • Joseph Bland on More blowback for Apple's Tim Cook, starting with M.G. Siegler - 'Bill, you’re right, of course. But there’s a great big target painted on Apple’s back as the “moral” company, so it makes painting Apple as being hypocritical just perfect for generating all that sweet anti-Apple click-bait. There’s not a doubt in my mind that this President is a danger for Apple, because he’s already shown us just how dangerous he can be. In fact, I now think Apple has been playing this game with the President for far longer I than I ever suspected, probably at least as far back as his last Presidency.'
  • Joseph Bland on More blowback for Apple's Tim Cook, starting with M.G. Siegler - 'Hi, Ron. Took a while, but I found the link: ped30.com/2024/10/18/apple-trump-cook-called/ He called Trump, and Trump used that call to paint Tim Cook as a supporter. That was 2 1/2 weeks before the election. IMO, it became a tacit endorsement of Donald Trump. Mr. Cook could easily have waited to see who won before making that call. He didn’t. And following that call, others tech leaders went to “bend the knee”, and the money rolled in….'
  • Joseph Bland on More blowback for Apple's Tim Cook, starting with M.G. Siegler - 'In a phrase, the Republican Party is guilty of a naked attempt to lock in power by any means necessary. And until that balance of power is restored, it’s irrelevant to say the Democratic Party would have done the same .'
  • Rodney Avilla on More blowback for Apple's Tim Cook, starting with M.G. Siegler - 'Need to change the title to: Daily Donald Disaster'
  • Bill Donahue on More blowback for Apple's Tim Cook, starting with M.G. Siegler - 'While I absolutely think TC’s decision to attend this was a horrifically bad and stupid decision, from pretty much every angle including strategically, I do find it pretty rich that all the other CEOs and “VIP”s who were there – or, even worse, who’ve absolutely in tight with Trump and doing far, far worse, like all the CEOs of the AI megascalers and associated AI and social media companies – are getting a free pass in both the media and publicly. Americans are being murdered on sidewalks for passively filming masked gunmen who are constantly breaking the law and called domestic terrorists by he people running the country, but let’s distract ourselves by being outraged at Tim Cook’s forced attendance at a super-crappy movie that was produced as part of a crooked settlement deal between Jeff Bezos and a vindictive, power-drunk sociopath. I’m not happy as a shareholder that Tim didn’t call in sick, but a little perspective is in order.'
  • Bill Donahue on More blowback for Apple's Tim Cook, starting with M.G. Siegler - 'In Trump’s current games, it instead always ends up “Tails he wins, heads you lose.”'
  • Ron Fredrick on More blowback for Apple's Tim Cook, starting with M.G. Siegler - 'Joseph Bland said: “IMO Mr. Cook helped Mr. Trump win election…” **Joseph, although I usually find myself in agreement with your comments, in this case I have to disagree. I believe Tim Cook not only didn’t help Trump win election, I don’t believe for a minute that he would ever vote for the person most people knew Trump to be.'
  • Joseph Bland on Premarket: Apple is green - 'I hope that Apple was able to buy back some of their stock with ASRs over the last couple of weeks…'
  • Joseph Bland on More blowback for Apple's Tim Cook, starting with M.G. Siegler - 'I chastised Mr. Cook here for his position on Donald Trump before the election. IMO Mr. Cook helped Mr. Trump win election in a very close race where huge sums were spent very late in defiance of campaign finance reform. But that’s the past. He’s the President. and we are stuck with him. In the interim, we are all forced to deal with the power grab the best we can.'
  • Joseph Bland on More blowback for Apple's Tim Cook, starting with M.G. Siegler - 'Anice, what we are seeing is the result of putting a single party in control of all three US political institutions, and not surprisingly the party most strongly associated with supporting the wealthy. The usual checks and balances have given way to a stultifying power grab. All that stands in the way of consolidating that power indefinitely is the upcoming vote of the citizens, , assuming the majority of people (1) see the danger and (2) want things to change, and assuming that election is allowed to take place, is fair, and is honored'
  • Joseph Bland on Premarket: Apple is green - 'Sorry, Daniel, but Occam’s Razor says that’s not the simplest explanation. The simplest explanation is what can be called the “short term options slingshot effect”. Apple’s first month of a new quarter always finds them on the open market sidelines for something like a month (except for ASRs), so sell at the high, diss the company, create a stampede for the exits, buy at the bottom, rinse, repeat, and pocket a nice profit every three months. This can be especially effective during January, as Apple’s quarterly earnings are higher by far over the other three quarters. Especially with this President in office… “Occam’s razor is a philosophical principle that suggests when faced with competing explanations, the simplest one—requiring the fewest assumptions—should be preferred.” – Wikipedia'
  • Gregg Thurman on Premarket: Apple is green - 'What a difference a day makes, 24 little hours Five sessions. $243.42 to $261.95. Up $18.53. GO AAPL'
  • Gregg Thurman on More blowback for Apple's Tim Cook, starting with M.G. Siegler - 'With apologies to Ray Charles. ”Not going to read this no more, no more, no more, no more. Not going to read this no moooore. Whad I say”'
  • Rodney Avilla on More blowback for Apple's Tim Cook, starting with M.G. Siegler - 'Then one shot – a gunshot – turned attending that movie screening into a statement… It is not only rude, but it is wrong, very wrong, to put words in other people’s mouth. And that’s just exactly what he’s doing. He’s putting words in Tim’s mouth that Tim never said. He should be ashamed of himself. he owes Tim Cook an apology.'
  • Neal Guttenberg on More blowback for Apple's Tim Cook, starting with M.G. Siegler - 'Let us see what other controversies we can try to blame Tim Cook and Apple for. They do business in China with their authoritarian leaders. Cook has met with them a number of times. Maybe, just maybe, Cook can affect how things go by having the influence behind the scenes since he has access. The thing is, I don’t know and neither does anyone else. Tim Cook and Apple did not cause this event. They are just trying to do business under the conditions they have to work with.'
  • Robert Stack on More blowback for Apple's Tim Cook, starting with M.G. Siegler - 'We all know that Steve Jobs reportedly said to Tim, as he was on the way out, “Don’t be asking yourself what I would do in this or that situation, do what you think is the right thing.” (Of course I’m paraphrasing – so ignore the quotes.) However, I think in this case Tim would benefit from thinking about what Steve would have done in a situation like this. At the very least, he could have called in sick at the last minute with the flu…'
  • Les Surdykowski on More blowback for Apple's Tim Cook, starting with M.G. Siegler - 'So you’re the CEO of a multi-trillion-dollar company and instead of navigating product design, roadmaps, etc., you have to navigate treacherous political waters, and no matter what course you take to guide this company where many people rely on its existence (shareholders, employees, and users), you will inevitably make a choice that will imperil you or these constituents. Who wouldn’t absolutely love that job? As an astute observer of these kinds of dynamics once articulated “ in the Game of Thrones you either win or you die”'
  • Stephen Gordon on More blowback for Apple's Tim Cook, starting with M.G. Siegler - 'Scroll to the bottom and check out the disgusting picture… boingboing.net/2026/01/27/melania-documentary-expected-to-bomb-who-cares.html'
  • Daniel Epstein on Premarket: Apple is green - 'Apple’s stock price recovery from the recent drop is almost logical when you consider the potential reasons for the drop. Trump Tariff abuse always causes Apple stock problems and the lifting of the tariff threat quickly makes people realize they have been handed a buying opportunity. The other concerning issues like Ram price costs for Apple and whether Tim Cook is acting like people want with Trump or Cook’s future as CEO are much more difficult to quantify. Upgrades by Analysts and release of new AirTags coincidentally with the price rise are not as important (Hah) as the Tariff issue. Even if the rebound reaction has not been instantaneous.'
  • Robert Paul Leitao on Premarket: Apple is green - 'Following yesterday’s $7.37 gain in Apple to $255.41, the shares are green pre-market and are currently higher by $4.05 at $259.46. Index futures are mixed heading into today’s opening bell. iPhone glass maker Corning has just inked a deal with Meta for $6 billion to supply the company with fiber-optic cables. This is another enterprise from the dotcom era finding new growth opportunities in the AI epoch. Corning shares are up $6.74 at $101.70 ahead of the bell.'
  • David Emery on More blowback for Apple's Tim Cook, starting with M.G. Siegler - 'Even JoyOfTech is on this topic: ‘Boycott Apple?’ https://www.geekculture.com/joyoftech/joyarchives/3230.html'
  • Anice Hassim on More blowback for Apple's Tim Cook, starting with M.G. Siegler - 'I have been giving Tim the benefit of a fairly broad latitude on the Trump situation, but I have to say that events have moved swiftly and I don’t believe he can continue for much longer without a better explanation to people who might be placing their trust in him. Trump is trumpy and he’s gonna make a big deal of the 5-600billion Apple is investing (irrespective of party or president I believe), and I guess Tim just has to live with that…. But to be seen to be intimately supporting events that are borderline complicit is going to create a lot of backlash from the global community. Now, the bougies don’t give up their habits easy, so Apple is no danger of losing sales just yet, but they are in danger of having their trust credentials severely dented with large sections of humanity. And being Apple, they are a sexy target and there will be a lot of ginning up by various actors who don’t want the spotlight on themselves – So this is brewing and depending on circumstances could become a real liability for Apple…. Is Apple going to be guilty of not reading the room properly because they are too old, or out of touch as leaders? Is it a form a noble sacrifice that Tim is undertaking, to spare others – I dont know — I would expect any CEO of Apple to be adept at handling this kind of terrain.'