“He didn’t eat a crow,” says Cramer about Hall’s post-earnings Apple note for Goldman Sachs. “He ate every crow in that picture.”
My take: Weird moment when Cramer points at the camera, says “He’s probably a nice guy,” and hold his stare for a long beat. What could it mean?
(Of course, the much more relevant question is “Why do you still have a job, after being SO wrong for SO long?”)
Maybe CNBC likes to trot Hall out because of his amazingly consist track record with AAPL?
He’s wrong 100% of the time. What other analyst can beat that for consistency?
As the saying goes, a broken clock gives the right time twice a day. This guy can’t even match that. Maybe he should get an Apple Watch?
Heaven forbid Goldman should get a better AAPL analyst.