"Does it go beyond bad headlines?" — Analyst Amit Daryanani
Read More Evercore takes a deep dive into Apple's antitrust risk
"Does it go beyond bad headlines?" — Analyst Amit Daryanani
Read More Evercore takes a deep dive into Apple's antitrust risk
From Kenneth Pringle's "Apple Is Only the Latest. Trustbusting Has a Long History." posted Wednesday by Barron's.
Read More Where Apple fits in the history of antitrust enforcement
From "The DOJ’s antitrust case against Apple is no blockbuster" posted Sunday.
Read More Apple antitrust case: The Washington Post editorial board is skeptical
"In reality, the case is a thinly veiled attempt by the Biden administration to control and remake Apple’s business model."
Read More The Hill rips a hole in the DOJ's Apple antitrust case
One of the interesting questions is why Big Tech is in the cross-hairs of antitrust, as opposed to more standard industries like food, medicine, farming, or banks.
Apple responded by calling the lawsuit “wrong on the facts and the law."
"The complaint begins more like a poorly edited magazine article than a legal document."
Read More Adam ('Inside Apple') Lashinsky takes a red pencil to the DOJ's complaint
From Sarah Jeong's "United States v. Apple is pure nerd rage" posted Friday by The Verge.
"The lawsuit claims that the main reason people hold on to their iPhones is because Apple makes it difficult to switch, not because people — I dunno — actually like their iPhones."
Read More Mark Gurman: The DOJ picked the wrong fight with Apple
"Apple does not conspire to increase costs to anyone." — FOB Paul Campbell
5 Comments