Tim Cook, privacy cop

While I was sleeping, Apple cut off—and restored—Facebook and Google’s access to 900 million iPhones.

Catching up, the commentary that caught my eye dealt with the power Apple could wield to impose its will.

From Ben Thompson’s “Facebook Versus Apple,” posted on Stratechery ($):

I can’t help but be extremely disquieted by Apple’s actions. Those of us that understand how iOS apps are locked down… have always understood at a theoretical level that Apple had a de facto “kill switch” for apps. In fact, Steve Jobs said as much in 2008, and Apple publicly acknowledged remotely removing malware-infested apps in 2015.

Even so, to see that power exercised is pretty stunning. On Tuesday Facebook employees and Facebook the company thought they owned their iPhones: on Wednesday Apple made clear that the ultimate owner — at least if ownership means control — was Apple itself. And so a $400+ billion enterprise was thrown into chaos and made unable to work on their most important product, simply because a different company said so.

From Tripp Mickle’s “Apple Exerts Power as Privacy Protector,” published in Friday’s Wall Street Journal ($):

The penalties, while temporary, punctuated Apple’s escalating campaign in recent years to highlight its purported protections of user information, in contrast to big tech rivals that Chief Executive Tim Cook has portrayed as cavalier about privacy. The Apple boss has repeatedly called for privacy legislation—an idea that many tech chiefs worry about—and has promoted Apple’s business model as superior to rivals because it sells devices rather than advertising.

The moves also highlight Apple’s dual role as a rival to those companies and a gatekeeper controlling their access to the more than 900 million iPhones in use around the world. In one swift move, it was able to undermine the ability of two competitors to continue their daily work of updating, fixing and improving popular apps such as Instagram and Gmail, former and current employees of Facebook and Apple said.

“This is Apple flexing its muscles and part of the Tim Cook indignation tour,” said Scott Galloway, a marketing professor at New York University who has criticized the dominance of big tech companies.

My take: Cook played his hand well. Tough, but forgiving.

11 Comments

  1. Gregg Thurman said:

    It’s Apple’s platform. If you want to play there you gotta obey the very clearly defined rules. If you don’t want to follow the rules you can’t play there. End of story.

    I don’t see a controversy.

    3
    February 1, 2019
  2. David Emery said:

    And I’m having A REALLY HARD TIME understanding the ‘outrage’ from the blogosphere over Apple applying a certificate revocation for companies who violate the App Store policies.

    The rules are -quite clear-, and both Facebook and Google clearly violated those rules, in ways that are particularly slimy.

    This was well-done by TechCrunch: https://techcrunch.com/2019/01/31/facebook-researchgate/ They annotate the Facebook statement based on their research and strongly rebut it.

    2
    February 1, 2019
  3. John Konopka said:

    Very disappointed in Ben Thompson’s take. Apple didn’t take away ownership of anyone’s phone. They shut down illegitimate behavior. Why is that so hard for him to see?

    1
    February 1, 2019
  4. In Ben Thompson’s defense, he spends 1,000 words explaining why Apple did what it did before sharing his disquiet.

    0
    February 1, 2019
  5. Fred Stein said:

    A lot of slow roll through stop signs. Every once in while, someone gets caught and gets a warning or a fine. Is that newsworthy?

    More seriously, as consumers, we expect Apple to enforce their rules to protects us. Conversely, none us knew that Facebook sold data about us to Cambridge Analytica. Only a tiny fraction of us understand what we agree to.

    0
    February 1, 2019
  6. David Emery said:

    Hey PED: My comment says ‘awaiting moderation’ Seems to me that, since we paid to be here, it should be OK to post a link without moderation.

    0
    February 1, 2019
  7. George Ewonus said:

    I agree with your take on this one, Philip!

    0
    February 1, 2019

Leave a Reply