"Apple’s streaming content catalog is small but it’s packed with quality and exclusivity."
From Christopher Hamilton's "Why Apple TV+’s 40% Subscription Price Hike Is Entirely Justified | Charts" ($) posted Monday by The Wrap:
Demand for shows on Apple TV+ more than doubled from January 2021 to September 2022, according to Parrot Analytics‘ data, which takes into account consumer research, streaming, downloads and social media, among other engagement...
Apple TV+ has managed this growth not by recklessly pouring money into ballooning the amount of content but by making smart content investments that have resulted in a library of high-quality programming that has won critical acclaim...
Let’s assume that 8.0 times is the level of demand that quantifies a show as a hit (less than 3% of shows reach this level of demand)... All of the 10 most in-demand Apple TV+ original series for the quarter comfortably surpass this 8.0 times threshold.
My take: That last chart is confusing (what's with the conflicting color codes?) but worth parsing. The average TV show -- in my experience -- is almost unwatchable. What this graphic tells me is that compared with the mean, Apple's offerings are off the charts.
My dishpan hands can now start healing.
S1 got some poor reviews, but I thought it was OK and grew in S2. S3 was good again, but I am glad the series satisfyingly wrapped in 3 seasons. It’s *very* violent, so again, I am surprised it has performed this well for Apple.
‘bout right. Sounds like another great Apple product.
(If you haven’t seen the “Bad Sisters” series yet, you definitely owe it to yourself.)