From Sarah Jeong's "United States v. Apple is pure nerd rage" posted Friday by The Verge.
"The lawsuit claims that the main reason people hold on to their iPhones is because Apple makes it difficult to switch, not because people — I dunno — actually like their iPhones."
Read More Mark Gurman: The DOJ picked the wrong fight with Apple
"Apple does not conspire to increase costs to anyone." — FOB Paul Campbell
"This continues to be the funniest and most underreported story in Hollywood." — Puck's Matthew Belloni
Read More iMore: Apple TV+ could be struggling, but will Apple care?
From Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert's "Acclaimed tech columnist Mossberg says the DOJ's claim of an Apple monopoly is 'laughable'" ($) posted Saturday by Business Insider.
Read More Walt Mossberg: The DOJ's Apple antitrust suit is a joke

"Mostly at this point my heart goes out for all the people at Apple who have worked so hard and built such market-defining and market-leading products." — Steven Sinofsky
"it remains unclear whether just enabling cross platform Apps, or allowing competing Apps on the platform would lead to much user migration given users’ preference for the brand, overall quality and usability of Apple products and integrated ecosystem." — Analyst Wamsi Mohan
Read More Despite antitrust suit, BofA sticks with $225 Apple target
This was Jobs' final appearance with Walt Mossberg and Kara Swisher. He died 16 months later.
Kevin Roose and Casey Newton go through the government's antitrust case point by point and find merit in several.
12 Comments